Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Advertisements

B-tagging, leptons and missing energy in ATLAS after first data Ivo van Vulpen (Nikhef) on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
Inefficiencies in the feet region 40 GeV muons selection efficiency   Barrel – End Cap transition 10th International Conference on Advanced Technology.
RAL Summer School September, 2004 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis High Level Trigger Studies for the.
A Fast Level 2 Tracking Algorithm for the ATLAS Detector Mark Sutton University College London 7 th October 2005.
Report from the Muon Trigger WG Aleandro Nisati On behalf of the Muon Trigger Slice Community Muon Week, April 18° 2007.
CMS High Level Trigger Selection Giuseppe Bagliesi INFN-Pisa On behalf of the CMS collaboration EPS-HEP 2003 Aachen, Germany.
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS Johannes Haller (CERN) on behalf of the ATLAS First-Level Trigger Groups International Europhysics Conference on High.
Como, ICATPP 2009 R.Crupi 1 Roberto Crupi INFN Lecce & Physics Department, University of Salento - Italy on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration 11 th ICATPP.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
Stefania.Spagnolo, Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce CERN, Nov. 2006, ATLAS Trigger and Physics week Muon Event Filter Stefania Spagnolo Dip. Fisica, Univ. Lecce.
Muon HLT status with emphasis on  Fast for endcap Alessandro Di Mattia MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY On behalf of the HLT Algorithm Group ATLAS TDAQ week.
The ATLAS trigger Ricardo Gonçalo Royal Holloway University of London.
General Trigger Philosophy The definition of ROI’s is what allows, by transferring a moderate amount of information, to concentrate on improvements in.
Tracking at the ATLAS LVL2 Trigger Athens – HEP2003 Nikos Konstantinidis University College London.
Sez. di Lecce Universita` degli Studi del Salento The Muon Trigger in ATLAS Giovanni Siragusa On behalf of the ATLAS Muon Trigger group.
1 Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) and the HLT.
1 Michela Biglietti (Universita’ di Napoli-Federico II) Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) and the HLT.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
Trigger Requirements first thoughts from Alessandro Di Mattia, Giovanni Siragusa, Sergio Grancagnolo, Andrea Ventura, Michela Biglietti, Diana Scannicchio.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
HEP 2005 WorkShop, Thessaloniki April, 21 st – 24 th 2005 Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis Studies on the High.
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=10 31 cm -2 s -1 Sergio Grancagnolo on behalf of the Muon Trigger software group.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
RPC DQA but also Monitoring for the DCS group: status and prospective for Marcello Bindi RPC L1MU Barrel DQM - 08/05/2013.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Cern -April 24, 2007Atlas Data Quality Workshop M. Primavera1 Muon EF Data Quality Muon EF Data Quality M. Primavera - I.N.F.N. Lecce on behalf of Muon.
Valeria Perez Reale University of Bern On behalf of the ATLAS Physics and Event Selection Architecture Group 1 ATLAS Physics Workshop Athens, May
Performance and Physics Workshop Summary: Top and Muons Sarah Allwood-Spiers Glasgow ATLAS meeting June 2008.
IOP HEPP: Beauty Physics in the UK, 12/11/08Julie Kirk1 B-triggers at ATLAS Julie Kirk Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Introduction – B physics at LHC –
Artemis School On Calibration and Performance of ATLAS Detectors Jörg Stelzer / David Berge.
Muon Reconstruction with Moore and MuonIdentification The Moore/MUID group Atlas Physics Workshop Athens, May 2003.
/MuID status report on behalf of the Moore/MuID group. Status in the releases ( Units Migrations DC1/G3 MuonGeoModel Migration DC2/G4) MuID updates Trig.
Muon Event Filter Status Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the muon EF working group INFN Lecce & Salento University.
MOORE MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) Track reconstruction in the Muon Spectrometer MuonIdentification MuonIdentification Reconstruction and.
FTKSim Status and plans FTK Meeting 07/13/2006 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, G.Volpi, P. Giannetti.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
4/9/2007RPC converter1/18 RPC bytestream converter: Brainstorming a summary of discussions involving M.Bianco, G.Cataldi, G.Chiodini, E.Gorini, A.Guida,
S t a t u s a n d u pd a t e s Gabriella Cataldi (INFN Lecce) & the group Moore … in the H8 test-beam … in the HLT(Pesa environment) … work in progress.
1 Detector Performance and Physics talks at Bern (very selective!) Pete Watkins.
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
L1 Global Muon Trigger Simulation Status URL of this presentation:
A Level-2 trigger algorithm for the identification of muons in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Alessandro Di Mattia on behalf of the Atlas TDAQ group Computing.
Performance of the ATLAS Trigger with Proton Collisions at the LHC John Baines (RAL) for the ATLAS Collaboration 1.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Muon HLT: status of the algorithms and performance Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon HLT group.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
1 TrigMoore: Status, Plans, Possible Milestones. 2 Moore in HLT- status and ongoing work Package under the CVS directory: Trigger/TrigAlgorithms/TrigMoore.
The ATLAS Muon Landscape towards a common Muon Reconstruction Rosemarie Aben, Peter Kluit, John Ottersbach, Egge van der Poel, Marcel Raas, Nicole Ruckstuhl,
Introduction 08/11/2007 Higgs WG – Trigger meeting Ricardo Gonçalo, RHUL.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
ATLAS B trigger Overview of B trigger Di-muon algorithms Performance (efficiency/rates) Menu for data taking experience 7/1/20101ATLAS UK Meeting,
EPS HEP 2007 Manchester -- Thilo Pauly July The ATLAS Level-1 Trigger Overview and Status Report including Cosmic-Ray Commissioning Thilo.
Muon identification in ATLAS Peter Kluit (NIKHEF).
Measuring the B+→J/ψ (μμ) K+ Channel with the first LHC data in Atlas
L2 Muon Trigger Study Status Report
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
for the transition region on behalf of the RPC upgrade group
OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS
High Level Trigger Studies for the Efstathios (Stathis) Stefanidis
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
MOORE (Muon Object Oriented REconstruction) MuonIdentification
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Muon Trigger Software Status
integration in HLT-status and prospects
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
M.Biglietti (Univ. Naples and INFN Naples)
Presentation transcript:

Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo2 Muon Trigger Slice  Fast  Isol  Comb ~2 kHz 10 ms time TrigMoore MOORE ~ 200 Hz 1 s time LVL1 Simulation LVL2 Selection EF Selection 2.5  s fixed latency time MuId SA MuId COMB B Physics processor DAQ RPC MuCTPI TGC CTP LVL2: muon RoIs DAQ: muon candidates DAQ: muon candidates DAQ 75 KHz ~23 KHz

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo3 Samples and Releases CSC production with Athena and previous DetDescrVersion = CSC-01-XX-YY Reconstruction with Athena Results presented are not complete, other validations are on going as more data will be available. More details on what will be shown here can also be found in “TAPM” and “T&P week” meetings.

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo4 HLT software status in Sequence for a  X signature: –muFast (LVL2 - Muon Spectrometer only) + muFastHypo (test p T >X ) –IDSCAN (LVL2 - Inner Detector only) –muComb (LVL2 - MS &ID) + muCombHypo (p T test) –Muon reconstruction EF ID –TrigMoore (EF) MS reconstruction Extrapolation to IP Combined fit with ID tracks (reconstructed with newTracking) –TrigMooreHypo (test p T of combined muons) Signatures: –mu6l, mu6, mu20i for HLTCONFIGVERSION=CSC-02 –mu0, mu5, mu20i for HLTCONFIGVERSION=CSC GeV Vertical slice configured for trigger menus at 900GeV in addition to standard configuration –No implementation of the isolation cuts yet

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo5 AODs Output of trigger objects in AOD to allow rerunning of hypothesis algorithms Trigger AOD contents LVL1LVL2EF RecMuonRoIMuonFeatureTrigMuonEF CombinedMuonFeature

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo6 LVL1

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo7 LVL1 Barrel Muon Trigger Rates Rates as shown in last T&P week Muon sources 6 GeV 6 GeV threshold Lumi= GeV 5 GeV threshold Lumi=10 33 Cosmic Cosmic threshold Lumi=10 33  /K Hz21800 Hz62500 Hz b 1640 Hz2220 Hz3360 Hz c 970 Hz1400 Hz2400 Hz W 3 Hz t Negligible Sum 13.5 kHz25.5 kHz68.3 kHz Level-1 Efficiency Inclusive μ LHC (prompt μ and  /K decay)

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo8 There is inconsistency between TGC cabling database in release and < <5% efficiency loss with older release for high pT muon(20GeV) <5% efficiency loss with older release for high pT muon(20GeV) with eta~1.2 and FWD region (small effect for low pT muon) with eta~1.2 and FWD region (small effect for low pT muon) LVL1 Muon Endcap Simulation: Current Status The latest version : TrigT1TGC (collected in ) [1]Use RDO generated by release x Execute TrigT1TGC with release since coincidence window is not optimal [2]Use RDO generated by release < MuonRdoToMuonDigit.ApplyPatchForTGC = True Patch will be introduced in release 13 so that user can use RDO (not necessary to start from HIT). To get the latest LVL1 endcap muon trigger performance to get correct IDs.

