Substance dualism Michael Lacewing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© Michael Lacewing The concept of a person Michael Lacewing.
Advertisements

The Ontological Argument
The value of certainty. Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis offer.
The ontological argument. I had the persuasion that there was absolutely nothing in the world, that there was no sky and no earth, neither minds nor.
Dualism. Substance Dualism : Human beings have both a material body and an immaterial mind.
Michael Lacewing Is the mind the brain? Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
Cartesian Dualism. Real Distinction Argument P1.Whatever can be clearly and distinctly conceived apart can exist apart. P2.Whatever can exist apart are.
Descartes’ rationalism
Descartes’ cosmological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument Michael Lacewing
Concept innatism II: the case of substance Michael Lacewing
Introduction to the philosophy of mind. epistemology episteme knowledge.
Plato, Aristotle and Descartes on body and soul
Descartes on Certainty (and Doubt)
The Rationalists: Descartes Certainty: Self and God
Meditations 5 & 6 And Descartes Death.
Substance dualism: do Descartes’ arguments work? Michael Lacewing
Chapter 2 The Mind-Body Problem
The metaphysics of mind: an overview Michael Lacewing
The knowledge argument Michael Lacewing
Property dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing Dualism and the Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
Descartes argument for dualism
The Mind-Brain Type Identity Theory
© Michael Lacewing Functionalism and the Mind- Body Problem Michael Lacewing
© Michael Lacewing The Mind-Body Identity Theory Michael Lacewing
PHILOSOPHY OF THE BODY. I. Historical Considerations: The Problem of Dualism What is Dualism? Basically dualism which is introduced by Plato is a theory.
Matter is Not the Object of Our Perceptions (1)Sensible things are just those that are perceived by the senses. (2)The senses perceive nothing that they.
Substance dualism and mental causation Michael Lacewing
Philosophy 1050: Introduction to Philosophy Week 10: Descartes and the Subject: The way of Ideas.
Is God a Deceiver? (P1)The idea I have of God is of an infinitely perfect being. (P2)The cause of such an idea must itself be infinitely perfect. (P3)Therefore,
© Michael Lacewing Doubt in Descartes’ Meditations Michael Lacewing
René Descartes ( AD) Meditations on First Philosophy (1641) (Text, pp )
Learning objective: To be able to explain the claim that the mind is ontologically distinct from the body; To understand Descartes’ conceivability argument.
 Doubt- to be uncertain about something, to hesitate to believe  Dualism- the belief that the mind and body are separate (but interact). Mind is a kind.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 12 Minds and bodies #1 (Descartes) By David Kelsey.
© Michael Lacewing Substance and Property Dualism Michael Lacewing
Substance dualism Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Descartes’ Interactionist Dualism. Overview Descartes’ general project Descartes’ general project Argument for dualism Argument for dualism Explanation.
Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing co.uk.
 The value of certainty.  Foundationalists suppose that true beliefs held with certainty (indubitable) together with logical and linguistic analysis.
Descartes’ divisibility argument
The argument for the existence of bodies (Meditation 6) 1.Nature provided me with a strong propensity to believe there are bodies. 2.The only way I could.
Meditations: 3 & 4.
An Outline of Descartes's Meditations on First Philosophy
Substance and Property Dualism Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity Quick task: Fill in the gaps activity ?v=sT41wRA67PA.
DUALISM. Dualism Monism Traditional Religion Experience Our bodies may be damaged whilst our minds are active Our mental experience is private Science.
Substance and Property Dualism
The Ontological Argument
The problem of other minds
Minds and Bodies.
Descartes’ Ontological Argument
Descartes’ ontological argument
Descartes’ trademark argument
Descartes’ conceivability argument for substance dualism
Property dualism: objections
Descartes’ proof of the external world
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Michael Lacewing The zombie argument Michael Lacewing
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
Kant’s objection to ontological arguments
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Get Yourself Thinking…
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Descartes -- Meditations Three
Is the concept of substance innate?
Michael Lacewing Physicalism Michael Lacewing
Dualism.
Michael Lacewing Descartes on the mind Michael Lacewing
The Mind Body Problem Our minds seem to be non-physical and different from our bodies. Our bodies seem to be something different from our minds. Are they.
Presentation transcript:

Substance dualism Michael Lacewing

Substance and properties A substance is an entity, a thing, that does not depend on another entity for its continued existence. –It has ‘ontological independence’. Substances are what possess properties. Properties can’t exist without substances –They depend on substances to exist. Substances persist through changes in properties.

Substance dualism Dualism: there are two sorts of substance, mind (or soul) and matter –Minds can exist independent of bodies –Mental properties are properties of a mental substance Materialism: there is just one sort of thing, matter –Mental properties are properties of a material substance

Descartes’ conceivability argument I have a clear and distinct idea of myself as something that thinks and isn’t extended. I have a clear and distinct idea of body as something that is extended and does not think. –Nothing in our concepts rules out the possibility that mind and body are distinct.

Descartes’ conceivability argument If I have a clear and distinct thought of something, God can create it in a way that corresponds to my thought. –If God is omnipotent, God can make anything that is not self-contradictory. The concepts of mind and body are not self-contradictory. Therefore, God can create mind as something that thinks and isn’t extended and body as extended and does not think. –It is important that our concepts of mind and body are complete and exclusive. This is shown by their being clear and distinct.

Descartes’ conceivability argument Therefore, mind and body can exist independently of one another. –A substance is something that can exist independently. Therefore, mind and body are two distinct substances.

The simple version It is conceivable that mind can exist without body. Therefore, it is possible that mind can exist without body. Therefore, mind and body are distinct substances.

Descartes’ divisibility argument The body is extended in space; it has (literal) parts. The mind has no (literal) parts. Leibniz’s law of the indiscernibility of identicals: If X and Y are the same thing, then they have the same properties –Therefore, if X and Y have different properties, they are not the same thing Therefore, mind and body are different.

The unity of mind and body If the mind and body are two distinct things, how are they related? –‘I (a thinking thing) am not merely in my body as a sailor is in a ship. Rather, I am closely joined to it—intermingled with it, so to speak—so that it and I form a unit.’ (Meditation VI) –How can a unit be two separate things?

The unity of mind and body Our bodily appetites, sensations, emotions have their origin in the body –If mind and body were not intermingled, then ‘I wouldn’t feel pain when the body was hurt but would perceive the damage in an intellectual way, like a sailor seeing that his ship needs repairs’ (p. 30). But we can exist as the things we are without them.

The unity of mind and body ‘it seems to me that the human mind can’t conceive the soul’s distinctness from the body and its union with the body, conceiving them very clearly and both at the same time. That is because this requires one to conceive them as one single thing and at the same time as two things, which is contradictory.’ The idea of the union between mind and body is a third ‘basic notion’ alongside the ideas of mind and body. –Is this a notion of a third type of substance, the human being?