1.2 EMU Electronics L.S. Durkin CMS Review CERN, September 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPT Week, Nov 2003, B. Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Trigger Status, MPC and Sorter B. Paul Padley Rice University November 2003.
Advertisements

HEP2005, Lisboa July 05 Roberto Campagnolo - CERN 1 HEP2005 International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics ( Lisboa-Portugal,
US CMS Collaboration Meeting, UC Riverside, May 19, Endcap Muons John Layter US CMS Collaboration Meeting May 19, 2001.
CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 CSC Muon Trigger - Annual Review Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin Acosta and Stan Durkin.
CSC Muon Trigger September 16, 2003 CMS Annual Review 1 Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary Jay Hauser, with many slides from Darin.
US Test Beam Results Of Front End Timing T. Ferguson, N. Terentiev* (Carnegie Mellon University) CMS EMU Meeting University of California, Davis Feb 25.
Commissioning of CSCs and Peripheral Crates Task L M. Ignatenko UCLA October
Endcap Muon meeting: CMU, Oct 19, 2003 J. Hauser UCLA 1 CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies Main Test Beam 2003 Goals: Verify the peripheral crate.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
The first testing of the CERC and PCB Version II with cosmic rays Catherine Fry Imperial College London CALICE Meeting, CERN 28 th – 29 th June 2004 Prototype.
US FAST site test results – a global view from ROOT T. Ferguson, A. Korytov, N. Terentiev* CMS EMU Meeting The Ohio State University April 16 – 17, 2004.
S. Durkin, USCMS-EMU Meeting, Oct. 21, 2005 Critical Data Errors S. Durkin The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 20, 2005.
CSC Trigger Report: Results from June 25 ns beam test Production plans Software Darin Acosta University of Florida.
October 1st th Workshop on Electronics for LHC Experiment at Amsterdam 1 Beam Test Result of the ATLAS End-cap Muon Level-1 Trigger Chikara Fukunaga.
The Track-Finding Processor for the Level-1 Trigger of the CMS Endcap Muon System D.Acosta, A.Madorsky, B.Scurlock, S.M.Wang University of Florida A.Atamanchuk,
Emulator System for OTMB Firmware Development for Post-LS1 and Beyond Aysen Tatarinov Texas A&M University US CMS Endcap Muon Collaboration Meeting October.
An Asynchronous Level-1 Tracking Trigger for Future LHC Detector Upgrades A. Madorsky, D. Acosta University of Florida/Physics, POB , Gainesville,
Printed by Topical Workshop on Electronics for Particle Physics TWEPP-08, Naxos, Greece / September 2008 MEZZANINE CARDS FOR.
EMU DAQ MotherBoard Jianhui Gu The Ohio State University ESR, CERN, November 2003.
Status of the CSC Track-Finder Darin Acosta University of Florida.
M. Lo Vetere 1,2, S. Minutoli 1, E. Robutti 1 1 I.N.F.N Genova, via Dodecaneso, GENOVA (Italy); 2 University of GENOVA (Italy) The TOTEM T1.
Track-Finder Trigger at the Beam Test Results and Features Darin Acosta, Rick Cavanaugh, Victor Golovtsov, Lindsey Gray, Khristian Kotov, Alex Madorsky,
CSC Endcap Muon Port Card and Muon Sorter Upgrade Status May 2013.
Test Beam Wrap-Up Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 18 June 2004 USCMS Meeting 2 Agenda n Darin/UF: General recap of runs taken, tests.
CSC EMU/Track Finder Clock and Control Board (CCB’2004) Status Plans M.Matveev Rice University August 27, 2004.
W. Smith, DOE/NSF Review, August, 2006 CMS Trigger - 1 SORT ASICs (w/heat sinks) EISO Bar Code Input DC-DC Converters Clock delay adjust Clock Input Oscillator.
