Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.
Advertisements

NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
0 © 2011 Silver Spring Networks. All rights reserved. Building the Smart Grid.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com Winter 2014 Overview & Recent and Upcoming Market Rule Changes Adam Keech Director, Market Operations.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
PECO Smart Ideas Energy Efficiency Programs
PUC of Texas EEIP Meeting Residential A/C Load Control Program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
Connecticut Energy Efficiency Incentive Program Overview of Program February 2010 DPUC-Approved Energy Efficiency Incentives for Connecticut Electric Users.
Automated Demand Response "PG&E" refers to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. ©2013 Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
Introductions Energy Curtailment Specialists, Inc. Confidential – Property of ECS, Inc Paul Tyno, Executive Vice President Program Development − Responsible.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Let’s Talk Energy Savings: The City of Norwalk partners with Conservation & Load Management (C&LM) Mayor Alex Knopp November 18, 2004.
Power Utilities in the Telecom Business in the USA: Past Failures and Future Trends Mike Oldak Vice President & General Counsel Utilities Telecom Council.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.
Demand Response How to make money by not using electricity?
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Joe Polidoro, Sr. Engineer PJM Interconnection, LLC Grid of the Future: Integrating Load Response into the Markets.
PJM©2009www.pjm.com Implications of Electric Transportation for the National Grid Ken Huber PJM Interconnection February 19, 2010.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION Status Report Demand Responsive Building Program William J. Keese California Energy Commission March 30, 2001.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Greg Miller – EVP, Market Development
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERCOT ELTF – Overview and Brief Proposal Dr. Eric Woychik – Strategy Integration LLC representing Comverge, Inc. 8 November 2006.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
©2005 PJM 1 STATE OF THE MARKET REPORT 2004 Joseph E. Bowring Market Monitor FERC Briefing April 13, 2005.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
PJM © 2006 The Institute for Regulatory Policy Studies Illinois State University Conference May 12, 2006 Jeff Bladen PJM Interconnection.
Demand Response as Capacity in New York National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meetings Washington, DC February 17,
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
© EnerNOC Inc. The Role of Aggregators in the Reliable Recruitment and Delivery of Demand Response Or “why do I need an aggregator anyway? 9 June, 2011.
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
State of Virginia Energy Managers 2016 Leigh Anne Ratlitf Account Management and Sales Integrated Demand Resources (iDR)
1 The End Of Price Freeze Service (PFS) For Schedule P Customers Presentation To The Maryland Public Service Commission by Wayne Harbaugh March 4, 2002.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Wind Management at MISO
Asia-Pacific Energy Regulatory Forum
Potomac Edison Preliminary Energy Efficiency and Conservation Programs
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Sustainability Leadership Forum - Dallas
Leveraging Energy Infrastructure to Drive Revenue
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
Presentation transcript:

Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14

Discussion Topics Comverge/Enerwise Introduction PJM & ComEd Demand Response Evolution –Capacity Market Program PJM Rules Changes –Synchronous Reserve ComEd opportunity –Energy Efficiency Credits ComEd and DCEO –FERC Order 745 & DC Courts

 Leading provider of Intelligent Energy Management (IEM)/Demand Response (DR) solutions  Headquartered in Atlanta, GA  ~520 employees  Revenues: $136.4 million, $119.4 million,  Acquired by H.I.G. Capital on May 16, 2012 Highlights Comverge Overview Sample Clients C&I 43% Program Experience 3 © 2012 Comverge, Inc. Vertical Market Expertise  Industrials  Water/waste water  Education  Manufacturing  Health Care  Retail  Hospitality  Public administration  Open Markets  Utilities

PJM Capacity (Summer) Program - RTO - Obligation to respond to capacity emergencies when called by PJM June through September; 11am to 7pm CST; Non-Holiday Weekdays Maximum of 10 outages for a maximum of 6 hours each Response within 30 minutes of the dispatch from PJM 100 kW minimum - Daily payment earned from June 1st through May 31 st for readiness to respond payments of $118.54/MW day ($43,267/MW from 6/1/15 through 5/31/16) -Extended Summer $136/MW day ($49,640/MW)* payments of $59.73/MW day ($21,801/MW from 6/1/16 through 5/31/17) payments of $106.00/MW day ($38,690/MW from 6/1/17 through 5/31/18) -Extended Summer $120.00/MW day ($43,800/MW)* - An energy payment may also be received during a curtailment event *Extensions of Summer Months with additional opportunities for Events

