LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Artificial Intelligence
Advertisements

Four Rules of Aristotelian Logic 1. Rule of Identity: A is A 2. Rule of Non-Contradiction: A is not (-A) 3. Rule of Excluded Middle: Either A or (-A)
An overview Lecture prepared for MODULE-13 (Western Logic) BY- MINAKSHI PRAMANICK Guest Lecturer, Dept. Of Philosophy.
CPSC 121: Models of Computation Unit 6 Rewriting Predicate Logic Statements Based on slides by Patrice Belleville and Steve Wolfman.
Deductive Arguments: Categorical Logic
Euler’s circles Some A are not B. All B are C. Some A are not C. Algorithm = a method of solution guaranteed to give the right answer.
1 Philosophy 1100 Title:Critical Reasoning Instructor:Paul Dickey Website:
Deduction: the categorical syllogism - 1 Logic: evaluating deductive arguments - the syllogism 4 A 5th pattern of deductive argument –the categorical syllogism.
Deductive Validity In this tutorial you will learn how to determine whether deductive arguments are valid or invalid. Chapter 3.b.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams Categorical Syllogisms Venn Diagram tests for validity Rule tests for validity.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Truth Trees Intermediate Logic.
Philosophy 1100 Today: Hand Back “Nail that Claim” Exercise! & Discuss
Page A concept is a category of objects, events or ideas that share similar characteristics; this allows for generalization and distinction.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.
No new reading for Monday or Wednesday Exam #2 is next Friday, and we’ll review and work on proofs on Monday and Wed.
Patterns of Deductive Thinking
Categorical Syllogisms
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
Copyright © 2015, 2011, 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 1, Unit 1D, Slide 1 Thinking Critically 1.

CATEGORICAL PROPOSITIONS, CHP. 8 DEDUCTIVE LOGIC VS INDUCTIVE LOGIC ONE CENTRAL PURPOSE: UNDERSTANDING CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS AS THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF.
Categorical Propositions All S is P No S is P Some S is P Some S is not P.
 Predicate: A sentence that contains a finite number of variables and becomes a statement when values are substituted for the variables. ◦ Domain: the.
The Science of Good Reasons
Venn Diagrams and Categorical Syllogisms
Unit 1D Analyzing Arguments. TWO TYPES OF ARGUMENTS Inductive Deductive Arguments come in two basic types:
Logic A: Capital punishment is immoral. B: No it isn’t! A: Yes it is! B: Well, what do you know about it? A: I know more about it then you do! B: Oh yeah?
Deductive Reasoning Rules for Valid Syllogisms. Rules for a valid categorical syllogism 1.A valid syllogism must possess three, and only three, unambiguous.
4 Categorical Propositions
MLS 570 Critical Thinking Reading Notes for Fogelin: Categorical Syllogisms We will go over diagramming Arguments in class. Fall Term 2006 North Central.
Hazırlayan DISCRETE COMPUTATIONAL STRUCTURES Propositional Logic PROF. DR. YUSUF OYSAL.
Logic – Basic Terms Logic: the study of how to reason well. Validity: Valid thinking is thinking in conformity with the rules. If the premises are true.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
CATEGORICAL SYLLOGISMS
2.1 Sets 2.2 Set Operations –Set Operations –Venn Diagrams –Set Identities –Union and Intersection of Indexed Collections 2.3 Functions 2.4 Sequences and.
Chapter 13: Categorical Propositions. Categorical Syllogisms (p. 141) Review of deductive arguments –Form –Valid/Invalid –Soundness Categorical syllogisms.
Quadratic Functions (4) What is the discriminant What is the discriminant Using the discriminant Using the discriminant.
Deductive and induction reasoning
Invitation to Critical Thinking Chapter 6
Fun with Deductive Reasoning
SYLLOGISTIC REASONING PART 2 Properties and Rules PART 2 Properties and Rules.
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Logic and Reasoning.
Giving good reasons. When listening to others, we cannot concentrate only on our own feelings and reactions We must listen to what they are saying.
Chapter 6 Evaluating Deductive Arguments 1: Categorical Logic Invitation to Critical Thinking First Canadian Edition.
CS.462 Artificial Intelligence SOMCHAI THANGSATHITYANGKUL Lecture 05 : Knowledge Base & First Order Logic.
Critical Thinking: A User’s Manual
Deductive reasoning. The curious incident An expensive racehorse has been stolen. A policeman asks Holmes if any aspect of the crime strikes him as significent.
Deductive s. Inductive Reasoning
10.2 hmwk. out Multiply the following 1.(2x + 3 )(x – 4) = 2.(3x – 4) 2 = 3.(2x + 1)(2x – 1) = Answers 1.2x 2 – 5x x 2 – 24x x
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
Categorical Propositions Chapter 5. Deductive Argument A deductive argument is one whose premises are claimed to provide conclusive grounds for the truth.
Deductive Reasoning. Inductive: premise offers support and evidenceInductive: premise offers support and evidence Deductive: premises offers proof that.
Do now Can you make sure that you have finished your Venn diagrams from last lesson. Can you name 5 famous mathematicians (including one that is still.
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
Arguments with Quantified Statements
Logic.
Deductive Logic, Categorical Syllogism
Jeffrey Martinez Math 170 Dr. Lipika Deka 10/15/13
Today’s Topics Introduction to Predicate Logic Venn Diagrams
Rules for Valid Syllogisms
5 Categorical Syllogisms
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Geometry Review PPT Finnegan 2013
CHAPTER 2 Set Theory.
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Presentation transcript:

LOGICAL REASONING FOR CAT 2009

LOGICAL DEDUCTIONS

Logical Premises All As are Bs Premise Quantifier Subject Predicate

Venn Diagrams All As are Bs No A is B B A B A

Venn Diagrams Some As are Not Bs Some As are Bs B A B A A B B A A B B A A B

QUANTIFIERS Basic Quantifier PremiseQuantifierSubjectPredicate AllAffirmativeUniversal NoNegativeUniversal SomeAffirmativeParticular Some NotNegativeParticular

Rules The middle term must not appear in the conclusion ◦ All As are Bs ◦ All Bs are Cs ◦ Conclusion cannot contain B Middle Term

Rules When both premises are affirmative, conclusion cannot be negative All As are Bs Some Bs are Cs Then, conclusion should have only All or Some as the quantifier.

Rules There must be 3 and only 3 distinct terms When both premises are particular no conclusion can be derived ◦ Some + some not, some + some, etc… When both premises are negative, no conclusion can be derived ◦ No + no, no + some not, some not + some not

Rules The middle term must be distributed at least once. ◦ All As are Bs, Some Bs are Cs ◦ All As are Bs, Some As are Cs

Rules If one of the premises is particular, then conclusion is particular Some Bs are Cs All Cs are Ds Conclusion has to have quantifier as some.

Rules When One Quantifier is negative, the conclusion must be negative No As are Bs All Bs are Cs Conclusion must have quantifier as some not or No.

Rules A term which isn’t distributed in the premise should not be distributed in the conclusion. All As are Bs All Bs are Cs Middle Term All As are Cs Some A/Cs are C/As

Lets Try an Example You say that sappy movies are always bad? I can prove that isn't true. For instance, Steven Spielberg always makes great movies! But some of his movies are sappy. So, some sappy movies are also great.

Solution All Steven Speilberg movies are Great Some Steven Speilberg movies are sappy Answer is and particular Some Sappy movies are Great

THANK YOU