TTK4165 Color Flow Imaging Hans Torp Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging NTNU, Norway Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MEDT8002 Blood flow measurement by Doppler technique Hans Torp Institutt for sirkulasjon og medisinsk bildediagnostikk Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.
Advertisements

MEDT8007 Simulering av ultralydsignal fra spredere i bevegelse Hans Torp Institutt for sirkulasjon og medisinsk bildediagnostikk Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
Foundations of Medical Ultrasonic Imaging
Non-linear acoustics in Ultrasound Imaging Hans Torp Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering NTNU NTNUNorway Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.
Nonrecursive Digital Filters
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems Digital Signal Processing (Synthesis) Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
Lecture 7 Linear time invariant systems
Filtering Filtering is one of the most widely used complex signal processing operations The system implementing this operation is called a filter A filter.
Pegasus Lectures, Inc. Volume II Companion Presentation Frank Miele Pegasus Lectures, Inc. Ultrasound Physics & Instrumentation 4 th Edition.
Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong EE3900 Computer Networks Data Transmission Slide 1 Continuous & Discrete Signals.
Matched Filters By: Andy Wang.
Transforms: Basis to Basis Normal Basis Hadamard Basis Basis functions Method to find coefficients (“Transform”) Inverse Transform.
Radar: Acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging
DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY By Dr/ Dina Metwaly.
CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS DSP Intro. Signals: quantization and sampling.
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman NCAR S-POL DOPPLER RADAR.
EEE422 Signals and Systems Laboratory Filters (FIR) Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
ELEC 303 – Random Signals Lecture 21 – Random processes
Doppler Radar From Josh Wurman Radar Meteorology M. D. Eastin.
Ultrasonography.
HIAPER Cloud Radar Transceiver Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration Exciter Receiver Oscillators High-Powered Amplifier Calibration.
Your Name Your Title Your Organization (Line #1) Your Organization (Line #2) Week 4 Update Joe Hoatam Josh Merritt Aaron Nielsen.
Decomposition of flow signals into basis functions: Performance advantages, disadvantages, and computational complexity Hans Torp and Lasse Løvstakken.
Sensitivity System sensitivity is defined as the available input signal level Si for a given (SNR)O Si is called the minimum detectable signal An expression.
Resident Categorical Course
1 Part 5 Response of Linear Systems 6.Linear Filtering of a Random Signals 7.Power Spectrum Analysis 8.Linear Estimation and Prediction Filters 9.Mean-Square.
Ping Zhang, Zhen Li,Jianmin Zhou, Quan Chen, Bangsen Tian
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Outline Introduction OFDM Basics Performance sensitivity for imperfect circuit Timing and.
Speckle Correlation Analysis1 Adaptive Imaging Preliminary: Speckle Correlation Analysis.
April 12, 2005Week 13 1 EE521 Analog and Digital Communications James K. Beard, Ph. D. Tuesday, March 29, 2005
EE Audio Signals and Systems Digital Signal Processing (Synthesis) Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
Display of Motion & Doppler Ultrasound
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
Sarah Gillies Ultrasound Sarah Gillies
Speech Signal Representations I Seminar Speech Recognition 2002 F.R. Verhage.
Authors: Sriram Ganapathy, Samuel Thomas, and Hynek Hermansky Temporal envelope compensation for robust phoneme recognition using modulation spectrum.
Doppler Ultrasound Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.. Introduction The Doppler Effect refers to the change in frequency that results when either the detector/observer.
1 RADAR OPERATIONS CENTER (ROC) EVALUATION OF THE WSR-88D OPEN RADAR DATA ACQUISITION (ORDA) SYSTEM SIGNAL PROCESSING WSR-88D Radar Operations Center Engineering.
LPC-analysis-VOSIM-resynthesis Combined class December 18 th 2012 Johan & Peter Institute of Sonology Royal Conservatory, The Hague.
Saudi Board of Radiology: Physics Refresher Course Kostas Chantziantoniou, MSc 2, DABR Head, Imaging Physics Section King Faisal Specialist Hospital &
Quantifying Cardiac Deformation by strain (-rate) imaging Hans Torp NTNU, Norway Hans Torp Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging Norwegian University.
Experiments on Noise CharacterizationRoma, March 10,1999Andrea Viceré Experiments on Noise Analysis l Need of noise characterization for  Monitoring the.
Ultrasonic Imaging Parameters Student: Mei-Ru Yang Wei-Ning Lee Advisor: Pai-Chi Li.
Statistical Description of Multipath Fading
Autoregressive (AR) Spectral Estimation
Ultrasound Basis Michel Slama Amiens.
MEDT8002 Ultralyd bildediagnostikk Faglærer: Hans Torp Institutt for sirkulasjon og bildediagnostikk Hans Torp NTNU, Norway.
ESTIMATION METHODS We know how to calculate confidence intervals for estimates of  and  2 Now, we need procedures to calculate  and  2, themselves.
Performance Issues in Doppler Ultrasound 1. 2 Fundamental Tradeoffs In pulsed modes (PW and color), maximum velocity without aliasing is In pulsed modes,
Digital Signal Processing Lecture 6 Frequency Selective Filters
TISSUE HARMONIC IMAGING (THI)
BME 312 BIOMEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION II LECTURER: ALİ IŞIN
Doppler Spectral Analysis
Lecture on Ultrasonography
Single-element transducers properties
EEE4176 Applications of Digital Signal Processing
EEE422 Signals and Systems Laboratory
Digital Communications Chapter 13. Source Coding
Clutter filtering in color flow imaging
MTI RADAR.
Optical Coherence Tomography
Spatially Varying Frequency Compounding of Ultrasound Images
Linear Prediction.
Review of Ultrasonic Imaging
Advanced Radar Systems
Radio Propagation Review
Uses of filters To remove unwanted components in a signal
Chapter 5: Active Filters
Ultrasonic Imaging Using Contrast Agents
Presentation transcript:

TTK4165 Color Flow Imaging Hans Torp Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging NTNU, Norway Hans Torp NTNU, Norway

Color flow imaging Estimator for velocity and velocity spread power, mean frequeny, bandwidthEstimator for velocity and velocity spread power, mean frequeny, bandwidth Color mapping and visualizationColor mapping and visualization Clutter filteringClutter filtering Scanning strategiesScanning strategies

Data acquistion in color flow imaging Beam k-1Beam k Beam k+1 Number of pulses in each direction 3 – 15 Frame rate reduction compared to B-mode

2D Color flow imaging 1. Limited information content in the signal, i.e. short observation time, low signal-to-noise ratio, and low Nyquist velocity limit. 2.Insufficient signal processing/display. Full spectrum analysis in each point of the sector is difficult to visualize.

Signal power: Mean frequency: Bandwidth:

Taylor expansion of exp-function

Autocorrelation method Power, meanfreq., bandwidth derived from sample mean autocorrelation estimator

Scatter diagram of the autocorrelation estimator with lag m=1 for three different signals. To the right, a narrow band signal with center frequency ω 1 =π/2 to the left, a slightly more broadband signal with ω 1 =3π/2, and in the middle, high-pass filtered white noise. Autocorrelation method

Estimation error is minimum when correlation is maximum Hans Torp NTNU, Norway Correlation magnitude Correlation angle ~Velocity Matlab-demo: AcorrEst.m

Estimator properties

Normalized Autocorrelation function  (1) = R(1) / R(0)

Color mapping types Hans Torp NTNU, Norway Power Doppler (Angio) Brightnes ~ signal power Color flow Brightnes ~ signal power Hue ~ Velocity Color flow ”Variance map” Hue & Brightnes ~ Velocity Green ~ signal bandwidth

Color scale for velocity and - spread Power Band width Aortic insufficiency Hans Torp NTNU, Norway

Color flow imaging Mitral valve blood flow Normal mitral valve Stenotic mitral valve Hans Torp NTNU, Norway

Autocorrelation method Sensitive to clutter noise Phase angle of R(1) substantially reduced due to low frequency clutter signal Clutter filter stopband much more critical than for spectral Doppler

Clutter filter in color flow imaging? Beam k-1Beam k Beam k+1

Doppler Signal Model Signal vector for each sample volume: Signal vector for each sample volume: x = [x(1),…,x(N)] T Signal = Clutter + White noise + Blood x = c + n + b Typical clutter/signal level: 30 – 80 dBTypical clutter/signal level: 30 – 80 dB Clutter filter stopband suppression is critical!Clutter filter stopband suppression is critical! Zero mean complex random processZero mean complex random process Three independent signal components:Three independent signal components: Hans Torp NTNU, Norway Blood velocity [m/s] Doppler spectrum [dB] Clutter Blood

Approaches to clutter filtering in color flow imaging IIR-filter with initialization techniquesIIR-filter with initialization techniques Short FIR filtersShort FIR filters Regression filtersRegression filters

IIR filter with initialization Chebyshev order 4, N=10 Power [dB] Frequency Frequency response Steady state Step init. Discard first samples Projection init* *Chornoboy: Initialization for improving IIR filter response, IEEE Trans. Signal processing, 1992

FIR Filters Discard the first M output samples, where M is equal to the filter orderDiscard the first M output samples, where M is equal to the filter order Improved amplitude response when nonlinear phase is allowedImproved amplitude response when nonlinear phase is allowed Power [dB] Frequency Frequency response, order M= 5, packet size N=10     M k k k zbzH 0 )( Linear phase Minimum phase

Regression Filters Subtraction of the signal component contained in a K-dimensional clutter space: Signal space Clutter space b1b1 b2b2 b3b3 x y c y = x - c Linear regression first proposed by Hooks & al. Ultrasonic imaging 1991 x = [x(1),…,x(N)]

