FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Glenn Bateman Lehigh University Physics Department
Advertisements

Physics Basis of FIRE Next Step Burning Plasma Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant.
The Swiss Association vision for the period Presented by M. Q. Tran on behalf of the CRPP.
Stability, Transport, and Conrol for the discussion Y. Miura IEA/LT Workshop (W59) combined with DOE/JAERI Technical Planning of Tokamak Experiments (FP1-2)
George Sips ITPA, active control, 14 July Real-time Control ( and development of control systems ) at ASDEX Upgrade George Sips Max-Planck-Institut.
6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement General scope.
Cyclic MHD Instabilities Hartmut Zohm MPI für Plasmaphysik, EURATOM Association Seminar talk at the ‚Advanced Course‘ of EU PhD Network, Garching, September.
The Physics Base for ITER and DEMO Hartmut Zohm Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik, Garching, Germany EURATOM Association Hauptvortrag given at AKE DPG.
FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM, Trilateral Euregio Cluster Feedback controlled ECRH power deposition for control of.
Discussion on application of current hole towards reactor T.Ozeki (JAERI) Current hole plasmas were observed in the large tokamaks of JT-60U and JET. This.
Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster 1 M.R. de Baar, Workshop Control for Nuclear Fusion, the Netherlands, In the control room:
1 st ITPA T&C Meeting, Milan, October WAHPage 1 ITER R&D Needs for Transport & Confinement W.A. Houlberg ITER Organization 1st ITPA Transport.
IAEA - FEC2004 // Vilamoura // // EX/4-5 // A. Staebler – 1 – A. Staebler, A.C.C Sips, M. Brambilla, R. Bilato, R. Dux, O. Gruber, J. Hobirk,
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Burning Plasma Gap Between ITER and DEMO Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy US-Japan Workshop Fusion Power Plants and Related Advanced Technologies.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
FOM-Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Tony Donné Introduction to fusion control.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 8 : The tokamak continued.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Introduction Tony Donné Information taken.
Raman, BPW (W60) 4-5 July 2005 Advanced fueling system for use as a burn control tool Roger Raman University of Washington, Seattle Workshop (W60) on Burning.
1 MHD for Fusion Where to Next? Jeff Freidberg MIT.
T. Hellsten IEA Burning Plasma Workshop, July 2005 Tarragona Spain Integrated Modelling of ICRH and AE Dynamics T. Hellsten, T. Bergkvist, T. Johnson and.
Y. Sakamoto JAEA Japan-US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants and Related Technologies with participations from China and Korea February 26-28, 2013 at Kyoto.
Recent JET Experiments and Science Issues Jim Strachan PPPL Students seminar Feb. 14, 2005 JET is presently world’s largest tokamak, being ½ linear dimension.
Prof. F.Troyon“JET: A major scientific contribution...”25th JET Anniversary 20 May 2004 JET: A major scientific contribution to the conception and design.
M.E. Fenstermacher - Summary of Progress and Outlook for Work Plan in PEP ITPA WG on RMP ELM Control 4/23/09 11:15 PM 1 PEP ITPA Working Group on RMP ELM.
Plasma particle fuelling a general view of methods and issues David Terranova.
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
Measurement and modeling of hydrogenic retention in molybdenum with the DIONISOS experiment G.M. Wright University of Wisconsin-Madison, FOM – Institute.
Measurement Requirements and Assessment of Measurement Capability David Johnson, Réjean Boivin, Ken Young.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Stan Milora, ORNL Director Virtual Laboratory for Technology 20 th ANS Topical Meeting on the Technology.
Chalmers University of Technology Szczecin, 23 March 2006 Meeting with Dr. B. Green Dr. B. Green (Euratom) and Prof. A. Gałkowski (Association Euratom-IPPLM)
US ITER UFA Meeting APS-DPP Savannah, GA Ned Sauthoff (presented by Dale Meade) November 15, 2004 US In-kind Contributions and Starting Burning Plasma.
