Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Use of Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) to Assess the Contribution of PAHs to Toxicity of Sediments at a Former Manufacturing Plant Battelle Sediment.
Advertisements

PCBs Total Maximum Daily Loads San Francisco Bay Fred Hetzel SFB-RWQCB May 13, 2003.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Kemakta Konsult AB Modelling to derive guideline concentrations for organic contaminants in soils Swedish experiences Mark.
Society for Risk Analysis Workshop 3: Application of Web-based Risk Assessment Information System (RAIS) Leslie Galloway, University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge.
Revisiting the Formula CTL Workgroup Contaminated Media Forum 1.
CE Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science Readings for This Class: O hio N orthern U niversity Introduction Chemistry, Microbiology.
PERSISTENT ORGANIC POLLUTANTS (POPs) IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS SAMPLED BY SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE DEVICES (SPMDs) Per-Anders Bergqvist, *Lijana Augulytė,
Chemistry, Environmental Fate and Transport, Production and Uses Charge Question 2-1: Please comment on whether the information is used appropriately in.
The Role of Background Soil Levels in Risk Assessment Teresa S. Bowers Presented at USGS/NRCS Soil Geochemistry Workshop March 4, 2003.
NASSCO and Southwest Marine Sediment Investigation Preliminary Results Thomas Ginn, Ph.D. Dreas Nielsen June 18, 2002.
Extent and Severity of Toxic Contaminants in Chesapeake Bay and the Watershed Scott Phillips (USGS) and Greg Allen (EPA)
RISK e Learning Bioavailability – Metals, Organics, and Use at Hazardous Waste Sites June 11 th, 2008 Session 2: “Bioavailability of Organic Compounds:
HydroQual Capabilities for Pathways Analysis in Support of Natural Resource Damage Assessment.
Environmental Risk Assessment for “Facet Enterprises”, New York, USA Presentation by Marie, Seun, and Deb.
National Inventory of Potential Sources of Soil Contamination in Cyprus Part 2 Risk-Based Approach to Assessment of Cypriot Contaminated Sites Eleonora.
Sediment Quality Criteria William Fish Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences And Resources.
Improving monitoring campaigns : A case study Dissemination Workshop on Evaluating Source Control Options for Reducing Emissions of Priority Pollutants.
GMU Chemistry & Biochemistry PCBs and PAHs in the Anacostia River: Sampling, Concentrations and Transport in Gregory D. Foster & Phillip R. McEachern.
Risk e-Learning Webinar Passive sampling for the measurement of freely dissolved contaminants in water: Practical Guidance Upal Ghosh University of Maryland.
New soil remediation strategies targeted at reduction of PACs contaminant exposure and mobility National Environmental Research Institute Aarhus University.
Chemical and Biological Behavior of Carbon Nanotubes in Estuarine Sedimentary Systems P. Lee Ferguson 1, G. Thomas Chandler 2, and Wally A. Scrivens 1.
Kevin Brackney, M.S., P.G. Nez Perce Tribe.  NPT Environmental Response  Historic Spills Clearwater Basin ◦ Impacts from both large and small spills.
Analytical and Relative Potency Factor Approach for Effective Evaluation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Betty Krupka, Scott Kirchner, and Vanessa.
River Corridor Closure Project Safety People Results 1 Data Evaluation Summary - Columbia River Component River Corridor Closure Project Safety People.
J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 J. Zhou 1, X. Zhu 1, T. Wang 1, and X. Zhang 2 1 College of Resources and Information Tech., China University.
UNEP POPs Negotiations Background Mandate Status Report Relevance to Great Lakes.
Randall Wentsel, Ph.D. 7 September, Background  Problems  PBT process is based on principles developed for organic substances that do not apply.
Screening Level Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment Poplar Point, Washington, DC.
ASSOCIATIONS OF POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS (PAHS) WITH SIZE FRACTIONATED SEDIMENT PARTICLES Jejal Reddy Bathi, Geosyntec Consultants, Santa Barbara,
