Warner van Hattem (The Netherlands) 1 december 2005 Roadside Safety Aspects in RSA's The Dutch Approach Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Road Safety Considerations around a mine site By Richard Jois Transport Mining and Safety Leader.
Advertisements

Gerald L. Ullman, Ph.D., P.E. Texas Transportation Institute Designing and Maintaining a Pedestrian-Friendly Work Zone.
2-10 ODOT Sign Policy and Guidelines for the State Highway System Ch. 6 – Construction and Maintenance Signs Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic-Roadway.
Assessing and Managing Risk
”Vision Zero Motorcycle Road” Before & After Morten Hansen - General Secretary, Norwegian Motorcycle Union in cooperation with the Norwegian Public Roads.
Implementation of rural road safety schemes: lessons from the Netherlands Raoul Beunen Catharinus F. Jaarsma Henk-Jan Kooij Wageningen University, the.
ROADS. Roads Introduction Transportation engineering is one of the most important branches of civil engineering. Transportation means conveyance of human.
Highway Engineering Code No. (CM 304) Lec. 2. What is Road Cross-Section Elements?
Capilano Road Improvement Project WELCOME TO THE OPEN HOUSE.
Chap 4 Cross Section Elements (pp.4-1 – 4-66 ) The following topics (pages) are covered in this lecture: Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7) Pavement (p.4-1 – 4-7)
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
INDONESIA INFRASTRUCTURE INITIATIVE A Safe System Supporting Vulnerable Road Users Dr Dale Andrea VicRoads International.
Preventing Runovers and Backovers
Learning Outcomes Identify safety issues unique to local and rural areas. Identify common challenges to improving road safety. Explain why road agencies.
SEHAUC 2010 The New Safety Code HAUC (UK) JAG (UK)
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Road Safety Inspection in Austria Thomas Fessl Best in Europe Conference Brussels, February
Road Safety Audits Ghazwan al-Haji PhD student ”On whats goes wrong in road design and how to put it right safely”
CHARACTERISTICS OF TRAFFIC ENGINEERNG
Introduction Transportation System Objectives : Military; Knit together the inhabitants of a territory by providing mutual access and communication; Economic.
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Shared Roadways Lesson 14 (This picture shows bicyclists not.
Expressway Driving. Characteristics of Expressway Driving Roadway Speed Interchanges No cross traffic Median Tollbooths Entrance/exit ramps Limited access.
SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CROSS- SECTION DESIGN OF 80 KM/H RURAL ROADS IN THE NETHERLANDS Jan Hendrik van Petegem Govert Schermers Paper ID 36.
Road Safety Audit CEDR SG „Road Safety“ Eva M. Eichinger Copenhagen, April, 2004 Road Safety Audit General Introduction Eva M. Eichinger, M.Sc., Ph.D.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
 Cross section elements consist of the following:  1.Traffic lanes (carriage ways);  2.Shoulders;  3.Medians;  4.Curbs;  5.Side slopes.
Driving a car down Anzac Parade on a rainy night Risk Assessment.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Overview of the RSACRP project Road Safety Audit and Crash Reduction Workshop Bandung, 27 & 28 May, 2011 Gerard Neilson VicRoads International Projects.
Today Misc slides from Evans Crash risk and age Road crash factors Vehicle crash factors Environmental crash factors.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
23e Congrès mondial de la Route - Paris 2007 Network Safety Management – From Case Study to Application François GANNEAU Roads and Motorways Engineering.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
R6891 CaSE OBJECTIVES " Provide evidence for relative safety of important design features " Identify aspects of design where costs and safety can be optimised.
Increasing of level crossing safety. Protecting modes of level crossings on MÁV network.
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Louisiana Local Road Safety Program
Safe Road Infrastructure George Mavroyeni – Executive Director, Major Projects (former Executive Director, Road Safety and Network Access) May 2011.
Positive Guidance Principles. Positive guidance concept - Provide drivers sufficient information about roadway design, operations, and potential hazards.
21st October 2015 Stillorgan Village Area Movement Framework Plan PUBLIC CONSULTATION INFORMATION PERIOD DOCUMENT.
Rijkswaterstaat 1 Functional specifications. Rijkswaterstaat 2 Functional specification – methodology When talking about functional requirements it is.
Positive Guidance Principles. Positive guidance concept - Provide drivers sufficient information about roadway design, operations, and potential hazards.
ROAD SAFETY PEER REVIEW Stuart Dungworth I.Eng FIHE MCIHT Reg RSA (IHE) URS/Scott Wilson.
Safety Audit Planned Project - Preliminary Design zGeneral Project Data yProject layout xRoad function Determine the road function. What kind of traffic.
Construction Vehicle Access and Egress Module 4.  Access to- and egress from work zones presents significant challenges. Hazards are compounded when.
Construction zones and traffic control Objective Review extent of problem Identify contractor responsibilites Identify control plan components.
Safety Signs. Traffic Light Ahead Slow down and prepare to stop.
Conducted by: Tyler Womble. “A place where two or more roads meet, especially when at least one is a major highway” Can be regulated by: Stop Signs Traffic.
Steps 6 to 8 Lesson 4 | The Eight-Step RSA Process 4-86.
Presenter’s name Presenter’s title. Contents The current situation Reducing collisions in London [INSERT ORGANISATION NAME]’s policy How we’re helping.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
® © 2016 National Safety Council SHARING THE ROADS SAFELY For use in conjunction with 5-Minute Safety Talk.
Overview Interim Advice Note 85/06 Minor Improvements to Existing National Roads Development of Approach / Issues Identified NRA TA 85/11 Guidance on.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 Funding Resources for Highway Safety (FY2001 Fed-Aid) $1.4 $5.6 Min. Guarantee Bridge Surface Transp. Program National Hwy.
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
Regional Road Safety Workshop
The risk of walking and cycling?
SHARING THE ROADS SAFELY
Learning Outcomes Describe ways to incorporate and implement practical safety solutions during projects and maintenance. Identify potential sources of.
Road Safety Audits in Europe
SHARING THE ROADS SAFELY
Interdisciplinary teams Existing or new roadway
Traffic Signs Regulatory Warning Informational/Guide.
From Channelization, Islands and Turning Roadways (p ~ p
Design Consistency and Positive Guidance
Towards the Ideal Roundabout Design
Maintaining a Safer Roadway
HERO UNIT Training Module
Presentation transcript:

Warner van Hattem (The Netherlands) 1 december 2005 Roadside Safety Aspects in RSA's The Dutch Approach Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management Road Design Departement Workshop RISER, Budapest

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's2 Contents RSA in the Netherlands Conclusion Project Stages and Road Side Safety

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's3 RSA in the Netherlands Starts in 2002 Training auditors Pilots and evaluation Voluntary approach

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's4 Project Stages 1Preparatory tasks of design 2Preliminary design 3Final design (tender document) 4Before opening of the road 5After opening of the road RSA in the Netherlands Project stages Conclusion Design Principles: P1 Prevent road users to leave the carriageway P2 Minimise the risk to strike an obstacle P3 Minimise the severity of the injuries the EARLIER, the BETTER

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's5 Preparatory Tasks of Design P1 Reserve sufficient space to enable an optimal road design Prevent leaving carriageway P2 Minimise risks P3 Minimise injuries Reserve sufficient space to enable an optimal obstacle-free zone Define requirements for VRS ASI < 1,0

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's6 Preparatory Tasks of Design

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's7 Preliminary Design (1) P1 Prevent sharp curves Prevent leaving carriageway Optimal cross section – Lane width – Hard shoulder – Recovery area Optimal superelevation Ensure sight distance

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's8 Preliminary Design (2) P2 Soft shoulder/ central reserve considering obstacle-free zones – Determine road axis – Determine distance between carriageways Minimise risks Low gradient side slopes Remove or replace obstacles Combine obstacles – Traffic signs with fly-overs – Cameras with lighting Minimise objects in behalf of motorcyclists

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's9 Preliminary Design (2)

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's10 Preliminary Design (3) P3 Soft shoulder/ central reserve considering VRS’s – Soil rampart – Flexible VRS – Rigid VRS Minimise injuries Application of passively safe poles Application of passively safe noise barriers Additional construction width considering a noise barrier Use service roads and secondary road network for vulnerable road users

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's11 Preliminary Design (3)

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's12 Final Design, Tender Document (1) P1 Wide recovery area (not too wide to avoid unwanted behaviour) Prevent leaving carriageway Acoustic road markings Rumble strips in recovery area Visual guidance by passively safe devices

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's13 Final Design, Tender Document (1)

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's14 Final Design, Tender Document (2) P2 Matted shoulder – Roughness – Green appearance Minimise risks Combine obstacles Lighting poles (although passively safe) in inside curve of connecting roads

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's15 Final Design, Tender Document (3) P3 Application of the correct VRS – ASI-value – Availability of space Minimise injuries

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's16 Before Opening of the Road P1 Roughness and contrast of pavement Roughness of road marking in behalf of motorcyclists Prevent leaving carriageway P2 Minimise risks P3 Minimise injuries Level out altitude differences between hard and soft shoulder Level out soft shoulder to prevent roll-overs Obstacles – Passively safe – Possibilities to combine Application of the correct VRS Correct installation of the VRS

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's17 Before Opening of the Road

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's18 After Opening of the Road Maintenance program ‘PRIOBERM’ – Priorities – Costs

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's19 Conclusion 1Preparatory tasks of design 2Preliminary design 3Final design (tender document) 4Before opening of the road 5After opening of the road RSA in the Netherlands Project stages Conclusion

1 december 2005 Road Side Safety Aspects in RSA's20 Conclusion Application of RSA in the Netherlands is increasing – Special attention to Roadside Safety Warner van Hattem Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management Lecture by: RSA in every stage of the project – Roadside safety involves every stage The three design principles P1 Prevent leaving carriageway Minimise risks Minimise injuries In this specific order P3 P2