Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of Diabatic Processes Cloud Parametrization 2: Cloud Cover Richard Forbes and Adrian Tompkins
Advertisements

Predictable Chaotic Exhibits memory Equilibrium Towards non-equilibrium Acknowledgements LD is supported by NERC CASE award NER/S/A/2004/ Conclusions.
R. Forbes, 17 Nov 09 ECMWF Clouds and Radiation University of Reading ECMWF Cloud and Radiation Parametrization: Recent Activities Richard Forbes, Maike.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The Original TRMM Science Objectives An assessment 15 years after launch Christian Kummerow Colorado State University 4 th International TRMM/GPM Science.
A Microwave Retrieval Algorithm of Above-Cloud Electric Fields Michael J. Peterson The University of Utah Chuntao Liu Texas A & M University – Corpus Christi.
New Product to Help Forecast Convective Initiation in the 1-6 Hour Time Frame Meeting September 12, 2007.
Salt rejection, advection, and mixing in the MITgcm coupled ocean and sea-ice model AOMIP/(C)ARCMIP / SEARCH for DAMOCLES Workshop, Paris Oct 29-31, 2007.
Diurnal Variations of Global Thunderstorms and Electrified Shower Clouds and Their Contribution to the Global Electrical Circuit Liu et al Review.
What kind of clouds have lightning?. Observing storms from space.
TRMM Tropical Rainfall Measurement (Mission). Why TRMM? n Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) is a joint US-Japan study initiated in 1997 to study.
Evaluation of ECHAM5 General Circulation Model using ISCCP simulator Swati Gehlot & Johannes Quaas Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Hamburg, Germany.
The Impact of Ice Microphysics on the Genesis of Hurricane Julia (2010) Stefan Cecelski 1 and Dr. Da-Lin Zhang Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science.
Precipitation Over Continental Africa and the East Atlantic: Connections with Synoptic Disturbances Matthew A. Janiga November 8, 2011.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
What controls the climatological PBL depth? Brian Medeiros Alex Hall Bjorn Stevens UCLA Department of Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences 16th Symposium on.
Observed Updraft & Mass Flux in Shallow Cumulus at ARM Southern Great Plains site Preliminary results Yunyan Zhang, Steve Klein & Pavlos Kollias CFMIP/GCSS.
Hydrometeors Injected into the Large-scale Environment by Tropical Cloud Systems Robert A. Houze & Courtney Schumacher Co-PIs ARM Science Team Meeting,
Hector simulation We found simulation largely depending on: Model initialization scheme Lateral boundary conditions Physical processes represented in the.
Impact of Model Grid Size on Estimating Source Strength from Sand Storm Wen-Dian Lin, Tsun-Hsien Liu and Julius S. Chang National Central University Jhongli,
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
Photo by Dave Fratello. Focus To evaluate CAM5/CARMA at 1x1 degree resolution with aircraft observations. - Improve cirrus cloud representation in the.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
The speaker took this picture on 11 December, 2012 over the ocean near Japan. 2014/07/29 AOGS 11th Annual Meeting in Sapporo.
Arctic sea ice melt in summer 2007: Sunlight, water, and ice NSIDC Sept 2007.
MIR OZONE ISSUES Horizontal (STE) and vertical transport (long life time in UTLS) Photochemical production by precursors (biomass burning, lightning,..)
GOES-R Risk Reduction New Initiative: Storm Severity Index Wayne M. MacKenzie John R. Mecikalski John R. Walker University of Alabama in Huntsville.
DYMECS: Dynamical and Microphysical Evolution of Convective Storms (NERC Standard Grant) University of Reading: Robin Hogan, Bob Plant, Thorwald Stein,
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms Robin Hogan John Nicol Robert Plant Peter Clark Kirsty Hanley Carol Halliwell Humphrey Lean Thorwald.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Hurricane Microphysics: Ice vs Water A presenation of papers by Willoughby et al. (1984) and Heymsfield et al. (2005) Derek Ortt April 17, 2007.
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget Braun, S. A., 2006: High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998).
Vertical Structure of the Atmosphere within Clouds Revealed by COSMIC Data Xiaolei Zou, Li Lin Florida State University Rick Anthes, Bill Kuo, UCAR Fourth.
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Possible Aerosol Effects on Lightning Activity and Structure of Hurricanes Khain, A., N. Cohen, B. Lynn, and A. Pokrovsky, 2008: Possible aerosol effects.
Yuying Zhang, Jim Boyle, and Steve Klein Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Jay Mace University.
Radiative Impacts of Cirrus on the Properties of Marine Stratocumulus M. Christensen 1,2, G. Carrió 1, G. Stephens 2, W. Cotton 1 Department of Atmospheric.
The MJO Cloud Population over the Indian Ocean
Evaluating the ability of climate models to simulate extremes Eric Robinson Natalie McLean Christine Radermacher Ross Towe Yushiang Tung Project 6.
New CRM diagnostics dedicated to convective parameterization J-I Yano P. Bechtold, J.-P. Chaboureau, F. Guichard, J.-L. Redelsperger and J.-P. Lafore LMD,
High-Resolution Simulation of Hurricane Bonnie (1998). Part II: Water Budget SCOTT A. BRAUN J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
A complicated mesoscale convective system Lightning flashes (ICs, CGs) happen both inside and outside convective regions (“cells”), sometimes in stratiform.
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
Assimilation of Pseudo-GLM Observations Into a Storm Scale Numerical Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter Blake Allen University of Oklahoma Edward Mansell.
Understanding Cirrus Cloud Behavior using A-Train and Geostationary Satellite and NCEP/NCAR Reanalysis Data Betsy Dupont and Jay Mace, University of Utah.
Convective Transport of Carbon Monoxide: An intercomparison of remote sensing observations and cloud-modeling simulations 1. Introduction The pollution.
The DYMECS project A statistical approach for the evaluation of convective storms in high-resolution models Thorwald Stein, Robin Hogan, John Nicol, Robert.
The three-dimensional structure of convective storms
A LATENT HEAT RETRIEVAL IN A RAPIDLY INTENSIFYING HURRICANE
October 23-26, 2012: AOMIP/FAMOS meetings
Validation of GCM, and the need of High resolution atmospheric and hydrological model Vicente Barros and Mariano Re San José de Costa Rica 28 May 2003.
Studying Hector: meteorology and tracer transport
Ming-Dah Chou Department of Atmospheric Sciences
Scott A. Braun, 2002: Mon. Wea. Rev.,130,
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
D. C. Stolz, S. A. Rutledge, J. R. Pierce, S. C. van den Heever 2017
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Lightning Potential Index (J/Kg) (Yair et al.2010,JGR)
Presentation transcript:

Towards parametrized GEC current sources for the CESM model FESD project meeting February 2014 Wiebke Deierling, Andreas Baumgaertner, Tina Kalb

Background Mach et al Investigate parameterizations based on readily available cloud parameters in model such as: -In-Cloud Ice Water Path -Convection Mass Flux -……… Assumption: Cloud characteristics relate to conduction currents of different type Step 1: Investigate spatial and temporal distribution of these cloud parameters. How well do they represent observed cloud parameters? Step 2: Regression between estimated observed currents and cloud parameters to infer currents in model. This can be done on different temporal and spatial scales.

Storm counts from TRMM from Liu et al Conversion of thunderstorm (TC) / electrified storm (T 30dbZ < -10/-17C) count to current per grid box: x 1.7A #TC over ocean x 1.0A #TC over land x 0.41A #ESC over ocean x 0.13A #ESC over land

CESM In-cloud ice water path above 500 hPa CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa June Liu et al., 2009 estimated current

MERRA Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa June Liu et al., 2009 estimated current

Yearly average CESM Convection updraft mass flux above 800 hPa single-year mean (low resolution) Liu et al., 2009 estimated current

June composite day: loop through 0-23 UT CESM updraft mass flux above 800hPa, deviation from mean

Carnegie curve: Percent deviation from mean (June) Liu et al current CESM % UT

Vertical location of charges Altitude above sea level (km) Positive charge at -30C Negative charge at -10C km from CESM temperature distribution

Conclusions and future work Convective updraft mass flux from CESM simulations has similar features to derived GEC source current from storm counts → possibly useful for parametrizing source current in the model Future work: o Derive relationships between storm counts and storm-current from ER-2 and radar o Compare results from different reanalysis (NCEP/NCAR, ECMWF) o Improve fitting of model variables to “observed” source current