Addressing Environmental Liabilities in Privatization in Bulgaria Workshop on CEA, SEA and Development Policy Lending Adriana J. Damianova South Asia Environment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Policy Framework: Priorities, Data Collection, Management
Advertisements

Cities and Green Growth OECD Green Cities Programme
G20 Training Strategy Bridging Education, Training, and Decent Work
WITH THE FINANCIAL SUPPORT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION SEE 2020 Sustainable growth workshop Monitoring Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina Feb
Governance for REDD+ Crystal Davis Governance of Forests Initiative World Resources Institute REDD Civil Society Coordination Seminar CIFOR campus, Bogor.
Cumulative Effects Management: Why We All Need to be Involved
Inclusive Green Growth Workshop Summary of discussion.
Presentation by Cambodian Participants Phuket, Thailand February 2012 Health Impact Assessment Royal Government of Cambodia.
Addressing Historical Environmental Damages in Privatization Bulgaria ’ s Road Towards Improved Environmental Management Adriana Damianova Environment.
Chinese – EU cooperation on water - Partnerships on Water Challenges 2014 CEWP High Level Conference, 4 th December 2014 Marta Moren Abat DG ENVIRONMENT,
Partnerships for Prosperity (P4P) An overview PPD Workshop, March 2014.
Investing in Employment and Entrepreneurship
1 LAND USE CONTROLS THE ISSUES AND CHALLENGES Presented by MGP Partners LLC December 7, 2000.
SOCIAL POLICY GUIDELINES FOR MINING SECTOR IN AFGHANISTAN Harjot Kaur Senior Social Development Advisor, Ministry of Mines.
Public Sector Perspective on CSR and Responsibility Who is Responsible for Responsibility? Santiago, Chile September 2005.
MODULE 3 THE ENVIRONMENTAL PRINCIPLES Session 2: Principle 8
Western States Energy & Environment Symposium October 27, 2009.
Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable
Overview Summary from Africa and ASEAN assistance Dr. Peter Pembleton, UNIDO.
Integrating Environment into Development Policy: The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis Sub-Regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points.
Knowledge on HIA IN CAMBODIA Constructing a Caring and Sharing Community Roles of HIA 4-6 October 2012 Bangkok.
MINERAL RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT POLICY(2013) 14 th February 2014 MINISTRY OF MINES, ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT 1.
«Проект по экономической реабилитации и построению мер доверия» Integrating interests and institutions in water resource management 25 th June, 2013 Eng.
Cross-cutting areas of Capacity Building and Adaptation UNDP Workshop for NIS Environmental Focal Points June 2004.
Rome Energy Meeting 2008 Rome, November 2008 Investments Opportunities and Project Finance in the Energy Market Luigi Marsullo President Finpublic.
Integrating Environment and Development: The World Bank’s Experience with Country Environmental Analysis (CEA) Presented at the GEF Sub-Regional Workshop.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
APEC ENERGY WORKING GROUP FRAMEWORK PROPOSAL FOR IMPLEMENTING ENERGY INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (November 2004).
Kyrgyzstan priorities in environment protection B. Tolongutov, Director, State Regulation Center on Environment Protection & Ecological Safety Sector State.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
Policy and Legal Framework on Soil Contamination Management in Thailand Workshop on Strengthening Contaminated Soil Monitoring in Vietnam, November.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 2 Slide 1 The EIA process The EIA process comprises:  screening - to decide if and at what level EIA should be applied.
THE OECD PRINCIPLES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Stilpon NESTOR OECD.
International Workshop – Green development May 14, 2014 Magali OUTTERS – Team Leader SCP/RAC.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
1 BULGARIA PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARNERSHIP FOR REMEDIATION OF HISTORICAL POLLUTION Dr. Vania Grigorova Ministry of Environment and Water Bulgaria Managing for.
E nvironmental Protection in Bulgaria facts and challenges Workshop on : “Protection of the environment: climate change, pollution and biodiversity” Sofia,
TOWARDS BETTER REGULATION: THE ROLE OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT COLIN KIRKPATRICK IMPACT ASSESSMENT RESEARCH CENTRE UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER, UK UNECE Symposium.
National Planning Department. Mobilizing private investment for low carbon development October 14 th, 2015.
July 3 – 4, 2003, Szentendre Dr. Valdemars Scerbaks MSc Peteris Blumats.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Kiichiro Fukasaku Development Centre
The Regulatory Framework for Accounting and Auditing Lessons learned from the World Bank’s ROSC Program John Hegarty Manager – Financial Management Europe.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
INTRODUCTION: World Bank Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies Training Workshop for Financial Intermediaries and Implementing Agencies May-June,
Sustainable Cities through Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Kenneth Markowitz 19 October 2015.
UNEP Collaborating Centre on Energy and Environment CD for CDM - Phase 1 - First National Workshop, Egypt December Capacity Development for.
Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.
Socially Sustainable Development, May 2002 Responsive, Reliable, Resilient Social Aspects of Sustainable Development Steen Lau Jørgensen Social Development.
Track 4 Building Sustainability: Partnerships and Finance Global Environment Facility – International Waters Second Biennial Conference September 25-29,
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
April Why a New Instrument? Change in client demand: Clients want Bank support for government’s own programs and increased focus on results. This.
Ideas to engage GEF and carbon finance under GEF-5 Input from IDB Washington D.C. 15 November 2010.
December Why Program-for-Results (PforR)? Development Effectiveness and Client Demand – PforR responds to client demand that could not be fully.
Governance in Central and Eastern Europe Cheryl W. Gray Europe and Central Asia Region World Bank.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Government’s strategy for Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment
Closing the loop – An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
Supporting Data for a KfW Financed Investment Project on the Montenegrin Coast 18 May 2017, Wien ●
April 2011.
Consultation & Participation
Sustainability Corporations, Capital Markets and Global Economy.
SPC - FAO Discussion on developing a Concept Note
UNDERSTANDING THE ENTITY AND ITS ENVIRONMENT AND ASSESSING THE RISKS OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT Topic 5.
Implementing the 2030 Agenda in the Asia- Pacific region, January 2019, Shanghai Institutional arrangements to facilitate coherence in sustainable.
Early Learning Social Impact Bond Contract Standardization Working Group Governance Issues and Expanded Agreements Listing.
Good Governance and an Effective Board of Trustees
Presentation transcript:

Addressing Environmental Liabilities in Privatization in Bulgaria Workshop on CEA, SEA and Development Policy Lending Adriana J. Damianova South Asia Environment and Social Sector Unit The World Bank January 2005

Presentation Overview  Nature of environmental liabilities  Policy issues  World Bank support and lending Instruments  Enabling framework and policy choice  Key design and implementation principles  Designing public – private partnership for compliance  Benefits and lessons learned

Nature of Environmental Liabilities  Exist at the time of privatization as “stocks”  Relate to an identifiable actor (owner, legal successor)  In analogy to a “public good” liabilities categorize as a “public bad” and posses features of “non- rejectability” by affected people  Liabilities are externalities which cannot be addressed by behavior-modifying instruments  Market failure is a result of imperfect information, high transaction cost and potential free-rider problems

Policy issues  Inherited damages from past production relate to ownership, not to outputs  Response should aim at turning “ public bad ” into a “ private bad ”  Identify competent policy and decision makers and their perspective on the social cost and benefits for addressing the liability problem

World Bank Support and Lending Instruments  Environment Remediation Pilot Project: US$16 Million (Copper Smelter /UM Belgium)  Environment and Privatization Support Adjustment Loan: US$50 Million (Oil Refinery, Steel Mill, Open Copper Mine, Fertilizer Plant, and Pharmaceutical Plant)