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo9 Overlap resolution in the MuCTPI MuCTPI simulation is able to handle all kinds of overlaps in release MuCTPI simulation is able to handle all kinds of overlaps in release The plots demonstrate the MuCTPI’s current efficiency to resolve fake double-counts between muon sectors. (Best and worst cases shown.)The plots demonstrate the MuCTPI’s current efficiency to resolve fake double-counts between muon sectors. (Best and worst cases shown.) The Barrel-Endcap overlaps can be handled pretty well, while the Endcap-Endcap overlaps show problems at low p T.The Barrel-Endcap overlaps can be handled pretty well, while the Endcap-Endcap overlaps show problems at low p T. before MuCTPI after MuCTPI

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo10 Expected fake double-count rates Overlap type w/o overlap removal in MuCTPI with overlap removal in MuCTPI Barrel-Barrel169 Hz81 Hz Barrel-Endcap174 Hz8 Hz Endcap-Endcap486 Hz*315 Hz* Forward-Forward43 Hz*28 Hz* Total872 Hz432 Hz * Not using strip masks on sector edges. Rates of fake 6 GeV di-muon triggers at L=10 33 cm -1 s -2

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo11 Other LVL1 on-going work Implementation of configurations mechanism for non-standard trigger (cosmics, 5GeV threshold)

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo12 LVL2

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo13  Fast: endcaps Barrel LUT vs r Endcap LUT vs  Track finding efficiency w.r.t. LVL1 ~ 99.5%~ 100% algo time on 2.4 GHz ~ 1.5 ms< 1 ms Tail extension over 2  6 GeV 20 GeV 6 GeV 20 GeV Resolution 6 GeV 20 GeV 6 GeV 20 GeV fit of the resolution core 1.5  fit first release where the algorithm for endcaps runs in the slice

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo14 Offline Emulation Inner station has less coverage than medium-outer stations. To check impact on acceptance of a three point measurements vs two point measurements, an offline emulation of the LVL2  Fast has been implemented in the endcaps, using also the inner station measurement. Resolutions function of eta,phi (local). Pt=-6 GeV Preliminary Offline studies Results agree with online code. Loss in acceptance only in some marginal regions. Including inner station, resolution improves (<10%) in most regions except some eta, phi regions

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo15 Without TRT BARREL: Algorithm for the barrel finalized for Matching with the ID track done at the external surface of the CALO –  match,  match & z match all studied with respect the muon p T –matching efficiency 99.2% with 3  performance checked with a new single muon production (11.0.6) used ~ 1.5x10 6 events produced with the spread of the interaction point cut on the matching window optimized for muon tracks with p T of 6 GeV  Comb: physics performance Barrel Endcap: as of now no back extrapolation is available, hence the association between ID and muon track is driven only by the p T estimated in the two subdetectors

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo16 Performances with misaligned data check of performances while LUTs and alignement of geometry are not optimal use of the available sample at 5,10,50,100,300 GeV –misaligned geometry: ATLAS-CSC performance of  Fast is lowered but  Comb almost recover it –no TRT propagation of IDSCAN always used

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo17 LVL2 on-going work Work in progress (ready for ): deploying the pattern recognition in the innermost endcap refining p T estimation with the use of innermost station back extrapolation for the combined reconstruction in the endcap correcting the LVL2 geometry model with the alignment accessing the MDT configuration database online access of the MDT calibration constants

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo18 Event Filter

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo19 EF Performances p T rec / p T gen MOORE tracks with  2 <3 3.65% 3.70% 2.75% Release p T = 50 GeV 10k single muon events MuidSA tracks successfully fitted MuidCB tracks successfully fitted No bias observedwithin statistical errors Results agree with expected performances from offline algorithms

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo20 p T rec / p T gen - SIGMA Blue = MOORE Red = MuidSA Pink= MuidCB  Expected trend of p T resolution vs eta. Increasing at critical barrel-endcap transition, as observed in offline reconstruction. Resolutions Release Release

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo21 Algorithm Efficiencies p T =100 GeV Efficiency drop in correspondance of the feets

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo22 EF plans for ID seeded version Package split in order to be more friendly to new developers Topological algorithms Migration to new EDM –Implementation of Alg tools in order to share code with offline –Will get collections of unseeded (for wrapped mode) or of seeded (for online use) PrepRawData

23 Jan 2007Sergio Grancagnolo23 Conclusions Muon slice is performing well All levels are ready, isolation requirement using calorimeter, still to be integrated Next improvements –Configurables drive with configurables the configuration of the full set of Tools/Services used by algorithms, where possible –Migration to "New Steering" FEX algorithm migrated for LVL2 and EF Hypothesis algorithm coding on going for EF, done for LVL2 need extensive testing –New performances need to be evaluated as new data will be available, compatibly with csc notes timescale