International Finance FINA 5331 Lecture 5: A History of Monetary Arrangements And modern systems Aaron Smallwood Ph.D.

Review What exchange rate systems exist today? –The choice between a fixed system and a flexible system. How does another country’s exchange rate system affect you? How does China’s changing exchange rate system affect you? What are currency crises and how can they impact your business? What is the euro? Will the euro-zone expand? How does expansion of the euro-zone affect you?

Bretton Woods System: Under the Bretton Woods system, the U.S. dollar was pegged to gold at $35 per ounce and other currencies were pegged to the U.S. dollar. Each country was responsible for maintaining its exchange rate within ±1% of the adopted par value by buying or selling foreign reserves as necessary. The U.S. was only responsible for maintaining the gold parity. Under Bretton Woods, the IMF and World Bank were created. The Bretton Woods is also known as an adjustable peg system. When facing serious balance of payments problems, countries could re-value their exchange rate. The US and Japan are the only countries to never re-value.

Collapse of Bretton Woods Triffin paradox – world demand for $ requires U.S. to run persistent balance-of-payments deficits that ultimately leads to loss of confidence in the $. SDR was created to relieve the $ shortage. Throughout the 1960s countries with large $ reserves began buying gold from the U.S. in increasing quantities threatening the gold reserves of the U.S. Large U.S. budget deficits and high money growth created exchange rate imbalances that could not be sustained, i.e. the $ was overvalued and the DM and £ were undervalued. Several attempts were made at re-alignment but eventually the run on U.S. gold supplies prompted the suspension of convertibility in September Smithsonian Agreement – December 1971

The Floating-Rate Dollar Standard, Without an agreement on who would set the common monetary policy and how it would be set, a floating exchange rate system provided the only alternative to the Bretton Woods system.

The Floating-Rate Dollar Standard, Industrial countries other than the United States : Smooth short-term variability in the dollar exchange rate, but do not commit to an official par value or to long-term exchange rate stability. United States : Remain passive in the foreign exchange market; practice free trade without a balance of payments or exchange rate target. No need for sizable official foreign exchange reserves.

The Plaza-Louvre Intervention Accords and the Floating-Rate Dollar Standard, Plaza Accord (1985): –Allow the dollar to depreciate following massive appreciation…announced that intervention may be used. Louvre Accord (1987) and “Managed Floating” –G-7 countries will cooperate to achieve exchange rate stability. –G-7 countries agree to meet and closely monitor macroeconomic policies.

Value of $ since 1973

IMF Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes Independent floating Managed floating Exchange rate systems with crawling bands Crawling peg systems Pegged exchange rate systems within horizontal bands Conventional pegs Currency board Exchange rate systems with no separate legal tender

IMF Classification of Exchange Rate Regimes Independent floating Managed floating Exchange rate systems with crawling bands Crawling peg systems Pegged exchange rate systems within horizontal bands Conventional pegs Currency board Exchange rate systems with no separate legal tender

Referenced Articles IMF classifications: – Potential banking crisis in China? – Mexican peso crisis –

Independent Floating Exchange rate determined by market forces, with intervention aimed at minimizing volatility: Example: United States

Managed Floating There is no pre-announced path for the exchange rate, although intervention is common. Policy makers will try to influence the “level” of the exchange rate: example: India

Crawling Band The currency is maintained within bands around a central target for the domestic currency against another currency (or group of currencies). The bands themselves are periodically adjusted, sometimes in response to changes in economic indicators. Example: Costa Rica, Mexico in 1994.

Example: Belarus through Feb 2008

Crawling pegs The domestic currency is pegged to another currency or basket of currencies at an established target rate. The target rate is periodically adjusted, perhaps in response to changing economic indicators. Example: Bolivia, China China allows for a daily revaluation of the RMB against a basket of currencies.

