Synchronization in complex network topologies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coordination of Multi-Agent Systems Mark W. Spong Donald Biggar Willett Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and The Coordinated.
Advertisements

Hamiltonian Chaos and the standard map Poincare section and twist maps. Area preserving mappings. Standard map as time sections of kicked oscillator (link.
PROCESS MODELLING AND MODEL ANALYSIS © CAPE Centre, The University of Queensland Hungarian Academy of Sciences Analysis of Dynamic Process Models C13.
DYNAMICS OF RANDOM BOOLEAN NETWORKS James F. Lynch Clarkson University.
Week 5 - Models of Complex Networks I Dr. Anthony Bonato Ryerson University AM8002 Fall 2014.
NOISE-INDUCED COLLECTIVE REGIMES IN POPULATIONS OF GLOBALLY COUPLED MAPS Silvia De Monte Dept. of Physics, The Technical University of Denmark Francesco.
WINNERLESS COMPETITION PRINCIPLE IN NEUROSCIENCE Mikhail Rabinovich INLS University of California, San Diego ’
II.A Business cycle Model A forced van der Pol oscillator model of business cycle was chosen as a prototype model to study the complex economic dynamics.
1 Epidemic Spreading in Real Networks: an Eigenvalue Viewpoint Yang Wang Deepayan Chakrabarti Chenxi Wang Christos Faloutsos.
Homework 4, Problem 3 The Allee Effect. Homework 4, Problem 4a The Ricker Model.
Introduction to chaotic dynamics
Common Properties of Real Networks. Erdős-Rényi Random Graphs.
ONR MURI: NexGeNetSci From Consensus to Social Learning in Complex Networks Ali Jadbabaie Skirkanich Associate Professor of innovation Electrical & Systems.
Advanced Topics in Data Mining Special focus: Social Networks.
Analysis of the Rossler system Chiara Mocenni. Considering only the first two equations and ssuming small z The Rossler equations.
The Erdös-Rényi models
Optimization Based Modeling of Social Network Yong-Yeol Ahn, Hawoong Jeong.
Information Networks Power Laws and Network Models Lecture 3.
Dynamical Encoding by Networks of Competing Neuron Groups : Winnerless Competition M. Rabinovich 1, A. Volkovskii 1, P. Lecanda 2,3, R. Huerta 1,2, H.D.I.
On Nonuniqueness of Cycles in Dissipative Dynamical Systems of Chemical Kinetics A.A.Akinshin, V.P.Golubyatnikov Altai State Technical University, Barnaul.
Dynamics of Coupled Oscillators-Theory and Applications
Network of Networks and the Climate System Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research & Institut of Physics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin & King‘s.
Percolation in self-similar networks Dmitri Krioukov CAIDA/UCSD M. Á. Serrano, M. Boguñá UNT, March 2011.
BME 6938 Neurodynamics Instructor: Dr Sachin S Talathi.
THE ANDERSON LOCALIZATION PROBLEM, THE FERMI - PASTA - ULAM PARADOX AND THE GENERALIZED DIFFUSION APPROACH V.N. Kuzovkov ERAF project Nr. 2010/0272/2DP/ /10/APIA/VIAA/088.
Introduction to Quantum Chaos
Ch 9.8: Chaos and Strange Attractors: The Lorenz Equations
Random-Graph Theory The Erdos-Renyi model. G={P,E}, PNP 1,P 2,...,P N E In mathematical terms a network is represented by a graph. A graph is a pair of.
Synchronization State Between Pre-turbulent Hyperchaotic Attractors G. Vidal H. Mancini Universidad de Navarra.
UNIVERSITY OF MONTENEGRO ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Igor DJUROVIĆ Vesna RUBEŽIĆ Time-Frequency Representations in Detection of Chaotic State in.
1 Mechanism for the Partial Synchronization in Coupled Logistic Maps  Cooperative Behaviors in Many Coupled Maps Woochang Lim and Sang-Yoon Kim Department.
Workshop on Applications of Wireless Communications (WAWC 2008) 21 August 2008, Lappeenranta - Finland CONTROLLING EPIDEMICS IN WIRELESS NETWORKS Ranjan.
Modeling Genetic Network: Boolean Network Yongyeol Ahn KAIST.
Some figures adapted from a 2004 Lecture by Larry Liebovitch, Ph.D. Chaos BIOL/CMSC 361: Emergence 1/29/08.
Lecture 21 Neural Modeling II Martin Giese. Aim of this Class Account for experimentally observed effects in motion perception with the simple neuronal.
Introduction to synchronization: History
1 Partial Synchronization in Coupled Chaotic Systems  Cooperative Behaviors in Three Coupled Maps Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National.
Synchronism in Large Networks of Coupled Heterogeneous
1 Low Dimensional Behavior in Large Systems of Coupled Oscillators Edward Ott University of Maryland.
Control and Synchronization of Chaos Li-Qun Chen Department of Mechanics, Shanghai University Shanghai Institute of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics Shanghai.
Asymptotic behaviour of blinking (stochastically switched) dynamical systems Vladimir Belykh Mathematics Department Volga State Academy Nizhny Novgorod.
1 Synchronization in large networks of coupled heterogeneous oscillators Edward Ott University of Maryland.
Analysis of the Rossler system Chiara Mocenni. Considering only the first two equations and assuming small z, we have: The Rossler equations.
Effects of the underlying topologies on Coupled Oscillators Soon-Hyung Yook.
1 Quasiperiodic Dynamics in Coupled Period-Doubling Systems Sang-Yoon Kim Department of Physics Kangwon National University Korea Nonlinear Systems with.
Controlling Chaos Journal presentation by Vaibhav Madhok.
Network Science K. Borner A.Vespignani S. Wasserman.
K. Zhou Menton Professor. Introduction  General nonlinear systems  Automomous (Time Invariant) Systems (does not depend explicitly on time):  Equilibrium.
On the behaviour of an edge number in a power-law random graph near a critical points E. V. Feklistova, Yu.
Dynamic Network Analysis Case study of PageRank-based Rewiring Narjès Bellamine-BenSaoud Galen Wilkerson 2 nd Second Annual French Complex Systems Summer.
V.V. Emel’yanov, S.P. Kuznetsov, and N.M. Ryskin* Saratov State University, , Saratov, Russia * GENERATION OF HYPERBOLIC.
Cmpe 588- Modeling of Internet Emergence of Scale-Free Network with Chaotic Units Pulin Gong, Cees van Leeuwen by Oya Ünlü Instructor: Haluk Bingöl.
The intimate relationship between networks' structure and dynamics
Stability and instability in nonlinear dynamical systems
Random Walk for Similarity Testing in Complex Networks
The Cournot duopoly Kopel Model
S. Sabarathinam Research Scholar Under the guidance of
Chaos Control (Part III)
Date of download: 10/29/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Dimension Review Many of the geometric structures generated by chaotic map or differential dynamic systems are extremely complex. Fractal : hard to define.
K. Zhou Menton Professor
Blair Ebeling MATH441: Spring 2017
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
One- and Two-Dimensional Flows
Abstract We simulate the twisting of an initially potential coronal flux tube by photospheric vortex motions. The flux tube starts to evolve slowly(quasi-statically)
Introduction of Chaos in Electric Drive Systems
Qiudong Wang, University of Arizona (Joint With Kening Lu, BYU)
OCNC Statistical Approach to Neural Learning and Population Coding ---- Introduction to Mathematical.
Modelling and Searching Networks Lecture 5 – Random graphs
Discrete Mathematics and its Applications Lecture 5 – Random graphs
Presentation transcript:

Synchronization in complex network topologies Ljupco Kocarev Institute for Nonlinear Science, University of California, San Diego In this talk I will present a couple examples of chaos synchronization which we studied in physical and biological systems. Using these examples I will illustrate the elements of chaos synchronization theory.

Outlook Chaotic oscillations and types of synchrony observed between chaotic oscillators Experimental and theoretical analysis of chaos synchronization; Stability of the synchronization manifold Synchronization in networks First, I will discuss the features of chaotic oscillations, which influence the notion of synchronization developed for chaotic systems. Then I will concider the regimes of identical chaotic synchronization in nonlinear circuits and biological neurons. And at the end of this talk I will discuss more general notion of chaos synchronization.

Periodic and Chaotic Oscillations Power Spectrum Waveform x(t) Power Spectrum Waveform x(t) Chaotic Attractor The differences between periodic and chaotic oscillations can be seen from this slide which presents the data acquired from a nonlinear circuit. The regime of periodic oscillations corresponds to the motions on a stable limit cycle. The spectrum of this oscillation contains discrete harmonics. Since the period of oscillations is well defined one can introduce a phase. Now let us consider two such periodic oscillators coupled together. The synchronization in this case means the onset of precise stable relation between the phases of oscillations in each circuit. The onset of this relation is a result of a bifurcation in joint phase space of coupled oscillators. Due to this bifurcation the attracting set changes from a ergodic torus to a limit cycle. The regime of chaotic oscillations corresponds to the motions on a chaotic attractor. Chaotic oscillations have a continues power spectrum. As the result of it there is no direct way to introduce phase for such oscillations and the original notion of chaos synchronization cannot be applied here. However it is known that chaotic oscillators can synchronize. Lyapunov exponents:

Types of chaos synchronization Complete Synchronization Partial Synchronization Identical synchronous chaotic oscillations. Generalized synchronized chaos. Threshold synchronization of chaotic pulses. Phase Synchronization. Synchronization of switching. Others time

Synchronization of chaos in electrical circuits. -2 -1 1 2 -0.5 0.0 0.5 3.0 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 2.1 -2.1 PHASE PORTRAIT Unidirectional coupling N a R C’ C r L Driving Oscillator Response Oscillator Coupling Let us consider an example of chaos synchronization in two identical chaotic circuits with unidirectional coupling. The parameters of the circuits are set to generate chaos which corresponds to this chaotic attractor. The unidirectional dissipative coupling between the circuits is implemented with the unity gain amplifier and coupling resistor Rc. Changing this resistor we can control the strength of the coupling between the circuits.

