RUDE Vivien With the help of Hélène MAINAUD-DURAND And Mateusz SOSIN BE/ABP/SU CLIC MODULE September 19, 2011 Présentation REPORT OF THE CURRENT TESTS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
. Load sensors conditioners – radiation tests Mateusz Sosin BE/ABP/SU RADWG,
Advertisements

, CLIC Test Module Meeting Status of the DB Quad adjustable support design Mateusz Sosin CLIC Module WG Meeting, 22-May-2013.
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
1 Long-term Variation of the Magnet Alignment In SPring-8 Storage Ring Main events of magnet alignment Long-term monitoring Variation of magnet alignment.
LHC Collimator Survey Train Concept / Development / Status Patrick Bestmann CERN BE/ABP/SU IWAA /09/2010 Remote Controlled Measurements in the LHC.
H. MAINAUD DURAND CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT SYSTEM: PROPOSAL FOR CDR AND PROGRAM FOR TDR.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, A. HERTY, A. MARIN, M. ACAR PERMANENT MONITORING OF THE LHC LOW BETA TRIPLETS: LATEST RESULTS AND PERSPECTIVES.
Yurii Levashov LCLS Undulator Fiducialization October 20, 2005 *Work supported in part by DOE Contract DE-AC02-76SF LCLS.
Warsaw University LiCAS Linear Collider Alignment & Survey IWAA08, G. Moss 1 The LiCAS LSM System First measurements from the Laser Straightness.
Workshop TS May 2008 GENERAL CLIC ALIGNMENT Progresses and strategy. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, TS/SU/MTI.
Development of a Precision Tilt Sensor for a Cryogenic Torsion Balance Experiment Micah Koller Carleton College INT REU Program 2011 University of Washington.
CLIC. Hélène MAINAUD DURAND| SU pendant LS1 day| | INDICO | page 2 Activities CLIC LAMBDA project (Laser Alignment Multi-Based Design.
JINR: J. Budagov, V. Glagolev, M. Lyablin, G. Shirkov CERN: H. Mainaud Durand, G. Stern A laser based fiducial line for high precision multipoint alignment.
Yury Gavrikov 25/03/  I met with two very nice g…oniometers 3 Because we decided to adapt their for a new experiment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team with 3D views and data from Hubert Gerwig, Richard Rosing and Juha Kemppinen Pre-alignment.
1/9 Hélène Mainaud Durand Sylvain GRIFFET, 28/11/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Adjustment of 4 Drive Beam Quads positions on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
Mechanical design, analysis and integration of pre-alignment systems for CLIC M.Anastasopoulos / BE-ABP-SU.
ALIGNMENT OF Q2 LOW BETA QUADRUPOLES D. Missiaen, On behalf of the EN-MEF-SU/MTI team 1.
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
H. SCHMICKLER Alignment challenges for a future linear collider.
, CLIC Test Module Meeting Concept of ‘hexapod type’ DB Quad adjustable support Mateusz Sosin.
Measurement report of Boostec girders 1/13 Sylvain GRIFFET, 15/11/2010 Measurements performed on the 28th of October 2010 with the Laser Tracker LTD500.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU, 23/04/2010 STATUS OF THE CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC ACTIVE PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDIES: STATUS FOR CDR AND PROSPECTS FOR TDR PHASE.
CLIC alignment studies OUTLINE CLEX Alignment of the components Impact of beam on sensors readings Long term stability of the supports (girders, DB quad)
Friedrich Lackner (TS-SU) CLIC08 Workshop. CLIC Main Beam Quadrupole Magnet The Alignment Concept Expected Properties of a the Support Structure Foreseen.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
1/12 Sylvain GRIFFET, 17/10/2011 BE/ABP-SU/ Simulations of laser tracker AT401 measurements on TM0 CLIC girders EDMS Document No
HPS Collaboration Meeting JLAB, May Tracker Design Status M.Oriunno, SLAC.
D. Missiaen Summaries of the discussion. 2 H. Mainaud Durand The iris diaphragm laser alignment system for Spring 8 storage ring magnets Align multipoes.