CSC Endcap Muon Port Card and Muon Sorter Status Mikhail Matveev Rice University.
CSC ME1/1 Upgrade Status of Electronics Design Mikhail Matveev Rice University March 28, 2012.
DAQMB Production Status S. Durkin The Ohio State University Florida EMU Meeting 2004.
1 SCA Cell Utilizing Scheme The output of each preamp-shaper channel is sampled continuously at 20 MHz and stored the SCA cells. There are 96 cells for.
A Study of Proton-Proton Collisions at the LHC The Ohio State University - Task A.2 B.G. Bylsma, L.S. Durkin, D. Fisher, J Gilmore, J.H. Gu, D. Larson,
T.Y. Ling EMU Meeting CERN, September 20, 2005 Status Summary Off-Chamber Electronics.
CSC Track-Finder Plans for Commissioning at Bat.904 and Point 5 Darin Acosta University of Florida.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: June 2002, B.Paul Padley, Rice University1 CSC Muon Trigger On Detector Components B. Paul Padley Rice University June, 2002.
Track-Finder Test Beam Results Darin Acosta. Darin Acosta, University of Florida 30 July 2004 Trigger Meeting CSC Beam Test (Muon Slice Test) ME.
DAQMB Status – Onward to Production! S. Durkin, J. Gu, B. Bylsma, J. Gilmore,T.Y. Ling DAQ Motherboard (DMB) Initiates FE digitization and readout Receives.
US Peripheral Crate VMEbus Controller Ben Bylsma EMU – ESR CERN, November 2003.
US CMS DOE/NSF Review: April 11-13, Trig. - Estimate to Complete.
10 th LECC Workshop, September 2004, Hauser et al.1 Experience with Trigger Electronics for the CSC System of CMS J. Hauser*, E. Boyd, R. Cousins,
S. Durkin, Software Review, March 16, 2006 FED Library S. Durkin The Ohio State University CSC Online Software Review, March 16,2005.
S. Durkin, CMS EMU Meeting U.C. Davis Feb. 25, DMB Production 8-layer PC Board, 2 Ball-Grid Array FPGA’s, 718 Components/Board 550 Production Boards.
Peter LICHARD CERN (NA62)1 NA62 Straw tracker electronics Study of different readout schemes Readout electronics frontend backend Plans.
7-Nov-08ESSC Nov 2008 > CSC Early Upgrades by Fred B. 1 CSC Early Upgrades Current plans for "early upgrades" and maintenance during 2009 and 2010 Description:
US CMS DOE/NSF Review, May Trigger Plenary - W. Smith1 WBS Trigger Wesley H. Smith, U. Wisconsin CMS Trigger Project Manager DOE/NSF.
1J. Gu CERN CSC Meeting July 2008 DAQMB/FEBs Readiness for First Beam Jianui Gu The Ohio State University.
M.Matveev Rice University March 20, 2002 EMU Muon Port Card Project.
CSC Ops/DPG meeting, 05-Oct-2011 Hauser1 ALCT boards for ME4/2 etc.
Evelyn Thomson Ohio State University Page 1 XFT Status CDF Trigger Workshop, 17 August 2000 l XFT Hardware status l XFT Integration tests at B0, including:
CMS Week, 3-7 November CSC Trigger Test Beam Report Cast of many.
CSC EMU Muon Port Card (MPC)
University of California Los Angeles
EMU Slice Test Run Plan a working document.
CMS EMU TRIGGER ELECTRONICS
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
University of California Los Angeles
8-layer PC Board, 2 Ball-Grid Array FPGA’s, 718 Components/Board
Current Status of CSC Trigger Elements – Quick Summary
CSC Muon Trigger - Annual Review
CSC Trigger Update Specific issues:
8-layer PC Board, 2 Ball-Grid Array FPGA’s, 718 Components/Board
ALCT, TMB Status, Peripheral Crate Layout, CSC Event Display
Regional Cal. Trigger Milestone: Production & Testing Complete
CSC Trigger Primitives Test Beam Studies
University of California Los Angeles
The digital read-out for the CSC system of the TOTEM experiment at LHC
University of California Los Angeles
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
FED Design and EMU-to-DAQ Test
Plans for the 2004 CSC Beam Test
Presentation transcript:

1.2 EMU Electronics L.S. Durkin CMS Review CERN, September 2003

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September OutlineOutline Overview of EMU Electronics System Status of EMU Electronics 25 ns Beam Test Results Future Plans Summary

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Cathode Strip Chambers cathode strips Cathode plane wires avalanche mm cathode strips wires avalanche  cathode plane 9.5 mm 3.1 mm muon 6-layer chambers Radial, trapezoidal cathode strips Azimuthal anode wires Induced charges on strips - precise  coordinate Closely spaced wires - fast timing Wires ganged in groups of for r coordinate

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Functions of Electronics Acquire precise muon data for off-line analysis –Cathode strips: precise  -coordinate (bending direction) determination in each layer by interpolation of induced strip charges. –Anode wire groups: precise timing for bunch crossing tagging and radial position determination. Generate primitives for Level-1 Trigger –Identify Local Charged Track (LCT) segments using cathode and anode signals

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Front-end Requirements Cathode Electronics –(total signal)/(per channel noise) : 100/1 –peaking time of shaped pulse: 100 ns –digitization precision: 12 bits –dynamic range: 15 MIPs –non-linearity: < 1% Anode Electronics –peaking time shaped pulse: 30 ns –time slew of discriminated pulses: 2 ns

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Trigger requirements Trigger requirements Cathode LCT –Identify cathode track segment. P t trigger based on angle of LCT –For P t threshold of GeV requires  p/p < 30% (in order to limit single muon trigger rate in Level-1 to a few KHz) –Track hits must be located to within ½ strip width in each chamber layer Anode LCT –Form anode track segment. –Tag bunch crossing of track segment with  92 % efficiency per chamber

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September The LHC Environment Charge Particle Rates in EMU –Punch through, hadrons, muons: Rates range from 10 Hz cm -2 (outer ME 3,4) to 300 Hz cm -2 (inner ME1) –Random hits induced by neutrons and photons: Rates can be as high as 500 Hz cm -2 (inner ME1) (Calculations based on TDR shielding) Radiation Levels at the CSC’s Integrated over 10 LHC years (5x10 7 s at cm -2 s -1 ) –Neutron Fluence (>100 keV): ( ) x cm -2 –Total Ionizing Dose: ( ) kRad Levels at the iron disk peripheral about 10 times lower (Calculations by M. Huhtinen)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September System Layout CSC CFEB ALCT 1 of 24 CFEB 1 of 2 LVDB LV Distribution Board FED Crate in USC55 1 of 5 Anode Front-end Board Cathode Front-end Board Anode LCT Board MPCMPC DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB CCBCCB CONTROLLERCONTROLLER Peripheral Crate on iron disk Slow Control Trigger-Timing-Control Muon Sector Receiver Lev-1 Trigger Trig Motherboard DAQ Motherboard Clock Control Board DDU Board Readout Data

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Total Board Count on-chamber Peripheral Crates FED Crates

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September EMU Electronics Schedule Final CFEB & AFEB prototypes tested (Performance, radiation) 2000 ALCT prototype tested Sep-2000 CMS Electronics System Review 2001 Start CFEB, AFEB production 2002 Start ALCT, LVDB production 2003 Finish production Final CFEB & AFEB prototypes tested (Performance, radiation) 2000 ALCT prototype tested Sep-2000 CMS Electronics System Review 2001 Start CFEB, AFEB production 2002 Start ALCT, LVDB production 2003 Finish production CSC CFEB ALCT 1 of 24 CFEB 1 of 2 LVDB Final prototype boards Performance tests Radiation tests Finalize design Nov- 03 CMS Electronics System Review Production Final prototype boards Performance tests Radiation tests Finalize design Nov- 03 CMS Electronics System Review Production MPCMPC DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB CCBCCB CONTROLLERCONTROLLER

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September On-Chamber Electronics CSC CFEB ALCT CFEB LVDB Cathode Front-end Board Anode LCT Board Anode Front-end Board Low Voltage Distribution Board

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Status: On-Chamber Boards Beam tests (GIF at CERN, 9/1999) of on-chamber boards showed that they met design specifications. Tests with 60 Mev protons and 1 MeV neutrons (UCD, OSU 5/2000) verified that the boards are tolerant to radiation at 3 times the calculated levels. Tests in magnetic fields (8/2000 at OSU, UCLA and FNAL) showed that the boards operate beyond 3.5 T. Spark protection circuits on CFEB and AFEB tested extensively with induced chamber sparks. Approved for production (CFEB, AFEB in 9/00; ALCT, LVDB in 11/01). Production of on-chamber boards is on schedule and within the budget.

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September CFEB Production

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September AFEB Production

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September ALCT Production ALCT- 672 ALCT- 384 ALCT- 288

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September LVDB Production All LVMB plus cables produced. LVDB Production caught up with schedule:

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September EMU Peripheral Crates in UXC55 MPCMPC DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB DMBDMB TMBTMB CCBCCB CONTROLLERCONTROLLER Crate Controller Interface to DCS Provide Slow Control services Download FPGA, thresholds, calibration constants; LV monitoring, debug electronics. Clock Control Board (CCB) Interfaces to the TTC system Distributes LHC clock, resets, L1- Accept TRIG Motherboard (TMB) Generates Cathode LCT trigger Receives ALCT data from FE Matches ALCT and CLCT Sends trigger primitive to Lev-1 DAQ Motherboard (DMB) Initiates FE digitization and readout Receives and sends FE data to DDU Provides Slow Control interface to FE boards (VME-JTAG)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Location of Peripheral Crates