Discussions and Summary for Session 1 ‘Transport and Confinement in Burning Plasmas’ Yukitoshi MIURA JAERI Naka IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning.
G.Huysmansworkshop : Principles of MHD 21-24/3/2005 MHD in Tokamak Plasmas Guido Huysmans Association Euratom/CEA Cadarache, France with contributions.
TRANSP Needs for Physics Modules R. J. Hawryluk TRANSP Users Group Meeting March 24, 2015.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
Implications of TFTR D-T Experiments for ITER R.J. Hawryluk May 23, 2014.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
OPERATIONAL SCENARIO of KTM Dokuka V.N., Khayrutdinov R.R. TRINITI, Russia O u t l i n e Goal of the work The DINA code capabilities Formulation of the.
EFDA EUROPEAN FUSION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Task Force S1 J.Ongena 19th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Lyon Towards the realization on JET of an.
ITPA Topical Group on MHD, Control, and Disruptions Summary of 5th meeting, Nov. 8-10, 2004 Presented by Ted Strait Workshop on MHD Mode Control Princeton,
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
B WEYSSOW 2009 Coordinated research activities under European Fusion Development Agreement (addressing fuelling) Boris Weyssow EFDA-CSU Garching ITPA 2009.
RFX workshop / /Valentin Igochine Page 1 Control of MHD instabilities. Similarities and differences between tokamak and RFP V. Igochine, T. Bolzonella,
PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION International Plan for ELM Control Studies Presented by M.R. Wade (for A. Leonard)
L. Zanotto – 10 February 2011 – RFX-mod programme workshop TF2: Active control of RFP and tokamak plasmas Report on experimental proposals L. Zanotto,
4th Transport/ITB IPTA Meeting, St Petersburg, 8-12 April Role of Edge Current in ELM Behaviour: Modelling of Recent Current Ramp Experiment in.
The influence of non-resonant perturbation fields: Modelling results and Proposals for TEXTOR experiments S. Günter, V. Igochine, K. Lackner, Q. Yu IPP.
Improved performance in long-pulse ELMy H-mode plasmas with internal transport barrier in JT-60U N. Oyama, A. Isayama, T. Suzuki, Y. Koide, H. Takenaga,
Implications of TFTR D-T Experiments for Burning Plasma Program R. J. Hawryluk IEA Large Tokamak Workshop (W60) Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation Tarragona,
QAS Design of the DEMO Reactor
Steady State Discharge Modeling for KSTAR C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory US-Korea Workshop - KSTAR Collaborations, 5/19-20/2004.
Approach for a High Performance Fusion Power Source Pathway Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy ARIES Team Meeting March 3-4, 2008 UCSD, San.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
MHD Issues and Control in FIRE C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability Austin, TX 11/3-5/2003.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas Workshop (W60) on “Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation 4-5 July 2005, University Campus, Tarragona, Spain Under.
Page 1 Alberto Loarte- NSTX Research Forum st - 3 rd December 2009  ELM control by RMP is foreseen in ITER to suppress or reduce size of ELM energy.
NSTX Meeting name – abbreviated presentation title, abbreviated author name (??/??/20??) Goals of NSTX Advanced Scenario and Control TSG Study, implement,
6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting combined with W60 IEA Workshop on Burning Plasmas Summary Session II MHD Stability and Fast Particle Confinement chaired.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
J. Menard for the MHD Science Focus Group Tuesday, November 22, 2005
L-H power threshold and ELM control techniques: experiments on MAST and JET Carlos Hidalgo EURATOM-CIEMAT Acknowledgments to: A. Kirk (MAST) European.
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
Influence of energetic ions on neoclassical tearing modes
Integrated Modeling for Burning Plasmas
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

