NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Advertisements

Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR5/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Work Package 3 Chris Shaw & Karim Zeghal (EUROCONTROL) CARE/ASAS Action.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Estimating safe separations.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR1/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Agenda & Project Overview Thierry Arino (Sofréavia) CARE/ASAS Action FALBALA.
ASAS Thematic Network Workshop #2: TAGA - Traffic Awareness for General Aviation DFS Research and Development October 2003 TAGA - Traffic Awareness for.
Mediterranean Free Flight ASAS Separation and Spacing Presented by Andy Barff – Project Leader MFF Real-time Simulations ASAS-TN, Malmö
C ENTRE D'ETUDES DE LA NAVIGATION AERIENNE ASAS-TN, 2nd workshop - Malmö 6 ~ 8 october 2003page 1 Electronic separation Clearance Enabling the Crossing.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
1st ASAS-Thematic Network 2 Workshop Malmoe 26th-28 th September 2005 “Implementation planning and future packages” Session Moderator: Giorgio MATRELLA.
Ames Research Center 1October 2006 Aviation Software Systems Workshop FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Aviation Software Systems.
VISUAL APPROACHES.
Standard Terminal Arrival Routes STARs
HCI in Safety-Critical Applications: ATC Systems Aslan Neishaboori.
CIVIL AIR SEARCH AND RESCUE ASSOCIATION
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OHA CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OHA.
ASSTAR Oceanic Applications by Nico de Gelder, NLR ASSTAR User Forum #1 4 April 2006, Roma.
Flight Mission AREA 1 COURSE RULES GOUGE. FAM-08 AREA 1.
Flight Mission AREA 4 COURSE RULES GOUGE. FAM-08 AREA 4 WILBUR 9K FLOOR LUKE 9K FLOOR NMM R-007 NMM R-325 FOZZY 11K FLOOR TARGET NJW GUNSHY AREA SEQUENCE:
© 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI) Enhanced Flight Rules (CEFR) Randall Bone October 7, 2003.
20 In-Trail Climb experience and an airlines view of ASAS opportunities Captain Rocky Stone United Airlines Manager – Flight Systems Technology.
Page Lufthansa ASAS It's Time for a paradigm change... Workshop May 2003, Rome
1 CoSpace Experimental results on sequencing & merging Karim Zeghal ASAS Thematic Network, Second workshop 6-8, October 2003, Malmö, Sweden.
ASSTAR User Forum #1 Rome 4th April 2006 ASAS-TN2 Second Workshop ASSTAR Safety Approach and Preliminary Issues Dr Giuseppe GRANIERO, SICTA
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS LC&P Applications in Radar Airspace: Operational Scenario Example and Fast-Time Simulation Results.
6-1 Design of UAV Systems UAV operating environmentsc 2002 LM Corporation Lesson objective - to discuss UAV Operating Environments including … National.
CRISTAL ATSAW Project Sep 2007 ASAS TN Christelle Pianetti, DSNA Simona Canu-Chiesa, Airbus.
ASAS-TN Second Workshop, 6-8 October 2003, MalmöSlide 1 Airborne Surveillance Applications included in ‘Package I’ Francis Casaux CARE/ASAS manager.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR3/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG WP2 Current situation analysis – Aircraft perspective Philippe Louyot (CENA)
ASAS FRA OB/T ATM Projects Lufthansa point of view.
2 nd ASAS-TN2 Workshop - Rome, 4 th April 20061/13 Civil-Military cooperation as a key factor in ASAS implementation Italian Air Force (IAF) Ltc. Maurizio.
1 Airborne spacing in the terminal area: A study of non-nominal situations EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre European Organisation for the Safety of Air.
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, April 2007 G2G project G2G project : ASPA S&M experiments and main validation results Marinella Leone
RECITE A PRAYER…(15 SECONDS). ATM TOPIC 1. INTRODUCTION TO AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,TYPE OF CONTROL AREAS & FLIGHT PLAN 2. AERODROME CONTROL 3. AREA CONTROL.
