Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. November 15, 2010, 15:01-15:59pm UCLA RCMAR/EXPORT Seminar Series.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multilevel analysis with EQS. Castello2004 Data is datamlevel.xls, datamlevel.sav, datamlevel.ess.
Advertisements

Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Applied Structural Equation Modeling for Dummies, by Dummies Borrowed gratefully from slides from February 22, 2013 Indiana University, Bloomington Joseph.
15-minute Introduction to PROMIS Ron D. Hays, Ph.D UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research Roundtable Meeting on Measuring.
Why Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Important: Growing Implications and Applications for Rheumatologists Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine RAND.
The Effects of Discrimination & Distrust on Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence by HIV+ Patients Angela Thrasher, PhD, MPH University.
Path Analysis SPSS/AMOS
Psychology 202b Advanced Psychological Statistics, II April 5, 2011.
Multivariate Data Analysis Chapter 11 - Structural Equation Modeling.
LECTURE 11 Hypotheses about Correlations EPSY 640 Texas A&M University.
Educating & Preparing Dialysis Patients for Transplantation Nicole M. Pinkerton, MA, MFT Consultant, Development & Education.
G Lecture 91 Thinking about an example Pitfalls in measurement models Pitfalls in model specification Item Parcel Issues.
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
The General LISREL MODEL and Non-normality Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
Factor Analysis Ulf H. Olsson Professor of Statistics.
The General (LISREL) SEM model Ulf H. Olsson Professor of statistics.
Where You Go, What You Do, What You Know? Understanding the Influences of Campus Experiences on the Academic Achievement and Self-Concept of Black Undergraduates.
1 8/14/2015 Evaluating the Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Change in Individual Patients Ron Hays October 8, 2004 UCLA GIM/HSR.
The Relative Impact of Positive and Negative Social Exchanges on Symptoms of Depression Acknowledgements: Helpful comments were provided by Karen Rook.
1 Health-Related Quality of Life Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. - UCLA Department of Medicine: Division of General Internal Medicine.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
MAPPING THE DIABETES HEALTH PROFILE (DHP-18) ONTO THE EQ-5D AND SF-6D GENERIC PREFERENCE BASED MEASURES OF HEALTH Brendan Mulhern 1, Keith Meadows 2, Donna.
Primer on Evaluating Reliability and Validity of Multi-Item Scales Questionnaire Design and Testing Workshop October 25, 2013, 3:30-5:00pm Wilshire.
2 Title : A Structural Model of Determinates of Social-Cognitive Theory to Predict Physical Activity in Iranian Women with Type 2 Diabetes By: Mehrsadat.
Structural Equation Modeling 3 Psy 524 Andrew Ainsworth.
T-test Mechanics. Z-score If we know the population mean and standard deviation, for any value of X we can compute a z-score Z-score tells us how far.
An example of a CFA: Evaluating an existing scale.
Structural role of perceived benefits and barriers to receiving macronutrients in women with metabolic syndrome; a path analysis study Siamak Mohebi- Leila.
Is the Minimally Important Difference Really 0.50 of a Standard Deviation? Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. June 18, 2004.
SAS PROC IRT July 20, 2015 RCMAR/EXPORT Methods Seminar 3-4pm Acknowledgements: - Karen L. Spritzer - NCI (1U2-CCA )
SEM: Basics Byrne Chapter 1 Tabachnick SEM
Ethnic Identity among Mexican American Adolescents: The Role of Maternal Cultural Values and Parenting Practices 1 Miriam M. Martinez, 1 Gustavo Carlo,
G Lecture 11 G Session 12 Analyses with missing data What should be reported?  Hoyle and Panter  McDonald and Moon-Ho (2002)
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
Development of Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores from PROMIS Global Items Ron D. Hays ( ) UCLA Department of Medicine
® Introduction Changes in Opioid Use for Chronic Low Back Pain: One-Year Followup Roy X. Luo, Tamara Armstrong, PsyD, Sandra K. Burge, PhD The University.
Introduction to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) UCLA Center for East-West Medicine 2428 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Regression Chapter 16. Regression >Builds on Correlation >The difference is a question of prediction versus relation Regression predicts, correlation.
Assessing Mental Health Among Latino Consumers of Mental Health Services Susan V. Eisen, PhD, Mariana Gerena, PhD, Gayatri Ranganathan, MS, Pradipta Seal.
Measurement Issues by Ron D. Hays UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine & Health Services Research (June 30, 2008, 4:55-5:35pm) Diabetes & Obesity.
Health-Related Quality of Life Preference Measures for Vision Studies Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA GIM & HSR June 10, 2009 (2:30-4:00 pm) Irvine, CA.
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
METHODS Sample: The Institute for Survey Research of Temple University conducted face-to-face interviews for the 1995 National Alcohol Survey (NAS). The.
Item Response Theory (IRT) Models for Questionnaire Evaluation: Response to Reeve Ron D. Hays October 22, 2009, ~3:45-4:05pm
® Changes in Opioid Use Over One Year in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Alejandra Garza, Gerald Kizerian, PhD, Sandra Burge, PhD The University of.
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire Design and Testing.
Social Anxiety and College Drinking: An Examination of Coping and Conformity Drinking Motives Lindsay S. Ham, Ph.D. and Tracey A. Garcia, B.A. Florida.
Introducing Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to Novices Using Kevin Heslin's SF-36 Data from Opioid Users Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. May 8, 2009, 12:01-12:59pm.
Approaches for Estimating Minimally Important Differences Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. January 12, 2004 (8:50-9:10am) Minimal Clinically Important Differences in.
Estimation Kline Chapter 7 (skip , appendices)
Overlap between Subjective Well-being and Health-related Quality of Life. 3 Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. (Alina Palimaru) November 18, 2015 (11:30-12:00 noon) Geriatric.
Examples. Path Model 1 Simple mediation model. Much of the influence of Family Background (SES) is indirect.
Demonstration of SEM-based IRT in Mplus
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. Questionnaire.
Evaluating Multi-item Scales Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Division of General Internal Medicine/Health Services Research HS237A 11/10/09, 2-4pm,
Chapter 17 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)  Relatively new statistical technique used to test theoretical or causal.
Psychometric Evaluation of Items Ron D. Hays
Structural Equation Modeling using MPlus
Chapter 15 Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Evaluating IRT Assumptions
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
Multitrait Scaling and IRT: Part I
Evaluating Multi-item Scales
UCLA GIM/HSR Research Seminar Series
Evaluating the Significance of Individual Change
UCLA Department of Medicine
How to Measure Quality of Life
Patient-reported Outcome Measures
Presentation transcript:

