The good life: Our search for happiness

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session 19 Character or Virtue Ethics. I. Introduction: How Character Ethics Differ from Principle and Consequentialist Ethics.
Advertisements

The Philosophers of Chapter 7
TELEOLOGICAL ETHICS.
Natural Law Tradition and Human Rights. Project Updates Revised list is posted on the webpage Revised list is posted on the webpage Elizabeth Stegeman.
Morality As Overcoming Self-Interest
Frameworks for Moral Arguments
Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category
ARISTOTLE: Background
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. Virtue.
Dr. Frankena: Moral Value & Responsibility
Aristotle Virtue Ethics
Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas St. Thomas Aquinas rediscovered Aristotle in the 13 th century through Arab scholars St. Thomas Aquinas rediscovered Aristotle.
Aristotelian Ethics Teleology and Virtue.
Christian Ethics. How Should We Live? 3. Virtue and Happiness Sunday, May 22, to 10:50 am, in the Parlor. Everyone is welcome!
TELEOLOGICAL ETHICS.
Chapter 1 A Comprehensive History of Western Ethics
What principles do you live by
Aristotle ( BCE): What is Virtue? PHIL 1003 Semester I
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Freedom and Virtues Introduction to Virtues. Questions… What are Virtues? What are Virtues? What is the significance of each? What is the significance.
6.1 Morality: A Response to God’s Love
CHAPTER 2 Justice and Virtues.
A Virtue is an habitual and firm disposition to do the good.
ETHICAL LEADERSHIP AND VALUES DATE: January 2008 PLACE: Lima, Peru BY JAIME CHAHIN, PH.D.
Natural Law/Virtue Ethics. Morality and Human Nature  Natural Law Theory  Based upon assumption that the good is consistent with fundamental design.
By Tori, Paola, Brad, and Adam
Chapter 12 The Freedom of the Children of God. Christ has set us free No one is perfect. Everyone struggles with sin. Video: By God’s grace
JESUS CHRIST: HIS MISSION AND MINISTRY
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
Freedom, Morality, and Grace
Tele-transport experiment Free from pain and anxiety Free from pain and anxiety.
Category 1Category 2Category 3Category 4Category
INTRODUCTION What is Life in Christ?.
Morality and Virtues: Cultivating Character. In This Chapter…  Virtues: Habits of the Heart  The Theological Virtues: Faith, Hope, and Charity  The.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Chapter Two Making Moral Decisions. Right Reason in Action Prudence The moral virtue that inclines us to lead good, ethical, and moral lives of action;
Where Do Good and Evil Come From?
WHAT IS HIS DUTY? Duty - something that one is expected or required to do by moral or legal obligation. Your response:
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
The Good Life and The Other. Virtues Prudence: moral reasoning Temperance: moderation in the exercise of emotions Fortitude: courage Justice: acting well.
You Are What You Do In Search of the Good, chapter 2.
Pete Byrne CCRS Bexhill
Traditional Ethical Theories. Reminder Optional Tutorial Monday, February 25, 1-1:50 Room M122.
Unit 3 Test Review Chapters 7 & 8. Plato Who compared the good to the sun? He believed the closest we come to the good is in contemplation. He believed.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC A Practical Approach For Decision Makers SECOND EDITION EILEEN E. MORRISON.
5 Some Traditional Ethical Theories
Traditional Judeo-Christian View of Human Nature
Chapter Two Making Moral Decisions. Right Reason in Action Prudence The moral virtue that inclines us to lead good, ethical, and moral lives of action;
WHAT MAKES FOR A GOOD AND HAPPY PERSON pp
THE GOOD LIFE AND HAPPINESS pp Think/Pair/Share  What is the “Good Life”? What is happiness? How are they connected?
Aristotelian Ethics Teleology and Virtue. Aristotle ( B.C.E.) Student of Plato in Socratic tradition Originally a botanist Scientific, analytical.
THEOLOGY OF THE BODY CHAPTER FIVE – TRUTH AND FREEDOM.
Let’s Learn Our Vocabulary for the Introduction Chapter of YLIC! OR ELSE!!!!
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Natural Law – Revision. The spec – What you need to know Main features of the theory That it is absolutist and deontological The relationship that Aquinas.
Immanuel Kant (1724 – 1804) Influenced Secular Moral Thought. Raised in a Protestant Household. No formal Church Structure. Morality ground in reason,
Ethical theories tend to suggest a set of principles or rules than all human beings are bound by. Utilitarianism – the greatest good for the greatest.
Ethical theories tend to suggest a set of principles or rules than all human beings are bound by. Utilitarianism – the greatest good for the greatest.
The Study of Ethics How do we know how to do the Right Thing?
MORALITY – “Living as Disciples”. The secret to happiness is to draw near to Jesus the Teacher and learn from him. We must do what Jesus says or we will.
Chapter 5 A People of Service.
Thomas Aquinas 13th-Century scholar in the Dominican order 1.
Absolute and Relative Morality
Kant’s Categorical Imperative - revision
Discussion Point Is there a natural order in the universe? List the evidence for and against. Are there any moral beliefs held by most or all people which.
Ethical theorists: A comparison of main ideas
Aristotle's Background
Traditional Ethical Theories
Presentation transcript:

The good life: Our search for happiness Chapter 7 The good life: Our search for happiness

What Makes You Happy? Watch the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZaIsR9seMo While you watch the video, really listen to what makes the different people happy.

What Makes You Happy Please be silent for the next two to three minutes and really think about what makes you happy Write your name down on the card in front of you Underneath it write down one thing that makes you happy. Please make it something that you feel comfortable sharing, as I will be collecting them Would anyone like to share what makes them happy with the class?

The good life: Our search for happiness It is universally acknowledged that despite all set-backs, failures, sickness, and disabilities, people want to be happy! The search to be happy lies behind every human vocation, and every choice we make The Christian tradition has always believed that we were created for happiness. It recognizes this desire as natural, insisting that God has placed it in the human heart

The desire for happiness is connected with ethics and morality All ethical theories insist that ethics is in search of the good Most ethical thinkers propose that the good life, this is, the ethical, moral life, is also the happy life The good life, the ethical/moral life and the happy life are the same thing There are 5 key thinkers in this chapter We will look at the way they understand the link between moral goodness and happiness

Learning Goals By the end of this lesson, we will be able to: 1) Identify five key thinkers and examine the way that they understand the connection between happiness and moral goodness. 2) State the similarities and differences between their ideas 3) Identify the three components of the Catholic approach to ethics and morality, and explain which thinkers are consistent with Catholic ethics.

Key Thinkers 1) Plato (427-347 BC) 2) Aristotle (384-322 BC) 3) St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) 4) Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) 5) Emmanuel Levinas (1905-1995)

Three Ways of Pursuing the Good 1) Teleological: Natural Ethics 2)Deontological: Obligation 3) Impact of the Gospel

Group Activity You will be given a number from 1 to 5. This will be your group number 1) Plato (pgs. 128-9) 2) Aristotle (pgs. 129-130) 3) St. Thomas Aquinas (pgs. 130-2) 4) Immanuel Kant and Emmanuel Levians (pgs. 132-3) 5) Three ways of pursuing the good (134)

Each group will read the passage written about their designated thinker. On a piece of chart paper, each student will write at least one point regarding their thinker’s theory of the good. The group will answer together the question: how does this thinker’s understanding of goodness relate to happiness? The last group will summarize the three ways of pursuing the good on pg. 134. Each group will elect one speaker to share the group’s ideas with the class. YOU WILL HAVE 30 MINUTES TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVITY

Plato (427-347 BC) Plato compared the good to the sun: “Just as the sun is the source of light and through it we can see things, so the good shines upon all our actions and is in all our actions We cannot actually locate the good anywhere in particular, we only find it in good things The closest we come to the good is in contemplation; in contemplation the good radiates through us Because philosophers are contemplators of the good they are closest to it They are the happiest because they make true choices about the value and worth of their actions; they measure their actions by their value, not by how much they enjoy them

