Q2010 – Internet based user satisfaction surveys Claudia Junker & Antonio Baigorri Eurostat.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lessons Learned from MICS1 and MICS2. MID-DECADE - INDEPENDENT EVALUATION OF MICS1 High level of satisfaction with quick information at low cost Exceeded.
Advertisements

Action and Change in the MH-CoPES Framework. What is Action & Change?
1 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, 8-11 July 2008 Improving the quality and the quality assessment of the Labour Force Survey.
Customer Satisfaction: using survey monkey Sarah Panzetta Library Services Manager Camden PCT Library.
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 1-1 Business Statistics: A First Course (3 rd Edition) Chapter 1 Introduction and Data Collection.
1 Developing and Measuring CRM. 2 Outline  Developing and Implementing CRM  Customer satisfaction –The value of measuring Customer satisfaction –Objective.
DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY A Multidisciplinary evaluation framework and.
Collecting Quantitative Data
Chapter 10 Collecting Quantitative Data. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES Establishing Procedures to Collect Survey Data Recording Survey Data Establishing the Reliability.
Company LOGO B2C E-commerce Web Site Quality: an Empirical Examination (Cao, et al) Article overview presented by: Karen Bray Emilie Martin Trung (John)
Results Mentor Feedback Description & Procedure Background Results Conclusion The current paper system for nurse mentors to provide feedback to nursing.
Basic Business Statistics (8th Edition)
14 Sept 2010 Workshop on Human Resources Management and Training Eurostat experience with staff satisfaction questionnaires and surveys Workshop on Human.
Handling Data Stem and Leaf Diagrams. Handling Data Stem and Leaf Diagrams Stem and Leaf diagrams are a way of organising ‘data’ collected from surveys.
The use and convergence of quality assurance frameworks for international and supranational organisations compiling statistics The European Conference.
Step 4: Gather Evidence Luann D’Ambrosio, MEd. Review: What to measure What amount of $ and time were invested What did the program actually consist of.
World of work How should we use science tasks to connect to the WoW? Tool WD-2: Connecting tasks to the world of work Tool # WD-2
University of Kaiserslautern Department of Computer Science Integrated Communication Systems ICSY Engaging Current and Prospective Internet.
Marina Signore Head of Service “Audit for Quality Istat Assessing Quality through Auditing and Self-Assessment Signore M., Carbini R., D’Orazio M., Brancato.
Career Link 2007 Report Yvonne Madden Project Leader 03 rd October 2008.
European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, Rome 8-11 July Satisfying User and Partner Needs- the Use of Specific Reviews at Eurostat.
Year 9 Business & Enterprise Competition. Lesson Aims: Collate and process data from your questionnaire Present information in a suitable format Draw.
Quality Assessments of Statistical Production Processes in Eurostat Pierre Ecochard and Małgorzata Szczęsna
Insurance Model. Call Centre Claim Assessment Centre Customer Surveys Underwriting Data Capturing and Data Entry IPO Insurance Process Out Sourcing.
1 S ystems Analysis Laboratory Helsinki University of Technology Opinions-Online Platform for Global Participation, Voting, Surveys and Group Decisions.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
Multi-source tools for assessing the users’ needs & perception on statistical quality. The Spanish experience. European Conference on Quality in Official.
Benchmarking Methodology. Sep 27th, 2004 © R. García-Castro, A. Gómez-Pérez Raúl García-Castro Asunción Gómez-Pérez September 27th, 2004 Benchmarking.
Data Collection Methods. After choosing a sampling method, we need to collect data from the sample selected. Can you name some data collection methods.
Dr. Sirirat Srisa-ard Kasetsart University.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
Virginia Alternate Assessment Program Standard Setting Richmond, Virginia September 18-21, 2001.
Sonali Bhasin. Abstract  Software organizations that are transitioning from traditional method to Agile development methods.  Study various challenges.
Online Radschool Web-Based Software for Radiologic Programs America’s Software Corporation  Call us today for a.
Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments OECD Teaching and Learning International Study (TALIS) Teacher evaluation Evidence from TALIS OECD.