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. November 15, 2010, 15:01-15:59pm UCLA RCMAR/EXPORT Seminar Series

Acknowledgment of Support UCLA Resource Center for Minority Aging Research/Center for Health Improvement in Minority Elderly (RCMAR/CHIME), P30AG UCLA/DREW Project EXPORT, 2P20MD

Example Wouters, E. Heunis, C. van Rensburg, D., & Meulemans, H. (2009). Physical and emotional health outcomes after 12 months of public-sector antiretroviral treatment in the Free State Province of South Africa: A longitudinal study using structural equation modelling. BMC Public Health 9:

Path Analysis Y 1 = α 1 + β 1 X + ε 1i Y 2 = α 2 + β 2 X + β 3 Y 1 + ε 2i XY1Y1 ε 1i Y2Y2 ε 2i

5 Fit Indices (> 0.94; 0.94; <0.06 cutoffs) Normed fit index:Normed fit index: Non-normed fit index:Non-normed fit index: Comparative fit index:  -  2 null model 2  2 null  2 model 2 - df nullmodel 2 null  df -1  - df 2 model  - 2 null df null 1 - Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: e.g.,

Methods (Public health sector in Free State Province of South African) Baseline –<6 months of antiretroviral treatment (ART) Follow-up –< 12 months ART Variables –ART duration (independent variable) –Adverse effects of ART (None, Mild, Disruptive) Do you have side effects? If yes, list them and tell us how disruptive they are? –Self-reported health (None, Some/moderate, Extreme) EQ-5D mobility, usual activities, pain, and self-care (None, Some/moderate, Extreme) EQ-5D anxiety/depression item, overall life satisfaction (5 response categories), global happiness item 6

7

Sample Characteristics n = 268 at baseline (n = 234 at follow-up) Mean age of 38 years (SD = 9) 67% women 40% reported some pain 30% reported some anxiety or depression 19% reported some –problems with walking about –problems with usual activities 8

Wouters, E., Heunis, C. Von Rensberg, D., & Meulemens, H. BMC Public Health 2009,9:103. Sample of 234 patients enrolled in public sector antiretroviral treatment program in the Free State Province of South Africa ART Treatment Duration VI Adverse Effects V2 Physical Health F1 Mental Health F2 Mobility V3 Usual Activities V4 Pain V5 Self Care V6 Life Satisfaction Global Happiness Anxiety/ Depression e3e4e5e6e7e8e (NS) -.08 (NS) Normed Fit Index= Non-normal Fit Index= Comprehensive Fit Index= Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA)= Original

