Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Development Process Overview For the Great Smoky Mountain National Park Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe,
Advertisements

SIP Development Process Overview For Rocky Mount Transportation Partners Requirements, Scenarios and Timelines Laura Boothe, NCDAQ Mike Abraczinskas, NCDAQ.
Overview of the Mountain Area Transportation Conformity Process.
Overview of the Transportation Conformity Process.
Isolated Rural Areas US EPA Conformity Training Summer 2004 Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Transportation Conformity Basics Eddie Dancausse FHWA NC Division x112
Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
1 SAFETEA-LU Changes to the Transportation Conformity Rule February 21, 2008.
Emission Factor Modeling Graciela Lubertino, HGAC.
Session 7: Other Conformity Rule Changes FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Transportation Conformity and Development of Emission Budgets.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
Cleaning the Air: Transportation Control Measures for Ozone San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern Council Of Governments For the Kern.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments Net Conference June 23, 2004 Hosted by the Federal Highway Administration Office of Natural and Human Environment.
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources Presentation for PM2.5 Implementation Workshop June 21, 2007 Gary Dolce U.S. EPA Office of Transportation and.
Project Delivery and ODOT’s Air Program & Air Quality Updates Geo-Environmental Conference Presented by: Natalie Liljenwall, ODOT Air Quality April 22,
Transportation & Air Quality Planning AMPO MPO Educational Series November 8,
UNLOCK THE MYSTERIES TO AIR QUALITY Bernadette Dupont, FHWA-KY June 2007.
A&WMA Georgia Regulatory Update Conference Current State of the Air in GA Jac Capp, GA EPD, Branch Chief, Air Protection Branch April 16, 2013.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Air Quality and Conformity Issues James M. Shrouds, Director Office of Natural and Human Environment Federal Highway Administration AASHTO SCOE Meeting.
1 Fugitive Dust Estimation Methods & On Road Mobile Sources An MPO’s Perspective.
Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443
The Regional Forum for Transportation Planning. Southwestern Pennsylvania 10 Counties >7,000 square miles 2.66 million citizens 548 municipalities 132.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
Keeping Tomorrow’s Air Clean: Conforming Transportation Plans with Air Quality Attainment Efforts San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
1 MOBILE6 -Input and Modeling Guidance -SIP and Conformity Policy North American Vehicle Emission Control Conference Atlanta, April 4, 2001 Gary Dolce.
Recent Developments in Transportation Conformity Beverly Chenausky Multimodal Planning Division – Air Quality Breakout Session: Transportation Conformity/Air.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
Abstract Transportation sustainability is of increasing concern to professionals and the public. This project describes modeling, calculation, and necessary.
May 21, 2008 Bringing Transit Planning to the MPO Planning Table Bringing Transit Planning To The MPO Planning Table Daniel Rudge.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
Conformity Determination Graciela Lubertino, PhD November 7, 2012.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Presented to Time of Day Subcommittee May 9, 2011 Time of Day Modeling in FSUTMS.
Missoula Air Quality Conformity Analysis Required by Federal and Montana Clean Air Act – Transportation-specific air quality requirements enacted in Federal.
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
Timely Implementation of TCMs. History  RACM developed for Severe Ozone Rate of Progress (ROP) Plan  2003 Incorporated in 2003 PM-10 Plan.
Survivor’s Guide to Ozone Conformity Breakout Session 9: Air Quality 2015 California Transportation Planning Conference: Partnering for Sustainable Transportation.
1 Climate Change: Impact on Transportation (And Transportation Impact on Climate Change) August 14, 2008 Mike Clifford Metropolitan Washington Council.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
Session 2: Background FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
Resource Management Planning Air Quality Brock LeBaron Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
Air Quality, Transportation Conformity, and the FSTIP FTIP/FSTIP Workshop February 9, 2016.
Session 3: When Do You Do Conformity? FHWA Transportation Conformity and CMAQ Workshop Summer 2004.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING PROCEDURES FOR REVISIONS STATEWIDE AND LOCAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS (STIP & TIP) State of Alabama Department.
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY OVERVIEW TRAINING 1. Training Objectives Understand the Following : – Why is air quality relevant to transportation? – What.
1 National Standards Set for Criteria Pollutants  Particulate Matter  Sulfur Dioxide  Nitrogen Dioxide  Carbon Monoxide  Lead  Ozone.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
PM Control Strategies for Mobile Sources
TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY
Transportation Improvement Program and Air Quality Conformity Analysis
Public Review Draft CARBON MONOXIDE AND PM-10 AIR QUALITY CONFORMITY DETERMINATION FOR THE 2035 AMATS METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN Municipality of.
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Uinta Basin General Conformity
Presentation transcript:

Transportation Conformity Overview H-GAC Conformity Workshop May 30, 2007

What is transportation conformity? Air Quality PlanningTransportation Planning Transportation Conformity

Who Makes the Conformity Determination? MPO’s Policy Board (Local level) FHWA and FTA (Federal level)

