New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
Advertisements

State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
Presented by The New Jersey Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Post-School Outcomes Issues for Large States.
Angela Tanner-Dean Diana Chang OSEP October 14, 2010.
Coordinating the IEP and IPE YTP Fall Summit February 21, 2008 Clayton Rees, YTP Coordinator Barbara Garland, Madras HS SpEd Director.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Part B Indicator 13 FFY 09 SPP/APR Writing Suggestions Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3 San Francisco, California.
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
11th Annual NDE Transition Conference
Data and Fiscal Management Monthly Webinar May 5, 2015.
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
April 2010 Copyright © 2010 Mississippi Department of Education Quarterly Special Education Meeting SPP/APR Update April 2010.
Indicator 13 File Review 1)Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 14 and Kentucky’s Continuous Monitoring Process (KCMP) Prepared by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Human Development Institute University.
Center for Change in Transition Services Improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington State Cinda Johnson Sue Ann Bube.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound check.
Trends in the Postschool Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Mary Wagner, Ph.D. SRI.
A Longitudinal Look at the Post-High School Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Findings From the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) Renee.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Four Years Out: Differences in Postschool Experiences of Youth With Disabilities Who Did and Did Not Complete High School Findings from the National Longitudinal.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
“I NEVER PLANNED NOT TO GO TO COLLEGE”: VOICES OF YOUNG ADULTS WITH ASPERGER SYNDROME TRANSITIONING TO COLLEGE PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A QUALITATIVE STUDY.
Collecting Post-school Data Webinar #2 November 18, 2009 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko,
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
IDEA 2004 Part B Changes to the Indicator Measurement Table.
New Mexico Post-School Outcomes Sub-group Analysis 2009 A Comparison of Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender and Strategies to Address Disparities NPSO Presentation.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
Presented by the Early Childhood Transition Program Priority Team August 11, 2010 Updated September 2010.
1 State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator # Measurement 1Graduation 2Dropout 3Statewide Assessments 4Suspension and Expulsion 5Least Restrictive Environment.
1)Type your name, address, and zip code (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS will conduct a.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction Improving Special Education Services November 2010 Sacramento, CA SPP/APR Update.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Special Education State Performance Plan and Annual Performance.
O S E P Office of Special Education Programs United States Department of Education Aligning the State Performance Plan, Improvement Strategies, and Professional.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
THE APR AND SPP--LINKING SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA TO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR EDUCATION RESULTS Building a Brighter Tomorrow through Positive and Progressive Leadership.
Transition Resources for Youth
What is “Annual Determination?”
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Part C State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report:
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Frequently Asked Questions (Revisions indicated in red font)
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Post-School Outcome Data Review
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
State performance plan indicator 14
CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, CHILD COUNT FY 2019 October 1, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14, 2009

2 Session Outcomes  Understand new Indicator 14 measurement requirements  Review Draft “Frequently Asked Questions”  Engage in dialogue about the FAQ

To ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment, and independent living IDEA Regulations §300.1(a) IDEA Purpose

National technical assistance & dissemination center funded by the U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs NPSO Mission Help State Education Agencies develop practical, yet rigorous data collection systems to describe the further education and competitive employment experiences of youth with disabilities as they transition from high school to adult life.

"Old" Indicator 14 Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who have been competitively employed enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both within one year of leaving high school.

Revised Indicator 14 Percent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were: A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school. B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school. C. Enrolled higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.

Highlight of Changes Feb. 2009, significant changes Now a “New Indicator” No reporting required FFY 2008 APR due Feb. 1, 2010 (for students who left school in school year) Baseline will be reported in FFY 2009 SPP, due Feb. 1, 2011 New baseline will represent students who left school during the school year New indicator requires reporting 3 percentages (A, B, C) Reporting categories are: higher education, competitive employment, some other postsecondary education or training, and some other employment This presentation summarizes a newly drafted NPSO document entitled: DRAFT Frequently Asked Questions, Revised Part B Indicator, Post-School Outcomes, May 2009

FFY Leave High School Collect one year out data Report in SPP/APR Not required Within one year of leaving school Feb New baseline, targets, and as needed, improvement activities using the SPP template Within one year of leaving school Feb Use APR template 8 SPP/APR Reporting Timelines

2007 Median Earnings: 20-25yr olds Wagner and Cameto, 2005 The More You Learn…the More You Earn

What are the Indicator measure denominators? For the three measures (A, B, and C), the denominator equals the number of respondent leavers 10

11 What are the Indicator measure numerators? A-24: First calculate the following: 1 = # of respondent leavers enrolled in “higher education” 2 = # of respondent leavers in “competitive employment” 3 = # of respondent leavers enrolled in “some other postsecondary education or training” 4 = # of respondent leavers in “some other employment” To calculate the indicator percentages, states should use the following calculations: A = 1 divided by total respondents B = divided by total respondents C = divided by total respondents Note: B and C are duplicated counts

12 1= #HE2= #CE 3= #PS ED/TRNG 4= #Other EMP A B C Here is another way to visualize it:

Q-1: If a state chooses to report in APR due 2/1/2010, must they use "new" Indicator 14 requirements? States have 3 options: 1. Collect PSO data on leavers and report with previous requirements 2. Collect PSO data on leavers, aligned with new Indicator 3. Not collect PSO data on leavers or report the data in Feb APR, make changes and start new data collection on students leaving in school year 13

Q-2: What should states do regarding sampling? Every district must be part of the sample during the 6 years of the SPP. States may need to adjust plan to ensure all districts are included. Submit revisions to OSEP for approval. 14

Q-3: If a state conducts a census, must they describe how representative their respondents are? Whether the state uses a sample or census, describe how respondents are similar, or dissimilar, to the target population. 15 Yes

Q-4: What is the definition of "Institution of Higher Education"? Q-5: What is the difference between "higher education" and "other postsecondary education or training"? See Draft document for IHE definition (pp. 4-5) The differences are under review by OSEP 16

What are your questions regarding the difference between “higher education” and “other postsecondary education or training”?

Q-12: In the definitions for both "competitive employment' and "some other employment", what does "at least 90 days at any time since leaving high school" mean? 90 days mean:  90 cumulative days at any time in the year since leaving high school  The days need not be consecutive  May include more than one job 18

Q-13: What does "20 hours a week" mean? “20 hours a week” includes:  At least 20 hours a week for 90 days  20 hours or more a week for 90 days The following possible response is being reviewed by OSEP for approval: An average of 20 hours a week for 90 days 19

Q-16: Can a state choose to NOT include "military" as competitive employment? Military is defined as competitive employment 20 NO

Q-17: Under "some other employment" are number of hours per week and earning considered? No, hours and wages are not considered However, the “other employment” needs to be “for a period of at least 90 days at any time in the year since leaving high school”. 21

Q-18: Does "some other employment" include sheltered and supported employment? 22 Yes

Q-19: If a youth meets all the criteria of competitive employment except they are working 16 hours per week, is that "other employment"? Yes, this is “some other employment”, because the youth does not meet the 20 hour/week definition of “competitive employment”. 23

Q-21: Must states set a target for each of the measures of the Indicator (e.g., A, B and C)? 24 Yes

Q-22: Are states to collect data to reflect engagement "within one year" or when "at least one year has passed"? Data collection starts when students have been out of school at least one year and describes whether they have been enrolled in higher education, competitively employed, etc.) within one year of leaving high school. See example scenarios… (pp. 8) 25

We are here to assist! Tools we will revise: This FAQ Interview Protocols Data Displays Deanne Unruh Jane Falls Charlotte Alverson Penny Church