Plato vs. Sophism Plato struggled against Sophism in his time Sophists proclaimed there could be no truth; the truth is just an opinion. If there is no absolute truth, there can be no universal moral code They held that life is ruled by basic needs and desires and not reason. Eg. Callicles said that the best life is one of sensual pleasure Refused any kind of thinking about moral principles or the good As a result, there was no agreement on how citizens should act Plato combated this crisis through Reason. Reason finds the good that pervades everything and the highest pursuit in life is to contemplate the good

Aristotle (384-322 BC) His concern for the good arose out of political considerations Like Plato, he was concerned with the shortsightedness of searching for happiness by following one’s instincts and sensual pleasures The search for the good has to do with acting intelligently. Like Plato, he thought that philosophers were most likely to succeed People do not find the good, they find a good

Absolute good can only be found in God God inscribes good into the nature of all things To find the good in anything is to find its purpose A person develops good character by acting virtuously (virtues serve to control passions) The good is found in middle ground rather than extremes The mark of humanity is the ability to act rationally To act ethically is to engage in our ability to reason To live an ethical life is the highest form of happiness

St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) Incorporated Aristotle’s thinking into theology Like Aristotle, he believed that the ethical is inscribed in the nature of all creatures At a person’s core is the desire for the good (happiness) The basis of ethics is following our natural desire for the good Equated God with the highest good, however this God is the Trinitarian God (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) People were made for happiness

Because of God’s love for us as shown in Jesus, there is a fuller happiness called blessedness that is only to be found in the loving vision of God. The fullness of a good life is not found on earth. True happiness is only found in the resurrection as God’s pure gift Connection between the good life and people that act according to reason To know how to use one’s intellectual and sensual capacities one must follow 4 virtues

The Cardinal Virtues 1) Prudence (how to reason well in moral decision making) 2) Temperance (how to remain moderate in the exercise of the emotions) 3) Fortitude (how to be courageous in the face of life’s difficulties) 4) Justice (how to act well in relation to others) Unlike Aristotle, Aquinas believes that Jesus changes the way we define what is good. Introduces three new virtues that are purely God’s gift: Faith, Hope and Charity

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Lived in the time of the Enlightenment, a time characterized by the sweeping away of any authority that could not justify itself through reason. Only reason had authority Rejected an ethics such as proposed by Aristotle and Aquinas, which emphasized happiness as the byproduct of doing good According to Kant, people do good because it is their duty. They must find the reason for doing good within themselves

Good will is the most important good in life Kant acknowledged the immortality of the soul by believing that humans could not achieve the supreme good in this life. Kant’s God also has a duty: to make certain that human beings can indeed achieve the supreme good. It is no longer the self-gift from God to us

Emmanuel Levinas (1905-1995) God is the infinite Good. He is at the heart of all ethics The good/happiness is a vocation. It does not come from ourselves The good is found in the faces of others When I am called to the other, I am called to be good without reward It is the other who awakens the highest good within me

Three ways of pursuing the good Which key thinker’s ideas are consistent with Catholic ethics? There are three components of the Catholic approach to ethics and morality: 1)Teleological: Natural Ethics: Aristotle’s approach as reflected in the work of Aquinas. Begins with questions about human happiness Then explores human actions: How does evil enter them? How are they effected by passions and emotions, and how they gradually become habits and virtues Explores action from the perspective of God’s self-gift

2) Deontological: Obligation Kant (duty), Levinas (call to the other) What is the role of obligation in our decision making? How do we make moral judgments? 3) Impact of the gospel Impact of the gospels on our actions Proclaims the Son of God has entered human history as a man to open up possibilities for actions that are motivated by God’s love

Resources All information can be found in chapter 7 of In Search of the Good: A Catholic Understanding of Moral Living. (pgs. 127-134)