Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
Ivy Tech Community College
A Collaborative Project between the Texas Education Agency and the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
What do you know about Effective Teaching Behaviors?
Evaluation EnAct Campuses Sonoma, Humboldt, Chico, San Francisco, San Jose, Fresno, Bakersfield, Pomona Presentation July 11, 2007 Public Works, Inc. Mikala.
Materials Support Assessment Professional Development Community/ Administrative Involvement Curriculum Materials Science: It’s Elementary Bringing science.
Company LOGO Interdisciplinary Curriculum Development Project Phase 3 Ken Morales ICDP Project Coordinator Brown University, Class of 2009.
Presented by Dr. Martin Camacho on behalf of Lela Morgan.
Integrating Academic and Vocational Education. What is Academic Integration? Blending CTE skills and competencies with academic standards to bring relevance.
PISA Partnership to Improve Student Achievement through Real World Learning in Engineering, Science, Mathematics and Technology.
1 Master Education of Vocational Instructors Jian-Rong ZHANG Institute of Vocational Instructors, Tongji University Shanghai, , China Tel :
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
Cumberland County: May 28 Oak Ridge: June 2 Roane County: June 4 Scott: June 4 Campbell: June 9 Knox: June 10 Loudon: June 11.
HSTW Southern Regional Education Board Orientation to HSTW Goals and Key Practices.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Collaborative Instructional Leader Becoming a collaborative instructional leader.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Service-Learning and Grant Writing Workshop Tennessee Technological University February 23, 2010 Presented by: Shelley Brown Department of Sociology and.
Getting More Students to Meet Standards: Research-based Practices That Work Southern Regional Education Board.
Technology Standards in Teacher Education Proficiencies and Assessment Ellen Hoffman Eastern Michigan University MDE Workshop October 10, 2003.
1 Linked Learning Summer Institute 2015 Planning Integrated Units.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
“CANUCK PRIDE”.  Made up of over 20 teachers, parents, students  Establish goals and priorities  Expand teaming protocols & interdisciplinary connections.
An Orientation of the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum Ohio ELL Project Carolyn Karatzas Technical Assistance Provider SEC ELL Grant.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Knowledge of Subject Matter OCPS Alternative Certification Program.
On the Cutting Edge Professional Development Program for Geoscience Faculty David Mogk – Montana State University Darrell Henry—Louisiana State University.
Professional Development Plan Erin Schwartzberg, Courtney Mancuso, Vanessa Denham, and Gail Blouin.
Theme: Teaching and Learning Goal: Provide quality curriculum and instruction that engages and meets the needs of all students in a diverse learning community.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Welcome to TEAMS Mid-Year Training. Workshop Goals 1.Identify and share successes with TEAMS implementation 2.Identify and problem solve concerns with.
Mississippi e-Learning for Educators: Reaching Teachers Across the State.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
SHIFT HAPPENS! English Montreal School Board AQIFGA Sheraton, Laval April 18, 2013 LEARNING CIRCLES.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Implementation and Management of Using ICT for Learning and Teaching LE ANH PHUONG Hue University of Education, Vietnam.
1 Roles of Mathematicians, and of MSRI in Mathematics Education.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
ARTS EDUCATION in GEORGIA. Georgia Council for the Arts MISSION The mission of Georgia Council for the Arts is to cultivate the growth of vibrant, thriving.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.
Session # 407 Connecting for Learning The Teacher-Librarian as Interdisciplinarian Tim Gauntley, Program Coordinator Jo-Anne LaForty, Instructional Leader.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
New Teacher Orientation 2009 Cheryl Dyer Assistant Superintendent Teacher Observation and Evaluation in BRRSD.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Special Education Tier 4 Levels of Support Inclusive Services Educational Support Services 2015.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Avon Grove School District October 2009
FPG Child Development Institute
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an education program designed for teachers and others working with youth from pre-school through 12th grade.
Making Technology Standards Work for You
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
The Concept of INTERDISCIPLINARY TEACHING
Educate Alabama PLP Development.
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Enriching Learning, Teaching, Assessment &
Fall Institute for Academic Deans and Department Chairs
Enriching Learning, Teaching, Assessment &
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

Career Academic Technical Institute (CATI) Division of Career-Technical Education TN State Department of Education 25th NACTEI New Orleans, 2005

Phase I 17 Schools were awarded grants in the amount of $30,000 to develop Models of Academic and Vocational Integration

PURPOSE of the GRANT  Develop models of integration of vocational and academic skills  Raise student achievement  Sustainable models  Replicable models

Recipients Provided Six Models as Guides

Which Model Does Your Model Model?

Discipline-Based Curriculum Integration  Teachers relate Cross-Curricular Activities while teaching their own discipline  Teachers teach in a traditional way, but show awareness of practical use of classroom knowledge.

Parallel Curriculum Integration  Teachers in their different classes teach independently, but plan to have lessons coincide simultaneously to cover the same themes, issues, topics, or concepts.

Multidisciplinary Curriculum Integration  Teachers from several subjects bring together two or three disciplines to teach common themes, issues, topics, or concepts.  Connections are made for students who may not see them on their own.  Larger blocks of class time are utilized such as classes following each other taught as one.

Interdisciplinary Curriculum Integration  Teachers coordinate a single unit that connects all of the disciplines.  A large block of time is necessary.  Complex integration that includes all the students’ subjects  Cover one unit at a time; several units in a school year.

Integrated Day Curriculum Integration Teachers base lessons or curriculum units on student-identified themes, issues, topics, or concepts viewed across the curriculum.

Field Based Curriculum Integration  Teachers expand the boundaries of the classroom creating opportunities for students to learn or practice skills and knowledge in the field or at a worksite.  Activity combines academic and vocational knowledge from several disciplines with hands-on skills.

Evaluation  Teams identified populations and samples from the population to be assess.  Teams identified the measure used to pre and post assess the population and sample participating in the model.  A survey of teachers participating, pre and post.

Models Chosen  5 or 6 models will be chosen to field test with a sister school in Phase III  Unbiased committee will attend presentations and make recommendations of models to field test.

Cycle of Integration Support for Staff Support for Staff Support for Staff Planning Identify need. Something more than “nice to do”. Based in need, set goal(s) Identify population to be involved. Reasons for integration clearly Defined and reasons clearly stated Provide planning opportunities for curriculum comparison and Sharing of information Professional development on diverse teaching methodologies, Multiple intelligences, diverse learning styles, cooperative learning Workshops on integrating curriculum Identify faculty to be involved Observation of classroom Techniques, teaching differences Collaboration opportunities Professional development on Evaluation, Plans for improvement Measurements completed and studied Study end results. Professional Development addressing redesign and changes in future implementation

CATI Phase II  Gateway Institutes with a Career and Technical Component  9 Gateway Institutes, one in each region  Teams of teachers consisting of: one English, one math, one science, two vocational, one special education teacher(s)  Teams will be Gateway Trained and Certified

Phase II  Teams will develop lesson plans with Gateway, Academic and Vocational skills embedded within the plans.  Our target is to produce 100 quality lesson plans.  The lesson plans will be posted on the state website as a resource for teachers (especially new teachers) state-wide.

CATI Phase III  The 5 or 6 models chosen from Phase I will field test their models with a “sister” school.  After 1 year of field testing, the models will be showcased at the Tennessee State Vocational Conference and other conferences.  Models will be a resource for schools similar to the grant schools.  The grant schools will become a resource for other schools who want to implement the model.

Thank You!