NC STATE UNIVERSITY Direct observation and characterization of domain-patterned ferroelectrics by UV Photo-Electron Emission Microscopy Woochul Yang, Brian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mechanism for suppression of free exciton no-phonon emission in ZnO tetrapod nanostructures S. L. Chen 1), S.-K. Lee 1), D. Hongxing 2), Z. Chen 2),
Advertisements

Anodic Aluminum Oxide.
Lecture 11. Microscopy. Optical or light microscopy involves passing visible light transmitted through or reflected from the sample through a single or.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
Groups: WA 2,4,5,7. History  The electron microscope was first invented by a team of German engineers headed by Max Knoll and physicist Ernst Ruska in.
Nanostructures Research Group Center for Solid State Electronics Research Quantum corrected full-band Cellular Monte Carlo simulation of AlGaN/GaN HEMTs.
Apr 13, 2007PHYS General Physics II Applications of Quantum Mechanics.
Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS)
Introduction Secondary electron secondary electron detector The electron beam interaction with near surface specimen atoms will make a signal which results.
Homogeneous Semiconductors
Compact Power Supplies Based on Heterojunction Switching in Wide Band Gap Semiconductors NC STATE UNIVERSITY UCSB Measurements of the E-field Breakdown.
Fluorescence microscopy – Principle and practical consideration Hiro Ohkura.
What We’ve Learned So Far A Review of Topics on Test 2.
Recent Progress in Non-Cesiated III-Nitride Photocathodes Douglas Bell, Shouleh Nikzad Jet Propulsion Laboratory Amir Dabiran SVT Associates, Inc. Shadi.
Magneto-optical study of InP/InGaAs/InP quantum well B. Karmakar, A.P. Shah, M.R. Gokhale and B.M. Arora Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai,
Fiber-Optic Communications James N. Downing. Chapter 5 Optical Sources and Transmitters.
Characterization of Detectors NEP= noise equivalent power = noise current (A/  Hz)/Radiant sensitivity (A/W) D = detectivity =  area/NEP IR cut-off maximum.
Photonic Crystal Fiber for Radiation Sensors Feng Wu Khalid Ikram Sacharia Albin Feng Wu Khalid Ikram Sacharia Albin Photonic Laboratory Old Dominion University.
FYSZ460 Electron Beam Lithography Electron Beam Lithography FYSZ460 Advanced Laboratory Exercise Mikko Palosaari
Do it with electrons !. Microscopy Structure determines properties We have discussed crystal structure (x-ray diffraction) But consider now different.
Chapter 5: Wave Optics How to explain the effects due to interference, diffraction, and polarization of light? How do lasers work?
Observation of magnetic domains in LSMO thin films by XMCD-PEEM M. Oshima A, T. Taniuchi A, H. Kumigashira A, H. Yokoya B, T. Wakita C, H. Akinaga D, M.
1 Introduction to Optical Electronics Quantum (Photon) Optics (Ch 12) Resonators (Ch 10) Electromagnetic Optics (Ch 5) Wave Optics (Ch 2 & 3) Ray Optics.
1 Chapter 2 Electic-ight conversion. 2 p-n junction We insert atoms of another material (called dopants) into a semiconductor so that either a majority.
Materials Considerations in Photoemission Detectors S W McKnight C A DiMarzio.
B. Spatial coherancy & source size Spetial coherancy is related to the size of the source. Source size governs spatial coherancy and maller source sizes.
1 P1X: Optics, Waves and Lasers Lectures, Lasers and their Applications i) to understand what is meant by coherent and incoherent light sources;
Semiconductors. Direct bandgap semiconductors (GaAs, InGaAs, InGaAsP) The minimum of CB is directly above the maximum of VB Electro-hole pair can recombine.
Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM)
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES BIW ’ 06 Lepton Beam Emittance Instrumentation Igor Pinayev National Synchrotron Light Source BNL, Upton, NY.
Photoacoustic Spectroscopy of Surface Defects States of Semiconductor Samples 1) M.Maliński, 2) J.Zakrzewski, 2) F.Firszt 1) Department of Electronics.
X-Rays and Materials A Vision of the Future Joachim Stöhr Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
Introduction Current and proposed linear colliders, energy recovery linacs and light sources require high quality electron sources. In particular, low-emittance.
Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center Nanolithography Lecture 15 G.J. Mankey
Fabrication of (Fe,Zn) 3 O 4 -BiFeO 3 nano-pillar structure by self- assembled growth Tanaka Laboratory Takuya Sakamoto.
