Neutrino Physics with Borexino Davide Franco Milano University & INFN APC January 26, 2010 – Paris.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riunione Settembre 2007 Gruppo 2 Inizio presa dati 2007: Auger, Borexino, Agile, Pamela Rivelatore on 2008: Gerda, Icarus, Opera,Warp, Glast, Antares,
Advertisements

1 Calor02 Pasadena (USA) March 2002Lino Miramonti - University and INFN Milano Borexino: A Real Time Liquid Scintillator Detector for Low Energy.
First real time 7 Be solar detection in Borexino Davide D’Angelo INFN Sez. Milano On behalf of the Borexino Collaboration.
Recent results from Borexino
The Borexino Solar Neutrino Experiment
Stockholm, May 2-6, 2006 SNOW Sub-MeV solar neutrinos: experimental techniques and backgrounds Aldo Ianni Gran Sasso Laboratory, INFN.
Prospects for 7 Be Solar Neutrino Detection with KamLAND Stanford University Department of Physics Kazumi Ishii.
Results and Future of the KamLAND Experiment
21-25 January 2002 WIN 2002 Colin Okada, LBNL for the SNO Collaboration What Else Can SNO Do? Muons and Atmospheric Neutrinos Supernovae Anti-Neutrinos.
Honolulu 16/Dec/2005 Marco G. Giammarchi, Infn Milano Geoneutrinos in Borexino Marco G. Giammarchi & Lino Miramonti Dip. di Fisica dell’Universita’ and.
Neutrino emission =0.27 MeV E=0.39,0.86 MeV =6.74 MeV ppI loss: ~2% ppII loss: 4% note: /Q= 0.27/26.73 = 1% ppIII loss: 28% Total loss: 2.3%
The first year of Borexino data
Neutrinos as Probes: Solar-, Geo-, Supernova neutrinos; Laguna
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
李玉峰 中科院高能所 JUNO中微子天文和天体物理学研讨会
First Results from the Borexino Solar Neutrino Experiment Celebrating F.Avignone, E.Fiorini & P. Rosen University of South Carolina May 16, 2008 Frank.
Solar Neutrinos Perspectives and Objectives Mark Chen Queen’s University and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)
Getting the first 7 Be detection: scintillator purification, detector response and data analysis in Borexino Marco Pallavicini Università di Genova & INFN.
KamLAND Experiment Kamioka Liquid scintillator Anti-Neutrino Detector - Largest low-energy anti-neutrino detector built so far - Located at the site of.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Laura Cadonati Princeton University.
Status of the BOREXINO experiment Hardy Simgen Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik / Heidelberg for the BOREXINO collaboration.
LAGUNA Large Apparatus for Grand Unification and Neutrino Astrophysics Launch meeting, Heidelberg, March 2007, Lothar Oberauer, TUM.
Emanuela Meroni Univ. & INFN Milano NO-VE April 15-18, 2008 Borexino and Solar Neutrinos Emanuela Meroni Università di Milano & INFN On behalf of the Borexino.
Methods and problems in low energy neutrino experiments (solar, reactors, geo-) I G. Ranucci ISAPP 2011 International School on Astroparticle physics THE.
KamLAND : Studying Neutrinos from Reactor Atsuto Suzuki KamLAND Collaboration KEK : High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
SNS2 Workshop August 28-29, 2003 Richard Talaga, Argonne1 Calibration of the OMNIS-LPC Supernova Neutrino Detector Outline –OMNIS Experiment and Detectors.
Yasuhiro Kishimoto for KamLAND collaboration RCNS, Tohoku Univ. September 12, 2007 TAUP 2007 in Sendai.
Present and future detectors for Geo-neutrinos: Borexino and LENA Applied Antineutrino Physics Workshop APC, Paris, Dec L. Oberauer, TU München.
LSc development for Solar und Supernova Neutrino detection 17 th Lomonosov conference, Moscow, August 2015 L. Oberauer, TUM.
G. Testera (INFN Genoa- Italy ) on behalf of the Borexino collaboration Low energy solar neutrino signals in Borexino Kurchatov Inst. (Russia) Dubna JINR.
Real-time Solar neutrino detection with Borexino Oleg Smirnov (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of Borexino collaboration 5-th International Workshop on Low energy.
M. Misiaszek (Institute of Physics, Jagellonian U., Krakow) on behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Results from the Borexino experiment Kurchatov Inst.
Borexino results and future Davide Franco CNRS-APC GdR Neutrino 2012 October 30-31, 2012.
Results from the Borexino experiment after 192 days of data-taking
