1 Statewide Directions for Student Information Systems James A. Kadamus New York State Education Department March, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Advertisements

The Need To Improve STEM Learning Successful K-12 STEM is essential for scientific discovery, economic growth and functioning democracy Too.
K-12 Data Warehousing and Reporting AIRPO Presentation January 11, 2006 Nicole Catapano, Ph.D., WSWHE BOCES Kathleen Maxwell, Capital Region BOCES Anita.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Successful Practices Network New York City and Long Island Career Pathways Regional Conference June 9, 2011.
1 TA Customizer Project—TAC Cheryl M. Lange
1 Proposed Changes to the Accreditation Process CDE Briefing for the Colorado State Board of Education March 5, 2008.
6/2/20151 Making the Case for Online Professional Development Linda Pittenger Kentucky Department of Education Online Learning Institute 22 March 2006.
Monitoring Accommodations in South Carolina Courtney Foster Office of Assessment.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Improving Data Migration Across Wyoming Schools Across Wyoming Schools October 2004 Presented By Data System Design Team Sponsored by the Wyoming Dept.
Data Collections Demystified Amy McLaughlin Director of IT Support Services Oregon Department of Education.
A Free sample background from Slide 1 NYS PLAN FOR DATA DATA FOR ACCOUNTABILITY DATA FOR INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
CORPORATE SERVICES Empowering Students For A Lifetime Of Success.
Successful Practices Network Staff and Curriculum Development Network June 2, 2011.
Successful Practices Network ACTEA Annual Leadership Conference March 24-25, 2011 Dr. Edward Shafer, Director Dr. Constance H. Spohn,
Statewide Initiatives & Lane County School Districts A conversation with Lane County Districts on statewide data initiatives and the implications for Lane.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Considerations for Developing a New Accountability System Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow, State Board of Education.
2nd Annual Tech Valley Career Pathways Annual Conference January 27, 2011.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Measurement of Academic Performance and Progress.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
NEW YORK STATE STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK Updates from the Office of Curriculum and Instructional Support March 3, 2006.
Update on Data Reporting September Repository System Goal To consolidate the Department’s collection of individual student data in the repository.
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
State HIE Program Chris Muir Program Manager for Western/Mid-western States.
External Supports for Educators Implementing Data-Driven Decision-Making Presented to the CCSSO September 9, 2008 Michelle LaPointe.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Draft TIP for E-rate. What is E-rate? The E-rate provides discounts to assist schools and libraries in the United States to obtain affordable telecommunications.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Successful Practices Network CTE Technical Assistance Center Work Plan 1.Improve CTE data collection to create an accurate picture.
Arizona Department of Education Superintendent John Huppenthal Mark Masterson, CIO Pamela Smith, IT Program Director September 14, 2011 ADE1.
Lawrence M. Paska, Ph.D. Coordinator of Technology Policy Educational Design and Technology Updates.
South Carolina Longitudinal Data System June 3, 2016 SC Longitudinal Data System.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Data Collection and Reporting System.
BOCES Data Collection & Reporting October 10, 2013 Lisa Pullaro Mid-Hudson Regional Information Center.
Data Pipeline May 10, 2013 Lisa Bradley IMS, Project Manager
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Office Of Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner For Standards, Assessment and Reporting S/CDN September 23, 2004.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
U.S. Department of Education Safeguarding Student Privacy Melanie Muenzer U.S. Department of Education Chief of Staff Office of Planning, Evaluation, and.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
NC Elements Web-based instructional management for planning, implementing, and improving instruction.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Oregon Department of Education Technology and School Finance Presenter:Doug Kosty, Director Presentation to the Joint Ways & Means Subcommittee on Education.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
Montana Office of Public Instruction Linda McCulloch Superintendent OPI Student Information System Madalyn QuinlanDonna O’Neill Charlie.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
1 Leading the Next Generation of Education Reform in New York State New York State Education Department James A. Kadamus September 22, 2005.
©2015, Region One Education Service Center Curriculum Advisory Council Meeting March 26, 2015 EDGAR Uniform Grants Guidance Office of School Improvement,
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
EECS David C. Chan1 Computer Security Management Session 1 How IT Affects Risks and Assurance.
Student Achievement, Data Trends, and Next Steps David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment and Reporting Staff/Curriculum Development.
E-Rate and District Technology Plan By Gwen Davis.
Instructional Technology Plan Overview
Implementing Race to the Top
Cross Elementary School Annual Title I Meeting
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