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September EMU Peripheral Crates Total of 60 crates in EMU –2 x (12 crates on YE1), serving ME1 station –2 x (12 crates on YE2), serving ME2,3 stations –2 x ( 6 crates on YE3), serving ME4 station Crate type –9U VME cage with custom LV power and cooling Each crate has a custom backplane in addition to the standard VME backplane Power consumption: 175 W per crate –Requires +3.3V, +5V, -12V Radiation background (M. Huhtinen) –Per 10 LHC yrs: Neutron fluence 4x10 10 cm -2, Ionization dose 1.3 Gy

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Rack for Peripheral Crates Each 600 x 600 rack houses two crates LV Power – custom regulator boards feed off AC-DC converters. Cooling – plan to use tangential fan with magnetically shielded motor. Special strain relief for the input cables designed. 600

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Peripheral Crate Electronics Status “Final” prototypes of DMB, TMB, CCB, Custom Backplane produced and bench tested. –FPGA firmware for all boards completed. –Dynatem (Controller) software written and tested. –A new, simpler controller being prototyped. –TTC software installed (CCB) and working. –Rad-hard solution of CCB using discrete logic under consideration. All skew-clear cable (including ME1/1) produced and delivered to CERN. Prototype Peripheral Crate electronics have been tested with 2 fully instrumented CSC in 25ns beam at X5A. Preliminary test results look good.

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Structure repeats during 2.6 s spill length 48 bunches 25 ns bunch spacing bunch width 3-5 ns SPS orbit period 1.2  s 23  s 2003 Time-Structured Test Beam

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Time-structured Beam Test Setup Peripheral Crate 2 DMB, 2 TMB 1 CCB, 1 MPC FED crate 1 DDU PC TTC crate DAQ Data Trigger primitives S1 S2 S3 beam CSC 1 CSC 2 Track finder Crate TRIDAS

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Set up at X5A

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Typical Muon Event

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Typical Muon Event (CSC1 tilted)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Two muons

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Anode timing resolution measured in 1999 beam test ALCT can be used as timing mark for each CSC hit. LHC clock from the TTC system will be used as a “TDC” to locate ALCT’s with respect to BC0 (start of LHC orbit). A primary goal of the time-structured beam test is to validate the peripheral crate electronics’ capability to unambiguously tag CSC hits using the TTC system and anode timing. 25ns  =3.9 ns Time (ns) ALCT time using TDC BXN ID Using ALCT and TTC System

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September BXN for L1A and ALCT (2003 beam test) BX Number L!A (Beam Scintillation Counters) 48 bunches BX Number ALCT (Anode trigger Primitive) 48 bunches

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September L1A BXN  ALCT BXN (2003 Beam Test)  In a single CSC module, 98.7 % of events in one bunch count. With 2 or more CSC’s, probability is higher than 99.9 %.  EMU system’s ability to tag BXN for each CSC hit using the TTC system has been validated. (L1A is scintillation counter in beam) CSC #1 CSC #2

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September CFEB Pulse Shape Cathode pulses were fitted by constraining peak to 133 ns Start time (Ts) and pulse height (P.H.) were extracted from fits. Plot shows digitized samples overlaid for all 500 pulses with Ts aligned and PH normalized to Time (ns)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Timing from Cathode Strips Cathode pulse timing (6 layer average) relative to L1A (beam scintillators ) Bunch Crossing Number bin width = 0.2 (5 ns)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Spatial Resolution from Cathode Strips Resolution is best for hit near the edge of strip, worst at the center. In a CSC, the 6 layers are staggered alternately by ½ strip width. The combined resolution is ~ 100  m per chamber Distance from edge of strip (unit: strip width) Spatial resolution (  m) Single layer resolution ME2,3/2 chamber

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Trigger Rate Tests Expected LCT rate at LHC < 25 KHz (ME1/1) data consistent with dead-time = 225 ns Chamber #1 CLCT ,000 1,500 2, ,0001,5002,0002,5003,000 Beam Intensity (KHz) CLCT Rate (KHz)

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September ns Beam Test Results/Status  ALCT BX number relative to L1A % in one bunch count. EMU system’s ability to tag BXN for each CSC hit using the TTC system has been validated. Efficiencies ~ 99% for both ALCT and CLCT –Lowered AFEB, Comparator thresholds (low CSC gas gain) –offline cuts to eliminate junk events Cathode strip timing and spatial resolution satisfactory. A lot of ALCT, CLCT data vs CSC angles (  ) was taken. DAQ rate tests carried out with high intensity pion beam. –100 KHz L1A (scintillators), 100 KHz LCT, 1 Kz matched L1A-LCT with 16 SCA sample readout. No Problems. –When L1A-LCT matching increased to 10 KHz, event got over written, DMB buffer not empty. –Repeat above with 8 sample readout. No problems. Preliminary CLCT, ALCT trigger rate tests look OK.