CTF and low background facility at Gran Sasso A. Ianni a, M. Laubenstein a and Y. Suvorov a a INFN, Gran Sasso Laboratory, Assergi (AQ), Italy The Counting.
LoNu Workshop R. B. Vogelaar October 14, 2006 Extraordinary Neutrino Beam Free of Charge For NEUTRINO PHYSICS: WELL DEFINED HIGHEST FLUX (~10 11 cm -2.
1 IDM2004 Edinburgh, 9 september 2004 Helenia Menghetti Bologna University and INFN Study of the muon-induced neutron background with the LVD detector.
M. Wójcik for the GERDA Collaboration Institute of Physics, Jagellonian University Epiphany 2006, Kraków, Poland, 6-7 January 2006.
New Results from the Salt Phase of SNO Kathryn Miknaitis Center for Experimental Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics, Univ. of Washington For the Sudbury.
GEANT4 simulation of the Borexino solar neutrino experiment. Igor Machulin Moscow, Kurchatov Institute On behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Catania,
VIeme rencontres du Vietnam
CTF at Gran Sasso (overview of the hardware) Richard Ford (SNOLAB) (who has not been in the collaboration since 2004) March 19 th 2010.
Solar neutrino spectroscopy and oscillation with Borexino Davide Franco APC-CNRS LPNHE November 17, 2011 – Paris.
Muon and Neutron Backgrounds at Yangyang underground lab Muju Workshop Kwak, Jungwon Seoul National University 1.External Backgrounds 2.Muon.
Karsten Heeger Beijing, January 18, 2003 Design Considerations for a  13 Reactor Neutrino Experiment with Multiple Detectors Karsten M. Heeger Lawrence.
Vulcan08, 26-31May 2008 Barbara Caccianiga, INFN Milano The first real time detection of 7 Be solar neutrinos in Borexino Barbara Caccianiga INFN Milano.
Davide Franco – NOW C measurement and the CNO and pep fluxes in Borexino Davide Franco NOW2004 Conca Specchiulla September 2004.
Medium baseline neutrino oscillation searches Andrew Bazarko, Princeton University Les Houches, 20 June 2001 LSND: MeVdecay at rest MeVdecay in flight.
1 Muon Veto System and Expected Backgrounds at Dayabay Hongshan (Kevin) Zhang, BNL DayaBay Collaboration DNP08, Oakland.
A screening facility for next generation low-background experiments Tom Shutt Case Western Reserve University.
Current status of XMASS experiment 11 th International Workshop on Low Temperature Detectors (LTD-11) Takeda Hall, University of Tokyo, JAPAN 8/1, 2005.
1 LTR 2004 Sudbury, December 2004 Helenia Menghetti, Marco Selvi Bologna University and INFN Large Volume Detector The Large Volume Detector (LVD)
Solar Neutrino Results from SNO
Results from Borexino Davide Franco CNRS-APC NOW 2012 September 9-16, 2012.
Second Workshop on large TPC for low energy rare event detection, Paris, December 21 st, 2004.
5th June 2003, NuFact03 Kengo Nakamura1 Solar neutrino results, KamLAND & prospects Solar Neutrino History Solar.
The first year of Borexino data Davide Franco on behalf of the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN Heavy Quarks and Leptons June 5-9, 2008.
Aldo Ianni for the Borexino collaboration 12th International Workshop on Next Generation Nucleon Decay and Neutrino Detectors Zurich, 7 th Nov 2011.
Cosmic muon signal and its seasonal modulation at Gran Sasso with the Borexino detector Davide D’Angelo for the Borexino Collaboration Università degli.
Enter the DarkSide Stefano Davini University of Houston RICAP-13.
Double Chooz Experiment Status Jelena Maricic, Drexel University (for the Double Chooz Collaboration) September, 27 th, SNAC11.
Solar neutrino physics The core of the Sun reaches temperatures of  15.5 million K. At these temperatures, nuclear fusion can occur which transforms 4.
Solar and geo neutrinos  in Borexino: summary of the PHASE 1 measurements and (two) new results Gemma Testera - INFN Genova (on behalf of the Borexino.
Solar and Geo Neutrino Physics with Borexino RICAP
Simulation for DayaBay Detectors
Solar neutrino detection in Borexino
New Results from the Borexino Neutrino Experiment
Search for sterile neutrinos with SOX: Monte Carlo studies of the experiment sensitivity Davide Basilico 1st year Workshop – 11/10/17 Tutors: Dott. Barbara.
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Presentation transcript:

Neutrino Physics with Borexino Davide Franco Milano University & INFN APC January 26, 2010 – Paris

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Outline Neutrinos from the Sun The physics of Borexino The Borexino detector The “radio-purity” challenge The reached goals ( 7 Be, 8 B and  ) Near and far future goals

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Neutrinos: cosmic messengers High energy protons 5·10Mpc neutrinos Astrophysical source Low energy protons deflected High energy gammas 10 Mpc Ideal messenger: neutral stable weakly interacting

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Messengers from the Sun’s core Core ( R s ) Nuclear reactions: T~ °K energy chains pp e CNO (neutrino production) Radiative region ( Rs) Photons carry energy in ~ 10 5 y Convective region ( Rs) Strong convection and turbulence Complex surface phenomena Corona (> 1 Rs) Complex magneto-hydrodynamic phenomena Gas at T~ 10 6 °K

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Neutrino Production In The Sun pp chain: pp, pep, 7 Be, hep,and 8 B CNO cycle: 13 N, 15 O, and 17 F

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Solar Neutrino Spectra SNO SuperK (real time) HomestakeGallex GNO Sage Borexino (real time)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 The Standard Solar Model before 2004 One fundamental input of the Standard Solar Model is the metallicity of the Sun - abundance of all elements above Helium: The Standard Solar Model, based on the old metallicity derived by Grevesse and Sauval (Space Sci. Rev. 85, 161 (1998)), was in agreement within 0.5 in % with the solar sound speed measured by helioseismology.

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 The Standard Solar Model after 2004 Latest work by Asplund, Grevesse and Sauval (Nucl. Phys. A 777, 1 (2006)) indicates a lower metallicity by a factor ~2. This result destroys the agreement with helioseismology [cm -2 s -1 ] pp (10 10 ) pep (10 10 ) hep (10 3 ) 7 Be (10 9 ) 8 B (10 6 ) 13 N (10 8 ) 15 O (10 8 ) 17 F (10 6 ) BS05 AGS BS05 AGS  -1%-2%-4%-12%-23%-42%-47%-57% Solar neutrino measurements can solve the problem!

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Borexino goals: solar physics First ever observations of sub-MeV neutrinos in real time Check the balance between photon luminosity and neutrino luminosity of the Sun CNO neutrinos (direct indication of metallicity in the Sun’s core) pep neutrinos (indirect constraint on pp neutrino flux) Low energy (3-5 MeV) 8 B neutrinos Tail end of pp neutrino spectrum?