EQS 6.1 for Windows Bentler, PM. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software, Inc. Normal theory estimators: ULS, GLS, ML Other estimators: ML robust, AGLS (ADF) 10

Wouters, E., Heunis, C. Von Rensberg, D., & Meulemens, H. BMC Public Health 2009,9:103. Sample of 234 patients enrolled in public sector antiretroviral treatment program in the Free State Province of South Africa ART Treatment Duration VI Adverse Effects V2 Physical Health F1 Mental Health F2 Mobility V3 Usual Activities V4 Pain V5 Self Care V6 Life Satisfaction Global Happiness Anxiety/ Depression e3e4e5e6e7e8e (NS) (NS) (NS) X 2 (n=234, dfs=23)= Normed Fit Index= Non-normal Fit Index= Comprehensive Fit Index= Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA)= ULS #1

12

Wouters, E., Heunis, C. Von Rensberg, D., & Meulemens, H. BMC Public Health 2009,9:103. Sample of 234 patients enrolled in public sector antiretroviral treatment program in the Free State Province of South Africa ART Treatment Duration VI Adverse Effects V2 Physical Health F1 Mental Health F2 Mobility V3 Usual Activities V4 Pain V5 Self Care V6 Life Satisfaction Global Happiness Anxiety/ Depression e3e4e5e6e7e8e X 2 (n=234, dfs=26)= Normed Fit Index= Non-normal Fit Index= Comprehensive Fit Index= Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.050 ULS #2

14

Wouters, E., Heunis, C. Von Rensberg, D., & Meulemens, H. BMC Public Health 2009,9:103. Sample of 234 patients enrolled in public sector antiretroviral treatment program in the Free State Province of South Africa ART Treatment Duration VI Adverse Effects V2 Physical Health F1 Mental Health F2 Mobility V3 Usual Activities V4 Pain V5 Self Care V6 Life Satisfaction Global Happiness Anxiety/ Depression e3e4e5e6e7e8e (NS) (NS) (NS) X 2 (n=234, dfs=23)= Normed Fit Index= Non-normal Fit Index= Comprehensive Fit Index= Root Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.278 ML #1

16

Wouters, E., Heunis, C. Von Rensberg, D., & Meulemens, H. BMC Public Health 2009,9:103. Sample of 234 patients enrolled in public sector antiretroviral treatment program in the Free State Province of South Africa ART Treatment Duration VI Adverse Effects V2 Physical Health F1 Mental Health F2 Mobility V3 Usual Activities V4 Pain V5 Self Care V6 Life Satisfaction Global Happiness Anxiety/ Depression e3e4e5e6e7e8e X 2 (n=234, 21)=94.465Normed Fit Index= Happiness with adverse effects & usual act.Non-normal Fit Index= Self-care with usual activitiesComprehensive Fit Index= Dep/Anx with mobility & self-careRoot Mean Square of Approximation (RMSEA)=0.123 ML #

18

19 ================ Dear Dr. Hays Thanks for showing interest in my work. I am also glad that someone is interested in the statistical side of the story :-) I would not dare to call myself an SEM-specialist, but I really like the versatile nature of the technique. In the paper you cited I first used ML, but after the comments of a reviewer I re-ran the analysis using WLS because I have a rather small sample size. The results were similar. The results shown should be the ones from the WLS-analysis. Unfortunately, I changed computers after finishing my PhD, so I do not have the Lisrel-files anymore (I also do not use Lisrel anymore. I now use MPlus (because it can also handle dependent dichotomous variables)), but I certainly still have the raw dataset. If needed, I can try to reconstruct and rerun the analysis in MPlus, or even in Lisrel (I surely still have a copy of it somewhere). However, I am now preparing to go (and present) at the First Global Symposium on Health Systems Research in Montreux (15-19 Nov), so it may take a little while... Again thanks for your interest in my paper, Best regards, Edwin Dr. Wouters: Can you provide the LISREL output from the path model show in Figure 1? I am trying to figure out what estimation approach (e.g., ML) you used in fitting the model.

Summary The longer the duration of ART treatment the less the adverse effects and (in turn) the better the health (physical and mental). –Duration has positive indirect effects on physical and mental health by reducing adverse effects 20

Thank you! Hays, R. D., Revicki, D., & Coyne, K. (2005). Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 28,