NEMO Re-chartering IETF 67 – November 9, 2006 T.J. Kniveton

Charter Proposal Update ► The latest charter proposal was posted on the ML one week ago. ► This charter focuses strictly on the deployment scenarios that have been identified ► Tasks include gathering requirements for these scenarios by Apr/May ’07. If these goals are not met, the scenario go away ► Solution specs expected by July/Aug ’07

Goal ► The idea behind these changes is to tighten the scope of the WG to achievable goals, based on existing deployment needs ► We would like to see research problems related to NEMO addressed in the IRTF (possibly MOBOPTS working group)

Scenarios 1. Aviation ► Aviation scenario includes requirements that are presented at this meeting by Terry Davis and/or Will Ivancic ► Problems have been discussed in NEMO before ► T.J. will manage requirements gathering process 2. Automotive ► European and Japanese automakers are running into issues for deploying NEMO in cars ► Thierry will manage requirements gathering process

Goals and Milestones: May 2006Finish draft on Threat Analysis and Security Requirements for NEMO. Nov 2006Submit Terminology as Informational to IESG Nov 2006Submit Goals and Requirements as Informational to IESG Nov 2006Submit final doc Multihoming Problem Statement Nov 2006Submit final doc on NEMO Basic Support Usages Nov 2006Submit final doc(s) on Analysis of the Solution Space for Route Optimization Dec 2006Submit final doc on MIB for NEMO Basic Support Dec 2006Submit final doc(s) on Prefix Delegation for NEMO Apr 2007Submit -00 draft on Route Optimization Needs for Aircraft and Spacecraft Deployments May 2007Submit -00 draft on Route Optimization Needs for Automobile and Highway Deployments Jul 2007Submit -00 draft for solution to aircraft/spacecraft problem Aug 2007Submit -00 draft for solution to automotive problem Mar 2008Shut down or recharter the WG to solve further identified topics

Open Questions ► Multihoming  A couple of proposals to take Appendix of Multihoming Problem Statement and making a BCP from this  Should this be a working group charter item at this point?  Is there already a document like this in existence? If not, where is it going to come from?

Next Steps ► Integrate comments received in the last week  Mostly minor (except for multihoming), and done ► Submit to ADs and IESG  Immediately following IETF67 ► Begin working towards new goals  Immediately following IETF67