Special Education: Innovative Arrangements Between a School District and Charter Schools Results in Better Outcomes for Students with Special Needs ACSA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Funding and Resources for Dropout Recovery & Multiple Education Pathways Dropout Recovery Discussion Group, American Youth Policy Forum October 20, 2006.
Advertisements

Back to the Drawing Board Summary of the work of the Human Services Redesign Committee from May 2012 forward.
Special Education Services in Charter Schools Juana Burchell Illinois State of Education Charter Schools Special Education Services State Coordinator
Project Narratives Colorado Department of Education June 2011.
Aging & Disability Resource Consortiums February 14, 2007 San Diego Long Term Care Integration Project The Massachusetts Experience.
Education Budgets and Transparent Funding PTA Council October 15, 2009 LMU Family of Schools.
Connecting government services to improve community outcomes Establishing Victorian state-wide area based governance architecture Presentation to the VCOSS.
1 Rhode Island Perspective Advanced Youth Forum. 2 State of Rhode Island Workforce Organizational Chart.
Building a Special Education Infrastructure Through a Joint Power Authority.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Developing a Federal Platform Presentation to State Board of Education January 2013.
Creating a Health Equity Plan ‘Even when diversity is in your DNA … it needs help and support’ Matt Anderson, President and CEO, William Osler Health System.
Twin Rivers Unified School District: Inspiring each student to extraordinary achievement every day! Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) UPDATE Presented.
1 TA Customizer Project—TAC Cheryl M. Lange
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Delivering Services under IDEA 2004 in Charter Schools Julie F. Mead University of Wisconsin-Madison
Charter Schools: Reinventing Public Education. Charter Schools… Are independent public schools of choice Serve ALL student populations Are tuition-free.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
March 21, 2008Westin Horton Plaza, San Diego1 ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS A County Office Perspective Thomas Silva: Facilities Planning.
Dennis Culhane and John Fantuzzo, University of Pennsylvania, 2011 EQUITY RELEVANCY CAPACITY Achieving a Common Purpose in the Real World of Public Services.
Los Angeles Unified School District Edgar Zazueta, Chief of Staff-External Affairs Valley Schools Task Force 1/29/14 Los Angeles Unified School District.
Student Achievement in Chicago Public Schools
MEDWAY COUNCIL Kent Private Sector Housing Sub Group Aim: To share best practice in terms of private sector housing (including the management of Disabled.
AHIMA & PHDSC A Transformational Alliance. CONFIDENTIAL AHIMA Background  Professional association founded in 1928 as the Association of Record Librarians.
Charter Schools and Charter Systems in Georgia Georgia Grantmakers Alliance Summer Meeting August 16, 2012.
Children and learning – the new agenda Children and Lifelong Learning Scrutiny Committee July 05.
Utah Communications Agency Network UCAN Governance Structure.
GEM Governance Summit An Introduction to Governance Models and Practices.
July 2008 Lee County Transit Authority Concept: An Update.
Briefing to the Virginia State Board of Education Committee on Lowest-Performing School Systems James Monroe Building, Richmond Don Soifer Lexington Institute.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
ExCEL Excellence: A Commitment to Every Learner Hesperia Unified School District (760) , ext. 209.
Coping with Mental Illness and Crafting Public Policy Coping with Mental Illness and Crafting Public Policy January 12, 2002 Being There: Making a Commitment.
Section 1115 Waiver Implementation Plan Stakeholder Advisory Committee May 13, 2010.
Average Daily Membership
Special Education: Lessons Learned in the Restructure of Los Angeles Unified School District National Charter School Conference Sharyn Howell, Executive.
How to Start a Charter School California Charter Schools Association Lisa Berlanga Steven Holguin Convert To ˅ Transforming Your School.
Switching SELPAs: When Should My Charter School Consider This?
LCFF The LCFF is the largest change to California’s school finance model in almost 40 years with a planned eight-year transition period, beginning in
PTA Special Education Committee: Special Education Flexible Service Delivery Model Specialized Academic Instruction (“SAI”) Michael Keller, Ed.D., Director,
California Department of Education and Los Angeles Unified School District NAEHCY Conference November 2009 Title I and Homeless Education Program Collaboration:
1 Balancing Act: A Board’s Role in Charter School Oversight Presented by: Sue Ann Evans, Dannis Woliver Kelley Moises Aguirre, San Diego Unified School.
2012 AASA Legislative Agenda NCE 2012 Bruce Hunter Houston, TX February 17, 2012 Associate Executive Director Advocacy and Communication.
Eligible Entities Who Qualifies for Discounts? E-Rate Modernization E-rate Modernization
State Allocation Board Meeting December 15, 2010 Presented By.
Nov 2, Agenda 1. Welcome and Introductions2. Overview of Oakland Special Education Landscape 3. Overview of Current Special Ed Arrangements in CA.
Office of Federal Programs Marcus E. Cheeks, Bureau Director.
Louisiana Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Student-Based Budgeting Task Force November 3, 2010 Matt Hill.
Region 4 ESC1 SLP Advisory Committee. Region 4 ESC2 Introductions.
Insurance Summit 2016 REGULATORY UPDATE. Panel Participants Ray Farmer (Director, South Carolina Department of Insurance) Tim Morris (Hanover Stone Solutions)
Opening a Quality Charter School in the Los Angeles Unified School District Charter Schools Division February 27, 2008.
N OVATO U NIFIED S CHOOL D ISTRICT October 15, 2013 Local Control Funding Formula.
The Changing Landscape of Special Education Data
Empowerment Zones Partnerships to get communities the schools they want with the results students need.
Florida Charter Schools:
ORIENTATION & ELECTION OF CAC MEMBERS
Hillsborough County Charter Schools
Special Education and the Charter Schools
RESULTS EXCELLENCE INNOVATION The SCPCSD: LEA and Charter Authorizer
District of innovation
Charter Considerations
Standing together to raise our voice
District of Innovation Overview Public Hearing January 17, 2017
RESULTS EXCELLENCE INNOVATION
THE EL DORADO CHARTER SELPA Jan. 25.
SELPA Governance State SELPA New Directors’ Sacramento October 5, 2016
Fostering a Working Relationship with Charter Authorizers
Recognizing the importance of LEA status and related issues
RIM OF THE WORLD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Access & Opportunities:
Presentation transcript:

Special Education: Innovative Arrangements Between a School District and Charter Schools Results in Better Outcomes for Students with Special Needs ACSA Every Child Counts Symposium Brian Bauer, CEO, Granada Hills Charter High School Sharyn Howell, Executive Director, LAUSD Gina Plate, Sr. Advisor for Special Education January 16, 2015

Charter Schools Intended as models for innovation, charter schools are uniquely position to provide individualized support to all students.

Local Educational Agency (LEA) for Special Education Ed. Code §47641(a) Part of an LEA (“School of the District”) Ed. Code §47641(b) California Charter Schools have two options for special education service delivery and responsibility: California: Two Options for Charter Schools

Key Factors Independent LEA for special education purposes Part of an LEA for special education purposes Legal Status Relationship to authorizer dictates: Access to funding Service delivery responsibility and decision making authority Linkage

= Authorizer = Traditional School = Charter School Another look at the Options Independent LEA for Special Education (No Link) Part of an LEA/ School of the District (Total Link) Responsibility & Funding

California Special Education Structures

Another look at the Structures LEA for Special Education School of The District School District Charter School SELP A

Charter School: Autonomy, Flexibility, Funding SELPA: Compliance, Funding Authorizer: Oversight, Funding The Great Divide: Competing Interests Quality Services for Students

Los Angeles Unified School District LAUSD ADA 611,000; Enrollment: 653,826Students with Disabilities: 82, Charter Schools; 122,000 ADA

The LAUSD Vision Expand the innovative, high-quality school choice options available for vulnerable youth by empowering charter schools to: Serve a greater number of students with unique needs; Provide innovative, high-quality services to a broader range of students.

11 The LAUSD SELPA Structure One Single-District SELPA Two Sub-groups – District-Operated Programs – Charter-Operated Programs

LAUSD: One structure, two programs LAUSD Board of Education LAUSD SELPA $ District-Operated Program $ Charter-Operated Program Advisory Committee 2 charter representatives 3 district representatives

One SELPA, two Programs District Operated Program Charter Operated Program LAUSD SELPA Affiliated charters Traditional district schools and “school of the district” charters Programs and Services Option 2 charters Option 1 charters Semi- autonomous “LEA-like” charters Option 3 charter $ $ $ $

How Does the Charter Operated Program (COP) Structure Look Like In LAUSD? Charter Schools 80% Admin. Costs10% Pooled for Risk Sharing10% Each charter school assumes responsibility for providing all special education services similar to structure available to schools operating as an LEA for special education purposes.

Charter schools in the new program have increased both the number and range of students with disabilities they serve COP schools increased the percentage of students with disabilities they serve from 8.12% in ’11 to 9.73% in 2012-’13. COP schools have increased the proportion of students with the most severe ("low-incidence") disabilities by 39%. Case Study: Los Angeles

Successes in New Arrangements A regression analysis showed every additional year as an LEA a school has an average increase of.4% in the proportion of student population identified with a disability. In other words, after 5 years as an LEA, the average increase in population of SWD is 2%.