Paul P. Biemer RTI International Lars E. Lyberg Statistics Sweden I ntroduction to S urvey Q uality.
Developing and applying business process models in practice Statistics Norway Jenny Linnerud and Anne Gro Hustoft.
Measuring How Good Your Search Engine Is. *. Information System Evaluation l Before 1993 evaluations were done using a few small, well-known corpora of.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Quality Frameworks: Implementation and Impact Notes by Michael Colledge.
Sponsorship on Quality The final report Zsuzsanna Kovács Expert Group Meeting on National Quality Assurance Frameworks UNSD, New York, September.
© fedict All rights reserved User satisfaction & impact measurement Belgian practice Description using the Template Christine Mahieu, Business Analyst.
Managing Agriculture KnowledgeThrough Localized CommunityExpert System Managing Agriculture Knowledge Through Localized Community Expert System A Research.
Short-Term Economic Statistics Working PartyJune Short Term Economic Statistics Timeliness Framework Richard McKenzie OECD.
Linking management, planning and quality in Statistics Norway A coherent planning system Systematic quality work Portfolio management Hans Viggo Sæbø and.
User Satisfaction Surveys in Eurostat and in the European Statistical System 2008 Conference on Quality in Official Statistics Rome, 8-11 July 2008 Pierre.
1 The GSBPM and ESS statistical business process metadata Session 4 H. Linden, Unit B6 Eurostat Workshop on Statistical Metadata (METIS) (Geneva, 5-7 October.
Communicating a Vision to staff Lukasz Augustyniak Eurostat Press Office and Internal Communication Unit.
1 Recent developments in quality matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker, Eurostat,
1 Recent developments in quality related matters in the ESS High level seminar for Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia countries Claudia Junker,
Design of online survey system with an advanced IPA discrimination index for customer satisfaction assessment Presenter: Mai, Yi-Ting ( 麥毅廷, 臺體大運管系 ) Paper.
13-Jul-07 Q 2008 – Claudia Junker (DDG 02) and Vera Herrmann (A2) 1 Reduction of response burden and priority setting in the field of Community Statistics.
Eurostat Quality reporting on energy statistics Framework and experience at EU level United Nations Oslo Group on Energy Statistics Aguascalientes (Mexico),
INCOSE Usability Working Group
BSA 413 RANK Lessons in Excellence-- bsa413rank.com.
breakout session of the measurement subgroup, CD4
GALILEO Support Services September 2007
פחת ורווח הון סוגיות מיוחדות תהילה ששון עו"ד (רו"ח) ספטמבר 2015
Eurostat User Satisfaction Survey
Question 3: What have you learnt from your audience feedback?
Интерпретация және зерттеу нәтижесін өңдеу
New tools for the Eurostat Internet B. Le Goff, G. Schaefer Unit B6
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics
LAMAS October 2017 Agenda Item 5.1 Consultation to stakeholders
The European Statistics Code of Practice - a Basis for Eurostat’s Quality Assurance Framework Marie Bohatá Deputy Director General, Eurostat ... Strategic.
New Eurostat website Annika Börtin Unit B4– Dissemination

ESS.VIP Validation Item 5.1
Commonly Used measurement dimensions
2.7 Annex 3 – Quality reports
Presentation transcript:

Q2010 – Internet based user satisfaction surveys Claudia Junker & Antonio Baigorri Eurostat

2 Structure of the presentation Background Types of user satisfaction surveys Results of some surveys The use of Internet Advantages and shortcomings Conclusions

3 Background Eurostat’s quality assurance framework –Documentation and measurement level –Evaluation level –Conformity level Link to user satisfaction surveys

4 Types of user satisfaction surveys General user satisfaction surveys –Why –How –What Specific domain user satisfaction surveys –Why –How –What –Domains covered

5 Results of some surveys General results Specific results Domain specific results Quality dimensions Quality ranking by users

6 The use of Internet – lessons learnt Mode of data collection Promotion of the survey Questionnaire design Tools used Follow-up of the results

7 Advantages and shortcomings Advantages in relation to the subject of the surveys Shortcoming sin relation to the subject of the survey Advantages in relation to the mode of data collection Shortcomings in relation to the mode of data collection

8 Conclusions The chosen approach The questionnaire The substance The mode of data collection Other user feedback