Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Carey Jang, Air Quality Modeling Group USEPA/OAQPS CMAS Workshop, RTP, 10/20/2004 CMAS Workshop, RTP, 10/20/2004 Applications of CMAQ over the Pacific.
Advertisements

An Update on the Activities of the Western Regional Air Partnership ‘WRAP v2.0’ Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. NW-AIRQUEST June, 2011.
REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
1 Policies for Addressing PM2.5 Precursor Emissions Rich Damberg EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards June 20, 2007.
Ozone Modeling over the Western U.S. -- Impact of National Controls on Ozone Trends in the Future Rural/Urban Ozone in the Western United States -- March.
EPA PM2.5 Modeling Guidance for Attainment Demonstrations Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS February 20, 2007.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
Multi-Scale Applications of U.S. EPA’s Third-Generation Air Quality Modeling System (Models-3/CMAQ) Carey Jang, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin,
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
Eladio M. Knipping, Ph.D. January 16, 2014 Air Quality Applied Science Team (AQAST) Meeting Rice University, Houston, TX Air Quality Research from the.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
1 icfi.com | 1 HIGH-RESOLUTION AIR QUALITY MODELING OF NEW YORK CITY TO ASSESS THE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN FUELS FOR BOILERS AND POWER GENERATION 13 th Annual.
Department of the Environment The State Implementation Plan Process – Our Next Steps Brian Hug Division Chief, Air Quality Planning and Policy Division.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States Prepared by the WESTAR Planning Committee for the Fall Business Meeting, Tempe, AZ October 31, 2011.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Using Air Quality Models for Emissions Management Decisions
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Evaluating.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Development of PM2.5 Interpollutant Trading Ratios James Boylan and Byeong-Uk Kim Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch 2012 CMAS Conference October 16,
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS EFFICIENT CHARACTERIZATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN CONTROL STRATEGY IMPACT PREDICTIONS.
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
Air Quality Impacts from a Potential Shale Gas Emissions Scenario - Photochemical Modeling of Ozone Concentrations in Central North Carolina Presented.
Further Development and Application of the CMAQ Ozone and Particle Precursor Tagging Methodologies (OPTM & PPTM) 7 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill,
Community Multiscale Air Quality Modeling System CMAQ Air Quality Data Summit February 2008.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Overview of the RIA Process - Bryan Hubbell. 2 Goals of an RIA Provide national estimates of costs and benefits of fully attaining current and proposed.
Preparation of Control Strategies October 18, 2007 NAAQS RIA Workshop Darryl Weatherhead, Kevin Culligan, Serpil Kayin, David Misenheimer, Larry Sorrels.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
Colorado Perspective on Nitrogen Oxides Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado APCD November 11, 2009.
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division IMPACTS OF MODELING CHOICES ON RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS IN ATLANTA, GA Byeong-Uk Kim, Maudood Khan, Amit Marmur,
Fugitive Dust Project Phase One The WRAP Emissions Forum contracted with a team of contractors lead by ENVIRON to produce regional PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions.
WRAP Workshop July 29-30, 2008 Potential Future Regional Modeling Center Cumulative Analysis Ralph Morris ENVIRON International Corporation Novato, California.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Phase II -- Task Source Apportionment Modeling Study Design University.
The Impact of Short-term Climate Variations on Predicted Surface Ozone Concentrations in the Eastern US 2020 and beyond Shao-Hang Chu and W.M. Cox US Environmental.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
May 22, UNDERSTANDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRECURSOR REDUCTIONS IN LOWERING 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS Steve Reynolds Charles Blanchard Envair 12.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Implementation Workgroup Meeting December 6, 2006 Attribution of Haze Workgroup’s Monitoring Metrics Document Status: 1)2018 Visibility Projections – Alternative.
Applications of Models-3/CMAQ:
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
Western Air Quality Issues and Photochemical Modeling - An Industrial Perspective Doug Blewitt, CCM AQRM Dana Wood, PE BP.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Impacts of Meteorological Variations on RRFs (Relative Response Factors) in the Demonstration of Attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality for 8-hr.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Stephen F. Austin State University February 27, 2014 Justin Cherry, P.E. Reece Parker TCEQ Air Permits Division.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Modeling Options for Proposed BART Rule Two roles for modeling in proposed BART rule > Does a potential BART-eligible.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
Weight of Evidence for Regional Haze Reasonable Progress
Predicting PM2.5 Concentrations that Result from Compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) James T. Kelly, Adam Reff, and Brett Gantt.
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
Issues on Ozone Planning in the Western United States
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Regional Modeling for Stationary Source Control Strategy Evaluation
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

Role of Air Quality Modeling in the RIA Norm Possiel & Pat Dolwick Air Quality Modeling Group EPA/OAQPS

2 Overview What are air quality models and why are they useful in regulatory/policy analyses? What are the key inputs to and outputs from air quality models? How is international transport treated in air quality modeling? What are the steps/timing for air quality model applications? How are air quality models used to project future attainment/nonattainment? How are air quality models used to provide inputs for calculating benefits? How are air quality models or tools used to inform control strategy development?