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Borexino goals: neutrino physics Test of the matter-vacuum oscillation transition with 7 Be, pep, and low energy 8 B neutrinos Limit on the neutrino magnetic moment by analyzing the 7 Be energy spectrum and with Cr source 7 Be pep 8B8B First evidence (>3  ) of geoneutrinos SNEWS network for supernovae Map of reactors in Europe

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Borexino Collaboration Kurchatov Institute (Russia) Dubna JINR (Russia) Heidelberg (Germany) Munich (Germany) Jagiellonian U. Cracow (Poland) Perugia Genova APC Paris Milano Princeton University Virginia Tech. University

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Abruzzo 120 Km da Roma Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso Assergi (AQ) Italy ~3500 m.w.e Borexino – Rivelatore e impianti Laboratori esterni

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Detection principles and signature Borexino detects solar via their elastic scattering off electrons in a volume of highly purified liquid scintillator Mono-energetic MeV 7 Be are the main target, and the only considered so far Mono-energetic pep, CNO and possibly pp will be studied in the future Detection via scintillation light: Very low energy threshold Good position reconstruction Good energy resolution BUT… No direction measurement The induced events can’t be distinguished from other  events due to natural radioactivity Extreme radiopurity of the scintillator is a must! Typical rate (SSM+LMA+Borexino)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Borexino Background Low background nylon vessel fabricated in hermetically sealed low radon clean room (~1 yr) Rapid transport of scintillator solvent (PC) from production plant to underground lab to avoid cosmogenic production of radioactivity ( 7 Be) Underground purification plant to distill scintillator components. Gas stripping of scintlllator with special nitrogen free of radioactive 85 Kr and 39 Ar from air All materials electropolished SS or teflon, precision cleaned with a dedicated cleaning module Expected solar neutrino rate in 100 tons of scintillator ~ 50 counts/day (~ Bq/kg) Just for comparison: Natural water~ 10 Bq/kg in 238 U, 232 Th and 40 K Air~ 10 Bq/m 3 in 39 Ar, 85 Kr and 222 Rn Typical rock~ Bq/kg in 238 U, 232 Th and 40 K BX scintillator must be 9/10 order of magnitude less radioactive than anything on earth!

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Detector layout and main features Water Tank:  and n shield  water Č detector 208 PMTs in water 2100 m 3 20 legs Carbon steel plates Scintillator: 270 t PC+PPO in a 150  m thick nylon vessel Stainless Steel Sphere: 2212 PMTs 1350 m 3 Nylon vessels: Inner: 4.25 m Outer: 5.50 m

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 PMTs: PC & Water proof Installation of PMTs on the sphere Nylon vessel installation

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Water Plant Storage area and Plants

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Counting Test Facility CTF is a small scale prototype of Borexino: ~ 4 tons of scintillator 100 PMTs Buffer of water Muon veto Vessel radius: 1 m CTF demonstrates the Borexino feasibility

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 May 15, 2007

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Borexino background RadioIsotopeConcentration or FluxStrategy for Reduction NameSourceTypicalRequiredHardwareSoftwareAchieved  cosmic~200 s -1 m -2 ~ UndergroundCherenkov signal < at sea level Cherenkov detectorPS analysis(overall) Ext.  rock Water Tank shieldingFiducial Volumenegligible Int.  PMTs, SSS Material SelectionFiducial Volumenegligible Water, Vessels Clean constr. and handling 14 CIntrinsic PC/PPO~ ~ Old Oil, check in CTFThreshold cut ~ UDust~ g/g < g/g Distillation, Water Extraction ~ ThOrganometallic (?)(dust)(in scintillator)Filtration, cleanliness ~ BeCosmogenic ( 12 C)~ Bq/t< Bq/tonFast procurement, distillationNot yet measurable? 40 KDust,~ g/g< g/g scin.Water ExtractionNot yet measurable? PPO(dust)< g/g PPODistillation 210 PbSurface contam. Cleanliness, distillationNot yet measurable? from 222 Rn decay (NOT in eq. with 210 Po) 210 Po Surface contam. Cleanliness, distillationSpectral analysis ~ 14 from 222 Rn decay  stat. subtraction ~ 0.01 c/d/t 222 Rnair, emanation from~ 10 Bq/l (air)< 1 c/d/100 tWater and PC N 2 stripping,Delayed coincidence< 0.02 c/d/t materials, vessels~100 Bq/l (water)(scintillator)cleanliness, material selection 39 ArAir (nitrogen)~17 mBq/m 3 (air)< 1 c/d/100 tSelect vendor, leak tightnessNot yet measurable? 85 Kr Air (nitrogen)~ 1 Bq/m 3 in air< 1 c/d/100 tSelect vendor, leak tightnessSpectral fit = 25±3 (learn how to measure it)fast coincidence = 29±14