FOM - Institute for Plasma Physics Rijnhuizen Association Euratom-FOM Diagnostics and Control for Burning Plasmas Discussion All of you

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Discussion Where are we? Where do we want to go? How do we get there? Try to define the key issues in the field of control and diagnostics on which further R&D and testing is urgently needed (eg. on present machines)?

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Proposal for discussion points What further steps are needed in dedicated/ integrated plasma control? What are the specific measurement challenges associated with real time control requirements in burning plasmas? What diagnostics do need (or would benefit from) R&D on present devices?

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 1/7 Equilibrium control –AC losses –power management –full scenario robustness –development of control matrix for shape and position with minimum coupling between the terms –modeling of breakdown phase

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 2a/7 MHD control –Control of NTM’s, sawteeth (yesterdays disc.) Interaction with pellets ECRH stabilization –Control of RWM’s Interaction with pellets RFA extrapolation to ITER? Internal coils needed in ITER What is ‘ideal wall’ in ITER? Coupling to ELMs, NTMs –disruption avoidance and mitigations,

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 2b/7 MHD control –ELM control, etc. Pellet ELM triggering Decouple ELM amplitude from pedestal height ELM location (deeper in plasma gives larger ELMs) Extrapolation of ELM-free QH mode to ITER? Control by ergodic fields (pure type II regime?)

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 3/7 Current profile control –Development of response matrix –effect of  -heating on current profile Frozen-in-fields (may require ultra-slow fusion power ramp up!) –mode conversion current drive –real-time equilibrium codes incl. bootstrap current and loop voltage profile Bootstrap current driven by fusion power may initiate a current hole

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 4/7 Transport barrier control –Identification of key parameters to control ITBs –role with current profile –simulation of ITB control in presence of  - heating –interrelation between ETB and ITB

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 5/7 Power control and particle exhaust –Methods for erosion/deposition control –control & monitoring of tritium inventory –edge power dissipation control in ELMy H- mode and ITB scenarios –validation of models of He-ash removal –real-time measurement and control of D/T ratio, –compatibility with good confinement

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 6/7 Control of steady state scenarios –Fuelling: how to increase density without destroying barrier (or without perturbing the beneficial pressure profile shape? NBI fuelling rates much lower then present devices HFS injection needed for pellets CT injection? Modeling for ITER. Localization of fuelling. Test on present device (NSTX). –Impurity accumulation and exhaust –disruptivity –develop scenarios with minimum control –control of current and loop voltage under high bootstrap conditions.

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Key aspects in control – 7/7 Other –Integration of all aspects of control (control architectures and methodologies) Based on dynamic models for transients Simulate burning plasma conditions in DT exp. W. ICRH –pre-emptive control (e.g. disruption avoidance), –diagnostic requirements on basis of adequacy for control –use modeling calculations for sensor development, –measurement requirements –indicators for possible loss of  confinement.

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Diagnostic issues Contamination of beam ions in confined alpha diagnostics Development of escaping alpha diagnostics Testing of new – ITER relevant – techniques on present devices FW reflectometer: coupling of antennas into plasma Requirements on fast ions/alphas in velocity space Environmental effects Simultaneous control First mirrors R&D on phenomena, components, techniques

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Specific measurement challenges related to control Impact of the various control issues on the measurement scenarios

Association Euratom-FOM Trilateral Euregio Cluster A.J.H. Donné, W60 Workshop on Burning Plasma Physics and Simulation, Tarragona, 4-5 July 2005 Aims as defined by organizers diagnostic needs and current developments (eg. diagnostics for fast particle thermalisation, re- distribution and loss; neutron yields, fluxes, spectra and tomography; helium ash and helium pumping efficiency; plasma isotopic composition; erosion, redeposition and tritium retention; and other specific diagnostic challenges for burning plasmas); advances in integrated plasma control and dedicated control (eg. of MHD instabilities); specific measurement challenges associated with real time control requirements in burning plasmas (eg. sensors, actuators and modelling for D-T mixture control, burn control, current and pressure control with  - particle driven sources).