Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, 2008-09 Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCLB Accountability Title III of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Presented.
Advertisements

Company LOGO Amy Weinmann Education Program Specialist 2009 NCLB Technical Assistance Staying the Course Amidst Change April 1 & 2, 2009.
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
ASCD: San Francisco Carrots and Sticks Is the system working? Civil Rights Act, Lau v. Nichols, EEOA, Castañeda interpretation. Elementary and Secondary.
Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
North Santiam School District State Report Cards
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
1 The Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues of California’s Implementation of No Child Left Behind Coachella Valley Unified School District Dr. Paul Grafton.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Cathy George Academic Accountability.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives AMAOs are achievement objectives for English learners that corporations must meet that receive Title III funds.
Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System (TELPAS) Results September 2007.
ESL Results and Targets Montgomery County Schools.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT for teachers of English Language Learners.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Virginia Title III Statewide Consortium Conference Blacksburg, Virginia January 21-22, 2015 Virginia Department of Education: ACCESS for ELLs ® Teacher.
ACCESS for ELLs® Interpreting the Results Developed by the WIDA Consortium.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives. Thompson School District Core Values Integrity –We will consistently demonstrate respect, honesty, transparency,
1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.
Meeting the Needs of English Language Learners: Using Assessment Results and Data to Inform Decisions Michael Sabados, PhD, CSDE consultant Bureau of Data,
Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.
Annual Measurable Achievement Objective s (AMAOs): Update Jacqueline A. Iribarren, DPI September 27, 2007.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Update on the California English Language Development Test.
Successfully “Translating” ELPA Results Session #25 Assessment and Accountability Conference 2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.
Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program Presentation to Board of Directors Shelton School District September 8, 2009 Gail Straus, Assistant.
Riverside County AMAO Performance Wes Scott Mitch Aulakh.
E L P A. ELPA Understand the definition and purpose of the English Language Proficiency Assessment Administer ELPA appropriately Objectives.
Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group
Quick Look at Minnesota’s Assessment Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Discussion of W-APT, ACCESS Testing, Adequate Yearly Progress and Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.
Derby High School Connecticut Academic Performance Test Derby High School 2011 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Disaggregated Data Analysis.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title III Accountability Update Bilingual Coordinators Network.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
WIDA Standards for ELLs
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
H Gary Cook, Ph.D., Associate Scientist WIDA Senior Director of Assessment 2/25/2019.
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
Shelton School District Bilingual Instruction Program
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Connecticut’s Performance on Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, Presentation to Connecticut Administrators of Programs for English Language Learners (CAPELL) Michael Sabados, Ph.D. October 2, 2009

U.S. Department of Education Final Interpretation of Title III Regulations (October 2008)  Annual assessment of all ELL students  All tested Title III-served students must be included in AMAO score calculations  English language service time should be taken into account when calculating AMAO scores  Progress (AMAO 1) should incorporate the language domains of reading, writing, listening and speaking CT State Department of Education

CT Department of Education (CSDE) Updated Title III Accountability Plan (January 2009) CT State Department of Education Progress (AMAO 1): improvement in overall scale score New AMAO 1 and AMAO 2 targets Weighting by service time for AMAO 1 and AMAO 2

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives, CT State Department of Education AMAONameDefinitionGoal AMAO 1ProgressCurrent overall score (average of reading, writing, speaking and listening) greater than prior year’s overall scale score 70% AMAO 2ProficiencyOverall score meets overall grade-level proficiency 22% AMAO 3AYPELL subgroup meets Title I Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) targets CMT Proficiency: Math (82%) Reading (79%) CAPT Proficiency: Math (80%) Reading (81%)

SAMPLE AMAO 2 (Proficiency) CALCULATION CATEGORY< 1 YEAR SERVICES 1 – < 2 YEARS SERVICES 2+ YEARS SERVICES TOTAL UNWEIGHTED RATE PROFICIENT10 30 NOT PROFICIENT TOTALS WEIGHTED RATE PROFICIENT10 30 NOT PROFICIENT TOTALS UNWEIGHTED PROFICIENCY RATE: 30 PROFICIENT/100 TEST TAKERS= 30% WEIGHTED PROFICIENCY RATE: 30 PROFICIENT/72 WEIGHTED TEST TAKERS = 42% CT State Department of Education

Title III Subgrantee AMAO Results, CT State Department of Education

AMAO 3: Test Areas AYP Not Met By Title III Subgrantees, CT State Department of Education

Title III Subgrantees by Years AMAO Not Met, CT State Department of Education

CT Students Who Made Progress and Achieved Proficiency or Better On LAS Links, CT State Department of Education

Share of Students Proficient or Better On LAS Links Components, CT State Department of Education

Overall LAS Links Status, CT State Department of Education

Unweighted English Language Proficiency Rate by Years of English Language Services, CT State Department of Education

Elementary and Middle School Students Most Likely to Achieve Proficiency or Better, CT State Department of Education

Unweighted Proficiency Rate by District Reference Group and Years of English Language Service, CT State Department of Education DRG Share of LAS Test-takers: A: 1%F: 2% B: 7%G: 8% C: 1%H: 26% D: 15%I: 37% E: 1%No DRG: 2%

Students Eligible for Free/Reduced Lunch Had Lower Unweighted Proficiency Rates, CT State Department of Education

Students with Disabilities Had Lower Unweighted Proficiency Rates, CT State Department of Education

AMAO DATA RESULTS SUMMARY,  Use of weighted data results  Of the 57 Title III Subgrantees: 56 Met AMAO1 Goal for Progress 57 Met AMAO 2 Goal for Proficiency 20 Met AMAO 3 Goal for AYP  81% of All ELL Students Made Progress and 44% Attained Proficiency CT State Department of Education

For Further Information: Michael Sabados, Ph.D. (860)

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc. All rights reserved.