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Expected Spectrum

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 The starting point: no cut spectrum

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Energy scale  -induced neutrons 14 C 11 C MC-G4Bx Data MC vs data comparison of photoelectron time distributions from 14 C LY = 510 (1%) p.e./MeV kB = (15%) cm/MeV Ph.Y. ~ photons/MeV Pulse shape of 14 C events

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Detecting (and rejecting) cosmic muons  are identified by ID and OD OD eff: ~ 99% ID based on pulse shape analysis Rejection factor > 10 3 (conservative) ID efficiency A muon in OD  track  crossing the buffer only  crossing the scintillator  pulses

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Detecting (and rejecting) cosmogenic neutrons A muon in OD A dedicated trigger starts after each muon opening a gate for 1.6 ms. An offline clustering algorithm identifies neutron in high multiplicity events n + p d +   ~ 250  s  = 255 ± 5  s

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Muon and neutron cuts Residual background : << 1 c/d/100 t No cut  cut

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Position reconstruction Position reconstruction algorythms (we have 4 codes right now) time of flight fit to hit time distribution developed with MC, tested and validated in CTF cross checked and tuned in Borexino with 214 Bi- 214 Po events and 14 C events z vs R c scatter plot

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Spatial distributions and resolutions FV 7 Be energy region (mainly 210 Po) 214 Bi- 214 Po  -induced neutrons FV 214 Bi- 214 Po (~800 KeV) 14±2 cm 14 C (~100 KeV): 41±4 cm 11 ~2200 keV

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Spectrum after FV cut (100 tons)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, U content 214 Bi 214 Po 210 Pb   = 236  s 3.2 MeV ~700 keV eq.  = 236 ± 8  s Assuming secular equilibrium and looking in the FV only: 0.02 cpd/tons corresponding to 238 U = (1.9 ± 0.3)× g/g 212 Bi 212 Po 208 Pb   = ns 2.25 MeV ~1000 keV eq.  = 442 ± 57 ns Assuming secular equilibrium and looking in the FV only : cpd/ton corresponding to 232 Th = (6.8±1.5)× g/g 232 Th content

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009  /  discrimination  particles  particles Full separation at high energy (800 keV) 2 gaussians fit ns  Gatti parameter 210 Po peak ( pe) Average time profiles of the scintillation pulses emitted by a PC+PPO (1.5 g/l) mixture under alpha and beta irradiation

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, Po contamination FV (R < 3 m) No radial cut     210 Po 210 Po mean life Not from 210 Pb

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009  statistical subtraction

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 New results with 192 days of statistics

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 New results with 192 days of statistics

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Expected interaction rate in absence of oscillations: 75±4 cpd/100 tons for LMA-MSW oscillations: 48±4 cpd/100 tons, which means: Estimated 1σ Systematic Uncertainties * [%] * Prior to Calibration Systematic and Final Result 7 Be Rate: 49±3 stat ±4 syst cpd/100 tons, which means Total Scintillator Mass0.2 Fiducial Mass Ratio6.0 Live Time0.1 Detector Resp. Function6.0 Cuts Efficiency0.3 Total8.5

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Before Borexino After Borexino

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Constraints on pp and CNO fluxes Combining Borexino 7Be results with other experiments,the expected rate in Clorine and Gallium experiments is where Survival Probability measured over predicted flux ratio R i,k and P i,k are calculated in the hypothesis of high-Z SSM and MSW LMA Rk are the rates actually measured by Clorine and Gallium experiments f 8 B is measured by SNO and SuperK to be 0.87 ±0.07 f 7 Be =1.02 ±0.10 is given by Borexino results Plus luminosity constraint: best determination of pp flux!