Synchronization Manifold The model: The coupling parameter: The dynamic of these circuits is described by the system of six differential equations. Variables X describe the behavior of the driving circuit. Variables Y stand for variable of the response circuit. This term describe the coupling between the circuits. g is the coupling parameter. Since the parameters of the circuits are tuned to be the same this six-dimensional system has an invariant manifold. The trajectories on this manifold correspond to the identical synchronous oscillations. Therefore if the circuits have a chaotic attractor entirely located in this manifold they will be able generate identical chaotic oscillations. There exits a 3-dimensional invariant manifold:

Synchronization of chaos: Experiment Driving Oscillator Response Oscillator Uncoupled Oscillators Coupling below the threshold of synchronization This slide presents the results of experimental studies. Here are the oscillations measured in the driving circuit. The behavior of the response circuit depends on the strength of the coupling. Without coupling the response circuits has the chaotic attractor which is identical to the attractor in the driving circuit, but the trajectories of these circuits are not correlated. It can be clearly seen from the figure where one variable of response circuit is plotted versus the same variable of the driving circuit. When we introduce coupling the oscillations remain uncorrelated until the strength of the becomes larger than some threshold value. After that the chaotic attractor entirely located in the synchronization manifold. The projection. Coupling above the threshold of synchronization

Stability of the Synchronization Manifold: Identical Synchronization Driving System: Response System: Synchronization Manifold: Perturbations transversal to the Synchronization Manifold: Linearized Equations for the transversal perturbations:

Chaos Synchronization Regime A regime of dynamical behavior should have a qualitative feature that is an invariant for this regime. Consider dynamics in the phase space No Synchronization The parameter space Synchronization p2 Synch No Synch p1 - Projection of chaotic limiting set Transient trajectories - Limit cycles

Synchronization of Chaos in Numerical Simulations Coupling: g=1.1 Transversal Lyapunov exponent evaluated for the chaotic trajectory x(t) equals Attractor in the Driving Circuit Simulation without noise and parameter mismatch Simulation with 0.4% of parameter mismatch

Network with N nodes m - dimensional vector - real matrix Assumptions: - real matrix - real number Synchronization manifold: Connectivity matrix: - real matrix

Master Stability Function Variation equation: - eigenvalue of the connectivity matrix Master Stability Function Connectivity Matrix

Properties of the master stability function Empty set Ellipsoid Half plane The master stability function for x coupling in the Rossler circuit. The dashed lines show contours in the unstable region. The solid lines are contours in the stable region.

versus Stable region:

Laplacian matrix Class-A oscillators Class-B oscillators B>1

Erdős-Rényi Random Graph (also called the binomial random graph) Consider N nodes (dots); Take every pair (i,j) of nodes and connect them with an edge with probability p

Power-law distribution Power-law networks Power-law distribution =<k> Power-law graphs with prescribed degree sequence (configuration model, 1978) Evolution models (BA model, 1999; Cooper and Frieze model, 2001) Power-law models with given expected degree sequence (Chung and Lu, 2001)

Hybrid Graphs Hybrid graph is a union of global graph (consisting of “long edges” providing small distances) and a local graph (consisting of “short edges” representing local connections). The edge set of of the hybrid graph is a disjoint union of the edge set of the global graph G and that of the local graph L. G: classical random model power-law model L: grid graph

Theorem 1. Let G(N,p) be a random graph on N vertices Theorem 1. Let G(N,p) be a random graph on N vertices. For sufficiently large N, the class-A network G(N,q) almost surely synchronize for arbitrary small coupling. For sufficiently large N, almost every class-B network G(N,p) with B>1 is synchronizable.

Theorem 2. Let M(N, , d, m) be a random power-law graph on N vertices Theorem 2. Let M(N, , d, m) be a random power-law graph on N vertices. For sufficiently large N, the class-A network M(N, , d, m) almost surely synchronize for arbitrary small coupling. For sufficiently large N, almost every class-B network M(N, , d, m) is synchronizable only if power of the power-law d expected average degree m expected maximum degree

Consider a hybrid graph for which L is a circle with N=128. Consider class-A oscillators for which A=1 and Consider class-B oscillators for which B=40 pNG number of global edges p=0.005 p=0.01

Oscillators do not synchronize Local networks Oscillators do not synchronize Hybrid networks Random networks Power-law Oscillators may or may not synchronize Binomial Oscillators synchronize Power-law Oscillators synchronize Binomial

Conclusions Two oscillators may have different synchronous behavior Synchronization of identical chaotic oscillations are found in the oscillators of various nature (including biological neurons) Global edges improve synchronization