Direction générale de l’Aviation civile centre d’Études de la navigation aérienne First ASAS thematic network workshop The user’s expectations and concerns.
Lessons learned from pilot involvement in ASAS experiments Rob Ruigrok & Hans Huisman ASAS Thematic Network Workshop 3 “ASAS - Making it happen”, Toulouse.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology MITRE Corporation Center.
Slide 1 July 2004 – FALBALA/WP5/FOR4/D – CENA, DFS, EEC, NATS, Sofréavia & UoG Mark Watson & Richard Pugh ( NATS) CARE / ASAS Action FALBALA Project Dissemination.
Page 1 CARE/ASAS Activity 3: ASM workshop Brétigny, 19 December 2001 Time-Based Sequencing OSED CARE-ASAS Activity 3: ASM Time-Based Sequencing OSED.
Glasgow 12 September 20061/22DEEP BLUE CONSULTING AND RESEARCH | CLAUDIA FUSAI ASAS-TN2 Controllers situational awareness issues.
Malmö 5 September. 27 th 2005 NUP ITP TT Reykjavik “NUP -- ITP”
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, April 2007 page 1 ASPA-S&M in Paris ASPA-S&M in Paris: CRISTAL PARIS and PALOMA results Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA.
Discussions Summary ASSTAR - Crossing & Passing session.
Slide 1 Malmö, 6-8 October 2003 – ASAS TN – Session 3: Airborne spacing applications – IAPA/WP00/035/W v2.0 ACAS / ASAS interaction IAPA Project Thierry.
1 Airborne Separation Assistance Systems (ASAS) - Summary of simulations Joint ASAS-TN2/IATA/AEA workshop NLR, Amsterdam, 8 th October 2007 Chris Shaw.
European View of Flexible Approaches Jon Arden 11 March 2004.
1 Controller feedback from the CoSpace / NUP II TMA experiment ASAS-TN, April 2004, Toulouse Liz Jordan, NATS, U.K. Gatwick approach controller.
ASAS Crossing and Passing Applications in Radar Airspace (operational concept and operational procedure) Jean-Marc Loscos, Bernard Hasquenoph, Claude Chamayou.
ASAS TN2 Final Seminar Paris, April Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA chairman of the Airborne Surveillance Subgroup of the Aeronautical Surveillance.
ASSTAR Airborne Separation Operations in Oceanic Airspace Bob McPike, NATS ASAS-TN2 Conference Glasgow, September 2006.
European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation RFG ASPA-S&M Requirements Determination ASAS-TN th September Malmo, Sweden.
ASAS TN Third Workshop, April 2004, Toulouse Session 1 Use of the System by pilots and controllers Tony Henley.
MFF is a EC Co-funded Programme  MEDITERRANEAN FREE FLIGHT Flight Trials Report ASAS TN2 1st Workshop | September 2005, Malmö Gennaro GRAZIANO 1/32.
4 th Workshop, Amsterdam, 23 rd -25 th April 2007 ASAS-SEP Applications Airborne Implementation Overall Architectural Considerations.
Joint 5 th ASAS TN2 Workshop & 2 nd FLYSAFE Forum Toulouse, September 2007 Experiments on the Impact of Wind on ASPA-S&M Manoeuvres Stephen Broatch,
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Impact of Operating Context on the Use of Structure in Air Traffic.
NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURE DESIGN
ASSTAR Overview Jean-Marc Loscos, DSNA
Project conclusions and recommendations Thierry Arino (Sofréavia)
OPERATIONS ON PARALLEL OR NEAR-PARALLEL RUNWAYS
Rome November 2008 Johan Martensson, CASCADE
Ground System implication for ASAS implementation
Karim Zeghal EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre
Crossing and Passing MA-AFAS
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 2.
NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
Presentation transcript:

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 1 NUP DFS / Lufthansa Simulation Workshops Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Experiences from the NUP-2 Simulation Workshops: Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Objectives: Look and Feel of potential Spacing applications for the future Frankfurt approach environment Evaluation of the controller acceptance of Spacing Applications Evaluation of a potential applicability of Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) or Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) in the future Frankfurt approach environment

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 2 NUP DFS / Lufthansa Simulation Workshops Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) similar to Visual Separation on Approach (VSA)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 3 PSACHA MTR GED ETARU LAGES ROKIM DF470 DF011 DF043 DF018 DF020 OTKUR EPINO DF082 DF038 DF480 DF484 DF040 LEDKIDF034 DF042 DF016 OSMAX Frankfurt Approach Sector: Working arrangements Pick-up North Pick-up South Feeder Tasks for the EVA Simulation Session: Performance of EVA procedure Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 4 EVA proposed phraseology Controller: ”Lufthansa 123, maintain own visual separation to Delta Lima Hotel 234.” Pilot: ”Delta Lima Hotel 234 in sight, maintaining own visual separation, Lufthansa 123” Controller: ”Lufthansa 123, maintain own visual separation to traffic twelve o’clock. 3 miles. Company A320.” Pilot: ”Traffic in sight, maintaining own visual separation, Lufthansa 123.” Visual Following Procedure without CDTI EVA Procedure using CDTI Controller: Lufthansa 123, Traffic to follow is a Company Airbus 320 in your 12 o‘clock position, range 4 nautical miles. Report when aircraft in sight. Pilot after visual identification: Aircraft in sight, Lufthansa 123. Controller: Lufthansa 123, Confirm visual identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234. Pilot after checking CDTI and visual identification: Confirm visual Identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234, Lufthansa 123. DLH 123 DLH 234 Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 5 Controller: Lufthansa 123, Confirm visual identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234. Pilot after checking CDTI and visual identification: Confirm visual Identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234. Range 4 nautical miles, 12 o’clock, Lufthansa 123. EVA proposed phraseology Visual Following Procedure without CDTI EVA Procedure using CDTI Controller: Lufthansa 123, Traffic to follow is a Company Airbus 320 in your 12 o‘clock position, range 4 nautical miles. Report when aircraft in sight. Pilot after visual identification: Aircraft in sight, Lufthansa 123. Controller: Lufthansa 123, Confirm visual identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234. Pilot after checking CDTI and visual identification: Confirm visual Identification of Delta Lima Hotel 234, Lufthansa 123. DLH 123 DLH 234 Controller: ”Lufthansa 123, maintain own visual separation to Delta Lima Hotel 234.” Pilot: ”Delta Lima Hotel 234 in sight, maintaining own visual separation, Lufthansa 123” Controller: ”Lufthansa 123, maintain own visual separation to traffic twelve o’clock. 3 miles. Company A320.” Pilot: ”Traffic in sight, maintaining own visual separation, Lufthansa 123.” VSA conform Procedure The participating controllers and pilots do not support the VSA conform procedure, because it does not support the requirement for a reduction of communication workload Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 6 Controller: ”Lufthansa 123, maintain own visual separation to Delta Lima Hotel 234.” Pilot: ”Delta Lima Hotel 234 in sight, maintaining own visual separation, Lufthansa 123” Conclusions from the EVA Workshops 1.The EVA application was highly accepted by the participating controllers and pilots assuming the use of the simplified phraseology: 2.Third Party Identification via Voice Communication is still to be resolved. DLH 123 DLH 234 Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) 3.Procedure Mix between EVA (with CDTI) and Visual Following Procedure (without CDTI) seems to be possible.