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 EstimateMethod μ B SuperK 8B8B<11 Montanino et al. 7 Be<8.4 GEMMAReactor<5.8 Borexino 7 Be<5.4 EM current affects cross section: spectral shape sensitive to μ ν sensitivity enhanced at low energies (c.s.≈ 1/T) Neutrino Magnetic Moment A fit is performed to the energy spectrum including contributions from 14 C, leaving μ as free parameter of the fit Neutrino-electron scattering is the most sensitive test for  search

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, B neutrinos with the lowest threshold: 2.8 MeV 2.6 MeV  ’s from 208 Tl on PMT’s and in the buffer All volume R < 3 m (100 tons) Energy spectrum in Borexino (after  subtraction) Expected 8 B rate in 100 tons of liquid scintillator above 2.8 MeV: 0.26±0.03 c/d/100 tons > 5  distant from the 2.6 MeV  peak

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Background in the MeV range Cosmic Muons External background High energy gamma’s from neutron captures 208 Tl and 214 Bi from radon emanation from nylon vessel Cosmogenic isotopes 214 Bi and 208 Tl from 238 U and 232 Th bulk contamination Raw Spectrum live-time: 246 days Count-rate: 1500 c/d/100 ton S/B ratio < 1/6000!!!

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Muon and neutron cuts Muon cut: All events detected by the outer detector are rejected Residual muon rate: <10 -3 c/d Neutron cut: 2 ms veto after each muon detected by the outer detector, in order to reject induced neutrons (mean capture time ~250  s) Residual neutron rate: ~10 -4 c/d Count-rate: 4.8 c/d/100 ton

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Fiducial Volume Cut (radius < 3 m, ~100 tons) Count-rate: 2.3 c/d/100 ton Surface contamination: 222 Rn and 220 Rn emanated from the nylon vessel Effective attenuation length: ~5 cm Residual contamination: ~10 -4 c/d

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Muon induced radioactive nuclides Cosmogenic candidate energy spectrum Entire mass 100 tons Event delay time after a   = 29±2 ms  = 1.1±0.1 s Random Coincidences  2 /ndf = 43.5/45

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Cosmogenic cut Cosmogenic cut: 5 s veto after each  crossing the buffer Rejection efficiency cut: 99.7% Residual short-lived cosmogenic rate: 3x10 -3 c/d Dead-time: 23.4% Effective detector live-time: 188 days Count-rate: 0.4 c/d/100 ton

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Summary of the Cuts and Systematic CutCounts MeV Counts MeV None Muon cut Neutron cut FV cut Cosmogenic cut C removal Bi removal6226 Expected 208 Tl Measured 8 B BS07(GS98) 8 B BS07(AGS05) 8 B *MSW-LMA:  m 2 =7.69×10 −5 eV 2, tan 2  =0.45 Systematic errors: 6% from the determination of the fiducial mass 3% (2%) uncertainty in the 8 B rate above 2.8 MeV (5.0 MeV) from the determination of the light yield (1%) raw spectrum  cut FV cut cosmogenic, neutron, 214 Bi and 10 C cuts 208 Tl

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 The 8 B spectrum Neutrino oscillation is confirmed at 4.2 , including the theoretical uncertainty (10%) on the 8 B flux from the Standard Solar Model BS07(GS98) + MSW-LMA

