FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Data Assimilation NCEO Data-assimilation training days 5-7 July 2010 Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) University.
Advertisements

The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System:
Setup of 4D VAR inverse modelling system for atmospheric CH 4 using the TM5 adjoint model Peter Bergamaschi Climate Change Unit Institute for Environment.
Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.
Exploitation of MODIS and MISR Surface Albedos in Support of SVAT Models LANDFLUX meeting, Toulouse, May 28-31, 2007 JRC – Ispra Bernard Pinty, T. Lavergne,
Markov-Chain Monte Carlo
Computing the Posterior Probability The posterior probability distribution contains the complete information concerning the parameters, but need often.
Paper Discussion: “Simultaneous Localization and Environmental Mapping with a Sensor Network”, Marinakis et. al. ICRA 2011.
Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Bayesian Analysis of X-ray Luminosity Functions A. Ptak (JHU) Abstract Often only a relatively small number of sources of a given class are detected in.
Estimating parameters in inversions for regional carbon fluxes Nir Y Krakauer 1*, Tapio Schneider 1, James T Randerson 2 1. California Institute of Technology.
Data Assimilation in the NCEO (National Centre for Earth Observation) Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data-Assimilation Research Centre DARC University of Reading.
Nonlinear and Non-Gaussian Estimation with A Focus on Particle Filters Prasanth Jeevan Mary Knox May 12, 2006.
A Variational Carbon Data Assimilation System (CDAS-4DVar)
A Concept of Environmental Forecasting and Variational Organization of Modeling Technology Vladimir Penenko Institute of Computational Mathematics and.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to infer atmosphere- biosphere CO 2 exchanges and their uncertainties Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner.
Lecture II-2: Probability Review
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
A global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) and its link to CAMELS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 3, Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H.
Applications of Bayesian sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to the statistical analysis of computer simulators for carbon dynamics Marc Kennedy Clive.
Nonlinear Data Assimilation and Particle Filters
Data assimilation in land surface schemes Mathew Williams University of Edinburgh.
Page 1© Crown copyright WP4 Development of a System for Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation Richard Betts.
CarboEurope, IMECC and GHG- Europe Mike Jones School of Natural Sciences Trinity College Dublin.
Results from the Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) 3 FastOpt 4 2 Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1 Heinrich Widmann 3, Thomas.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
Carbon, soil moisture and fAPAR assimilation Wolfgang Knorr Max-Planck Institute of Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany 1 Acknowledgments: Nadine Gobron 2, Marko.
Regional Inverse Modeling in North and South America for the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Arlyn Andrews (NOAA/ESRL), John Miller (NOAA/ESRL, CIRES), Thomas.
The General Data Assimilation Problem Ronald Errico Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research Center at Morgan State University and Global Modeling.
Regional Inversion of continuous atmospheric CO 2 measurements A first attempt ! P., P., P., P., and P. Philippe Peylin, Peter Rayner, Philippe Bousquet,
A Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) to Infer Atmosphere- Biosphere CO2 Exchanges and Their Uncertainties Marko Scholze1, Peter Rayner2,
A unifying framework for hybrid data-assimilation schemes Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) National Centre for Earth Observation.
Applications of optimal control and EnKF to Flow Simulation and Modeling Florida State University, February, 2005, Tallahassee, Florida The Maximum.
Integration of biosphere and atmosphere observations Yingping Wang 1, Gabriel Abramowitz 1, Rachel Law 1, Bernard Pak 1, Cathy Trudinger 1, Ian Enting.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
Non-Linear Parameter Optimisation of a Terrestrial Biosphere Model Using Atmospheric CO 2 Observation - CCDAS Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang.
Inferring terrestrial CO 2 fluxes from a global-scale Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Marko Scholze 1, Peter Rayner 2, Wolfgang Knorr 1,
Quantitative network design for biosphere model process parameters E. Koffi 1, P. Rayner 1, T. Kaminski 2, M. Scholze 3, M. Voßbeck 2, and R. Giering 2.
CAMELS CCDAS A Bayesian approach and Metropolis Monte Carlo method to estimate parameters and uncertainties in ecosystem models from eddy-covariance data.
July 11, 2006Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Probing the covariance matrix Kenneth M. Hanson T-16, Nuclear Physics; Theoretical Division Los.
1 CAMELS CAMELS PROJECT OVERVIEW Motivation for CAMELS Deliverables Products Structure Peter Cox, Hadley Centre, Met Office.
Climate–Carbon Modelling, Assimilation & Prediction Wolfgang Knorr, QUEST NCEO/Carbon Fusion Sheffield, 29 February 2008.
CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.
Derivative-based uncertainty quantification in climate modeling P. Heimbach 1, D. Goldberg 2, C. Hill 1, C. Jackson 3, N. Petra 3, S. Price 4, G. Stadler.
Data assimilation in Marko Scholze. Strictly speaking, there are so far no DA activities in QUEST, but CCDAS (as part of core team activities) CPDAS and.
Prepared by Dusanka Zupanski and …… Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: application to carbon problems.
Detection and Quantification of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Greenhouse Gas Dry Mole Fraction Enhancements from Urban Emissions: Results from INFLUX NOAA.
Success and Failure of Implementing Data-driven Upscaling Using Flux Networks and Remote Sensing Jingfeng Xiao Complex Systems Research Center, University.
Consideration of Representativeness Error In an OSSE Framework Before deciding specifically how observations are to be simulated, how instrument and representativeness.
FastOpt CAMELS A prototype Global Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Wolfgang Knorr 1, Marko Scholze 2, Peter Rayner 3,Thomas Kaminski 4, Ralf.
Inverse Modeling of Surface Carbon Fluxes Please read Peters et al (2007) and Explore the CarbonTracker website.
Geogg124: Data assimilation P. Lewis. What is Data Assimilation? Optimal merging of models and data Models Expression of current understanding about process.
Earth Observation Data and Carbon Cycle Modelling Marko Scholze QUEST, Department of Earth Sciences University of Bristol GAIM/AIMES Task Force Meeting,
Ensemble forecasting/data assimilation and model error estimation algorithm Prepared by Dusanka Zupanski and Milija Zupanski CIRA/CSU Denning group meeting.
FastOpt A prototype Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Inferring interannual variations of vegetation- atmosphere CO 2 fluxes Marko Scholze.
On the Robustness of Air-Sea Flux Estimates of Anthropogenic Carbon from Ocean Inversions Sara Mikaloff Fletcher, Nicolas Gruber, Andrew Jacobson, Scott.
Comparison of adjoint and analytical approaches for solving atmospheric chemistry inverse problems Monika Kopacz 1, Daniel J. Jacob 1, Daven Henze 2, Colette.
Estimating emissions from observed atmospheric concentrations: A primer on top-down inverse methods Daniel J. Jacob.
Potential of 14 CO 2 to constrain emissions at country scale Y. Wang, G. Broquet, P. Ciais, F. Vogel, F. Chevallier, N. Kadygrov, L. Wu, R. Wang, S. Tao.
The Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS)
The Lodore Falls Hotel, Borrowdale
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Effects of drought and fire on interannual variability in CO2 as derived using atmospheric-CO2 inversion Prabir K. Patra Acknowledgements to: M. Ishizawa,
Carbon Model-Data Fusion
Directions of Inquiry Given a fixed atmospheric CO2 concentration assimilation scheme, what is the optimal network expansion? Given the wide array of available.
2. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, Canada
Instrumental Surface Temperature Record
Hartmut Bösch and Sarah Dance
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Presentation transcript:

FastOpt Quantitative Design of Observational Networks M. Scholze, R. Giering, T. Kaminski, E. Koffi P. Rayner, and M. Voßbeck Future GHG observation WS, Edinburgh, Jan 2008

FastOpt Motivation Can construct a machinery that, for a given network and a given target quantity, can approximate the uncertainty with which the value of the target quantity is constrained by the observations What is the question?

FastOpt Outline Motivation Example Method Demo Which assumptions? Links to further information Discussion -> Potential application or UK GHG monitoring strategy, CCnet proposal?

FastOpt Example Linear Model From Rayner et al. (Tellus, 1996) Inverse model based on atmospheric tracer model Extend given atmospheric network CO 2 Target quantity: Global Ocean uptake Figure shows additional station locations for two experiments, “1” additional site allowed / “3” additional sites allows

FastOpt Posterior Uncertainty If the model was linear: and data + priors have Gaussian PDF, then the posterior PDF is also Gaussian: with mean value: and uncertainty: which are related to the Hessian of the cost function: For a non-linear model, this is an approximation -

FastOpt Model and Observational Uncertainties No observation/no model is perfect. It is convenient to quantify observations and their model counterpart by probability density functions PDFs. The simplest assumption is that they are Gaussian. If the observation refers to a point in space and time, there is a representation error because the counterpart simulated by the model refers to a box in space and time. The corresponding uncertainty must be accounted for either by the observational or by the model contribution to total uncertainty. total uncertainty uncertainty from model error uncertainty from observational error

FastOpt Uncertainty calculation in 2 steps

FastOpt Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) Forward Modelling Chain Process Parameters BETHY + background fluxes TM2LMDZ Surface Fluxes CO2 FlaskCO2 continuouseddy flux

FastOpt CCDAS scheme

FastOpt Sketch of Network Designer Observations [sigma] + Flask [enter] x Continuous [enter] o Eddy Flux [enter] |Compute| Targets [sigma] European Uptake [ ] Global Uptake [ ]

FastOpt Assumptions and Ingredients Assumptions: Gaussian uncertainties on priors, observations, and from model error (or function of Gaussian, e.g. lognormal) Model not too non linear What else? Ingredients Ability to estimate uncertainties for priors, observations and due to model error Assimilation system that can (efficiently) propagate uncertainties (helpful: adjoint, Hessian, and Jacobian codes)

FastOpt Further Information Terrestrial assimilation system applications and papers: The corresponding network design project: with link to paper on network design (Kaminski and Rayner, in press)