Present Development of a Regional Guidance Document for Dredged Material Evaluation Christopher McArthur, P.E. (US Environmental.
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Case Study Palos Verdes Shelf Judy C. Huang, P.E.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
Environmental Processes Partitioning of pollutants 3.iii Sorption in living media (bioavailability)
Upal Ghosh and James Sanders,
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
Danny Reible – University of Texas Heidi Blischke - GSI 1 Polydimethyl siloxane 2 Solid Phase Microextraction.
Assessing changes in contaminant fluxes following removal of a dam in the Pawtuxet River Results and Discussion Methods and Approach Passive samplers (polyethylene;
Evaluation of Intrinsic Biodegradation and Amendments to Support Enhanced Monitored Natural Recovery of Sediments Tom Krug and David Himmelheber, Geosyntec.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
23 rd Annual NARPM Training Program Passive sampling methods (PSMs) for organic contaminants in sediments: State of the Science Keith Maruya Southern California.
Proposed Lake Michigan Rivers Network NMN proposed 17sites. Lake Michigan group added 3 additional sites that already conduct flow and quality monitoring.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
WATER QUALITY LEGISLATION A.I. ZOUBOULIS Assoc. Professor, Dept. of Chemistry, Div. Of Chem. Technol. Main aspects: Introduction Dangerous substances in.
NEW ADVANCES IN PASSIVE SAMPLING FOR SEDIMENT RISK ASSESSMENT Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical, & Environmental Engineering UMBC SETAC HDC.
Porewater: NJDEP Site Remediation Program regulatory perspective
Setting Standards: The Science of Water Quality Criteria EA Engineering, Science, and Technology ® Presented by: James B. Whitaker Review of Annex 1 of.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Dynamic PCB Partitioning in Ashtabula Harbor, Ohio Sediments Andrew Lenox Environmental Engineer US Army Corps.
Health Outcomes in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Issue:  Higher health risks found in: Infants Infants Elderly (age >65) Elderly (age >65) Blacks Blacks.
A Comparison of SPME Approaches for the Analysis of Alkylated PAHs in Pore Water Porewater: The Interaction between Sediment, Biota, and Water 2015 Fall.
STORMWATER SAMPLING OF OIL PRODUCTS USING SEMIPERMEABLE MEMBRANE DEVICES (SPMDs) Per-Anders Bergqvist, *Lina Ulčinienė, *Viktoras Račys and *Audronė Žaliauskienė.
In Situ Sediment Treatment: State of the Practice
Air Pollution Research Group Analysis of 1999 TRI Data to Identify High Environmental Risk Areas of Ohio by Amit Joshi.
The Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR), a tool that uses both exposure and toxicity data to determine when cumulative assessments are most necessary Paul Price.
Alternative Evaluation Framework for Managing Dioxins/Furans in Dredged Material Proposed for Open-Water Disposal Tad Deshler Windward Environmental LLC.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Portable SERS Detector for Simultaneous Detection of Trace-level Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Superfund Sites Wayne Weimer (PI) and Monika Wilson,
Organics analysis in marine sediment and biota
Chemical Analysis of Fat Particles Mike Delaney, MWRA Outfall Monitoring Science Advisory Panel April 1, 2013 Update on Outfall monitoring.
Gregory J. Cavallo, P.G. Thomas J. Fikslin, Ph.D.
Question: which aquatic phase to monitor for which compounds?
Environmental sampling and monitoring
Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC)
Arsenic in the Soils, USGS
Dedicated maps on contaminants
Derivation of ecotoxicological quality standards for PAHs
Remediation Standards Rule Update NJDEP and A&WMA Regulatory Update Conference November 16, 2018 Barry Frasco, Assistant Director Hazardous Site Science,
Effect of Aging on Contaminant Bioavailability
Michael Smith and Greg Zychowski TCEQ Remediation Division
Presentation transcript:

Partitioning and Bioavailability Assessment for Sediments from South Wilmington Wetlands Huan Xia and Upal Ghosh Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County

Location 27-acre degraded wetland Contaminants detected in marsh soil: Metals (e.g. As, Pb, Cr) PAHs (e.g. Benzo(a)pyrene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene) PCBs such as Arochlor-1248 (Hendershot and Asreen Jr. 2005)

Introduction Hydrophobic organic compounds (HOCs) like PCBs and PAHs strongly bound to sediment geochemical components Some carbonaceous particles (e.g. soot and charcoal) exhibit greater sorption capacity than organic matter, resulting in reduced exposure Traditional risk assessment uses default values from generic organic matter Site specific values can be orders of magnitude different from default values EPA recommends using site specific measurement of partition constants to refine the risk assessment

Study Objectives: Methods Evaluate site specific bioavailability of PAHs and PCBs in South Wilmington Wetland sediment and refine risk assessment. Methods Sediment samples collected from 12 locations of wetland. Measurement of PAH and PCB concentrations in sediment samples. Laboratory partitioning study to measure PAH and PCB porewater concentrations using Polyethylene (PE) as passive sampler 5 PRCs used to correct for equilibrium porewater concentration Laboratory bioaccumulation study for PCBs using Lumbriculus variegatus

Results: Total PAH and PCB concentrations in sediments Total PAH range from 0-40 mg/kg , mean value: 12 mg/kg Total PCB range from 0-4.6 mg/kg , mean value :0.7 mg/kg

Total Equilibrium porewater concentrations of PAHs & PCBs The highest PAH porewater concentration was measured in Sed01. Sed02 and Sed03 were amended with 5% activated carbon to evaluate the effect of the carbon treatment, named as Sed02T and Sed03T. “U” refers to “untreated”. 70% to 90% reduction in PAH porewater concentration observed in treated samples

Total Equilibrium porewater concentrations of PAHs & PCBs The highest total PCB porewater concentration was measured in Sed02U, Sed03U and 1330. 80% to 90% reduction in PCB porewater concentration also observed in treated samples Site specific organic partition constants : Koc= Cs/Cw/foc

Bioaccumulation of PCBs in Lumbriculus variegatus Worm recovery ranges from 50- 70%. The highest bioaccumulations in worms were in samples 1330, Sed03 and Sed02, which also had the highest PCB levels in sediment. Reduction in PCB bioaccumulation was 97-98% in treated samples

partition constants for PAHs and PCBs Measured Koc values for both PAHs and PCBs were 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than the generic values used in preliminary risk assessments Median value of BC/OC ratio : 9%, n=300 (Cornelissen et al. 2005) Measured BC/OC ratio: 17-36% Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol, 2012 Karickoff 1981, Werner et al 2010

PCB Bioaccumulation Factors (BCF) in worms log BCF= 0.819 log Kow- 1.146 BCF calculated as: BCF= Clipid/Cporewater Measured BCF (blue diamonds) are consistent with the generic values (green dash), but nearly 1 order of magnitude higher than those in initial PRG (red dash) EPA. (1999). Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment Protocol for Hazardous Waste Combustion Facilities

PRGsediment = Toxicity Value × foc × Koc Calculation for Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) Benthic organism-based PRGs (Equilibrium Partitioning Approach): PRGsediment = Toxicity Value × foc × Koc PRG, concentration in sediment (mg/kg DW sediment) Toxicity Value , Aquatic community-based toxicity value (μg/L) foc, Organic carbon fraction (2 % default used in initial calculation, average of 4% TOC was detected in sediments ) Koc, Organic carbon partition constants (default value from HHRAP used in initial calculation, measured specific Koc used in revised version) Procedures for the Derivation of Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmarks (ESBs) for the Protection of Benthic Organisms: PAH Mixtures (EPA, 2003e)

Revised Benthic Organism-based PRGs using site specific Koc Human Health Risk Assessment Protocol, 2012

Calculation for Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) PRGs based on invertebrate –based food web modeling: (bioamagnification and trophic transfer through dietary exposure) PRGsediment= 𝑇𝐻𝑄 ∗𝑇𝑅𝑉 𝐹𝑇 ∗(𝐹𝐼𝑅∗ 𝐵𝐶𝐹 𝑓 𝑜𝑐 𝐾 𝑜𝑐 +𝑆𝐼𝑅) Local receptors: American robin, Raccoon, Spotted sandpiper, etc. Spotted sandpiper was selected due to its most rigid sediment concentration criteria. (Ecological Sediment Screening Level, EPA 2007a, 1999, 1993)