Final Examination April 18 th, 2006 Dominic A. Ricci Department of Physics University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Photoemission Studies of Interface.
AFM. The cantilever holder The cantilever dimensions Tip position.
Reminders for this week Homework #4 Due Wednesday (5/20) Lithography Lab Due Thursday (5/21) Quiz #3 on Thursday (5/21) – In Classroom –Covers Lithography,
Temperature behaviour of threshold on broad area Quantum Dot-in-a-Well laser diodes By: Bhavin Bijlani.
V. Electrical Properties at Surfaces. Interface: two different bulk materials are brought together to form an interface The abrupt change of electronic.
1x1.5  m 2 Capacitor Introduction An experimental approach for quantitative measurements of the polarization reversal mechanism in PZT thin film ferroelectric.
Development of a Gamma-Ray Beam Profile Monitor for the High-Intensity Gamma-Ray Source Thomas Regier, Department of Physics and Engineering Physics University.
Ferroelectric Nanolithography Extended to Flexible Substrates Dawn A. Bonnell, University of Pennsylvania, DMR Recent advances in materials synthesis.
Region of possible oscillations
Extended Questions- The Answers
Characterization of Nanomaterials…
SEM Scanning Electron Microscope
Advisor: Prof. Yen-Kuang Kuo
Polarized Photocathode Research Collaboration PPRC R
Center for Materials for Information Technology an NSF Materials Science and Engineering Center Substrate Preparation Techniques Lecture 7 G.J. Mankey.
Photoluminescence and Photocurrent in a Blue LED Ben Stroup & Timothy Gfroerer, Davidson College, Davidson, NC Yong Zhang, University of North Carolina.
Duke University, Physics Department and the Fitzpatrick Institute for Photonics · Durham, NC Collective Nonlinear Optical Effects in an Ultracold Thermal.
2. Design Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine photonic crystal lattice type and dimensions.
NEEP 541 Ionization in Semiconductors Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
N. Tabet (a), M. Faiz (a), N. M. Hamdan (b) and Z. Hussain (c) (a)Surface Science Laboratory, Physics.
ELECTRICAL, CHEMICAL, AND STRUCTURAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE INTERFACE FORMED BETWEEN Au/Pd CONTACT STRUCTURES AND CLEANED p-TYPE GaN (0001) SURFACES.
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd Photoelectric effect Investigation of photoelectric effect Explanation of photoelectric effect by quantum theory Types.
CIRCE beamline at ALBA variable polarization soft x-rays for advanced photoelectron spectroscopy & microscopy.
Do it with electrons !. Microscopy Structure determines properties We have discussed crystal structure (x-ray diffraction) But consider now different.
By c.Keerthana.  First described by Dutch physicist frits Zernike in  It is a type of light microscopy.  It is a contrast enhancing optical technique.
Band Theory of Electronic Structure in Solids
(a)luminescence (LED) (b)optical amplifiers (c)laser diodes.
MOS Transistor Theory The MOS transistor is a majority carrier device having the current in the conducting channel being controlled by the voltage applied.
Interaction between Photons and Electrons
Chapter 3. Components of Optical Instruments
Well - come.
Do it with electrons !.
Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering
PRINCIPLE AND WORKING OF A SEMICONDUCTOR LASER
Observation of Intrinsic Quantum Well States and
Presentation transcript:

NC STATE UNIVERSITY Direct observation and characterization of domain-patterned ferroelectrics by UV Photo-Electron Emission Microscopy Woochul Yang, Brian J. Rodriguez, Alexei Gruverman, and Robert J. Nemanich Department of Physics, and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC Summary We observed polarity contrast of domain-patterned ferroelectrics with UV-PEEM. Enhanced emission from negative domains is attributed to differences in electron affinity. The photothreshold for negative domains of LNO and PZT were found to be 4.6eV and less than 4.3eV, respectively. Future Work Compare PEEM of an as-loaded and clean surface of ferroelectrics Include screening charge (internal and external) into model XPS/UPS to measure surface Fermi level position How are these differences manifested in other interfaces (GaN growth on PPLN)Acknowledgements Duke University Free Electron Laser Laboratory ONR and AFOSR P sp Negative domain Positive domain E E - + Polarization-induced bound charges + - Absorbates (accumulated charges) -- Electrons emitted from valence band P sp Emission model Surface