Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part IV 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Policy Issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OPEN ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES: CASE STUDY OF THE UoN BY ROSEMARY OTANDO LIBRARY DEPARTMENT.
Advertisements

Partnering with Faculty / researchers to Enhance Scholarly Communication Caroline Mutwiri.
The Future of Scholarship in the Digital Age: The Role of Institutional Repositories Ann J. Wolpert Director of Libraries Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Karen Estlund DSpace User & Group Permissions UO NSRC Workshop March 29, 2013 Karen Estlund Head, Digital Scholarship Center.
DSpace: the MIT Libraries Institutional Repository MacKenzie Smith, MIT EDUCAUSE 2003, November 5 th Copyright MacKenzie Smith, This work is the.
5-7 November 2014 DR policies Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Brown’s Digital Repository An overview of services.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Introducing Symposia : “ The digital repository that thinks like a librarian”
Expanding the Focus of the IR: Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon Elizabeth Breakstone, Reference Librarian Heather Briston, University Archivist.
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository Delivered to Technical Services Staff Dr. John Archer Library University of Regina September 21,
Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.
Planning for a University of Guelph Institutional Repository: DSpace Implementation Helen Salmon & Ron MacKinnon Presentation to Information Services Committee.
I:\Share\Bestuursinligting\OUDITfinaal\Portfolio\Statistics\BI UPSpace An institutional research repository for the University of Pretoria.
From Berlin back to Business OPEN Stellenbosch University Library and Information Service Mimi Seyffert Manager: Digitisation and Digital Services.
ETD Repositories Using DSpace Software Andrew Penman The Robert Gordon University 27 th September 2004.
Management, marketing and population of repositories Morag Greig, University of Glasgow.
Introducing New Services with DSpace Open Repositories Conference 2007 Susan Wells Parham Kent Woynowski Julie Griffin.
Social Science Data and ETDs: Issues and Challenges Joan Cheverie Georgetown University Myron Gutmann ICPSR – University of Michigan Austin McLean ProQuest.
Libra: Thesis and Dissertation Submission. What is Libra? UVA’s institutional repository, providing online archiving and access for the scholarly output.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
5-7 November 2014 DR Workflow Practical Digital Content Management from Digital Libraries & Archives Perspective.
Practical Advice Morag Greig Advocacy William J Nixon Service Development DAEDALUS Workshop – 27 June 2005.
DSpace. TM 2 Agenda  Introduction to DSpace  DSpace community  Institutional Repository  Easy to add/find content in DSpace  Building Online Communities.
Italy: OA repositories, mandates and author’s rights management. Does it really work? Paola Gargiulo CASPUR.
Electronic Theses at Rhodes University presented by Irene Vermaak Rhodes University Library National ETD Project CHELSA Stakeholder Workshop 5 November.
University of Bergen Library Electronic publishing Bergen – Makerere visit February 2005.
I Never Met a Data I Didn’t Like Metadata Issues in Local and Shared Digital Collections Presentation to ALCTS Electronic Resources Interest Group January.
Implementing an Institutional Repository at IUPUI: A Good IDeA Kevin Petsche Acting Digital Libraries Team Leader Emily Dill Public Services Librarian,
How to Implement an Institutional Repository A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Choosing Delivery Software for a Digital Library Jody DeRidder Digital Library Center University of Tennessee.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
PNC 2005 Hawaii Toward an Institutional Repository at the Data Service of NDAP Ya-ning Chen, Shu-jiun Chen Computing Centre, Academia Sinica Taiwan.
1 ARRO: Anglia Ruskin Research Online Making submissions: Benefits and Process.
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Resource Issues.
Uganda Scholarly Digital Library (USDL) Makerere University’s Institutional Repository By Margaret Nakiganda URL:
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part V 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Marketing.
Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon A Presentation to the ACRL Oregon & Washington Joint.
Ufdc.ufl.edu/ufir Institutional UF. The Institutional Repository at the University of Florida is the digital archive for the intellectual.
Depositing your thesis, dissertation and other research outputs Carol Brandenburg & Sarah L. Tritt, Library Teaching and Learning, 2014.
DalSpace A content repository for Dalhousie community members.
Vicki Tobias Introduction to and Institutional Repositories.
DEEP BLUE University of Michigan Institutional Repository.
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
The Promise of Institutional Repositories : Scholars’ Bank at the University of Oregon Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services University.
Greater Visibility, Greater Access QSpace QSpace Queen’s University Research & Learning Repository.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part IV A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Policy Issues.
The Glasgow Experience: From DAEDALUS to Enlighten William J Nixon and Morag Greig Glasgow University Library IUA Librarians Group, 20 th February 2007.
BENEFITS OF AN INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORY THE REPOSITORY AT ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSITY.
Making the Case for Curation: The Practical Experiment of DSpace Managing Digital Assets February 5-6, 2005 Charleston, SC Ann J. Wolpert, Director of.
There’s a policy for that? RESULTS FROM AN INFORMAL SURVEY OF IR PRACTICES Christy Shorey - University of Florida.
Implementing an Institutional Repository Pre-Conference 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 by Carol Hixson University Librarian, University.
DAEDALUS Project William J Nixon Service Development Susan Ashworth Advocacy.
Redefining the Library’s Role through an Institutional Repository Sharon Mader, Dean Jeanne Pavy, Scholarly Communications Librarian Earl K. Long Library.
TOP SCHOLAR Digital Research WKU Mike Binder Dean of Libraries Western Kentucky University Presentation at Council of Academic Deans Retreat,
Outline of Talk What is eResearch and why does it matter? The South African SARIS project Challenging the current scholarly communication system eResearch,
If We Build It, Will They Come (Eventually)? : Scholarly Communication and Institutional Repositories A Presentation to the NASIG 2005 Conference May 20.
Professional Development Programme: Design and Development of Institutional Repository Using DSpace Nipul G Shihora INFLIBNET Centre Gandhinagar
Tiewei (Lucy) Liu Metadata Librarian June 26, 2016
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part IV
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part III
How to Implement an Institutional Repository
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
Presentation transcript:

Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part IV 16 th North Carolina Serials Conference March 29, 2007 Policy Issues

Document and publicize policies

Policy issues  Division of responsibilities and clarification of roles

Division of responsibilities and clarification of roles  Roles within the hosting institution  Target group and users can help with:  Identifying and submitting content  Verifying copyright  Serving as advisers  Letting you know of service problems

UO’s Steering Committee

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, name of the archive

Structure of the archive  Depends on software and technical support  Communities, collections, titles, files  Author or mediated submissions  Need for local modifications to software  Depends on your vision and resources  Target group(s)  Type of content  Staffing

Structure: software implications

 Communities  Sub-communities  Collections  Titles  Files

Structure: software implications

Definition of the repository: UO  Somehow affiliated with institution  Cumulative and perpetual  Open access  Interoperable  Academic content, or in support of the academic mission

The name  Scholars’ Bank  KU ScholarWorks  DLearn  QSpace  Papyrus   eScholarship

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users

General guidelines

Definition of communities, collections, and users  Definition of community  Limits on the number and type of collections?  Different rules for different groups?  Commercial use permitted or not?

Establishment of communities

Sample community Academic department

Sample community Academic program

Sample community Administrative department

Sample community Student community

Sample sub-community Faculty communities

Sample sub-community The library example

Sample sub-community

Limits on the number or type of collections  Will you limit?  Who makes the decision?  What are the determining factors?  How will you accomplish it?

Types of collections  Informational  Administrative  Primary resources for research or study  From the faculty  From students  Groups only or individuals also  Born digital or digitized

Collection guidelines

Informational collection Campus newsletter

Administrative collection Campus planning documents

Primary resources Statistical data sets

Primary resources Images

Society publication Scholarly journal

Academic collection Working papers

Faculty collection (individual) Personal collection of a professor

Sample sub-community Faculty communities

Student collection Papers for an honors class

Student collection Theses and dissertations

Different rules for different groups  One set of rules and services for students  Another set of rules and services for faculty  Institutional users vs. external users

Services for different users

Commercial use

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content

Control of content  Who sets the standards for the content?  What type of material is acceptable?  Who owns the content once deposited?  Will you restrict access to any content?

Type of content accepted

What happens when someone leaves?

Restricted access

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content SSubmission and withdrawal

Submission and withdrawal  Mediated submission  Author self-submission  Review of submissions  Replacement of files  Withdrawal

Policies for submission and withdrawal

Policies for submission and withdrawal: UO example  Every community determines the specific submission policies for its collections  Someone will revise new submissions to make sure the content is appropriate  Authors may submit their own work or ask for assistance

Policies for submission and withdrawal: UO example  Someone from library always reviews first few submissions  Library reserves the right to remove content  Library reserves the right to change its guidelines

Mediated submissions: Challenges

Capturing hyper links

Broken or erroneous links

Revision or replacement of files  Will you permit the replacement or revision of files?  If so, in what circumstances?

Revision of submissions

Example of a new version

Withdrawal of content  Will you withdraw submissions to your IR?  If so, in what cases?  Will you leave any markers or placeholders for that missing content?

Example of a withdrawal

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content SSubmission and withdrawal MMetadata standards

Metadata standards  Based in Dublin Core or some other standard  Determined by software limitations  Mediated versus self-submission  Controlled vocabulary issues  Whatever is necessary to find, organize, and display the files appropriately  It’s not cataloging!

Authors

Description

Appropriate level of metadata

Logical and useful presentation

Numbering

Numbering: Dissociation

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content SSubmission and withdrawal MMetadata standards IInstitutional commitment

Institutional commitment  Permanence of the archive  How to guarantee the integrity of the files  How to guarantee the stability of the archive

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content SSubmission and withdrawal MMetadata standards IInstitutional commitment CCopyright, permission, and access

Copyright, permission, and access  Do authors have the right to post?  Will putting it in IR affect later publication?  Are authors turning over copyright to IR?  Who gets to use content in the IR?  What guarantees are there against plagiarism?

Copyright and permission

Policy issues DDivision of responsibilities and clarification of roles SStructure, definition, and name of the archive DDefinition of communities, collections, and users CControl of content SSubmission and withdrawal MMetadata standards IInstitutional commitment CCopyright, permission, and access GGoing it alone or multi-institutional

Multi-institutional archive