Figure 1 shows the 10 most frequently isolated blood pathogens in these hospitals from 1997 through 2000. These species represent about 85% of blood isolates.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT FOR SUPERIMPOSED PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA INFECTION.
Advertisements

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection (blood) surveillance (2009Q1-4) **** Data as of 14/04/2010.
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae infection (blood/CSF) surveillance (2009Q1-4) **** Data as.
Community-acquired bacterial infections. The most frequent etiologic agents of bacterial tonsillitis and tonsillopharyngitis are Streptococcus pyogenes.
Enoch Omonge University of Nairobi
The SENTRY antimicrobial resistance surveillance program is designed to track antimicrobial resistance trends nationally and internationally through a.
1. Fung-Tomc J, Minassian B, Kloek B, et al. (2000). Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-Fluoro (6) quinolone, BMS Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Sorting Out Antibiotics: A systematic approach to antibiotic selection Kenneth Alexander, M.D., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Microbiology.
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (blood/CSF) surveillance, 2009 **** Data as of 01/12/2010.
CHOICE OF ANTIBIOTICS IN THE VIEW OF DEVELOPING ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE Dr. Jolanta Miciulevičienė Vilnius City Clinical Hospital National Public Health.
MDR Organisms in Holy Family Hospital Rawalpindi
Methods Revised Abstract Methods Results TP-271 is a Potent, Broad-Spectrum Fluorocycline with Activity Against Community-Acquired Bacterial Respiratory.
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Escherichia coli infection (blood/CSF) surveillance, 2009 **** Data as of 01/12/2010.
E. faecalis continues to be the most prevalent enterococcal species (56-76% by region) followed by E. faecium, Table 1. Table 2 shows the generally stable.
E. coli, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis accounted for more than 25% of all bacterial samples isolated from the Asian-Pacific region. The ESBL phenotype.
Do Physicians Find Our AST Reports As Confusing As We Do? Louis B. Rice, M.D. Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University.
NCCLS (1997) Approved standard M27-A. Rex JH et al. Clin Infect Dis (1997) 24: Pfaller M. A., et al. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis (1999); 35:19-25.
Aims of study This surveillance study was performed to determine the in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli and.
JT Kirby, DJ Biedenbach, RN Jones, SENTRY Participants Group Univ of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; The JONES Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA Poster #
Zunilda Djanun*, Rudyanto S**, Yulia Rosa***, *Dept. Clinical Pharmacology FMUI/CMH, **ICU CMH, *** Dept. Clinical Microbiology FMUI.
Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) is a toxin that destroys white blood cells and is a virulence factor in some strains of Staphylococcus aureus. PVL occurs.
Antimicrobial Resistance patterns among nosocomial gram negative bacilli by E-test and disc diffusion methods in Sina and Imam Hospital.
Swedres 2005 Swedres 2005 Figures and tables. Swedres 2005 Table Total use of antibacterial drugs for systemic use in Sveden , DDD/1000/day.
김의종(집필대표), 강정옥, 김미나, 김민중, 김성일, 이경원, 이도현, 이장호, 이남용, 이창규, 신종희, 장철훈, 최혜심
Hospital Acquired Pneumonia(HAP): is defined as a pneumonia which occurs after 48 hours of admission to hospital. Hospital Acquired Pneumonia(HAP): is.
Nosocomial E. coli Urine Isolates 1991 – Nosocomial K. pneumoniae Urine Isolates
Supplemental testing methods
EARS-Net data on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland, Q3 2015
Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (AMR Surveillance)
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Klebsiella pneumoniae infection (blood/CSF) surveillance, 2009 **** Data as of 01/12/2010.
Nosocomial E. coli Urine Isolates Nosocomial K. pneumoniae Urine Isolates
MICROBIOLOGICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY OF RESPIRATORY SPECIMENS IN ICU PATIENTS Dr Farooq Cheema, Dr Waseem Tariq, Dr Raja Ishtiaq, Dr Tabassum Qureshi, Dr Vincent.
Dr. Laila M. Matalqah Ph.D. Pharmacology
EARS-Net data on antimicrobial resistance in Ireland Quarter st March 2016.