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 7 NUP DFS / Lufthansa Simulation Workshops Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 8 PSACHA MTR GED ETARU LAGES ROKIM DF470 DF011 DF043 DF018 DF020 OTKUR EPINO DF082 DF038 DF480 DF484 DF040 LEDKIDF034 DF042 DF016 OSMAX Frankfurt Approach Sector: Working arrangements Pick-up North Pick-up South Feeder Tasks for the AAS Simulation Session: - Sequencing of Aircraft - (Handling of Sequences) Tasks for the AAS Simulation Session: Handling of Sequences Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 9 Spacing Functionality Spacing x NM / x sec 1. Distance based Spacing / Time based Spacing Spacing x NM / x sec 2. Track Mode Spacing / Navigation Mode Spacing Track Mode Spacing switch to Navigation Mode Spacing as soon as the aircraft is established on ILS Spacing x NM / x sec 3. Altitude Changes Aircraft is able to follow 3D-track of the preceding aircraft incl. altitude changes Point of Descent of the preceding aircraft Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 10 Phraseology used for the Simulation ATC:AZA400, expect spacing with TYR263V A/C: Expect spacing with TYR263V, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, select target TYR263V A/C:Select target TYR263V, AZA400 A/C:Target selected, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, remain 3 NM behind target A/C:Remain 3 NM behind target, AZA400 Instruction Phase Initiation Phase Identification Phase Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 11 Subjective Workload: Pick-Up Controller Related tasks of the Pick-Up Controllers: Sequencing of Aircraft (Handling of Sequences) ATC:AZA400, expect spacing with TYR263V A/C: Expect spacing with TYR263V, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, select target TYR263V A/C:Select target TYR263V, AZA400 A/C:Target selected, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, remain 3 NM behind target A/C:Remain 3 NM behind target, AZA400 Instruction Phase Initiation Phase Identification Phase Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 12 Possible vectoring of trailing aircraft Subjective Workload: Pick-Up Controller ATC:AZA400, expect spacing with TYR263V A/C: Expect spacing with TYR263V, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, select target TYR263V A/C:Select target TYR263V, AZA400 A/C:Target selected, AZA400 ATC:AZA400, remain 3 NM behind target A/C:Remain 3 NM behind target, AZA400 Instruction Phase Initiation Phase Identification Phase high voice communication workload during the Initiation / Identification / Instruction Phases Selection of appropriate aircraft (similar performance) Vectoring of aircraft to the initial position to initiate Spacing Monitoring instead of Vectoring for all following aircraft Vectoring of first aircraft Monitoring of all following aircraft only Conclusion Adding the increasing and the decreasing effects of the subjective controller workload, the handling of sequences still significantly increased the subjective workload of the Pick-Up Controller Increasing Subjective Workload Decreasing Subjective Workload Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 13 Subjective Workload: Feeder Controller Related tasks of the Feeder Controller: Handling of Sequences Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 14 Conclusion  The more aircraft in a sequence  The higher the Reduction in Workload Subjective Workload: Feeder Controller (similar subjective workload as today) Feeder has to control the first aircraft in the sequence High effort to monitor the last aircraft in the sequence, because the aircraft is not under „direct“ control of the controller, but the controller has to separate the following aircraft relative to the last aircraft in the sequence (increased subjective workload) Very low effort to monitor additional aircraft in the sequence(very low subjective workload) Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 15 Effects: First Come - First Serve Today:alternating aircraft from North / South Future: alternating sequences from North / South  Difficulties to respect the “First come - First serve“ principle  loss of flexibility (evolving gaps can’t be used any more) Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 16 Effects: Time based / Distance based Spacing Early speed reductions because of long sequences on final: Speed reduction of the first aircraft effects all following aircraft in the sequence Distance based Spacing: Strong effect Time based Spacing: Less (but still visible) effect distance-based time-based  waste of rare airspace  non-economic aircraft configuration (leaving clean configuration early) Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 17 Conclusions from the AAS Workshops Effects on Subjective Controller Workload Controllers reported an increase of subjective workload in cases when they had to initiate sequences a reduction of subjective workload in cases when sequences were transferred to them Limitation of Flexibility Long Sequences resulted in a limitation of flexibility (limitation of the applicability of the „First Come – First Serve“ principle) Distance based Spacing vs. Time based Spacing Distance based spacing  early speed reduction Time based spacing  large spacing distances at high speeds Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS)

NUP Phase 2 – Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) and Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) Oliver Reitenbach / DFS, Matthias Groth / DLH September 2005 / Slide 18 Thank you for your attention … Workshop Objectives Extended Visual Acquisition (EVA) Airborne Approach Spacing (AAS) … we would be happy to present you more of our view of the AAS application during the demonstration session in the evening