American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 ACRIN 6664 – Protocol Review The National CT Colonography Trial Name(s) of presenters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rare Film Guide Slide Set. Clinical Trial Design for Pirfenidone Study Purpose of Study: To see if the use of pirfenidone decreases the loss of lung function.
Advertisements

Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance FDA Advisory Committee March, 2002 David Lieberman MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology Oregon Health Sciences.
Presentation Name Recruitment and Accrual of Special Populations Special Population Committee Elizabeth A. Patterson M.D., Chair.
Spotlight on Colorectal Cancer Screening 1 1. Home Screening for Colon Cancer
Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal-Cancer Screening NEJM April 3, 2014 Vol 3 Imperiale, T.F. et al Presented by Melissa Spera, MD.
Preconception Healthcare: What Men Know and Believe Keith A. Frey, MD Richard Engle, MD Brie Noble Department of Family Medicine Mayo Clinic in Arizona.
Research Protocol ACRIN 6678 Learning About PET/CT Scans: Can PET/CT scans provide helpful information for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer?
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
A pilot surveillance study in TP53 mutation carriers utilizing whole body MRI Mandy Ballinger PhD Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre Melbourne, Australia.
The primary care excellence model Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake with a Patient Navigator Dr. Brian Mitchell, Co-Investigator Northern Ontario.
Chicken Soup for the Busy Coordinator Nov 2010 PROTOCOL FEASIBILITY.
ROLE OF NURSES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH IN MALAWI OWEN DAIRE BSCN MPH RNM.
Consent for Research Study A Study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether an MRI scan with an investigative contrast agent (called.
Colorectal cancer: How do we approach health disparities? Marta L. Davila, MD, FASGE University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Colorectal Cancer Screening John Pelzel MD Sleepy Eye Medical Center.
Update on Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests Source: Levin Bernard et al. Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous.
Tryggvi Björn Stefánsson Dept of Surgery Landspitali University Hospital.
Expanding CRC screening: Understanding the options and the costs to providers Paul Brown Kelly Kohler University of North Carolina 1.
Azara Proprietary & Confidential Overview June 2014 Improving Patient Outcomes through Data.
Recruitment Strategies for Clinical Trials in Radiology: Active vs. Passive Patient Recruitment J Hollada S G Ruehm A Tognolini W Speier L Ristow W Marfori.
Virtual Colonoscopy to Screen for Colorectal Cancer Lawrence Fleming, M.D. June 23, 2004.
Mobilizing Newcomers and Immigrants to Cancer Screening Programs funded by Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) The views expressed herein do not necessarily.
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY March 23, OUR MISSION To foster the ongoing development of widely acceptable consistent imaging.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients with a diagnosis of liver cancer who are on the waiting list for a liver transplant Comparison of advanced.
Primary Aim To compare outcomes of participants with symptoms of stable angina or angina equivalent evaluated with an anatomic imaging strategy using CCTA.
Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening in Family Care Clinic and their Outcomes Presented by Liana Poghosyan, MD Ne Moe, MD May 19, 2008.
High risk population in GI field how we can find them? Ahmad Shavakhi MD Associate professor of gastroenterology.
FIRST TWO AND HALF YEAR OF NATIONAL SCREENING PROGRAM FOR COLORECTAL CANCERS IN REPUBLIC CROATIA Miroslava Katicic 1, Milan Kujundzic 2, Davor Stimac 3,
ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Consent for Research Study A study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether a PET/CT scan using an imaging agent called.
Finding N.E.M.O. Marvin R. Balaan, MD, FCCP System Division Director, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh.
ACRIN Protocol 6666 ACRIN Protocol 6666 Screening Breast Ultrasound in High-Risk Women Made possible by grants from the Avon Foundation and National Cancer.
Slides last updated: June 2015 CRC: CLINICAL FEATURES.
ACRIN Breast Committee Fall Meeting : Comparison of Full-Field Digital Mammography with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Image Acquisition in Relation.
Implications of lung cancer screening in the new millenia Andrew R. Haas, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Interventional Pulmonary and.
Dr. Cynthia Walsh Department of Radiology.  To learn the imaging modality best to SCREEN for Colon Cancer  To learn the imaging modality best to SCREEN.
2011 ACRIN Annual Meeting The ACRIN Accrual Project at University of Washington Constance Lehman, MD. PhD David Mankoff, MD. PhD Tiffany Wong, MS.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachia PA: a pilot intervention project William Curry, MD, MS Dept of Family & Community Medicine M.S.Hershey Medical.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer Learning if the imaging agent, [ 18 F] fluorothymidine (FLT),
Building Clinical Infrastructure and Expert Support Michael Steinberg, MD, FACR ULAAC Disparity Project Centinela/Freeman Health System.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
Consent for Research Study A study using 18 F-Fluoride for prostate cancer patients currently enrolled in Dr. Febbo’s “Genomic Guided Therapy” study A.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
Implications of lung cancer screening in the new millenia Andrew R. Haas, MD, PhD Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Interventional Pulmonary and.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening VT SGNA Conference VT SGNA Conference October 24, 2015 October 24, 2015 Lynn Butterly, MD Lynn.
ACRIN 6666 Follow-Up 0 month “12 month” = months –If patient has been contacted, plans follow-up, please hold IA, IS, and F1 until she returns (even.
Routine Preventive Care and Cancer Surveillance in Long-Term Survivors (LTS) of Colorectal Cancer: Results from NSABP Protocol LTS-01 Hiroko Kunitake MD.
AccrualNet: A New NCI Tool for Supporting Accrual to Clinical Trials Linda Parreco, RN, MS NCI, Office of Communication and Education September 29, 2010.
Colorado Colorectal Screening Program Holly Wolf University of Colorado School of Medicine
CT Colonography vs Colonoscopy for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia David H. Kim, M.D., Perry J. Pickhardt, M.D., Andrew J. Taylor, M.D., Winifred K.
Colorectal Cancer Screening Implementation of a public health programme An Expert Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening Cancer Society of Finland, Finnish.
Presented by: Liz M. Baker, CHES NC Comprehensive Cancer Program 1.
Medical Advisory Board Quality assurance Maine Cancer Registry US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cancer Treatment Centers and Cancer Treating.
The National Cancer Research Network is part of the National Institute for Health Research CANCER GENETIC TRIALS Leicestershire, Northamptonshire and Rutland.
R4 채정민 / Prof 이창균. INTRODUCTION colonoscopy is a widely used screening tool for colorectal cancer adenoma detection rate (ADR) important quality indicator.
HOW TO SCREEN PATIENTS AND BOOK THE BASELINE VISIT APPOINTMENT?
Presented by Liana Poghosyan, MD Ne Moe, MD May 19, 2008
The Role and Responsibilities of the Clinical Research Coordinator
The capacity challenge:
WellOne Primary Medical and Dental Care
Table 1: Patient Demographics
Coordination (benign lesions)
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Increasing Access to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural East Texas
WellOne Primary Medical and Dental Care
Learning About PET/CT Scans:
Douglas K. Rex, Emely Eid  Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 
SAMPLE – Preliminary Results
VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY DR DEEPIKA SOLANKI.
Cindy Murray NP Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Presentation transcript:

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 ACRIN 6664 – Protocol Review The National CT Colonography Trial Name(s) of presenters

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Study Support  Funded by: The National Cancer Institute  Coordinated by: The American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) Trial Principal Investigator: –C. Daniel Johnson, MD, Mayo Clinic  Endorsed by: The American Cancer Society

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Study Support cont.  Site Principal Investigator Name and contact information  Site Research Associate Name and contact information  Participating Gastroenterologists Name and contact information

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Rationale  Colorectal cancer 3rd most common cancer 2 nd leading cause of malignant death in the US  Potential to remove CRC screening barriers Get more people 50 and older screened Save more lives  Conflicting evidence exists as to the role of CTC compared to colonoscopy for screening  Trial is designed to answer this and other pertinent CTC questions

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Protocol Review  Objectives  Study Design Summary  Participant Eligibility  General Study Information  Recruitment

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Main Objective To clinically validate the widespread use of computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) in a screening population for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. To clinically validate the widespread use of computerized tomographic colonography (CTC) in a screening population for the detection of colorectal neoplasia.

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Study Design Summary Participants will have a CTC followed by a colonoscopy on the same day. The study addresses important clinical CTC applications:  Comparison of the CTC, in a blinded fashion, to colonoscopy  Optimization of the CTC technique using new technology

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Study Design Summary cont.  Optimization of lesion detection by studying the lesions’ morphological features and developing a computer-assisted diagnosis database  Evaluation of patient preferences and their corresponding cost-effectiveness implications.

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Eligibility  Inclusion Criteria Male or female outpatients 50 years of age or older Scheduled for screening colonoscopy Signed informed consent

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Eligibility cont.  Exclusion Criteria GI symptoms: blood in stool >1 occasion within 6 months IBD FAP Medical condition increased risk of colonoscopy/no screening benefit Pregnancy Prior colonoscopy in past 5 years Anemia (HGB < 10 gm/dl) Positive FOBT

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 CT Colonography  Interpretation Radiologists received training Passed certifying exam in CTC interpretation  Record of findings Location: segment Size (mm) Confidence Extracolonic findings

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 CTC Images

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Colonoscopy  Colonoscopy by staff endoscopists  Photographs All lesions ICV or appendiceal orifice  Measurement Calibrated wire or open forceps  Separate container, each specimen

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Pathology  All lesions > 5 mm read locally and sent for central review  Local path for size  Slides and tissue block mailed  Returned within 30 days

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Lesion Matching  Independent radiologist  Match Same or adjacent segment Within 50% reported size  Non-match Location mismatch, within 2 segments- picture comparison (morph & fold location) Size mismatch, location match-picture comparison (morph & fold location)

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Participant Considerations  Both OC & CTC have advantages & disadvantages Both are likely better at detection/screening  Participant Considerations CTC is free to study participant Low radiation dose Extracolonic evaluation for AAA, solid masses, adenopathy Single participant preparation in vast majority Only approx. 1.5 hour extra time needed for study participation

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Recruitment  2289 outpatients  15 institutions  Accrual goal: maximum 1 year  Approximately 150 patients per site  Quick recruitment is key – rapidly changing technology

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Recruitment cont.  Patients prescheduled for screening colonoscopy 50 yrs older No prior colonoscopy – 5 yrs  Patient education Referral by PCP physician very effective  Minority recruitment Goal to have solid minority representation

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 Recruitment Tools  Patient Brochures  Posters  Letter to patients

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 The National CT Colonoscopy Trial Questions

American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 The National CT Colonoscopy Trial Thank you!