Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, 24.8.2006 Status report of offset and angle studies with Guinea-Pig Status report of offset and angle studies.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

K. Buesser & N. Walker TF Studies: A very first look.

Advertisements

1 MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS Glen White, SLAC/QMUL Snowmass 2005.

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.

Main Linac Simulation - Main Linac Alignment Tolerances - From single bunch effect ILC-MDIR Workshop Kiyoshi KUBO References: TESLA TDR ILC-TRC-2.

PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER: A. Faus-Golfe IFIC - Valencia Accelerator and Detector aspects FPA

Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !

MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.

Web-Based ILC Multi-Bunch Simulation Database Glen White (SLAC / QMUL) ILC MDI Workshop SLAC, Jan 8th 2005.

Exotic approach to a Super B-FACTORY P. Raimondi.

C.Limborg-Deprey Beam Dynamics Justifying L01 November 3 rd 2004 Beam Dynamics Justifications of modification of.

Beam-beam studies for Super KEKB K. Ohmi & M Tawada (KEK) Super B factories workshop in Hawaii Apr

High L parameters 1 July 25, 2005 Discussion of ILC high luminosity parameters Andrei Seryi with suggestions from Tor Raubenheimer and critical comments.

ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.

ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.

Beam-beam simulations M.E. Biagini, K. Ohmi, E. Paoloni, P. Raimondi, D. Shatilov, M. Zobov INFN Frascati, KEK, INFN Pisa, SLAC, BINP April 26th, 2006.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project “Slow” Feedback Requirements: Deflections and Luminosity Linda Hendrickson IPBI Meeting, SLAC June 26, 2002.

Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Analysis C.Grah ILC ECFA 2006 Valencia, 9 th November 2006.

Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.

NLC Intra-Pulse Fast Feedback Simon Jolly Oxford University NLC Beam Delivery Meeting July 2001.

Feedback On Nano-second Timescales: An IP Feedback System for the Future Linear Collider Requirement for a fast IP beam-based feedback system Simulation.

ILC Start-End Simulations Glen White, SLAC May 13, 2014 AWLC14, Fermilab.

Proposed machine parameters Andrei Seryi July 23, 2010.

Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.

Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.

BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.

Luminosity Monitoring and Beam Diagnostics FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.

Analysis of Beamstrahlung Pairs ECFA Workshop Vienna, November 14-17, 2005 Christian Grah.

Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov

ILC Meeting Vancouver July What Does Beam-strahlung Tell Us? William Morse - BNL.

Fast Beam Diagnostics at the ILC Using the Beam Calorimeter Christian Grah, Desy FCAL Workshop February Cracow.

Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.

Study of alternative ILC final focus optical configurations Dou Wang (IHEP), Yiwei Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) International Workshop.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project P. Tenenbaum DR  IP  DR Simulations Collaboration + MAC Meeting May 2002 “Now Bliss is Everywhere…”

1 Alternative ILC Bunch Compressor 7 th Nov KNU (Kyungpook National Univ.) Eun-San Kim.

1 DR -> IP Beam Transport Simulations with Intra-Train Feedback Glen White, SLAC Jan 19 th 2006.

Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.

Placet based DFS simulations in the ILC Main Linac. Some preliminary results of error scans open for discussion Javier Resta Lopez JAI, Oxford University.

BDS Alignment, Tuning, Feedback update and Integrated Simulation Plans Glen White.

Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann LET Beam Dynamics Workshop, Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Lumi scans with wakefields in Merlin Isabell-A.

07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.

Beam-Beam head-on Limit J. Barranco, X. Buffat, T. Pieloni, C. Tambasco, J. Qiang, K. Ohmi, M. Crouch for the Beam-Beam team BI BSRT Team George and Enrico.

The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,

Beamdiagnostics using BeamCal C.Grah FCAL Workshop, Paris,

GUINEA-PIG: Beam-beam interaction simulation status M. Alabau, P. Bambade, O. Dadoun, G. Le Meur, C. Rimbault, F. Touze LAL - Orsay D. Schulte CERN - Genève.

Beam-Beam Effects in the LHeC Edward Nissen 1LHeC Workshop June

BDS, Start to End Simulation, Simulation Codes Summary D. Schulte.

G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.

Beam-beam simulations with large synchrotron tune for strong RF focusing scheme D.Shatilov (BINP), M.Zobov (LNF) SBSR Workshop LNF, Frascati, 7-8 November.

Emittance Growth in the SPPS Chicane P. Emma, P. Krejcik, C. O’Connell, M. Woodley; SLAC, H. Schlarb, F. Stulle; DESY.

ILC BDS Commissioning Glen White, SLAC AWLC 2014, Fermilab May 14 th 2014.