REVISED ABSTRACT Background: Omadacycline (OMC) is the first of a new class of tetracyclines, the aminomethylcyclines, and is being developed as a once-daily.
Multi-Resistant Gram Negative Microorganisms St Elisabeth Hospital Curacao.
1 A clinico-microbiological study of diabetic foot ulcers in an Indian tertiary care hospital DIABETES Care; Aug 2006; 29,8 : FM R1 임혜원.
Using Nursing Home Antibiograms To Improve Antibiotic Prescribing and Delivery Training Slides for Nursing Home Nurses Comprehensive Antibiogram Toolkit.
How I deal with an outbreak? Prof Bertrand SOUWEINE Medical ICU Clermont-Ferrand France ISICEM March 2009.
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Polish invasive isolates of Neisseria meningitidis in the years Marcin Kadłubowski 1, Anna Skoczyńska.
Ocular TRUST 3: Ongoing Longitudinal Surveillance of Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Ocular Isolates Penny A. Asbell, MD, FACS, MBA 1 ; Daniel F. Sahm,
MRSA, ESBLs and Carbapenem Resistance
Tapasyapreeti Mukhopadhyay, Vrushali Patwardhan, Sarman Singh
Etiology of bacteremia in children under 5 years in Southern Mali
N°XXXX Rapid detection of extended-spectrum BETA-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae from urine using the ESBL NDP test Patrice Nordmann, Laurent Poirel,
This poster will be made available for download after the meeting at :
Afaq R. Afridi, Tanveer Ahmad, Arshad Hussain and Abdul Samad.
EARS-Net data on Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland, Q
The Role of the Microbiology Laboratory in AMS programs
Average susceptibility
Background Goals Methods Conclusions Results
at George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, DC
Introduction Results Materials and Methods Conclusions
Antibiotics sensitivity of microorganism causing nosocomial infections
Development of resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa obtained from patients with cystic fibrosis at different times  F.B. Spencker, L. Staber, T. Lietz,
GLOBAL POINT PREVALENCE SURVEY OF ANTIMICROBIAL CONSUMPTION AND RESISTANCE (GLOBAL-PPS): RESULTS OF ANTIMICROBIAL PRESCRIBING IN INDIA Dr. Sanjeev K Singh.
BSAC Bacteraemia Resistance Surveillance Update 2013
C th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy October 25-28, Washington, DC Examining Temocillin Activity in Combination.
19/ژانويه/17
The need for new antibiotics
…monitoring trends in antimicrobial resistance in Canada
Multicenter study of the in vitro activity of cefepime in comparison with five other broad- spectrum antibiotics against clinical isolates of Gram-positive.
Gonorrhoea antimicrobial resistance in Ireland, 2010 – 2017 On behalf of the National Forum on Antimicrobial Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae Health.
Evolving problems with resistant pathogens
…monitoring trends in antimicrobial resistance in Canada
…monitoring trends in antimicrobial resistance in Canada
…monitoring trends in antimicrobial resistance in Canada
…monitoring trends in antimicrobial resistance in Canada
EARS-Net results 2011 Ole Heuer
Ticarcillin/Clavulinate <8
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1 shows the 10 most frequently isolated blood pathogens in these hospitals from 1997 through These species represent about 85% of blood isolates during the year E. coli, S. aureus, coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa, were the 5 most frequent pathogens. Of these bloodstream isolates, 47 % were from nosocomial bacteremia and 23% were from patients admitted to intensive care units. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the most common Gram-negative isolates is shown in table 2. As compared to blood isolates from European SENTRY centers in , resistance rates to first line antimicrobials appeared to increase for a number of leading pathogens (Table3): ciprofloxacin resistance in E.coli, oxacillin resistance in S.aureus, K.pneumoniae decreased susceptibility to ceftazidime and resistance to ceftazidime, imipenem, ciprofloxacin in P.aeruginosa and Acinetobacter sp. The same trend was noted for teicoplanin-resistant CNS. Figures 2 to 7 illustrate the inter-center variation in the frequency of isolates by species and proportion of resistant strains for selected pathogens and antimicrobials. Some resistant pathogens such P. aeruginosa resistant to imipenem were significantly more prevalent in Mediterranean countries (p<0.01) than in centers from Central or Northern European countries. Similar differences were shown for penicillin resistant S. pneumoniae (p<0.001). ABSTRACT Background: To update the antimicrobial resistance rates in bloodstream isolates from a network of European hospitals. Methods: In the first 9 months of 2000, 18 University Hospitals from 10 European countries referred 3087 blood isolates for in vitro testing against >20 antimicrobials. Results: Of these isolates, 47% were considered from nosocomial bacteremia and 23% were from patients admitted to intensive care units. The 5 most frequent pathogens were E. coli, S. aureus, coag.-neg. staphylococci, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. As compared to blood isolates from 25 European SENTRY centers in , resistance rates to first line antimicrobials appeared to increase for a number of leading pathogens but also showed large variation by center and by region. The mean (inter-center range) proportion of ciprofloxacin non-susceptible strains in E.coli was 14% (0-42) (vs 8% in ); oxacillin resistance in S.aureus was 31% (0-67) (vs 24% in ); ceftazidime decreased susceptibility (MIC  2 µg/ml) in K.pneumoniae was 33% (0-64) (vs 17% in ); in P.aeruginosa, the proportion of strains non-susceptible to ceftazidime was 28% (1-60) (vs 16% in ), imipenem 22% (0-71) (vs 15% in ) and ciprofloxacin 29% (0-67) (vs 25% in ). The prevalence of glycopeptide resistant enteroccci remained stably low in 2000: E. faecium, 8% (vs 11%, ) and E.faecalis, 1% (vs 1% in ). Conclusions: These data indicate that bacterial resistance to antimicrobials used for therapy of bloodstream infections has reached worrisome levels at many of the institutions surveyed in Given the large regional and local variation of resistance rates across Europe, these average secular trends should be interpreted with caution and compared to local data. H.Rodriguez-Villalobos 1, M.J. Struelens 1, R.Jones 2, European SENTRY participants. Hôpital Erasme -Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 1 The Jones Group North Liberty,IA. 2 Poster #77 Dr. H.Rodriguez Villalobos ULB- Hopital Erasme Microbiology Dpt, 808 route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium Phone: (+32) , Fax: (+32) CONCLUSIONS 1. The distribution of most frequent bloodstream pathogens was similar in 2000 as compared with A trend toward increased resistance to first line antimicrobials over the period was seen with several leading pathogens, including community acquired pathogens (E.coli, S. pneumoniae) and nosocomial pathogens (K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter sp). 3. These average secular trends should be interpreted with caution because of large inter-center variation in resistance rates and change in the cohort of SENTRY participants during this period. 4. These European-wide trends underline the magnitude of antimicrobial resistance in many participating hospitals. Monitoring of local data is essential for guiding therapeutic strategies. RESULTS Frequency of Occurrence of Bacterial Pathogens in Bacteremic Infections and Antimicrobial Susceptibility From the SENTRY Surveillance Programme in Europe 2000 TABLE 3: Trends in proportion of isolates non susceptible to broad spectrum antibiotics for selected blood pathogens, SENTRY Europe During the year 2000, a total of 3087 bloodstream isolates from 18 European hospitals were analyzed. These centers were distributed among 10 European countries: 6 Mediterranean countries and 6 other countries (Table 1). Of these centers, 11 (61%) had participated in the SENTRY program during As part of the SENTRY program, European participating centers referred the first 20 clinically significant consecutive blood isolates of any species per month. Only 1 isolate per patient was submitted. All strains were sent to the regional monitor (RN Jones, University of Iowa, IA) for susceptibility testing to >20 antimicrobials and confirmation of organism identification. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of isolates was performed using a broth microdilution method according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) guidelines. A MATERIALS AND METHODS The SENTRY program is a longitudinal surveillance program designed to monitor the predominant pathogens and antimicrobial resistance patterns of nosocomial and community acquired infections via an international network of sentinel hospitals. We analyzed the SENTRY data from the year 2000, to update the antimicrobial resistance rates in bloodstream isolates from a network of European hospitals. INTRODUCTION TABLE 1: List of the participating centers in Euro SENTRY 2000 Country France Greece Israel Spain Turkey Italy Belgium Switzerland Germany Germany Sweden Poland UK Center CHU de Lille National University of Athens Medical School The Chaim Sheba Medical Center University Hospital Virgen de la Macarena Hospital de Bellvitge Hospital Ramon y Cajal Hacettepe Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Marmara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Universita degli Studi di Genova Universita degli Studi di Catania Policlinico Agostino Germelli Hopital Erasme-Université Libre de Bruxelles Unité de Bacteriologie CHU Lausanne Heinrich-Heine Universitat J.-W.-Goethe Universitat University Hospital, Linkoping Sera and Vaccines Central Research Lab St Thomas Hospital TABLE 2: Susceptibility to 28 antimicrobials of top 5 gram-negative pathogens from bloodstream infection, Euro SENTRY 2000 Acinetobacter sp MIC 50MIC 90% S Enterobacter sp MIC 50MIC 90% S K. pneumoniae MIC 50MIC 90% S P. aeruginosa MIC 50MIC 90% S E. coli MIC 50MIC 90% S Antimicrobial Agent Ampicillin Piperacillin Ticarcillin Amoxicillin/clavulanate Piperacillin/tazobactam Ticarcillin/clavulanate Cefazolin Cefuroxime Cefoxitin Ceftazidime Ceftriaxone Cefepime Aztreonam Imipenem Meropenem Gentamicin Tobramycin Amikacin Isepamicin Nalidixic acid Ciprofloxacin Levofloxacin Gatifloxacin BMSQ SBQ Nitrofurantoin Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole Tetracycline >  2 4  0.12  0.25   ,    4 >16 >  0.25   >32 >2 4 > > NA NA NA > >16 >32 4 > > NA >8 NA >128 >16 >64 >128 >16 >32 >16 >32 >16 >8 >16 >32 32 >32 >2 >4 NA >8 NA NA 0 71 NA 1 >16 8 >  0.25      4 >16 >128 >16 >64 >128 >16 8 >16 >32 16 >  0.06 >8 > >32 >2 2 >4 2 >64 2 > NA NA > > >16 16 >  0.25      4 >16 >128 >16 >64 >128 >16 >32 >16 >32 4 > >32 >2 > NA NA NA >128 >16 > >16 >32 >16 >32 16 > >8 16 >32 >2 4 >4 4 >64 2 >8 NA >128 >16 >64 >128 >16 >32 >16 >32 >16 >8 >16 >32 >2 >4 >64 2 >8 NA NA NA NA - Not applicable Organism % of non susceptibles isolates by yearsChi-square and antibiotic by year, p value P. aeruginosa(n=257)(n=248)(n=187) Piperacillin132326<0,001 Ciprofloxacin Ceftazidime <0,001 Cefepime <0,001 Imipenem82022<0,0001 Meropenem 91421<0,01 E. coli (n=963)(n=954)(n=649) Ceftazidime Cefepime 011<0,01 Ciprofloxacin61014<0,0001 Meropenem 000_ Enterobacter species(n=178)(n=199)(n=137) Ceftazidime <0,001 Cefepime Ciprofloxacin Meropenem 000_ K. pneumoniae (n=204)(n=250)(n=213) Ceftazidime (MIC >1 mg/l)142833<0,0001 Ceftazidime (MIC > 8 mg/l)132624<0,01 Cefepime Ciprofloxacin4612<0,01 Meropenem 000_ Acinetobacter species(n=111)(n=138)(n=100) Ceftazidime465071<0,001 Cefepime <0,0001 Ciprofloxacin <0,001 Meropenem S. aureus (n=931)(n=759)(n=589) Oxacillin <0,01 CNS (n=811)(n=841)(n=428) Oxacillin <0,001 Teicoplanin 0.136<0,0001 Enterococcus species(n=338)(n=280)(n=232) Vancomycin Teicoplanin S. peumoniae (n=105)(n=112)(n=105) Penicillin (MIC 0.1-1mg/l) Penicillin (MIC >1 mg/l) FIGURE 1: Top 10 isolated blood pathogens from 1997 through 2000, Euro SENTRY FIGURES 2 - 7