Program Changes 30 Minute Dispatch (Note: There is no change in dispatch time for the 2014/15 Capacity season.) –The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) approved a request by PJM to move the default dispatch time for the PJM Capacity program from 120 minutes (2 hours) down to 30 minutes. Starting in delivery year 2015/16, PJM Capacity Market demand response program participants will be expected to curtail within 30 minutes of dispatch. –Comverge is working with PJM and FERC to broaden the rule and the exception process, but for now, it is anticipated that there will be very few exceptions to the new dispatch requirement and we are operating under the assumption the FERC’s May 9 th order will hold. –Potential Exception Descriptions Transfer of load to back-up generation requires time-intensive manual process taking more than 30 minutes On-site safety concerns prevent location from implementing reduction plan in less than 30 minutes The manufacturing processes for Demand Response require gradual reduction to avoid damaging major industrial equipment used in the manufacturing process, or damage to the product generated or feedstock used in the manufacturing process –Possible Implications Deployment of Direct Load Control and/or Remote Operation of Generation Assets Removal from Program in 2015

Program Changes Limited, Extended, and Annual Programs Limited (Current Program) Available for interruption for up to 10 times during curtailment period June through September (Weekdays, excluding holidays, from 12:00 pm – 8:00 pm) Each event could last up to six (6) hours in duration Extended Available for an unlimited number of interruptions during an extended curtailment period June through October and the following May (7 days/week between the hours of 10:00 am – 10:00 pm) Each event could last up to ten (10) hours in duration Annual Available for an unlimited number of interruptions during the delivery year Extended summer period of June through October and the following May (7 days/week between the hours of 10:00 am – 10:00 pm) November through April (7 days/weeks between the hours of 6:00 am – 9:00 pm) Each event could last up to ten (10) hours in duration

PJM Synchronous Reserve Program-- Overview PJM Regional Transmission Owner ’ s occasionally need immediate assistance with system reliability Need loads to reduce quickly – within 10 minutes Load that can respond in 10 minutes will get paid for that ability to respond Load will have to stay reduced for a maximum of 30 minutes per event. Estimated 25 events per year Get paid for every hour available to be called Value based on Synchronized Reserve Market Clearing Price ComEd – 2014 YTD: 7 Events Averaging 16 Minutes – Totaling $29, in Revenue Based on $2 Strike Price Penalties for non performance and multiple missed performances.

MonthNet Sync TotalHours Cleared 2013$6, $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $1, $1, $2, $29, ,524 1$10, $4, $3, $3, $2, $1, $1, $1, $

PJM Energy Efficiency (EE) Program What Projects Qualify? NOT Demand Response (DR) Lighting HVAC Motors VFD’s Refrigeration Equipment Weatherization / Building Envelope Process Improvements Any Electrical Reduction Improvement

PJM Energy Efficiency (EE) Program Permanent & Continuous Peak kW Demand Reduction during Performance hours: June thru August, Weekday, Non-Holiday, 3-6pm ComEd DCEO Credits Available Installation Period Fully Installed by June 1 st of Eligible Delivery Years June 2011 – May 2012 Install Date Before May 2012

© 2012 Comverge, Inc.  DC Courts Have set a ruling that FERC does not have the Authority to Regulate a DR Market  Utility Generator has requested all C&I DR be cancelled before June 1, 2015  DR will not be going Away but will potentially change  Enerwise and Other CSP’s are fighting this ruling to keep DR available  Current DR customers can send letters to the Courts and FERC expressing the positive Impact DR has. FERC Order 745 & DC Courts 11

 Demand Response and Similar Programs are Evolving  Utilize Knowledgeable Curtailment Service Provider Guidance  Programs Involvement Becoming More Automated.  Participation supports local electric supplier’s efforts to produce and deliver electricity more efficiently and cost-effectively  Comverge offers solutions that help effectively participate in the PJM Demand Response programs to maximize revenues and energy savings Summation

Kellen Bollettino Comverge – Sales Executive (847)