3 What are Air Quality Models? Computer programs that contain equations to represent the chemical and physical properties of the atmosphere in relation to air pollutants In general…….  Models are driven by meteorology and emissions inputs  Models treat the chemical formation and transformation and the dispersion, transport and removal of pollutants  Models output pollutant concentrations and deposition at hourly time steps within grid cells within a user- specified modeling domain (i.e. the area modeled)

4 Evolution of Air Quality Models 1st-generation AQM (1970s s)  Dispersion Models (e.g., Gaussian Plume Models)  Photochemical Box Models (e.g. OZIP/EKMA) 2nd-generation AQM (1980s s)  Photochemical grid models (e.g., UAM, RADM) 3rd-generation AQM (1990s s)  Community-Based “One-Atmosphere” Modeling System (e.g., CMAQ, CAMx)

5 Physical Configuration of Grid-based Photochemical Air Quality Models

6 Integrated Ozone & PM Air Quality Modeling MobileSources IndustrialSources AreaSources (Cars, trucks, planes, boats, etc.) (Power plants, refineries/ chemical plants, etc.) (Residential, farming commercial, biogenic, etc.) NOx, VOC, PM SOx, PM NOx, VOC, PM Chemistry Meteorology

7 Why are Models useful for Regulatory/ Policy Analyses? Models provide (the only) means of estimating changes in air quality expected to result from changes in emissions and other environmental conditions (e.g., climate and land-use) Example uses of air quality models....  Provide basis or legal justification for Agency action, e.g., OTAQ rules, NOx SIP Call, and CAIR.  Support NAAQS RIAs by helping to identify “cost-effective” control measures for illustrative demonstration of achieving revised standard(s)  Estimate contributions from various sources to air quality problems, e.g., CAIR, designations, and future multi-pollutant sector work  Demonstrate attainment of NAAQS based on controls to be implemented by state/local agencies as part of State Implementation Plans (SIPs)

8 Air Quality Modeling Platform Air quality models are typically applied as part of a “Modeling Platform”  Structured system of connected modeling- related tools and data that provide a consistent and transparent basis for assessing the air quality response to changes in emissions and/or meteorology

9 Conceptual Structure of a Modeling Platform

10 Key Components of 2002-Based Modeling Platform 2002 Emissions – mostly from the 2002 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) 2002 Meteorology from simulations of the PSU Mesoscale Meteorological Model (MM-5) International Transport (details on slide 15) Emissions Models, Tools, Projections and Ancillary Data (more on this in a later session) Air quality Models  Photochemical models: CMAQ & CAMx

Platform Modeling Domains 36 x 36 km Continental US Domain 12 x 12 km Eastern US and Western US Domains

12 What are the Key Inputs to and Outputs from Air Quality Models?

13 What are the Key Model Inputs? Emissions inventory  Anthropogenic emissions of NO/NO2, SO2, VOC species, PM species, NH3, and CO  Biogenic VOC species and NO Meteorology  Winds, temperature, humidity, clouds, precipitation, vertical mixing, etc. Boundary Conditions  Pollutant concentrations at the domain boundaries which reflect transport from outside the region modeled

14 What are the Key Model Outputs? Concentrations of O3 and PM2.5 species  Gridded fields used as inputs to BenMap for calculating health benefits of control strategies Projected O3 and PM2.5 design values by monitoring site  Used for determining future attainment and residual nonattainment  We now have projections for all monitored counties in the continental US Projected visibility at IMPROVE sites in Class I Areas Deposition of pollutants species…e.g., nitrogen and sulfur  Gridded fields which can be converted to Hydrologic Unit Codes (HUC) corresponding to watersheds

15 How is International Transport Treated in Air Quality Modeling? Estimates of international transport are obtained from a global chemistry model GEOSChem – Global chemistry transport model developed at Harvard Univ.  Concentration outputs from the 2002 annual simulation of GEOSChem were provided via the Intercontinental transport and Climatic effects on Air Pollutants (ICAP) project  Domain covers entire globe up to the Stratosphere

16 What are the Steps/Timing for Air Quality Model Applications?

17 Base Year EI Meteorology International Transport Ambient Data EMF, SMOKE & Ancillary Files Met Pre-Processors Initial/Boundary Concentrations Pre-Processors Air Quality Models Post-Processing Data Fields / Evaluation / Projections / Reports Future Projections Raw Outputs Data Archives* EI Summaries Air Quality Modeling Process

