Assessing Development Pressure on Agriculture Land 2009 Ohio GIS Conference September 16-18, 2009 Crowne Plaza North Hotel Columbus, Ohio 2009 Ohio GIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 FARM AND RANCH LANDS PROTECTION PROGRAM (FRPP) Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources.
Advertisements

WESTERN LOUDOUN SCHOOLS: ALTERNATE SITES May 26, 2009 Schoene/Engle McDonough Assemblage.
Pennsylvania Farmland Preservation Programs and Initiatives IRWA – February 24, 2010.
Farmland Preservation Haywood County Becoming an Enhanced Voluntary Agriculture District.
The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 amended the Farmland Protection Program, established by the Federal Agricultural Improvement and Reform.
Farmlands Office Of Environmental Services Managing the Environmental and Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation.
LAND USE CONFERENCE JANUARY 11, 2013 OSU 4-H CENTER Linking Economic Development & Agricultural Easements 1.
Idaho Working Lands 1 Idaho’s Private Forests, Ranches And Farms Natural Resources Interim Committee July 31, 2009.
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
Conserving Missouri Wildlife Through CSP Bill White Missouri Department of Conservation Private Land Programs Supervisor.
Agricultural Land Use Historical Data and the 2004 Rural/Urban Definition Alison Wray: Farming Statistics Team, Defra York. Julian Groom: Rural Statistics.
THE NORTH CAROLINA AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM NC Water Resources Congress October 30, 2014.
National, State and Local Funding Sources for Conservation Easements Montana Association of Land Trusts Montana Conservation Easement Conference for Financial,
Wetland Planning Requirements, Tools & Processes.
Suburban Food Deserts: Islands of Food Insecurity in Seas of Affluence A Case Study of Butler County, Ohio 2010 Ohio GIS Conference September 15-17, 2010.
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA) in Yolo County Phil Hogan, District Conservationist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service 221 W. Court,
Working Lands Programs Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 Jim Pease Dept of Agricultural & Applied Economics Virginia Tech 540/
Green Infrastructure Planning for working landscapes, natural resources and other open spaces.
Protecting Working Lands: Through USDA Conservation Programs Denise Coleman National Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Manager USDA, Natural Resources.
Low-Density Urbanization and Southern California Critical Habitats Steven Guerry UP206a Final Project Winter 2011.
New River Gorge National River West Virginia GIS Conference 2004 GIS activities at New River Gorge National River By Andrew Steel.
Door County Comprehensive Plan 2030 Visioning Meeting: County Background and Trend Information Door County Planning Department April 18 th, 2007.
A Century of Classification: The Census Bureau’s Urban and Rural Classification, Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Conservation Easements 101 Why is this important? What will it do for me? What can I do? Native Plants in the Landscape July 24, 2009 Milo Pyne, NatureServe.
8/29/20151 Docket Z (Easter Mountain, LLC) A Request to Rezone 556 Acres From RU-4 to SR-2 Cochise County Board of Supervisors October 25, 2011.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
Linda Zellmer Government Information & Data Services Librarian Western Illinois University
Building Blocks The process of creating decennial census tabulation blocks. GeoElections User’s Conference October 6 th, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
LAND EVALUATION SITE ASSESSMENT (LESA) GIS APPLICATION REDESIGN Brad M. Shirey, GISP The Pennsylvania State University Master of GIS Program – Capstone.
Chapter 18 Land Resources and Conservation. Vocabulary  Urban- city/high density  Rural- sparsely populated areas.
Prioritizing Agricultural Lands for Riparian Buffer Placement in the Raritan Basin: A Geographic Information System (GIS) Model Project Partners: North.
LESA: Land Evaluation and Site Assessment An Effective Way to Plan Champaign County Soil and Water Conservation District.
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Community Forests: June, 2005 Changes in Timberland Ownership The New Hampshire Experience - By Paul Doscher Society for the Protection of NH Forests.
FAUQUIER COUNTY PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM A TOOL FOR PRESERVING FARMLAND PRESENTATION AT 2007 Potomac Watershed Forum V August 10, 2007 Manassas,
Collection of Land Use Statistics in Bermuda CARICOM’s 2 nd Workshop on Environment Statistics April 7 th -8 th 2014 St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
Guidelines and Applications of grant cycle Lindsay Balance Maximilian Merrill.
A GIS-Based Model to Identify Sensitive Water Resource Properties in Need of Protection 2009 Watershed Science and Technical Conference September 14 &
APPLYING CONSERVATION TO THE TEXAS LANDSCAPE Norman Bade, NRCS State Resource Conservationist Conservation Provisions of the 2002 Farm Bill (Farm Security.
2009 DELAWARE ENVIROTHON “Biodiversity in a Changing World” Presenter Scott C. Blaier, P.G.
San Luis Obispo County Planning and Building Department Jeff Legato Mapping and Graphics Specialist
USDA Climate Change Capabilities and Responsibilities William Hohenstein Director USDA Global Change Program Office.
Farmland Preservation Partnership Opportunities with North Carolina Land Trusts J. Frank Parker Preserve, Pitt County North Carolina Agricultural Development.
Forest Management Challenges & Opportunities Green Counties: Green Lands Madison, VA 18 September 2007 Mike Santucci Region 3 Forest Conservation Specialist.
The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional Build-Out Model with GIS Martin Kim, Tom Harner, Kathryn Youra Polk The Capacity of Hope: Developing a Regional.
F2F Conservation Easement Program Land conservation protects water quality by preventing the conversion of forests to other land uses Forests to Faucets.
1 Preserving Swainson’s Hawk Habitat LAFCO October 5, 2005.
Sustaining Michigan’s Wetlands: Mitigation, Conservation Easements, and No Net Loss Andrew T. Kozich MTU School of Forest Resources & Environmental Science.
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Master Plans in Montgomery County.
University of Kentucky College of Agriculture Landscape Architecture Franklin-Simpson County In Franklin-Simpson County 85% of the land area is devoted.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
Presented by Neighborhood Services Division Board of County Commissioners January 29, 2008.
Metropolitan Planning Organization for Blair County (Altoona MSA) Regional Long Range Transportation Plan Draft Agency Coordination Meeting (ACM)
Watershed Protection Land Trust Partnerships to Meet Your Goals.
Condition of Forests in San Diego County: Recent Conifer Tree Mortality and the Institutional Response Presented by California Department of Forestry Mark.
1 Proposed Urban Area Criteria for the 2010 Census Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau Let’s Focus on Census Geography Workshop GIS-T.
Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation Carol S. West Executive Director Saturday, April 2, 2016.
Suffolk County’s Purchase of Development Rights Program Background, Intent, Accomplishments, Trends Sarah Lansdale, AICP.
International Airport Site Evaluation St. George, Utah TYREL EDWARDS - JOSH GATHRO - MATTHEW HALES - PLOY SAMRANJIT 25 APRIL 2016 CEE 5190 – GIS FOR CIVIL.
Jackson County Farmland Protection Program A County/Local/State Partnership.
Butte County Board of Supervisors June 14, 2016 Garner Ranch Agricultural Conservation Easement RFI
Caroline County, Md. Agricultural Industry Profile for Caroline County, Maryland.
PROTECTING THE UPPER OCONEE RIVER WATERSHED WITH CONSERVATION EASEMENTS & ACEP-ALE Krisztian Varsa Athens Land Trust September 30, 2016.
Low-Density Urbanization and Critical Habitats
Options for TDR in Puyallup
Of wetland mitigation sites constructed in the U.P.
Farmland Preservation Partnership Opportunities With NC Land Trusts
Herrera Environmental Consultants Clackamas River Water Providers
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Development Pressure on Agriculture Land 2009 Ohio GIS Conference September 16-18, 2009 Crowne Plaza North Hotel Columbus, Ohio 2009 Ohio GIS Conference September 16-18, 2009 Crowne Plaza North Hotel Columbus, Ohio Scott F Snider, GISP GIS Supervisor Knox County, Ohio