1 Statewide Directions for Student Information Systems James A. Kadamus New York State Education Department March, 2004

2 Introduction n the “state” of education n moving to a statewide student information system n student performance data n what a statewide system can do for you n role of the RICs n disclaimers u conceptual, not technical u ongoing policy development

3 The Current State In a standards-based environment, we need to: n collect data n analyze n plan and report n analyze again n improve practice n analyze again n be mindful of costs

4 What do we need in order to do this? n an orderly process n a statewide system n clear rules n clear roles n financial assistance n sufficient resources (people, technology, infrastructure, funding)

5 The Role of SED (part 1) Close gaps in student achievement n foster the development of a statewide system n meet federal and state reporting requirements n ensure resources are provided efficiently and effectively n set standards, reduce redundancy n advocate for funding

6 The Role of SED (part 2) n facilitate cooperation and coordination n ensure equity n focus on outcomes n highlight best practices n provide a planning infrastructure n integrate educational technology with other State functions

7 Elements of a Statewide Student Information System n unique student identifier n reporting requirements n statewide data standards n statewide data repository n technical services for LEAs n analysis support for instruction n instructional resources and staff development n coordination between elements

8 Unique Student Identifier n purpose: numbering system – enables longitudinal, disaggregated data n awarded contract n ID will be available for n can be used to track students n will enhance student data reporting n will improve data quality

9 Reporting Requirements n purpose: meet obligations, reduce redundancy n NCLB accountability n must comply with state accountability systems n goal of simplifying data submission

10 Statewide Data Repository n purpose: meet requirements n databases (local) n warehouses (regional) n repository (statewide) n will provide the State with required information n the same data items can be used for multiple purposes

11 Technical Support for LEAs n purpose: reduce burden n system needs quality data n systems have to be integrated n need networked infrastructure n technical assistance will be available to meet data requirements n improve quality, enhance staff expertise

12 Analysis Support for Instruction n purpose: improve instruction n generate user-friendly reports n provide a series of standard analyses (e.g., reports sent to districts that participated in the January Math A field test) n additional analyses available on request, with additional costs n professional development for using data

13 Instructional Resources and Staff Development n purpose: improve instruction n Virtual Learning System (VLS) u all standards in one place n web portal concept n authentication and authorization (replace the need for passwords for each application) n centralized place - eliminates involved searching and researching

14 How could/would/will it work? n district gives exam (not just state exams) n results sent to RIC (in the future, using online exams) n RIC sends data wherever; sends analysis back to district n web portal provides resources for staff development and instruction n instruction is improved; retest results follow the same route n faster transactions will enhance instruction and student performance

15 Role of RICs (part 1) n core partners with SED and districts to manage the process n foster regional planning in support of statewide directions (793 plan process) n provide statewide coordination (RIC directors) n construct warehouses n apply for E-rate funding on behalf of districts

16 Role of RICs (part 2) n create coordination n support management applications - financial, cafeteria, etc. n assure development of, and compliance with, regional standards n convene districts for regional planning

17 Ongoing Issues n determining the line between standardization and local autonomy, e.g., statewide purchase of software n cost effectiveness, e.g., balance between costs and local assistance in data warehouses n determining the line between instructional and management technology services (7710 and 6360) n integrating non-RIC parties, e.g., Big 5, charter schools

18 Implications for School Superintendents n will have longitudinal data on all students n will have data to assess strengths and weaknesses of instructional program n processes such as LEAP and STEP will be streamlined n teachers, parents and students will have ready access to resources to promote better learning

19 School District Obligations n provide quality data at student level (core issue for data-based decision making and data-driven instruction) n integrate planning for technology n provide ongoing staff development n involve parents n ensure Internet safety n designate a district data administrator

20 How can this save money? n reduce staff time (analysis rather than collection) n improve planning process n target staff development n facilitate program improvement n focus curriculum development n inform decisionmaking n provide required reports

21 How can this help students? n can direct instruction to gaps in student performance n increases curriculum articulation n provides resources to differentiate instruction n provides ready access to data for students moving between districts

22 Resources n Statewide Data Collection memo ments/02-04studentid-fm.htm n Virtual Learning System n NYSED Technology Plan uments/technology/tech-plan-2-03.html n E-rate