Public Interest Law & Policy Class 6 Ronald W. Staudt February 7, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to the Study of Law Professors Lisa Dufraimont and Erik Knutsen (2012)
Advertisements

TOMORROW: Test + Irony packet due TODAY: World café ~
California v. Greenwood
Valuing People Now Annual Review on 23 April 09 Presentation by Berge Kanikanian & David Cooper.
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896 “ Separate But Equal ” Power point created by Robert L. Martinez Primary Content: The Americans.
Giving legal advice how to give legal information without.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 5 Ronald W. Staudt September 8, 2009.
‘ Technology that manages your people with you’ Copyright Townhouse Consulting Ltd The Absence Management System.
R OLES & R ESPONSIBILITIES From Speaking With A Purpose: Jo Thornton & Jessica Pegis.
Librarians and the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
The Supreme Court at Work. Basic Facts About the Supreme Court 9 Justices on the Court Each “term” begins first Monday in October and lasts until they.
From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Learning About Law © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Do Now: Grab today’s Agenda (9:2). Read the story and sketch out the structure of the court system.
The Supreme Court at Work
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Judiciary Week 11 Chapter 12 in Wilson. Models of Judicial Roles Natural Law Model Natural Law Model Legal Rules Model Legal Rules Model.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 2 Ronald W. Staudt August 27, 2009.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Public Interest Law & Policy Recap and Review Ronald W. Staudt April 30, 2013.
Northumbria- A case study.  Open to the public  Works like a lawyer’s office.
Part B: Notes: Chapter 18 “The Federal Court System”
Erie Family Health Center April 4, 2012 Housing Health 1.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 5 Ronald W. Staudt February 5, 2013.
The Basics The Constitution is the highest law in the United States. All other laws come from the Constitution. It says how the government works. It creates.
Unit 1 Part 2.  Using the “Steps in a Typical Mediation Session” handout, write down questions you can use at each stage in the mediation process to.
Effective Communication in Court Confidence, Integrity and General Comments.
Good Day This is your Disability Employment Initiative MYTHS Training ENJOY Click here to begin.
AP U.S. GOVERNMENT & POLITICS - Judiciary The Judiciary.
Dispute Resolution…. AGENDA February 25, 2013 Today’s topics  Taking care of each other  Legal Methods for Resolving Disputes  Organization of the.
November 29 – December International Young Professionals Summit 2004 Our Dreams Cameron asked: What is in our hearts and our heads – what has brought.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 6 Ronald W. Staudt September 18, 2007.
Texas v. Johnson What are the facts of the case? What is the constitutional issue before the US Supreme Court? What was the Supreme Court’s ruling.
UCLA UCLA Moot Court Honors Program Oral Argument Workshop.
Submissions to Portfolio Committee on Social Development on Bill B Professor Ann Skelton Director Centre for Child Law, University of Pretoria.
Brown vs. Board of Education By Alex Labruzzo. What is Brown vs. Board of Education? In 1950 the Topeka NAACP, led by McKinley Burnett, set out to organize.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 3 Ronald W. Staudt January 29, 2013.
Judicial Branch Chapter 8 Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4.
8.4 The Supreme Court at Work. Court Procedures The Supreme Court meets about 9 months each year, each term begins the first Monday in October and runs.
Access to Justice and Technology Ronald W. Staudt Class 3: The Supply: Legal Services Delivery Systems for Low Income People Guest: Leslie Corbett, Chicago.
Easy Read Summary Mental Capacity Act Mental Capacity Act A Summary The Mental Capacity Act 2005 will help people to make their own decisions.
SURVIVING AND THRIVING THROUGH DIVORCE. Overview of Divorce Issues Overview of the Divorce Process Litigation versus Mediation Frequently Asked Questions.
Ch 8 The Judicial Branch 8.4 Deciding Cases at the Supreme Court.
Sources of American Law U.S. Government Chapter 15 Section 1.
SOAR CONFERENCE “Innovative Projects and Resources for the Self- represented Litigant” November 5, 2015.
Public Interest Law & Policy Class 5 Ronald W. Staudt September 11, 2007.
Forming Service Teams methods for forming interdisciplinary teams to promote integrated planning, service, and support.
The Supreme Court And the Judicial Branch. The Supreme Court It has nine judges. It has nine judges.
THE COURT’S PROCEDURES Washington, DC The Supreme Court meets about nine months out of the year. The Court traditionally convenes on the first Monday.
Goal 5 Political and Legal Systems and the Balance of Competing Interests and Conflicts.
Moot Court Supreme Court Summer Institute for Teachers.
November 4,  Who are these folks?  In what branch of government do they belong? They are the justices who serve on the U.S. Supreme Court. It.
WHAT IS DEBATE?.  We have a national topic that hundreds of thousands of students across the nation use for debates.  The yearly topic, called the “resolution”
George W Bush George Walker Bush ; born July 6, 1946) is a former President of the United States. He served as the 43rd President from 2001 to He.
The Supreme Court The court’s procedures – During two – week sessions, justices hear oral arguments on cases and then meet to make decisions on them. –
The Federal Court System
Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case 1896
Cover Letters That Do The Job
Effective Oral Advocacy
Solicitors, law firms, and legal services
California v. Greenwood
Appellate Courts: Let’s Take it Up
Cover Letters That Do The Job
The Judiciary: Blending Law and Politics
California v. Greenwood
The Supreme Court at Work
Access to Justice and Technology Ronald W. Staudt
The Judicial Branch.
Courtroom to Classroom:
California v. Greenwood
Do Now #8 Minimum Wage and Babysitters
Presentation transcript:

Public Interest Law & Policy Class 6 Ronald W. Staudt February 7, 2013

Public Interest Law & Policy Alexander Polikoff Director, Public Housing Program Business and Professional People for the Public Interest

Waiting for Gautreaux “The dream of the civil rights revolution seemed distant indeed, the bright hopes for litigation as a social change lever naïve.” What would I say to the law students today…

Client Autonomy and Cause Lawyering Can you talk about your current thoughts about the fact that Dorothy Gautreaux and the other class representatives and Chicago’s black community groups did not get involved in the decisions you describe in the case, like the Model Cities issue or the decision to appeal or not to appeal major rulings? Did the lawyer team receive dissenting or opposing views on your decisions from tenant groups or other black organizations? If so, how voiced? What about other interest groups, disabled tenants, for example?

Personal and professional questions When you pursue such a deeply felt cause as a lawyer, how do you relate to opposing counsel and lawyers who do not share your convictions? What about the people described in the book, especially those depicted critically? Litigation as a tool for social change- can it work? Can judges administer major transformations without administrative resources? Tell us more about your experience arguing in front of the United States Supreme Court for the first time, and what else you did to prepare other than small "moot courts" and taking advice from a friend who had argued before the 9 justices before. How did you cope with nervousness, how much did you use your notes during the oral argument, etc.United States Supreme Court

Gautreaux going forward What do you think of the Hope VI program and the current direction of public housing in Chicago, and nationally? What are your current thoughts on the CHA Transformation process? As you predicted we no longer have a Bush in the White House. Is your “indulgent fantasy” now politically feasible?

Beyond housing… As a public interest lawyer, perhaps imagining yourself again as head of BPI, how would you try to address the problem of gun violence in the city. In light of the Sandy Hook School shooting and other mass shootings that have occurred recently in the United States, do you think that an increase in mental health care benefits might alleviate some of the crime/violence in the United States or even further rehabilitate Chicago's ghettos? I ask this because it has been stated over and over again that poverty-ridden areas see an increase in crime and violence mostly because people are trying to find a way to survive and put food on the table, but what about the people who live in these poverty-ridden areas, or ghettos, who are mentally sick and don't understand their actions or are unable to control them? Might an increase in mental health care drastically help revitalize the ghettos and help people get back on their feet?

CLASS 7 — Tuesday February 12 Guest Speaker: Professor Felice Batlan Gendered Lives of Legal Aid: Law, Social Work and the Poor Read: Inventing Legal Aid: Lawyers, Social Workers and the Poor, , by Felice Batlan, Chapter IV: Lawyerly Visions of Legal Aid, NO Class on Thursday Feb 14. Papers are due Feb. 17.