dipole induced by adsorbates changes surface electron affinity. Electron affinity for negative domain is lower and thus emission is more intense. PEEM contrast of ferroelectrics Negative domain E th = E g +  s -  Positive domain E th * = E g +  s +  * E vac EcEc EFEF EvEv P sp E th  ss EgEg E vac EcEc EFEF EvEv P sp E th * ss EgEg  * _ _ _ _ _ _  eff  eff * Energy band diagram of polar domains Difference in electron affinity due to the surface dipole causes a PEEM polarity contrast between the positive and negative end domains of ferroelectrics surfaces. PZT -  s ~ 3.5eV (Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 38, 2272 (1999)), E g ~ 3.4 eV  E th ~ 6.9eV - PEEM measurement: E th ~ < 4.3eV,  eff =  s -  = E th – E g = < 0.9 eV E th * ~ > 6.0eV,  eff * =  s +  * = E th * – E g = > 2.6 eV LNO -  s ~ 1.1eV (Sov. Phys. Solid State 25, 1990 (1983)), E g ~ 3.9 eV  E th ~ 5.0 eV - PEEM measurement: E th ~ < 4.6eV,  eff =  s -  = E th – E g = < 0.7 eV E th * ~ > 6.2eV,  eff * =  s +  * = E th * – E g = > 2.3 eV Motivation Precise control of ferroelectric domains has become important as a new approach to the self-assembly of complex nanostructures. Direct information about local polarization, charge distribution, and potential of the ferroelectric surface is necessary to control the local electronic structures and to influence the chemical reactivity. UV-FEL PEEM can allow us to image ferroelectric domain structures with high resolution (~ 10nm) and to obtain local polarization and surface electronic structures through the variation in work function on the surface. Goals PEEM observation of ferroelectrics with polarity patterned domains Understanding PEEM polarity contrast of ferroelectric materials PEEM measurement of photothresholds of ferroelectrics to understand local electronic properties Sample (-20kV) Anode (ground) Channel Plate P-screen CCD Objective lens Intermediate lens hv Projective lens Concept of PEEM Illuminate sample with UV photons just above the photoelectron threshold. Accelerate photo-electrons with an immersion lens and image the surface with conventional electron optics with high magnification. Advantages of PEEM Good surface sensitivity: depth(1-20 nm) High spatial resolution: ~10nm In situ, real-time characterization of film surfaces Non-destructive imaging method Measurement of surface work function and electronic structures of materials (UV-FEL PEEM) What is PEEM? Coherent FEL radiation Spontaneous Radiation eV UV-XUV FEL OK-4 System e-beam Injection Laser Mirror 1 GeV Duke Storage Ring Evaporator CCD AES MBE Lens Column computer & image processor e t  hv : 4 – 6.3 eV P a ~ 2mW, P p ~ 20W  : 100 psec t : 6 nsec n p : 5 x photon/sec  E/E : ~1% UV-FEL Parameters FEL-PEEM : PEEM (~10nm resolution) + FEL (tunable, high-intensity, polarized light) UV-PEEM at Duke FEL Measure piezoelectric properties by detection of sample deformation Positive domainNegative domain P sp Phase contrast of ferroelectric domain polarity In phase: Brighter (negative domain) Out of phase: darker (positive domain) LNO 50  m Piezoresponse Force Microscopy positive domain negative domain 10  m PEEM PFM AFM hv = 4.8eV In PEEM, the brightness contrast displays different polar domains. PFM measurement confirms that the bright regions are negative domains. Polarity-patterned PbZrTiO 3 (PZT) thin films 150 o C 250 o C300 o C The polarity contrast disappears at near the Curie temperature of ~ 300 o C 10  m hv = 4.9eV PEEM images of PZT during annealing hv=4.3eV4.8eV5.0eV 5.2eV5.5eV Emission threshold of negative domains is less than 4.3eV eV PEEM images of PZT-photon energy scan 10  m Before etching After etching PEEM PFM AFM PFM The brighter (negative) domains is wider than darker (positive) domains. Chemical etching (negative domain) and PFM measurement confirm that the emission from the negative domains is more intense Polarity patterned LiNbO 3 (LNO) crystal hv=4.5eV4.6eV4.7eV 5.2eV Emission threshold of negative domains is less than 4.6eV 5.9eV6.2eV PEEM images of LNO - photon energy scan E vac EgEg  h Semiconductor Surfaces Minimum Escape Energy h =  + E g Ferroelectric Semiconductor Surfaces: local variations in  (electron affinity), E g (band gap), band bending, doping density will change the minimum escape energy and lead to PEEM contrast. PEEM Image Contrast: Photo-threshold difference EgEg ** 11 22 Contrast between two regions can be obtained by choosing  2 < hv <  1 Photo electrons will be emitted from region 2 (bright) but not from region 1 (dark) 10  m 22 11