DBQ support – motorization and performance upgrade Mateusz Sosin EN/MEF-SU.
CLIC survey and alignment 1 CLIC CES meeting STARTSLIDE CLIC SURVEY AND ALIGNMENT Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
Dmitry Gudkov BE-RF-PM CLIC Module Working Group Engineering design of the adjustable supporting system for DBQ.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
Short range alignment strategy in CLEX and first results CLIC Workshop January 2015 on behalf of : Hélène Mainaud-Durand, Mateusz Sosin Mathieu.
The CLIC alignment studies 1 CLIC workshop October 2007 THE CLIC ALIGNMENT STUDIES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
CLIC Module WG 20/07/2009 H. MAINAUD DURAND, BE-ABP/SU Pre-alignment system and impact on module design.
CLIC Beam Physics Working Group CLIC pre-alignment simulations Thomas Touzé BE/ABP-SU Update on the simulations of the CLIC pre-alignment.
November 11 SESAPS 2006 Samir Guragain 1 Calibration, Installation & Commissioning of Sensors for the Alignment of Muon Endcap Chambers in the CMS Experiment.
Calibration and production of PRAXIAL (*) sensors for the ATLAS muon spectrometer Optical Metrology - SPIE Optical Measurement Systems for Industrial Inspection.
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
EMU Meeting, CERN, Sept 18-19, 2006O.Prokofiev 1 EMU Alignment System Analog Data Analysis for ME+1yME+4 Stations Run: Aug 25-28, 2006 Magnetic field up.
CLEX constraints between the 2 linacs CLIC meeting 18 March 2015 Vivien RUDE Contents : (Alignment in the CLEX) Lab constraints CLEX constraints.
Alignment system and impact on CLIC two-beam module design H. Mainaud-Durand, G. Riddone CTC meeting –
Pre-alignment of quadrupoles 1 CLIC stabilization day, STARTSLIDE PRE-ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN BEAM QUADRUPOLES Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignement team QD0 and BDS pre-alignment.
CLIC08 Workshop, CERN October 2008 PRE-ALIGNMENT STUDY STATUS AND MODEL FOR THE BEAM DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS TS/SU/MTI Thomas TOUZE Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
CERN –GSI/CEA MM preparation meeting, Magnetic Measurements WP.
CLIC survey and alignment studies 1 CTC meeting, 13 th January 2009 STARTSLIDE CLIC Survey and alignment studies Jean-Pierre QUESNEL, Hélène MAINAUD DURAND.
D. Missiaen – 13/06/2014. D. Missiaen 13/06/ Agenda Introduction to alignment techniques Reserved space for Survey The CERN Co-ordinates System.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
BRAINSTORMING ON LASER BASED SOLUTIONS FOR CLIC PRE-ALIGNMENT INTRODUCTION Hélène MAINAUD DURAND, BE/ABP/SU, 09/02/2010 Status of the study CLIC pre-alignment.
H. MAINAUD DURAND Studies on active pre-alignment for the CLIC project.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team Status on CLIC pre-alignment studies.
Survey for SPL Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP/SU. Outline 12/11/2008 Dominique Missiaen BE-ABP-SU, Survey for SPL 2  Scope & Main Parameters  Technical Description.
H. MAINAUD DURAND on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team oWPS versus cWPS OUTLINE Introduction oWPS cWPS Results of inter-comparison tests
CLIC Parameter Working Group Two Beam Module Design
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
PACMAN impact on future module design
SLAWG #15 ZS fiducialisation and alignment today
TEST MODULE WG Cradles for CLIC module supporting system
Alignment methods developed for the validation of the thermal and mechanical behavior of the Two Beam Test Modules for the CLIC project Hélène MAINAUD.
List of changes and improvements for the next generation CLIC module
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
TBL quadrupole mover prototype development
Towards a common mechanical interface
Alignment challenges for a future linear collider
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Presentation transcript:

RUDE Vivien With the help of Hélène MAINAUD-DURAND And Mateusz SOSIN BE/ABP/SU CLIC MODULE September 19, 2011 Présentation REPORT OF THE CURRENT TESTS REPORT OF THE CURRENT TESTS RUDE Vivien

DRIVE BEAM DRIVE BEAM MAIN BEAM MAIN BEAM Presentation of the mock up RUDE Vivien

Test Module Synoptic RUDE Vivien B4-C B4-PT B4-T VLA010 VLA011 VLA010

Objectives :  Validation of alignment Systems  Qualification of linear actuators  Qualification of articulation point  Conclusion  Perspective Objectives RUDE Vivien

Time series of the tilt ( Inclinometer ) June 11, 2011 : June 11, 2011 :  23,5 °C  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Time series of the tilt ( Inclinometer ) September 15, 2011 : September 15, 2011 :  25,5 °C  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

 = 2,1  rad PAM-T Repeatibility test concerning inclinometer  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Time series of the Transversal Position ( WPS) June 11, 2011 : June 11, 2011 :  23,5 °C  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Time series of the Transversal Position ( WPS) September 15, 2011 : September 15, 2011 :  25,5 °C  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Repeatibility test concerning WPS sensors B3-C PAB-C  = 0,4  m  = 0,3  m  = 0,5  m  = 0,3  m Control of wire stability PBB-C  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Control of wire stability

Displacement of straight wire  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Displacement of straight wire Difference with theoretical Value  B4-C : 0.2 micron  B2-C : 0.2 micron  B3-C : 1.4 micron  B1-C : -1 micron  B5-C : -1.5 micron Difference with theoretical Value  B4-C : -1.9 micron  B2-C : microns  B3-C : 2.7 microns  B1-C : 26.8 microns  B5-C : 22.8 microns  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Test Actuators : Limit of Vertical Actuators Boostec LIMIT / VERTICAL / BOOSTEC: LIMIT / VERTICAL / BOOSTEC:  Moving the 6 Vertical actuators  In the same time  UP and DOWN + / - 3 mm  Step : 100 microns  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Test Actuators : Limit of Vertical Actuators Boostec  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Test Actuators : Limit of Vertical Actuators Boostec  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Test Actuators : Limit of Vertical Actuators Boostec 2 Solutions : 2 Solutions :  Increase the length of the last girder  Increase the longitudinal space between the two plates of the articulation point  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective

Test Actuators : Classic Case  Vertical : + / - 1 mm  Horizontal : + / - 1 mm  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective  = 99  m  = 98  m  = 101  m  = 131  m  = 98  m  = 93  m  = 95  m  = 120  m

Test Actuators : Classic Case  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective  Vertical : + / mm  Horizontal : + / mm  = 106  m  = 105  m  = 111  m  = 112  m  = 114  m  = 112  m  = 111  m

Test Actuators : Backlash for Boostec  Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Boostec OrderUPDOWN Backlash (  m) Micro-Contrôle OrderUPDOWN Backlash (  m)

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective RESOLUTION :  BOOSTEC VERTICAL : 0.17 micron  BOOSTEC HORIZONTAL : 0.2 micron  MICRO-CONTROLE VERTICAL : less than 0.2 micron  MICRO-CONTROLE HORIZONTAL : less than 0.2 micron Test Actuators : Resolution

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Articulation-Point : Vertical translation

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Articulation-Point : Vertical translation

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Articulation-Point : Rotation

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Conclusion concerning Validation of alignment systems:  Inclinometer :  Good repeatability Problem : need 1 hour after installation to be stabilized Problem : increase of the noise in 3 months  WPS :  Good repeatability  Good precision (Same wire in the mock up and for the calibration)  Problem : increase of the noise in 3 months Conclusion (1/3)

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Conclusions concerning Boostec Actuators:  Vertical Actuators :  Very Good resolution  Very Good repeatability  Good backlash Problem : de-synchronisation after 3 hours  Transversal Actuators:  No de-synchronisation  Good backlash Problem : one transversal actuator is not linear and has a bad repeatability (std=14 microns) Conclusion (2/3)

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Conclusions concerning Micro-Controle Actuators:  Vertical Actuators :  Good backlash  Good repeatability Problem : need to readjust the step  Transversal Actuators:  Good backlash  Good repeatability Problem : need to readjust the step Conclusion (2/3)

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Conclusions concerning Articulation Point :  Boostec:  Good transfer of the translation  Good transfer of the rotation Problem : need to resolve the problem of the last girder (too short) Problem : shift of 120 microns for the vertical distance between the two girder  Micro-controle:  Good transfer of the translation  Good transfer of the rotation Problem : shift of 50 microns for the radial distance between the two girder Conclusion (3/3)

 Validation of alignment systems  Inclinometer  WPS  Test - Actuators  Limit  Classic Case  Backlash  Resolution  Articulation- Point  Translation  Rotation  Conclusion  Perspective Perspective :  Inclinometer and WPS:  Improve the absolute measurement (only relative for now)  Understand the increase of the noise  Girder:  Find a solution for the last girder  Actuators :  Adjust the step of Micro-Controle actuators  Increase the range of Micro-Controle actuators (only 1 mm for now)  Resolve the problem of the de-synchronisation of Boostec actuators after 3 h  Articulation Point :  Resolve the problem of the shift for Boostec and for Micro-Controle  Me (Vivien RUDE):  Improve my English Perspective