Why should clutter filters be linear? No intermodulation between clutter and blood signalNo intermodulation between clutter and blood signal Preservation of signal power from bloodPreservation of signal power from blood Optimum detection (Neuman-Pearson test) includes a linear filterOptimum detection (Neuman-Pearson test) includes a linear filter y = Ax Any linear filter can be performed by a matrix multiplication of the N - dimensional signal vector xAny linear filter can be performed by a matrix multiplication of the N - dimensional signal vector x This form includes all IIR filters with linear initialization, FIR filters, and regression filtersThis form includes all IIR filters with linear initialization, FIR filters, and regression filters * Matrix A Input vector xOutput vector y

Frequency response Linear Filters y = Ax Definition of frequency response functionDefinition of frequency response function = power output for single frequency input signal 2 1 )(   Ae N HoHo   T Nii eee    )1( 1    Note 1. The output of the filter is not in general a single frequency signal (This is only the case for FIR-filters) Note 2. Frequency response only well defined for complex signals 

FIR filter matrix structure FIR filter order M=5 Packet sizeN=10 Output samples: N-M= 5 Increasing filter order + Improved clutter rejection - Increased estimator variance Hans Torp NTNU, Norway

Regression Filters Subtraction of the signal component contained in a K-dimensional clutter space:Subtraction of the signal component contained in a K-dimensional clutter space: xbbIy          K i H ii 1 Signal space Clutter space b1b1 b2b2 b3b3 x y c Choise of basis function is crucial for filter performance y = x - c A

Fourier basis functions n b (k)= 1/sqrt(N) e i*2π*k*n/N n= 0,.., N-1 are orthonormal, and equally distributed in frequency

Fourier Regression Filters DFT Set low frequency coefficients to zero Inverse DFT Frequency Power [dB] Frequency response N=10, clutter dim.=3

Legendre polynom basis functions b 0 = b 1 = b 2 = b 3 = Gram-Schmidt process to obtain Orthonormal basis functions -> Legendre polynomials

Polynomial Regression Filters b 0 = b 1 = b 2 = b 3 = Power [dB] Frequency Frequency responses, N=10

Regression filter bias Magnitude and phase frequency response Polynomial regression filter packet size = 10, polynom order 3. Severe bias in bandwidth and mean freq. estimator below cutoff frequency.

How to image low velocity flow Long observation time neededLong observation time needed Obtained by increased packet size or lower PRFObtained by increased packet size or lower PRF Beam interleaving permits lower prf without loss in framerateBeam interleaving permits lower prf without loss in framerate

Color flow scanning strategies B-mode scanning Mechanical scanning + No settling time clutter filter - low frame rate Electronic scanning Packet acquisition - Settling time clutter filter +flexible PRF without loss in frame rate Electronic scanning continuous acquisition + no settling time clutter filter + High frame rate - low PRF (=frame rate) scanning direction time

Color flow imaging with a mechanical probe v = W*FR Image width W Frame rateFR Sweep velocityv= W*FR Virtual axial velocity: vr= v*cotan(  ) vr v  Example: Image width W = 5 cm Frame rateFR =20 fr/sec Angle with beam  = 45 deg. Sweep velocityv= 1 m/s Virtual axial velocity: vr= 1 m/s vr > max normal blood flow velocities!

Color flow imaging with a mechanical probe v = W*FR Reflected wave does not hit the transducer Max Dopplershift 600 Hz ~ 0.21 m/sec

Color flow imaging with a mechanical probe W= N*b v = W*FR Beamwidth (Rayleigh criterion): b Effective number of beams: N =W/b Frame Rate: FR Signal from stationary scatterer N*Fr*t Clutter signal bandwidth: 2*N*FR Power spectrum Clutter filter cutoff frequency: fc > N*FR Frequency components < fc removed

Minimum detectable Doppler shift Frame rate FR =1 Hz FR = 10 Hz FR=20 Hz Width (# beams) N=3030 Hz300 Hz 600 Hz N=7070 Hz700 Hz1400 Hz Clutter filter cutoff frequency: fc > N*FR (transit time effect mechanical scan) Cardiac flow imaging: fo= 2 MHz, 15 mm aperture, beamwidth 3 mm 30 beams covers the left ventricle fc = 600 Hz ~ 0.21 m/sec. lower velocity limit

Atlanta, GA april 1986 Vingmed, introduced CFM The first commercial colorflow imaging scanner with mechanical probe Horten, Norway september 2001 GE-Vingmed closed down production line for CFM after 15 years of continuous production

Minimum detectable Doppler shift Clutter filter cutoff frequency: fc > N*FR Frame rate FR =1 Hz FR = 10 Hz FR=20 Hz Width (# beams) N=3030 Hz300 Hz 600 Hz N=7070 Hz700 Hz1400 Hz Periferal vessel imaging with fo= 10 MHz Mechanical scanning: fc = 1400 Hz ~ 108 mm/sec. Electronic scanning: fc = 30 Hz ~ 2.3 mm/sec. Packet acquisition (P=10): Frame rate = 35 frames/sec Continuous acquisition:Frame rate = 350 frames/sec

Combining tissue and flow Continuous sweep acquisition + Brachial artery