Energy determination at BEPC-II  Satellite Meeting «On the Need for a super-tau-charm factory» September 26 – 27, 2008, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia M.N.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk E.Levichev Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk Tau-08 Satellite Meeting,
Advertisements

55. Jahrestagung der ÖPG, September 2005 Pionischer Wasserstoff: Präzisionsmessungen zur starken Wechselwirkung J. Marton Stefan Meyer Institut der ÖAW.
Oct.,  Overview of the CLEO experiment  D and D S leptonic decays to  and  : Measurements of absolute branching fractions Measurements of absolute.
DPF Victor Pavlunin on behalf of the CLEO Collaboration DPF-2006 Results from four CLEO Y (5S) analyses:  Exclusive B s and B Reconstruction at.
Glasgow, October 25, 2007 Results on e+e- annihilation from CMD2 and SND G.V.Fedotovich and S.I.Eidelman Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk.
TAU-04, NARA 1 First steps to radiative return studies at Belle B.A.Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk.
Compton Scattering Experiment John Klumpp And Ainsley Niemkiewicz.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
Shu Zhang (on behalf of the HXMT team) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Science The current status of HXMT and its calibrations.
CMD-2 and SND results on the  and  International Workshop «e+e- Collisions from  to  » February 27 – March 2, 2006, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Measurements of R Value and Hadronic Form Factors at BES Haiming Hu Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS, Beijing Novosibirsk, Russian Feb. 27 – Mar.
PHENIX Fig1. Phase diagram Subtracted background Subtracted background Red point : foreground Blue point : background Low-mass vector mesons (ω,ρ,φ) ~
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
Low energy e + e –  hadrons in Novosibirsk I.Logashenko On behalf of the CMD-2 and SND Collaborations Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk,
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
28 Feb – 3 Mar, 2006 Discoveries in Flavour Physics Frascati, Italy 1 Why do we need a super tau/charm factory? David Asner Carleton University.
Plans for Polarized Beams at VEPP-2000 and U-70 Yu.Shatunov BINP, Novosibirsk P S IN 2006.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
June, 14th, 2006Mo Xiaohu1  Mass Measurement at BESIII X.H.MO Workshop on Future PRC-U.S. Cooperation in High Energy Physics Beijing, China, Jun
Source of longitudinally polarized electrons I.A.Koop BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia Tau-2008 satellite meeting Novosibirsk
Tau – Charm Summary Frederick A. Harris June. 16, 2006 Workshop on US/PRC Cooperation in HEP.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Possible Applications of Wave-Beam Interaction for Energy Measurement and Obtaining of Polarization at FCCee Evgeni Levichev, Sergei Nikitin BINP, Novosibirsk.
16 June, 2015 В.И. Тельнов 1 Two-photon experiments with detector MD1 at VEPP-4 Valery Telnov Budker INP and Novosibirsk St. Univ. PHOTON 2015, June 16,
1 New Results on  (3770) and D Mesons Production and Decays From BES Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Presented by Yi-Fang Wang Charm07 Cornell University,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
Review of τ -mass measurements at e + e - - colliders Yury Tikhonov (Budker INP) Contents  Introduction  Current status of τ-mass measurements and μτ.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
Study of e+e- annihilation at low energies Vladimir Druzhinin Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk, Russia) SND - BaBar Lepton-Photon, August,
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
1 GASTOF Cherenkov with RF Phototube for FP420 Amur Margaryan 1 Timing Workshop Krakow 2010.
Febr.28-March 2, 2006N Nbar project at VEPP The project to measure the nucleon form factors at VEPP-2000 Workshop - e+e- collisions from phi to psi,
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
First results from CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 collider Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia September 2011 E.Solodov (for.
First results from SND at VEPP-2000 S. Serednyakov On behalf of SND group VIII International Workshop on e + e - Collisions from Phi to Psi, PHIPSI11,
Spectra distortion by the interstrip gap in spectrometric silicon strip detectors Vladimir Eremin and.
Search for Lepton Flavor Violation (LFV) in e+e– interaction (review of experimental results) M.N. Achasov International Workshop on e+e– collisions from.
1 Recent Results on J/  Decays Shuangshi FANG Representing BES Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS International Conference on QCD and.
JINR, Dubna 5-9 December, 2011 Current status of luminosity measurements with the CMD-3 detector at VEPP-2000 G.V.Fedotovich BINP, Novosibirsk.
High Precision Energy Calibration with Resonant Depolarization at VEPP-4M Collider S.A. Nikitin BINP, Novosibirsk 3 July 2014, Valencia, Spain.
1 Double Beta Decay of 150 Nd in the NEMO 3 Experiment Nasim Fatemi-Ghomi (On behalf of the NEMO 3 collaboration) The University of Manchester IOP HEPP.
Particle Physics at Budker INP Novosibirsk, Russia Novosibirsk, Russia Yu.Tikhonov Instr2014, Feb 24-March 1.
HADRON 2009, FloridaAnar Rustamov, GSI Darmstadt, Germany 1 Inclusive meson production at 3.5 GeV pp collisions with the HADES spectrometer Anar Rustamov.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
Fedotovich G.V. On behalf of CMD-3 collaboration Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk State University phipsi15, USTC, Hefei, China 23 – 26.
Measurement of the total hadronic cross-section at e+e- machines I. Logashenko Boston University (Boston, USA) Budker Institure of Nuclear Physics (Novosibirsk,
Exploring the alpha cluster structure of nuclei using the thick target inverse kinematics technique for multiple alpha decays. The 24 Mg case Marina Barbui.
The project of Super-ct-factory with Crab Waist in Novosibirsk
Mashines&Detectors at Budker INP PhoPSi workshop, Beijing
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Electroweak physics at CEPC
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
Measurement of J/ψ→ηCγ at KEDR
Baseline of Super-c-tau in Novosibirsk
Super-c-tau factory in Novosibirsk
Cross section of the process
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Cecilia Voena INFN Roma on behalf of the MEG collaboration
Electroweak Physics Towards the CDR
FCCee energy calibration using reference low energy storage ring
High precision measurement of the beam energy at VEPP-4M collider by Yury Tikhonov KEDR&VEPP-4M collaboration Budker INP, Novosibirsk Outlook Introduction.
Matteo Negrini Università degli Studi di Ferrara - INFN
Bubble Chamber Planning Meeting
BINP Tau-Charm Project
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
Status and results of Novosibirsk accelerator complex
Presentation transcript:

Energy determination at BEPC-II  Satellite Meeting «On the Need for a super-tau-charm factory» September 26 – 27, 2008, BINP, Novosibirsk, Russia M.N. Achasov (on behalf of BINP,IHEP and Univ. of Hawaii collaboration) Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Introduction Why in e+e- experiments the accurate beam energy calibration is important in the «c-  » energy region ? The  -lepton mass determination m  =1776,76±0,15 MeV/c 2  lepton is fundamental particle, its mass is important parameter of the Standard Model. The masses of  and D mesons are also of interest.

Accuracy of the  mass measurement in BEPC-II – BESIII experiment Statistic uncertainty <20 keV (one week of data taking) Systematic uncertainty (without accuracy of beam energy determination) about 20 keV; include the following sources – luminosity, detection efficiency, branching ratios, background subtraction, energy spread, theoretical uncertainty ) Total error is about 30 keV. [Y.K.Wang, X.H.Mo, C.Z.Yuan, J.P.Liu, Optimization of the data taking strategy for a high precision  mass measurement, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A583, 2007, pp ; X.H. Mo, Study of high precision  mass measurement at BESIII, In Proc. Of TAU’06, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl., 169, 2007, pp ] The most important source of uncertainty is the precision of the absolute beam energy

Approaches to the beam energy determination Calibration of the energy scale from scan of the J  and  ′ resonances. Expected accuracy is about 100 keV. [BES Collaboration, Measurement of the mass of  lepton, Phys. Rev. D 53, 1996, pp ] Beam energy measurement using Compton backscattering of monochromatic laser radiation on the e ± beams. This approach was approved in collider experiment at VEPP-4M [V.E.Blinov, A.V.Bogomyakov, N.Yu.Muchnoi, S.A..Nikitin, I.B.Nikolaev, A.G.Shamov, V.N.Zhilich, Review of beam energy measurements at VEPP-4M collider, in Proc. Of INSTR’08]

General idea of the Compton backscattering approach The maximum energy of backscattered photon  max is strictly related with the electron energy  so if one measured  max then the electron energy can be obtained: where  0 is the laser photon energy. The  max which is measured by High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detector with ultimately high resolution (~10 -3 ) allows to have statistical accuracy in the beam energy measurement about The systematic accuracy is mostly defined by absolute calibration of the detector. The accurate calibration could be done in the photon energy range up to 10 MeV by using the  active radionuclides.

Accuracy of the method The method was tested using the resonant depolarization technique in experiments at VEPP- 4M ( accuracy is about 1 keV.) The comparison of the energy measurements results shows that the Compton backscattering method accuracy is about 40 keV The  mass expected accuracy is about 50 keV

BEPC-II electron-positron collider

Layout of the beam energy calibration system

Deployment place

Components of the system Source of photons - CO 2 laser with radiation wavelength =10,6  m (Univ. of Hawaii, USA) Optical system which provide the laser beam transportation to the beams (BINP, Russia). Coaxial HPGe detector (50 mm diameter, 50 mm height) with energy resolution 2,5 keV for 6 MeV photons (BINP, Russia). Laser to vacuum insertion system (BINP, Russia) Sources of  for HPGe calibration (IHEP, China)

Optical system Laser will be here

Design drawing of vacuum box New Vacuum Chamber

Laser to vacuum insertion system Short vacuum chamber with copper mirror Long vacuum chamber

Conclusion The BEPC-II energy calibration system is in progress now. We hope to finish its installation and testing in Then the preliminary physical results can be obtained to the end of 2010.