Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS) and ISO Data Quality Ted Habermann NOAA National Data Centers MADIS observations on April 29, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS AIP Phase 2 Kickoff Workshop September, Boulder Colorado, USA AP ISO 1.0 Jürgen Walther Office of the Interministerial Committee for Geo Information.
Advertisements

Evolution of Metadata Standards: New Features in ISO Ted Habermann NOAA National Data Centers September, 2008
Documenting Data to Support Discovery and Use Dave Neufeld Ted Habermann John Kozimor.
1 OGC Web Services Kai Lin San Diego Supercomputer Center
FGDC & ISO: What is the Current Status and Considerations when Moving Forward? Viv Hutchison USGS Core Science Systems November 10, 2010 Salem, OR.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
Oregon Spatial Data Library Partnership Metadata Training OU Knight Library Eugene, Oregon December 3, 2009 Kuuipo Walsh Institute for Natural Resources.
1 NODC, Russia GISC & DCPC developers meeting Langen, 29 – 31 March E2EDM technology implementation for WIS GISC development S. Sukhonosov, S. Belov.
Linked Sensor Data Harshal Patni, Cory Henson, Amit P. Sheth Ohio Center of Excellence in Knowledge enabled Computing (Kno.e.sis) Wright State University,
Crossing the Digital Divide
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. National Water Census “Cyber – Platform” Update Progress and challenges to overcome in realizing.
Introduction to Geospatial Metadata – ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
Evolution of Metadata Standards: New Features in ISO Ted Habermann NOAA National Data Centers December, 2007
ISO Standards: Status, Tools, Implementations, and Training Standards/David Danko.
Documentation Developments Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Adoption of ISO Metadata Standards - Crossing the Chasm Facilitating the Transition Documentation.
Overview of the ODP Data Provider Sergey Sukhonosov National Oceanographic Data Centre, Russia Expert training on the Ocean Data Portal technology, Buenos.
Amended Oregon Geospatial Metadata Standard DRAFT PROPOSED BY METADATA WORKGROUP 18 TH FRAMEWORK FORUM, MAY 20, 2015, SALEM Bob DenOuden, GEO.
Metadata (for the data users downstream) RFC GIS Workshop July 2007 NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Documentation.
ALKIS-ATKIS modelling using ISO standards Workshop “Standards in action” – Lisbon – Clemens Portele interactive instruments GmbH Trierer.
Metadata Understanding the Value and Importance of Proper Data Documentation Exercise 2 Reading a Metadata File Exercise 3 Using the Workbook Exercise.
Vers national spatial data infrastructure training program Geographic Metadata North American Profile Development for ISO Geographic Metadata.
Interoperable Documentation Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC NCAR Earth Observing Laboratory, June 2010 Links: GEO-IDE Wiki:
Training course on biodiversity data publishing and fitness-for-use in the GBIF Network, 2011 edition How Darwin Core Archives have changed the landscape.
1 The NERC DataGrid DataGrid The NERC DataGrid DataGrid AHM 2003 – 2 Sept, 2003 e-Science Centre Metadata of the NERC DataGrid Kevin O’Neill CCLRC e-Science.
29-30 April 2004NVO Team Meeting NCSA1 Data Access Layer (DAL) SSA, SIA Enhancement Doug Tody National Radio Astronomy Observatory National Virtual Observatory.
Mapping between SOS standard specifications and INSPIRE legislation. Relationship between SOS and D2.9 Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke,
Handshake across the border… The North American Profile Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee.
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
Documenting Data Quality Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC Documentation: It’s not just discovery... 50% change in global average Why? i checked my 2002.
USGS Metadata in the Broader Picture 1994 Executive Order – Metadata must be created for all Federally-funded research – Federal Geographic Data.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
GEO-IDE Community Building and Best Practices Process GEO-IDE Standards Process Denver Post, Sunday, 9 April 2006.
Documentation from NcML to ISO Ted Habermann, NOAA NESDIS NGDC.
Documenting Data Quality Ted Habermann, NOAA National Geophysical Data Center.
{Fez} a Hatrack for your Metadata Sam Wilson & Nathan Denny HUBbub – Sep. 30, 2014.
Workshop Resources.
GeoMAPP: Using Metadata to Help Preserve Geospatial Content Matt Peters, Utah’s Automated Geographic Reference Center Glen McAninch, Kentucky Department.
2008 EPA and Partners Metadata Training Program: 2008 CAP Project Geospatial Metadata: Introduction Module 4: ISO 19115/19139 Metadata.
Metadata for Data Understandability Ted Habermann NOAA National Geophysical Data Center AGU, Spring 2008.
2013 NOAA MADIS Plans MADIS – The Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System Greg Pratt, Leon Benjamin, Thomas Kent, Gopa Padmanabhan, and Leigh Cheatwood.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata
Metadata – use data discovery e.g. a library catalog data assessment determine the fitness-for-purpose of a data set data retrieval e.g., format.
Dataset Metadata Distribution Data Extrinsic Metadata Intrinsic Metadata Vocabulary Access Metadata Provenance Metadata Usage Metadata Quality Metadata.
The Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat ESPON.
Documenting UAF Data Ted Habermann NOAA/NESDIS/National Geophysical Data Center.
1-2-3 February 2006 –Page 1 Mersea Integrated System How to improve Access/Downloading services ? How far do we go in terms of standardization ?
Mercury – A Service Oriented Web-based system for finding and retrieving Biogeochemical, Ecological and other land- based data National Aeronautics and.
Creating Good Documentation NOAA National Geophysical Data Center
Why Standardize Metadata?. Why Have a Standard? Think for a moment how hard it would be to… … bake a cake without standard units of measurement. … put.
Sneak Preview: Sneak Preview: The New US Geospatial Metadata Standard GeoMaxim Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Lynda Wayne, GISP Sharon Shin.
Danish Meteorological Institute, Ice Charting and Remote Sensing Division “SIKU” Sea Ice Mapping System The DMI Approach Henrik Steen Andersen Danish Meteorological.
The FGDC and Metadata. To maintain an organization's internal investment in geospatial data To provide information about an organization's data holdings.
Spatial Databases and Metadata.
Merging Metadata Standards: FGDC CSDGM and ISO and Sharon Shin Federal Geographic Data Committee Metadata Coordinator
Standard Metadata in Scientific Data Formats September 19, 2007 Flash at:
NOAA’s Surface Weather Program and the Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS) National Weather Service Partners Meeting June 6, 2006 Mike.
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
Forecast Model Run Collections and ISO Ted Habermann There has been considerable discussion of describing multiple times in forecast datasets This is not.
Transitioning from FGDC CSDGM Metadata to ISO 191** Metadata National Coastal Data Development Center A division of the National Oceanographic Data Center.
A look to the past for the future- The North American Profile Sharon Shin Metadata Coordinator Federal Geographic Data Committee.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
OFCM CEISC December 12, 2005 Non-Traditional and Non-WMO Observational Networks: Transitioning of the Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS)
Data Quality for Long-Term Datasets
ODP V2 Data Provider overview. 22 Scope Data Provider provides access to data and metadata of the local data systems. Data Provider is a wrapper, installed.
Geospatial metadata Prof. Wenwen Li School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning 5644 Coor Hall
The CUAHSI Hydrologic Information System Spatial Data Publication Platform David Tarboton, Jeff Horsburgh, David Maidment, Dan Ames, Jon Goodall, Richard.
Documenting Data Quality Ted Habermann, NOAA/NESDIS/NGDC
Overview EMODnet Biology Portal Standards used Web services available
Data Validation Methods WFD GIS Working Group
Dataverse for citing and sharing research data
Presentation transcript:

Meteorological Assimilation Data Ingest System (MADIS) and ISO Data Quality Ted Habermann NOAA National Data Centers MADIS observations on April 29, 2004

MADIS and ISO Metadata MADIS produces and distributes thousands of quality reports for stations in U.S. meteorological mesonets every week. See for MADIS information. The ISO Metadata Standard includes an extensive section devoted to data quality reports. How can these fit together? MADIS mesonet stations in the North- American domain on May 26, 2004

Generating ISO Metadata Rich Inventory MADISTrackingNMMR Existing Quality Resources Existing Metadata Resources ISO Generator ISO Metadata REST Views This schematic shows our approach. Existing quality resources are queried using a web service (REST) for the “beef” of the quality report. The “bun” is provided from views into existing FGDC or new ISO sources. These two are combined into a complete ISO report. The “Beef” The “Bun”

Data Quality Granularity MADIS integrates observations from stations in many meteorological mesonets around the U.S. The MADIS Quality Repository includes: nine statistics for six parameters For thousands of stations from ~150 data networks every week. Quality reports can be generated at any level (or granularity) from this hierarchy.

ISO Quality Granularity DQ_Scope + level: MD_ScopeCode + extent [0..1] : EX_Extent + levelDescription [0..*] : MD_ScopeDescription MD_ScopeDescription + attributes : Set + features : Set + featureInstances : Set + attributeInstances : Set + dataset : CharacterString + other : CharacterString + nonGeographicDataset + dimensionGroup + feature + featureType + propertyType + fieldSession MD_ScopeCode + attribute + attributeType + collectionHardware + collectionSession + dataset + series + software + service + model + tile

ISO Quality Granularity In the geographic jargon an ISO feature is a station and an ISO attribute is a parameter MD_ScopeDescription + attributes : Set + features : Set + featureInstances : Set + attributeInstances : Set + dataset : CharacterString + other : CharacterString MD_ScopeCode = dataset (data network in this case) We considered several options for expressing report granularity in ISO and ended up with a general approach that seems to make sense (at least as a first draft): = list of parameters = list of stations

Select Report Select three weeks Select three stations Select two parameters

The HTML View Three weeks Two Parameters Three Stations The Quality Information

The “Beef” Three weeks Two Parameters Three Stations The Quality Information

The ISO Report

dataset IODOT /levelDescription> SLP,THETA RAMI4,RAVI4,RBUI4 ISO Report Scope Two Parameters Three Stations One Network

ISO Temporal Extent Week One Week Two

The ISO Quantitative Report "Start Date","End Date","Data Network","Station","Parameter","Total Count","Bad Count", "Accum_Sum","Accum_Sum2","Percent Bad","Mean","RMS“ " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","THETA",294,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","THETA",282,5,36.96,276.1,1.77,7.39,7.43 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","THETA",308,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","THETA",314,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","THETA",291,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","THETA",316,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","THETA",671,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAMI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","THETA",633,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RAVI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","THETA",622,0,0,0,0,0,0 " ", " ","IODOT","RBUI4","SLP",0,0,0,0,0,0,0 The Quality Information

Conclusions Yes, MADIS Quality Information can be reported as ISO The ScopeCode is general with details in the LevelDescription We need to learn about describing feature and attribute sets in Feature Catalogs. At present we are using comma separated lists. We need to learn about how to describe the formats of reports. At present we are using CSV (comma separated values)