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Electronics Control Fast Control –Reload FPGA’s to recover from SEU –Reset buffers to restore synchronization –Resets will come from TTCrx via the Clock Control Board Slow Control (part of DCS) –Download FPGA firmware –Down load thresholds –Download calibration constants –Debug electronics –Monitor LV voltages, currents –Monitor board temperatures.

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Peripheral Crate Controller Dynatem D360 (baseline) –25 MHz 68EN360 Processor –Communicates with Linux PC (in USC55) via 10 Base FL Ethernet –Operating System:  CLinux –Software for PC-D360-VME communications have been written and tested. –Radiation tolerant Tested with 63 MeV protons. Observed 35 upsets in a fluence of 0.74x10 11 p’s/cm 2. Recover from upsets with “system reset”. Requires 47 resets in 10 LHC-years. –Speed Transfer rate ~ 2.5 Mbits/s continuous. Speed of loading FPGA firmware to EPROM dominated by required erase/program delays on chip. –Cost ~ $1100 per unit

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September A New Crate Controller in Development A simple custom board containing –XILINX Virtex-II Pro with built in Gigabit Ethernet –Optical transceiver (for Gigabit Ethernet) Advantages –A much simpler crate controller –Communicates with stand-alone PC (in USC55) via ethernet –Gigabit ethernet PCI card commercially available –All programming done on PC. No controller specific software. –Fast: transfer rate ~ 1 Mbits/s –Inexpensive: ~ $600 per unit Status of development (at Ohio State Univ) –XILINX II Pro now available –Firmware for Gigabit ethernet already exits. –Firmware for a limited VME master to be developed.

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September EMU FED Crate (in USC55) CRATECONTROLLERCRATECONTROLLER DDUDDU DCCDCC DDUDDU DDUDDU DDUDDU DDUDDU DDUDDU DDUDDU DCCDCC DDUDDU DDUDDU Crate Controller Interface to DCS Provide Slow Control services Detector Dependent Unit Receive data from Frontend, Format and send data to DCC Detect and report errors Data Concentration Card Receive data from DDU’s Merge and send data to DAQ via S-Link EMU will have 4 FED crates in USC55. Each FED crate houses 9 DDU’s and 2 DCC’s Latest rack layout for EMU in USC confirmed. (

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September DDU Prototype First 9U DDU board produced and tested. (2002) Full error checking implemented Interface to VME PC readout via Gigabit Ethernet (90 MB/s data transfer) DMB calibration pulses, regular and random timing S-Link64 tested –Need to integrate w/ FMM and TTS

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Looking Ahead Tests of EMU Electronics system – for validation of peripheral crate electronics prior to ESR and production. –Use multiple chambers and multiple peripheral crates. –Tests with Cosmic rays at UCLA by end of April ‘03 –Test with 25 ns beam at CERN in May ‘03 Radiation tolerant tests of all peripheral crate boards (60 MeV protons at UCD) by Sep 03. –Tolerance of all components to a level of 3x10 11 n’s/cm 2 –Finalize scheme to make CCB immune to SEU. ESR of full EMU electronics system - Nov 03 Start production for peripheral crate boards by end of 03. Installation and commissioning of CSC’s on iron disks at SX5 in Slice test together with TRIDAS planned for

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September Joint EMU-TRIDAS Slice Test Peripheral crates FED crate Standalone DAQ PC Muon Trigger Crates DCS ME1 ME2 ME3 TTC crate Slice Test planned for (Key Milestone, L3 Task in M&O) Slice Test planned for (Key Milestone, L3 Task in M&O) cosmic ray DAQ Data Trigger primitives

L.S. Durkin, CMS Review, September SummarySummary On-chamber boards met performance requirements and passed extensive radiation, magnetic field and sparking tests. Production of on-chamber boards is on schedule and within budget. Prototype work of all off-chamber boards (in peripheral crates and in FED crates) are in advanced stages. Integrated EMU electronics system works well and tested successfully in 25 ns time-structured beam at CERN ( May23 – June1, 2003 ). Production review of Peripheral crate electronics in Nov Production scheduled to start in EMU Electronics is in good shape.