Knox County at a Glance 527 square miles 54,500 est. population –100 people per square mile –(Ohio = 281 people/sq mi) Land Use/Land Cover Cropland: 43.68% Pasture: 12.73% Forest: 39.09% Urban: 3.54% Other: 0.96% Source: Ohio Dept of Development, County Profile Source: US Census Bureau

Knox County Agriculture at a Glance Agricultural Profile –205,000 acres in 1220 farms 168 Acre average farm size –$66,001,000 annual cash receipts $54,099 annual per farm Source: Ohio Dept. of Development County Profile

Ohio Department of Agriculture Agriculture Easement Purchase Program (AEPP) Overview Purpose is to protect agricultural land from development across the state. Participation is voluntary on farmer’s part. Attempt to protect land in large tracts, not just protecting for the Clean Ohio Fund –Typically $3million - $4million annually used to purchase easements –2009 anticipated at $6.25million –Maximum: $2000/acre and $500,000/farm

Tier One Scoring Criteria Proximity to Existing Easement Protected Land, Non-easement Protected Land, and other AEPP Applicants (with exemption for large farms) Proximity to Sewer access, Water access, Road Intersections Road Frontage, Housing Density “Other” Factors, Historic Designation, Century Farms, ASA, Etc. Local Government Comprehensive Plan Soil Type Productivity

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria Proximity to Protected Land It is important to protect larger areas of land, AEPP scores a maximum of 7.5 points for proximity to Easement Protected Properties. Properties Include: –Previously accepted AEPP land –Conservation Easement land

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria Proximity to Protected Land (cont.) AEPP scores a maximum of 2.5 points for proximity to Non-Easement Protected Properties. Properties Include: –Parks –Reservoirs –Well Fields –Airports Other factors not addressed: Large farms 350+ac Other applicant farms each funding year

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria Access to Infrastructure Access to Public Sewer (5pts max), Public Water (3pts max), & Major Road Intersections (2pts max) Not Addressed: –Road Frontage –Housing Density

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria “Other” Factors Many of the “Other” factors were not addressed because they are either specific to each individual property or are applied to all properties in Knox County. –Metropolitan Statistical Area = Knox is “Adjacent” 1.5pts for all –Enrollment in Agricultural Security Area = Voluntary per farm –Historic Designation = State Registry of Historic Sites –Repeat Application = Specific to Individual Farms –Recent Land Use Conversion = Hard to monitor for recent splits Many of these also do not pertain to assessing the pressure of development, so the loss of this portion of the assessment was deemed to be acceptable.

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria Comprehensive Planning The CP was used to apply points for land that is designated for agricultural use. CP Future LU MapRecreation of FLU Map in GIS

GIS Surrogates for AEPP Criteria Soil Type Productivity Soils classified as: –Prime –Locally Important –Poor Soil Productivity accounts for 1/5 total points. Instead of attempting complex calculation, we penalized poor soils 20% of point total.

Results Raster Calculator (Prox Protected + Prox Semi-prot + Water Avail + Sewer Avail + ODOT Proximity + CP Ag Delineated) * Soil Modifier

Results Raster Calculator (Water Avail + Sewer Avail + ODOT Proximity + CP Delineated Ag) * Soil Modifier

Potential Uses of Project Future applications to AEPP Updates to County Comprehensive Plan County level Agricultural Protection Program –Depends on availability of funding General education about AEPP –County Fair, Festivals, Newspaper, etc.

Questions or Comments Please Contact: Scott F Snider, GISP GIS Supervisor Knox County Map Department