18 Timing for Annual Air Quality Model Applications? Emissions Inventories  Develop new Base Year Inventory ~ several years  Develop Future Base Projections ~ 3 to 6 months  Develop Control Strategies ~ 2 to 3 months  Process Emissions for Input to AQ Model New Base Year ~ 3 to 6 months and Future Base Case ~ 1 to 2 months Control Strategies ~ 1 to 2 weeks

19 Timing for Annual Air Quality Model Applications? Meteorology – done once  Run meteorological model (e.g., MM5) ~ 3 months +  Process Met for Input to AQ Model ~ 3 weeks International Transport – done once  Run GEOSChem ~ 4 to 6 weeks  Process Outputs for Input to AQ Model ~ 2 weeks Air Quality Model Simulations (CMAQ)  Run model for 12 km grid resolution, nationwide ~ 2 weeks  Extractions and post-processing to create products ~ 1 to 2 weeks

20 How are Air Quality Models used in Regulatory Assessments? Project future nonattainment/attainment status of areas Provide inputs for calculating benefits To inform control strategy development

21 How are AQ Models used to Project Future Attainment/ Nonattainment? We use model estimates in a “relative” sense  Premise: models are better at predicting relative changes in concentrations than absolute concentrations Relative Response Factors (RRF) are calculated by taking the ratio of the model’s future to current predictions of ozone or PM2.5 species  RRFs are calculated for ozone and for each component of PM2.5 and regional haze  Calculation is performed for the location of each ozone and PM2.5 (FRM) monitoring site  For each site, Future DV = Base DV times RRF Projected ozone and PM2.5 concentrations are, thereby, “tied” to ambient measurements which provides a more robust and scientifically credible future projection of air quality.

22 Example: Current and 2020 Projected 8-Hour Ozone Model RRF “Current” Ozone Levels: Average of 8-Hour Ozone Design Values ( , , ) 2020 Base Case Projected 8-Hour Ozone Design Values

23 How are Air Quality Models used to provide Inputs for Calculating Benefits? Models are typically run for a future base case or baseline scenario along with one or more control strategies Outputs from the future base case/baseline and control strategy scenarios are provided as gridded concentrations for input to BenMap

24 Elements of a Benefits Analysis Estimate Expected Changes in Human Health Outcomes (Health Impact Analysis) Establish Baseline Conditions (Emissions, Air Quality, Health) Estimate Expected Reductions in Pollutant Emissions Model Changes in Ambient Concentrations of Ozone and PM Estimate Expected Changes in Human Health Outcomes (Health Impact Analysis) Estimate Monetary Value of Changes in Health Impacts Estimate Monetary Value of Health Impacts Role of Air Quality Models

25 How are Air Quality Models or Tools used to Inform Control Strategy Development? Future Base Case/Baseline Modeling  results indicate the location, magnitude, and extent of nonattainment after application of expected control programs Emissions Sensitivity Modeling  indicates on how air quality may respond to additional controls on one or more pollutants Source Apportionment/Tagging and “Zero-out” Modeling  useful for estimating the contribution to pollutant concentrations of individual pollutants and sources (or groups of sources)

26 Overview of Sensitivity Modeling for O3 NAAQS Extrapolated Cost Analysis

27 Emissions Sensitivity Modeling to Support O3 NAAQS Extrapolated Cost Analysis Background  The final ozone NAAQS RIA will require an estimate of the full costs of attaining a new ozone standard  The RIA control scenario, which includes all known control measures, is unlikely to result in attainment over all U.S. locations  Thus, we need an estimate of the amount of additional emissions reductions that would yield attainment  The "impact ratio“ approach used for the Proposal RIA contained large uncertainty when applied to individual areas We are conducting Emissions Sensitivity Modeling to provide more information about the:  nonlinear response of ozone to emissions changes  geographic variation in ozone response  impacts of local versus upwind emissions reductions  relationship between NOx and VOC controls in various areas Sensitivity modeling will be based off the hypothetical control case emissions

28 Phase 1: Focus on 4 Key Nonattainment Areas Emissions Scenarios  Three across-the-board reductions (30, 60, 90%)  Two sets of runs: NOx only, NOx + VOC  Twelve scenarios in total Four areas: California, Houston, western Lake Michigan, & Northeast Corridor  These areas exceed 80 ppb in the 2020 Base Case, and as such they are expected to have the greatest chance of needing additional controls beyond the RIA control scenario. Emissions reductions will be applied within 200 km for NOx and 100 km for VOC from each of these four areas Results will be interpolated to estimate the additional amount of emissions reductions needed for attainment

29 Phase 2: Impacts of Emissions Reductions in Upwind Areas Apply emissions reductions in all areas outside the Phase 1 areas with ozone >70 ppb, after application of the RIA control scenario Single across-the-board reduction will be modeled (30%) Two sets of runs: NOx only, NOx + VOC Results will be used to...  develop emissions reduction targets for areas outside the four most problematic areas, and  Modify the local extrapolated tons estimates in the four regions to consider ozone reductions coming from upwind areas