Enabling policy and regulatory framework Strategic update of NEAP National Privatization Plan Privatization Act and supporting by-laws Environmental Protection Act Water Act EIA Regulation Regulation on Principles and Procedures for Determining State Liabilities for Historical Pollution Methodological Guidance on Past Environmental Pollution

Stakeholders and Beneficiaries Bank involvement facilitated partnerships between stakeholders and beneficiaries : Ministry of Environment and Water and Regional Environmental Inspectorates Ministry of Finance Privatization Agency Firms ’ management Investors Municipalities Local population

Issues and challenges before the Government in late 90-ites  Ambitious sector restructuring and privatization program supported by the Bank (FESALI and II)  Resistance of reputable investors to commit to environmental compliance unless pollution “ stocks ” are resolved  Significant health risks in industrial hot spots from past pollution  Growing public pressure to address social and environmental risks  Weak governance structure and regulatory framework to deal with environmental uncertainties in the privatization

Opportunities Privatization is a “window of opportunity” to eliminate policy and regulatory roadblocks to privatize polluting industries and improve corporate environmental compliance Improve investment climate, attract reputable investors and re-capitalize enterprise assets Improve local environmental conditions and address long-standing public health concerns

Implementation principles for designing lending support Enabling policies and legislation in place Procedures for accountable and transparent use of public resources Assessment of liabilities based on risk assessment methodology (EIA, Environmental Remediation and Compliance plans) with public involvement Promote cost effective remediation techniques based on assessment of environmental risk Clear implementation procedures and agreed institutional responsibilities for monitoring of environmental performance of privatized plants

Implementation Framework Sales Purchase Agreements with environmental compliance plan based on standards acceptable to regulator and regulated entity Implementation Agreement with agreed performance indicators to show implementation progress Agreement on inter – agency implementation and post- privatization oversight (structure,functions responsibilities, reporting etc.) “ After-care program ” for sustainability of project measures agreed prior to completion

Policy Outcomes Effective mainstreaming of environment in sector reforms and investment planning Policy and instruments for addressing environmental liabilities in place Improved institutional capacity and enhanced public-private partnership in environmental management Enhanced role of environmental agencies and improved institutional coordination Better collaboration among donors

Direct economic benefits Increased FDI in privatization Positive effect on demand for clean up technologies Sharing clean up costs Increased budgetary revenues Improved corporate governance Increased company value due to reduced risks and uncertainty Positive effect on local economic growth from private sector Gains from increased property value

Social and environmental benefits Mitigation of risks and protection of human health and sensitive ecosystems Partial offset of adverse social impact of privatization from prolonged demand for new jobs and new employment opportunities for local population Improved environmental monitoring and compliance of industries Cleaner ground and drinking water, more fertile farm land

Policy lessons  Most feasible policies to address liabilities are those combining environmental and economically beneficial side effects  Privatization sets a unique opportunity to set the negative value of liabilities in direct relation to present value of plants, expected stream of future incomes, and eventually its present asset value  The approach allows addressing liabilities with least involvement of the government resources ( remediation cost caps, sharing preparation and management cost)  Stakeholders ’ participation has direct interest on the company ’ s sound financial and environmental performance and incentives to reduce implementation costs

Lessons contd.  Information on environmental performance is key (audits/ EIA) and should be included in Privatization Information Memorandum  Public involvement is critical for sustaining project outcomes  Negotiations on environmental conditions should be included in individual sales and post-privatization oversight  Bank support facilitates effective collaboration and public- private partnership for environmental management  Private businesses act more responsibly to social and environment issues in a transparent environment  The model enhanced transparency and public access to information on corporate environmental performance

Old Slag Dump Rehabilitation Contaminated waste excavated and sites cleaned up November 1999 September 2002

Clean-up of Old Sulfuric Acid Plant Old sulfuric acid plant demolished and site decontaminated November 1999 October 1997

June 1999 December 2002 Closure of the sludge “Blue Lagoon” encapsulation and re-vegetation