Birr/$ between Apr 10 and Apr 11

Exchange rates within horizontal bands The domestic currency is pegged to another currency or group of currencies. The exchange rate is maintained within bands that are wider than 1% of the established target: Example: Any ERM II country, including Denmark

Conventional pegs The country pegs its currency at a fixed rate to another currency (or group of currencies). The currency cannot fluctuate by more than 1% relative to the established target: Example: Saudi Arabia, formerly China

Currency boards Currency board countries are sometimes called “hard peggers”. Example: Hong Kong…. The currency board is a separate government institution whose only responsibility is to buy and sell foreign currency at an established price. The country will typically maintain foreign currency reserves equivalent to 100% of the total amount of outstanding domestic money and credit.

Hong Kong Jim Rogers a famed currency trader has noted: “If I were the Hong Kong government, I would abolish the Hong Kong dollar. There's no reason for the Hong Kong dollar. It's a historical anomaly and I don't know why it exists anymore…. You have a gigantic neighbor who is becoming the most incredible economy in the world.”

No separate legal tender The country uses another country’s (or group of countries’) currency as its own: Example: Ecuador (US dollar)

Benefits of pegging your currency Exchange rates are stable –Could possibly benefit trade If pegged to a country with stable inflation, we may be able to import stable inflation. Likely provides an anchor for future inflation.

Drawbacks Loss of monetary policy independence Loss of the exchange rate as an automatic adjustment mechanism following economic shocks. Potential for major currency crises, especially if the trillema is violated.

Trillema The trillema, also known as the “impossible trinity” states that a country can ONLY have TWO of the following three: –Fixed exchange rate system –Free flow of capital –Independent monetary policy.

Integration in Europe Integration in Europe begins with the ECSC in With the Treaty of Rome, the ECSC becomes the EEC, which eventually becomes the EC and then the EU in –ESCS leads to EEC, which leads to EC, which leads to the EU. Monetary integration is formalized with the establishment of the EMS where exchange rates are fixed. The mechanism by which exchange rates are fixes is known as the exchange rate mechanism. The EMS leads to European Monetary Union. The 17 countries that use the euro are part of a currency union known as the EMU. Monetary policy for the entire EMU is overseen by the European Central Bank in Frankfurt.

The EU and the EMU. Today, there are 28 EU countries. The European Union is a political and economic union based on free trade. NOT ALL countries use the euro. There are several distinct groups –EU Countries EU countries who are not in the ERMII and have no intention of adopting the euro EU Countries that will adopt ERM II countr(y)ies that have no stated intentions of adopting the euro ERM II countries that will adopt EMU Countries

Euro Area Austria Denmark BelgiumLatvia Cyprus Lithuania Estonia Finland France Germany GreeceBulgaria IrelandCzech Republic ItalyHungary LuxembourgPoland MaltaRomania NetherlandsCroatia (July 1) PortugalSweden SloveniaUK Spain Slovakia EU

EU countries that are not part of the ERMII EU countries that will eventually adopt (or plan to): –Bulgaria –Croatia (joined on July 1) –Czech Republic –Hungary –Poland –Romania EU countries (not part of ERMII) with no stated intention of adopting the euro –Sweden –UK

ERM II Countries That will adopt: Latvia (will likely adopt on Jan 1, 2014) Lithuania The have no stated intentions of adopting Denmark

EMU Countries –Austria (in 1999)- Netherlands (in 1999) - Portugal (in 1999) –Belgium (in 1999)- Slovenia (in 2007) –Cyprus (in 2008)- Slovakia (in 2009) –Estonia (in 2011)- Spain (in 1999) –Finland (in 1999) –France (in 1999) –Germany (in 1999) –Greece (in 2000) –Ireland (in 1999) –Italy (in 1999) –Luxembourg (in 1999) –Malta (in 2008)

Is the EMU an OCA? OCA optimum currency area: The best geographic region where one currency is used within the region, and where outside the region, different currency(ies) are used. It is generally accepted that within an OCA: –Countries should be relatively buffered from asymmetric shocks –Factors of production should be mobile