1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Early Childhood Outcomes… Who, What, Where and How
Advertisements

Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Transition from Early Intervention RIDE Winter Leadership Conference February 2007.
Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
File Review Activity Lessons learned through monitoring: Service areas must ensure there is documentation supporting the information reported in the self-
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
1 The Maryland Early Childhood Accountability System Program Effectiveness Based on Results for Children Maryland State Department of Education Division.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
CHRISTINA SPECTOR WENDI SCHREITER ERIN ARANGO-ESCALANTE IDEA Part C to Part B Transition.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
Preschool Outcomes Measurement System (POMS) Design and Implementation.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
2014 ALACASE CONFERENCE Preschool Indicators 2014 EI Preschool Conference.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.
Sarah Walters - Part C Coordinator KDHE Tiffany Smith - Part B ECSE Coordinator KSDE 1.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
School for Early Development and Achievement Kim Johnsen SPE 644.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
Early Development Network Conference June 10, 2015 Kearney, NE Amy Bunnell & Cole Johnson, NDE Julie Docter, DHHS.
KETTLE MORAINE (KM) SCHOOL DISTRICT: Ryan Meyer.
Annual Desk Audit (ADA) March 31, 2015 Webinar. Agenda  Purpose/Introduction of the ADA  Indicator Reviews  With Five-year trends  Navigating the.
ECSE Indicator Trainings Lunch & Learn Series PPS Training: Basics, Tips, & Tricks Wendi Schreiter.
State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (SPP/APR/CIPP) Buncombe County Schools 2013.
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes Jim J. Lesko Director, Early Development and Learning Resources Delaware Department of.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
 CIO Training Special Education VR Reports.
Special Education School District Profile Slinger School District Lynda McTrusty.
Dawn Hendricks, Ph.D. Early Childhood Special Education Coordinator
Early Childhood Outcomes
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Appleton Area School District
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
Hartford Jt. 1 School District
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Integrating Outcomes Learning Community Call February 8, 2012
Building State Systems to Produce Quality Data on Child Outcomes
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009
Presentation transcript:

1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011

GoToWebinar Attendee Interface 1. Viewer Window2. Control Panel GoToWebinar Attendee Interface

Changes to the data collection Indicator 7 Child Outcomes application additions Internal system Frequently Asked Questions Resources and contact information Questions Agenda

Percent of preschool children aged 3 through 5 with IEPs who demonstrate improved: A. Positive social-emotional skills (including social relationships); B. Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills (including early language/communication and early literacy); and C. Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs. Indicator 7 Child Outcomes

Beginning July 1, 2011 – Indicator 7 is now an annual data collection – No longer associated with the Procedural Compliance Self-Assessment Cycle. All LEAs will report entry status on all children who enter Early Childhood Special Education. – New definition of Entry Date - Changes to Projected IEP Implementation Date (formerly Initial Placement Signature Date). 5 Changes to the Data Collection

6 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes Application Enhancements Indicator 7 Child Outcomes Application Enhancements

Child Information-Race/Ethnicity Child Information-Primary/Secondary Disability Sources of Information includes: – B-3 exit rating – Teaching Strategies Gold Contact information for person submitting record 7 Application Additions

8 Internal System

Set up a “colored folder” system. Identify a staff person who will monitor the Child Outcomes “system” on a monthly basis. Identify a day of the month that child outcomes data is reported. Set up a process for training new staff on the Child Outcomes process and procedures. 9 Internal System

I.Timelines II.Less than 6 months of service III.Transfer children Frequently Asked Questions

Assess Child’s Level of Functioning Projected IEP Implementation Date Enter Data Into Indicator 7 Child Outcomes Application Day Window Before Entry Entry Date Begin Ongoing Assessment Within 60 Days of Entry Date Complete COSF IEP Meeting Entry Status Timeline

Assess Child’s Level of Functioning Projected IEP Implementation Date Enter Data Into Indicator 7 Child Outcomes Application Day Window Before Entry Entry Date Begin Ongoing Assessment Within 60 Days of Entry Date Considering Completing COSF Nearer Entry Date IEP If more than 60 days between IEP and Entry Date What If Window Between IEP & Entry Date is More Than 60 Days?

Districts may choose to use the B-3 Exit Rating as the LEA Entry Rating. The ratings can be found on PPS (Additional Information). Best practice is to develop system of communication between B-3 & LEA regarding exchange of Child Outcomes information. 13 Using Birth to 3 Exit Ratings

Assess Child’s Level of Functioning - Date child turns 6, or - Date child leaves LEA, or - Date child no longer eligible for ECSE services Enter Data Into Indicator 7 Child Outcomes Application Day Window Prior to Exit Exit Date Within30 Days of Exit Date Complete COSF Exit Status Timeline

Points to Remember 6 Months of Service – Exit data must be reported for all children who receive a minimum of 181 days of ECSE service. If child exits ECSE and has not received 6 months (181 days) of ECSE service – you must enter the exit date but not exit ratings into Indicator 7 application on Special Education Web Portal. If child enters ECSE less than 181 days from the child’s 6 th birthday - do NOT begin outcomes rating process. 15 Less Than 6 Months of Service

Transfers In & Out of Your District LEA that completes the child’s Initial IEP includes the child in the Child Outcomes process. If child transfers into your LEA- do not include child in Child Outcomes process unless you do not accept the IEP and complete a new Initial IEP. If child transfers out of your LEA – child is done with Child Outcomes process – enter appropriate exit data into the Indicator 7 Child Outcomes application. 16 Transfer Children

Two Common Questions If a child is provided ECSE services in a neighboring LEA outside of the LEA of residence – which LEA reports the child? – The child’s LEA of residence is responsible for reporting the child’s Outcomes data. If a child attends a LEA through school choice- which LEA reports the child? – The school choice LEA is responsible for reporting the child’s Outcomes data. Out of District Services

Support Available to You Information on Early Childhood Indicator Trainings – – Indicator 7 online training modules Ruth Chvojicek, Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator: or ext. Support Available to You

Questions?

Thank You