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

MTP Content Describe transportation facilities in enough detail to permit conformity determination Describe highway and transit system in terms of regionally significant additions or modifications to transportation network by analysis year Fiscally constrained

TIP Content Include all projects selected by the MPO to be initiated in the TIP time frame (4-years) Projects described in enough detail to determine fiscal constraint Must be fiscally constrained

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

Latest Planning Assumptions Conformity Determinations must be based on latest planning assumptions: Population estimates Employment Travel Congestion Transit fares, service levels and ridership TCM effectiveness

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

Latest Emissions Model Must use latest emissions model in conformity determinations EPA’s MOBILE6.2 emissions factor model EPA updates model every few years SIP budgets may have been developed with a previous emissions model

MOBILE6 Emissions Factor Model Fuels and Programs Inspection and Maintenance program Fuel program Sulfur content of gasoline Fuel Reid Vapor Pressure Vehicle Fleet Distribution of vehicle age Percent diesel Annual mileage accumulation rates Vehicle Activity % of total VMT by vehicle type % of VMT on each facility type VMT by hour VMT by average speed Vehicle starts per day Vehicle start distribution (by hour) Vehicle “soak” data Trip length distribution External Conditions Calendar Year Month Temperatures Humidity Grams/mile

Emissions Factor Model Grams/mile VMT X = From emissions factor model From travel demand model Grams/Day Where it fits:

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

Consultation Follow interagency consultation procedures Spelled out in the State’s Conformity SIP Interagency Consultation FHWA TCEQ FTA MPO EPA Local Transit TxDOT

Consultation Follow Public Involvement procedures HGAC’s Transportation Public Involvement Plan available on their website

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

TCMs TCMs are actions included in the SIP to adjust traffic patterns or reduce vehicle use to reduce air pollutant emissions. Examples: HOV lanes Bicycle facilities Park & Ride lots Traffic Flow Improvements (grade separations, signal timing)

Timely Implementation of TCMs The transportation plan (MTP) provides for timely implementation of TCMs in the applicable SIP Nothing in the MTP or TIP interferes with implementation of a TCM TCMs are on or ahead of schedule. If behind schedule, TCMs given maximum priority over other projects.

What are the basic conformity requirements? MTP/TIP Content Latest Planning Assumptions Latest Emissions Model Consultation Timely Implementation of Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) Consistency with Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs, or “Budgets”)

Budget Test Projected roadway and transit emissions must be less than the MVEBs established in the SIP Pass budget test for each “analysis year” Any year that has a budget (e.g. 2007) 8-hour Attainment Year (e.g. 2010) Last year of MTP forecast period (e.g.2035) Interim year so no more than 10 yrs apart (e.g. 2015, 2025)

Budget Test Example from NCTCOG’s Draft Mobility 2025 Conformity Determination, April 2005

What if there isn’t a budget? Interim emissions test Interim test varies based on nonattainment classification

When is Conformity Required? At least every 4 years With MTP or TIP updates When change to a regionally significant project After change in SIP budgets After new emissions standards Most recently new 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 standards

MTP or TIP Project Changes Trigger conformity if: Estimated project completion date crosses analysis years Change in project scope Number of lanes Project limits Toll vs. no toll

When is Conformity Required? Within 24 months of: Date of State’s initial SIP submittal containing motor vehicle emission budget EPA adequacy determination of SIP EPA approval of SIP revisions which establish or revise motor vehicle emission budget EPA promulgates a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)

Project Level Conformity Project must come from conforming plan and TIP Design concept and scope have not changed significantly from what was described in transportation plan/TIP or in a manner which would significantly impact use of the facility For projects not specifically required to be identified in transportation plan, project is consistent with policies and purpose of transportation plan and will not interfere with other projects

Project Level Conformity Project must come from conforming plan and TIP Projects can’t receive final environmental clearance if they aren’t consistent with the conforming plan and TIP

Conformity Consequences Conformity Lapse Conformity Freeze

Conformity Lapse Caused by: Not meeting 4 yr time frame for Plan/TIP update Not meeting any of the 24 month triggers SIP Disapproval consequences Severely limits project actions that may be taken Project Authorizations for non-exempt projects Environmental document actions for non- exempt projects

During a Lapse- What Projects Can Proceed? TCMs in approved SIPs Exempt projects identified in 40 CFR § and 127 Federally funded previously conforming projects authorized prior to the lapse: Includes preliminary engineering, right-of-way acquisition and construction Full Funding Grant Agreements (FFGA) - FTA Projects Regionally significant non-federal projects that were approved prior to the lapse

SIP Disapproval If EPA disapproves Control Strategy SIP WITH a “protective finding” Disapproved SIP emission budget can be used for conformity if found “adequate” Highway sanctions/Conformity Lapse occur 24 months later

Conformity Freeze Applied when EPA disapproves Control Strategy SIP w/o a protective finding Begins on effective date of disapproval Only projects in first 3 yrs of TIP can move forward If no SIP resubmitted and approved in 2 yrs, highway sanctions/conformity lapse occurs