Revised PRGs based on exposure to Spotted Sandpiper

Conclusions Observed site specific Koc values were higher than generic values derived from organic matter, mainly due to elevated black carbon in sediment BCF measures in good agreement with literature values PCB bioaccumulation is explained well by porewater data Site specific measurements provided realistic parameters to refine the remediation goals

Acknowledgements City of Wilmington, Delaware Brightfields Inc Acknowledgements City of Wilmington, Delaware Brightfields Inc. Labmates for worm retrieval

Methods Correction based on different properties: diffusivity, partitioning coefficient, molar volume Molar volume adjustment Calculate residual PRC in PE: 𝐶 𝑝𝑟𝑐,𝑓 𝐶 𝑝𝑟𝑐,𝑖 Exchange rate (for PRC) : 𝐾 𝑒,𝑝𝑟𝑐 =− ln⁡( 𝐶 𝑝𝑟𝑐,𝑓 𝐶 𝑝𝑟𝑐,𝑖 ) 𝑡 Sampling rate (for PRC) : 𝑅 𝑠,𝑝𝑟𝑐 = 𝐾 𝑒,𝑝𝑟𝑐 𝐾 𝑝𝑒𝑤,𝑝𝑟𝑐 𝑀 𝑝𝑒 𝑅 𝑠,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 = 𝑅 𝑠,𝑝𝑟𝑐 ( 𝑉 𝑚,𝑝𝑟𝑐 𝑉 𝑚,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 ) 0.39 𝐾 𝑒,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 = 𝑅 𝑠,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝐾 𝑝𝑒𝑤,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑀 𝑝𝑒 𝐶 𝑤,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 = 𝐶 𝑝𝑒,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝐾 𝑝𝑒𝑤,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 [1− exp − 𝐾 𝑒,𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 𝑡 ] 𝐾 𝑝𝑒𝑤 , PE sampler partition coefficient; 𝑀 𝑝𝑒 , mass of PE sampler; 𝑉 𝑚 , molar volume; t, exposure time (28days) (Huckins et al 2006)

partition constants for PAHs and PCBs Elevated Koc (3-4 orders of magnitude range) for PAHs previously observed from industrially impacted sites (n=117) Hawthorne et al. 2006

Methods Impregnate PE sampler with PRCs Measured CW may not be at equilibrium CW corrected using Performance Reference Compounds (PRCs) Assume absorption = desorption Assume PRCs have similar properties as HOCs PRCs: PCB 29 (mono, di, tri), 69 (tetra, penta), 155 (hexa), 192 (hepta, octa, nona and deca groups) for PCB correction and d-10 pyrene for PAH. Preload PE sampler with PRCs for two week and measure initial concentration in sampler (CPRC,i) Add PE sampler into sediment

Methods Laboratory worm bioaccumulation study for PCBs Species: Lumbriculus variegatus Daily water exchange and water quality monitoring 28 days bioaccumulation Worm collection Analyzed worm tissue for PCBs

Revised Benthic Organism-based PRGs using site specific Koc

Revised PRGs based on exposure to Spotted Sandpiper SVOCs 2,4-Dinitrophenol NA PAHs 2-Methylnaphthalene 6280 356 Acenaphthene 6010 167 Acenaphthylene 1570 346 Anthracene 7270 256 Benzo(a)anthracene 5050 360 Benzo(a)pyrene 4850 477 Carbazole 37 Chrysene 3500 367 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 4120 255 Fluoranthene 8110 209 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 3820 521 Phenanthrene 5860 288 Pyrene 7570 347 Pesticides 4,4'-DDE 0.017 0.00092 4,4'-DDT 0.0036 Dieldrin 0.005 0.0014 Endrin 0.013 0.0097 Endrin aldehyde 0.0047 Endrin ketone 0.014 0.0045 gamma-Chlordane 1.61 Heptachlor epoxide 0.030 0.0087 PCBs PCBs,total 0.40 0.09 Dioxins/Furans 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.000011 0.000036 PRG C sed (mg COPEC/kg DW sediment) NOAEL Based using site BCF NOAEL Based from initial report COPEC

Revised PRGs : Bentho-based Vs. Exposure to Spotted Sandpiper

Revised PRGs : Bentho-based Vs. Exposure to Spotted Sandpiper