1 Development of charm quark tagger for supersymmetric particle search at the CMS detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon, Burin Asavapibhop, Narumon Suwonjandee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Advertisements

Open beauty production in pp collisions at 7 TeV with CMS Kajari Mazumdar Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India. on behalf of CMS Collaboration,
Bruce Kennedy, RAL PPD Particle Physics 2 Bruce Kennedy RAL PPD.
Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Experimental aspects of top quark physics Lecture #1 Regina Demina University of Rochester Topical Seminar on Frontier of Particle Physics Beijing, China.
On the Trail of the Higgs Boson Meenakshi Narain.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 C-Tagger Development Status Update Kittikul Kovitanggoon* (CU) Gerrit Van Onsem (VUB) Dinko Ferencek (RU) CMS-POG BTAG-WG Meeting June 18, 2015.
The Big Bang, the LHC and the Higgs Boson Dr Cormac O’ Raifeartaigh (WIT)
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
Sung-Won Lee 1 Study of Jets Production Association with a Z boson in pp Collision at 7 and 8 TeV with the CMS Detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon Ph. D. Thesis.
CMS Masterclass It’s a time of exciting new discoveries in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC and its experiments are underway. ATLAS and CMS, the.
1 Some predictions and experiment prospects of the heavy ion physics at LHC C. Kobdaj, Y. Yan and K. Khosonthongkee School of Physics, Institute of Science.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
ROY, D. (2011). Why Large Hadron Collider?. Pramana: Journal Of Physics, 76(5), doi: /s
Institute for Anything of the University of Everything Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz New Physics at the LHC C.-E. Wulz (Institute of High Energy Physics) 1 Institute.
My Chapter 30 Lecture.
Point 1 activities and perspectives Marzio Nessi ATLAS plenary 2 nd October 2004 Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
LHC Olympics Yeong Gyun Kim (KAIST)
LHC Olympics Yeong Gyun Kim.
LHC Detectors 101 Vivek Sharma (with slides stolen from talks of several people ) 1 Good review article: ARNPS 2006, “General purpose detectors for large.
Surrounding the tracker, the calorimetry system measures with high accuracy the energy of electrons and photons as well as individual hadrons with 7500.
Introduction to CERN David Barney, CERN Introduction to CERN Activities Intro to particle physics Accelerators – the LHC Detectors - CMS.
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Detecting & observing particles
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
25 sep Reconstruction and Identification of Hadronic Decays of Taus using the CMS Detector Michele Pioppi – CERN On behalf.
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
FIMCMS, 26 May, 2008 S. Lehti HIP Charged Higgs Project Preparative Analysis for Background Measurements with Data R.Kinnunen, M. Kortelainen, S. Lehti,
Caroline Fletcher Advisor: Dan Karmgard.  Astrophysics  Compact Muon Solenoid.
Introduction to CERN Activities
Search for a Z′ boson in the dimuon channel in p-p collisions at √s = 7TeV with CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Search for a Z′ boson in the.
Recent Open Heavy Flavor Results from ATLAS and CMS Experiment at LHC
Low scale gravity black holes at LHC Enikő Regős ( CERN )
By Henry Brown Henry Brown, LHCb, IOP 10/04/13 1.
29/08/2008ALICE Italia Analysis of the D + s  K + K - π + channel in the ALICE experiment Serhiy Senyukov Università & INFN di Torino (4050 m. asl)
M. Garcia-Sciveres July 2002 ATLAS A Proton Collider Detector M. Garcia-Sciveres Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Particle Detectors January 18, 2011 Kevin Stenson.
1 LHCb CMS ALICE ATLAS The ATLAS experiment at the LHC 27 km.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
CMS Masterclass It’s a time of exciting new discoveries in particle physics! At CERN, the LHC succesfully completed Run I at 8 TeV of collision.
Higgs in the Large Hadron Collider Joe Mitchell Advisor: Dr. Chung Kao.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
LHC LARGE HADRON COLLIDER World’s largest and highest-energy particle accelerator. Built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research(CERN). To study.
V. Pozdnyakov Direct photon and photon-jet measurement capability of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Valery Pozdnyakov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the HI.
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
Lecture 18 - Detectors Detector systems
Introduction to CERN Activities
Introduction to CERN Activities
Study of Gamma+Jets production
Jet Identification in QCD Samples at DØ
How a Particle Detector works
Open heavy flavor analysis with the ALICE experiment at LHC
Particle physics.
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 6th May 2009 Fergus Wilson, RAL.
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL
The Top Quark Search Joey Foley.
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

1 Development of charm quark tagger for supersymmetric particle search at the CMS detector Kittikul Kovitanggoon, Burin Asavapibhop, Narumon Suwonjandee Chulalongkorn University, Thailand The Global Human Resource Program Bridging across Physics and Chemistry Tokyo Metropolitan University (TMU) January 30, 2015

2 Outline Supersymmetry (SUSY) Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) Conclusions Objects and Event Reconstructions Charm quarks tagger

3 Supersymmetry (SUSY) Standard Model describes three of the four known fundamental forces, the weak, the electromagnetic and the strong force. However, it does not include the fourth force, the gravity, and leaves a number of questions open.  Do the four fundamental forces unify at large energies?  What is dark matter made of? Supersymmetry (SUSY) provides a framework for the unification of all four forces. Some SUSY models propose a light stable supersymmetric particle (LSP or ) These LSPs are promising candidates for dark matter. A LSP, being neutral and weakly interacting, is invisible for our detectors.