Freddy Poirier - DESY Preliminary Merlin DFS studies following discussion (Very preliminary) Freddy Poirier DESY.

8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.

1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,

1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.

For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.

Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)

Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC

Other beam-induced background at the IP

SD0/QD0 Cryomodule Jitter Tolerance

MULTI-BUNCH INTEGRATED ILC SIMULATIONS

GUINEA-PIG++ Workshop on Spin Simulation Tools, 9-11 Nov 2010, DESY

Beam beam simulations with disruption (work in progress...)

Preliminary results on depolarization due to beam-beam interaction at SuperB Cecile Rimbault LAL - Orsay.

Beamdiagnostics by Beamstrahlung Pair Analysis

Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.

MULTI-BUNCH SIMULATIONS OF THE ILC FOR LUMINOSITY PERFORMANCE STUDIES

Orbit Bumps in PEP-II to Maximize Luminosity

Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC

CLEAR’s Inductive Beam Position Monitors

Presentation transcript:

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Status report of offset and angle studies with Guinea-Pig Status report of offset and angle studies with Guinea-Pig Isabell-Alissandra Melzer-Pellmann ILC tech meeting July 11 th, 2006

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Offset and angle scan from TESLA TDR Luminosity drops fast with small change of offset and/or angle TESLA parameters:  y = 5nm,  y = 12  rad How is the luminosity change for the ILC parameters? Results from beam-beam simulation with GUINEA-PIG from TESLA TDR

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Offset scan with ILC parameters ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM:  y = 5.7nm ILC 500 LOW Q:  y = 3.5nm ILC 500 LARGE Y:  y = 8.1nm ILC 500 LOW P:  y = 3.8nm ILC 500 HIGH L:  y = 3.5nm ILC 1000 NOM:  y = 3.5nm ILC 1000 LOW Q:  y = 2.5nm ILC 1000 LARGE Y:  y = 7.0nm ILC 1000 LOW P:  y = 2.7nm ILC 1000 HIGH L:  y = 2.5nm Loss of luminosity falls not so steep, for  y/  y =±1 O(30%) (TESLA: for  y/  y =±1 O(40%))

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Offset scan with ILC parameters ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM:  y = 5.7nm ILC 500 LOW Q:  y = 3.5nm ILC 500 LARGE Y:  y = 8.1nm ILC 500 LOW P:  y = 3.8nm ILC 1000 NOM:  y = 3.5nm ILC 1000 LOW Q:  y = 2.5nm ILC 1000 LARGE Y:  y = 7.0nm ILC 1000 LOW P:  y = 2.7nm Loss of luminosity falls not so steep, for  y/  y =±1 O(30%) (TESLA: for  y/  y =±1 O(40%))

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Angle scan with ILC parameters ILC parameters: ILC 500 NOM:  y = 14.3  rad ILC 500 LOW Q:  y = 17.5  rad ILC 500 LARGE Y:  y = 20.2  rad ILC 500 LOW P:  y = 18.9  rad ILC 500 HIGH L:  y = 17.5  rad ILC 1000 NOM:  y = 11.7  rad ILC 1000 LOW Q:  y = 12.4  rad ILC 1000 LARGE Y:  y = 11.7  rad ILC 1000 LOW P:  y = 13.4  rad ILC 1000 HIGH L:  y = 12.4  rad Changing variable angle_y in Guinea-Pig results in almost no change (tested also with TESLA parameters) - contacted Daniel Schulte… waiting for response

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Next step: include ‘banana effect’ Banana effect: internal bunch deformations, induced by single-bunch wakefields in the linac. TESLA TDR: single bunch correlated emittance growth expected to be 6% in average. Results from beam-beam simulation with GUINEA-PIG from TESLA TDR

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Next step: include ‘banana effect’ For these plots a ‘banana shape’ beam needs to be feeded into Guinea-Pig Simulated ‘banana’ from MERLIN not yet available. Idea: just generate beam with ILC parameters and change it linearly by average of 6% (number from TESLA TDR) Status: generated beam (without change yet) fed into Guinea-Pig, compared beam generated by Guinea-Pig with my generated beam after interaction (output from Guinea-Pig) - see next pages  differences observed need to check this before further simulation can be run. wrong calculation of x’, y’? x/  m y/  m z/  m

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction) Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generator generated beam. z/  m x/  m y/  m z/  m y/  m x/  m

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction) Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generator generated beam. x/  m y/  m

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction) Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generator generated beam. x/  m z/  m z-distribution seems ok x-distribution seems ok exept around 0

Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann ILC-tech meeting, Comparison: Guinea Pig generated beam vs my generated beam (after interaction) Guinea-Pig generated With root random number generator generated beam. z/  m y/  m y-distribution has large tails