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 > 5 MeV > 7 MeV > 5 MeV > 5.5 MeV > 6 MeV > 7 MeV> 2.8 MeV *Threshold is defined at 100% trigger efficiency 8 B equivalent flux MeV MeV Rate [c/d/100 tons]0.26±0.04± ±0.03± 0.01  ES exp [10 6 cm −2 s −1 ] 2.65±0.44± ±0.54±0.17  ES exp /  ES th 0.96± ±0.23 Equivalent unoscillated 8 B neutrino flux, as derived from the electron scattering rate Good agreement with the SK-I and SNO D20 measurements (same threshold at 5 MeV)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Electron Neutrino Survival Probability P ee is defined such that: R: measured rate E and T e : neutrino and recoiled electron energies T 0 = 2.8 MeV: energy threshold E 0 = 3.0 MeV: minimum neutrino energy at T 0 N e : number of target electrons  x (x=e,  ): elastic cross sections For the first time, we confirm at 1.8 , using data from a single detector, the presence of a transition between the low energy vacuum-driven and the high-energy matter-enhanced solar neutrino oscillations, in agreement with the prediction of the MSW-LMA solution for solar neutrinos P ee ( 7 Be) = 0.56±0.10 (0.862 MeV) P ee ( 8 B) = 0.35±0.10 (8.6 MeV)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Calibrations Goal: <5% 7 Be measurement Detector response vs position: 100 Hz 14 C+ 222 Rn in scintillator in >100 positions Quenching and energy scale: Beta: 14 C, 222 Rn in scintillator Alpha: 222 Rn in scintillator Gamma: 139 Ce, 57 Co, 60 Co, 203 Hg, 65 Zn, 40 K, 85 Sr, 54 Mn Neutron: AmBe 222 Rn source: overall spectrum 218 Po, 222 Rn 214 Po 214 Bi Charge (p.e.) Insertion system

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Calibrations: Monte Carlo vs Data Gamma sources in the detector center 4.9 MeV Energy 2.2 MeV1.4 MeV0.5 MeV

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 What next?

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 BOREXino KamLAND (from the Mitzui presentation at Neutrino06) 11 C Rate (cts / day / 100 tons) All energy0.8 – 1.4 MeV KamLAND10755 BOREXino157.4 SNO CERN: 100 and 190 GeV muon beams on a 12 C target: 11 C represents 80% of all the muon-induced contaminants and more than 99% in the CNO pep- energy window Hagner et al., Astropart. Phys. 14, 33 (2000)

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, C production and decay  (+ secondaries) + 12 C →  (+ secondaries) + 11 C + n 11 C → 11 B + e + + e n + p → d +  Coincidence among: cosmic muon: rate at LNGS (3700 mwe): 1.16 hr -1 m -2 average energy: 320 GeV gamma from neutron capture: energy: 2.2 MeV capture time: 250  s positron from 11 C decay: deposited energy between and MeV mean life: 30 min

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Large scintillator detector potential  PC+PPO 11 C n 

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Detection technique: inverse  -decay and delayed coincidence: Energy range: MeV Efficiency: 80% e + p e + + n  t ~250  s n + p d +  (2.2 MeV) Geo- reactor Total Borexino potential on geoneutrinos Prediction: geoneutrino signal: 6.3 / year / 300 tons reactor antineutrinos (in the geo- range): 5.7 / year / 300 tons (Balata et al., 2006, ref. model Mantovani et al., 2004) Prompt signal energy spectrum (model) Cosmogenic  -n background ( 8 Li and 6 He) identified and rejected event by event

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 pep and CNO fluxes software algorithm based on a three-fold coincidence analysis to subtract efficiently cosmogenic 11 C background Muon track reconstruction 8 B at low energy region (3-5 MeV) pp neutrinos seasonal variations 14 C subtraction 7 Be with errors < 5% Systematic reduction Calibrations Purifications planned for 2010 geoneutrinos Summary of the future measurements

Davide Franco – Università di Milano & INFN APC – January 26, 2009 Conclusion Borexino opened the study of the solar neutrinos in real time below the barrier of natural radioactivity (5 MeV) Two measurements reported for 7 Be neutrinos Best limits for pp and CNO neutrinos, combining information from SNO and radiochemical experiments Opportunities to tackle pep and CNO neutrinos in direct measurement First observation of 8 B neutrino spectrum below 5 MeV Borexino will run comprehensive program to study antineutrinos geoneutrino analysis is coming soon! Borexino is a powerful observatory for neutrinos from Supernovae explosions within few tens of kpc Best limit on neutrino magnetic moment. Improve by dedicated measurement with 51 Cr neutrino source …and do not forget the technological success of the high-radiopurity scintillator!