4 SUSY (II) One interesting search channel is Charm quark will be detected as a jet in the detector and LSP will be invisible to our detector. In order to find the supersymmetric top particle in this channel, it is important to identify the charm quark jet and precisely measure the missing energy from detector. Top

5 Large Hadron Collider (LHC) 27 km in circumference To collide rotating beams of protons or heavy ions Maximum energy of proton-proton collisions at = 14 TeV and 4 x cm -2 s -1 In 2011, collision at = 7 TeV and 4 x cm -2 s -1 In 2012, collision at = 8 TeV and 7.7 x cm -2 s -1 CMS ALICE ATLAS LHCb In 2015, expect collision at =13 TeV and 22.8 x cm -2 s -1

6 Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS)

7 CMS (II)

8 CMS (III)

9 Tracker The tracker can reconstruct the paths of high-energy muons, electrons and hadrons (particles made up of quarks) as well as see tracks coming from the decay of relatively long lived particles such as “b quarks” and “c quarks”. These paths can be traced back to the interaction point (or primary vertex) of the event. The interaction point that misplaces from beam line (or secondary vertex) is the indication of b and c quarks

10 Jet Because of QCD confinement, particles carrying a color charge, such as quarks, cannot exist in free form. This spray is called a “jet” which can be detected A high-energy quark (or gluon or anti-quark) is transformed into a spray of hadrons (particles made from quarks, antiquarks and gluons).

11 Jet Reconstruction Particle Flow Jet Using all detector component as inputs with Anti-k T cone size 0.5 Jet Energy Correction Corrected jets Raw jets XX XX = L1 Fast Jet L2 Relative L3 AbsoluteL2L3 Residual Only Data pile-up Flat response vs. η Flat response vs. p T Adjust for different between Data and MC

12 Missing Transverse Energy Since the actual collisions take place at the parton level (quark, anti-quark, or gluon), thus we do not know the actual colliding energy of the partons. However, the plane that perpendicular to the incoming particles, transverse plane, has zero momentum before the collision, so after the collision the sum of outgoing momenta have to be zero. We defined momentum measured of outgoing particles as “p T “ or the “transverse momentum” If the sum of momenta after collision is not zero, any net momentum in the transverse plane is called “Missing Transverse Energy (MET)”. MET is the indication of the non-detectable particles such as standard model neutrino and physics beyond standard model particle, lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP)

13 MET Reconstruction μ pT Jet pT

14 Event at CMS

15 C-quark Jets Tagger at CMS Identification (“tagging”) of jets originating from the hadronization of c-quarks (c-jets). Due to the sizable life-time, the decay of the J/ψ meson (c and anti-c) and D mesons (c or anti-c and light or anti-light quark) are characterized by displaced tracks with a large impact parameter (IP) and a displaced secondary vertex (SV), with a large flight distance. C-tagger is a new topic studied at CMS. Started in C-tagger is a sub group under the well established b-tagger group. The method and software is based on the b-tag algorithm. The goal of the c-tag development group is to provide a c-tag algorithm for analyses in Run-II (2015). As of now, there are 7 people from 4 institutes.

16 C-quark Jets Tagger at CMS (II)

17 C-quark Jets Tagger at CMS (III) We are using the newly developed b-tag code that using BTagAnalyzer with Toolkit for Multivariate Data Analysis (TMVA). There are two more setups that are currently developing by our c-tag colleagues. The goal is to find the best c-tag setup or mixing these setups together. Discriminator data base

18 C-Tagger Procedures Starting with well defined QCD simulation, modified BTagAnalyzer produces a set of variables needed for c-tag purpose such as jet p T, jet η, and secondary vertex information. Since this is done on simulation, we can match jets with the mother parton. Discriminator data base

19 C-Tagger Procedures (II) Jets are independent for the p T and η. Discriminator data base TagVarExtractor eliminate the bias due to the restricted size of the sample.

20 C-Tagger Procedures (III) TMVA is the statistical method that will tell us that this kind of jet are c jet or not. Discriminator data base In the end we will have the discriminator data base to use with real data recorded at the CMS.

21 C-Tagger Procedures (IV) The last step is to understand the performance of our c-tag setup. Discriminator data base So we can go back to find the way to improve the efficiency of c-tag.

22 Status, Plans, and Conclusions Step 1 and Step 2 are done. We are successfully modified BTagAnalyzer and TagVarExtractor for c-tag purpose. Currently produce the ROOT tree from BTagAnalyzer by changing the input parameters to optimize the selections needed for c-tag. TMVA is newly implement at CMS, thus we are working closely with experts to understand and maximize the efficiency of c-tag. In the end, we will finalized the best method that can be used at the CMS. Status: Plans: Conclusion: For the first time c-tagger is studied at the CMS. C-tagger will be one of the crucial elements for new physics search such as supersymmetric top. Also, it can be benefit for Standard Model precision measurement.

23 Acknowledgement Tokyo Metropolitan University (TMU) for financial support. Prof. Takayuki Sumiyoshi for coordination between CU and TMU. All TMU staffs for organizing this event.