05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, 17-21 January 20051 How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
M. Jimenez AT/VAC Room Temperature (LSS) Vacuum Systems M. Jimenez.
Advertisements

LHC HARDWARE COMMISSIONING REVIEW May 2005 CRYOGENIC VACUUM SYSTEM Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC.
Heinz Grote1 Presentation to NSCX WENDELSTEIN 7-X Assembly Max-Planck- Institut für Plasmaphysik KKS-Nr.: 1-AD Dok-Kennz.: -Txxxx.0 Heinz Grote October.
Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)
MICE Hydrogen System Implementation Tom Bradshaw Elwyn Baynham Iouri Ivaniouchenkov Jim Rochford.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.
Leak Testing QC of Cold Vacuum Systems the story so far………. Paul Cruikshank on behalf of TE-VSC colleagues & AL4030 Consortium (S133) 1 Paul Cruikshank.
QRL Leak Tests the story so far………. Paul Cruikshank on behalf of TE-VSC colleagues & AL4030 Consortium (S133) 1 Paul Cruikshank TE/VSC - QRL Leak Tests.
1 Presented at ColUSM by D. Ramos on behalf of the Cold Collimator Feasibility Study Working Group Longitudinal.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Vacuum tests for CLIC module prototypes 6 November 2013 C. Garion2 Outline: Reminder: specification.
PSB H 0 -H - Injection: Sectorisation Analysis C.Pasquino, J. Hansen, P.Chiggiato LIU - PSB Ho-H- Injection Meeting 1.
LHC Experimental Areas Forum - 03/07/ ATLAS Helium Cryogenics Nicolas Delruelle on behalf of the AT / ECR group.
LHC Machine Status Report Roberto Saban LHCC June 4 th 2014.
Status of vacuum & interconnections of the CLIC main linac modules C. Garion TE/VSC TBMWG, 9 th November 2009.
CRYOGENICS AND POWERING
23 Jan 2007 LASA Cryogenics Global Group 1 ILC Cryomodule piping L. Tavian for the cryogenics global group.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac CM - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden J. Polinski.
ESS Cryogenic Distribution System for the Elliptical Linac MBL/HBL - CDS requirements Preliminary Design Review Meeting, 20 May 2015, ESS, Lund, Sweden.
Cryomodule Helium Vessel Pressure -- a Few Additional Comments Tom Peterson 18 November 2007.
Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL CERN, 9 th -10 th November 2009 Workshop Organisation and Goals Vittorio Parma TE-MSC.
IHEP 1.3 GHz Cryomodule and Cryogenics IHEP Cryogenic group 2nd Workshop of the IHEP 1.3 GHz SRF R&D Project Dec 2 nd, 2009.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Workshop Chamonix XIV Shortcuts during installation and commissioning: risk and benefit H. Gruehagen, G. Riddone on behalf of the AT/ACR group 18 January.
Introduction to LHC cryogenic system (layout, architecture) Preparation before cool-down (Purge, flushing) Transient operations to reach nominal operating.
MICE CC Test Status Ruben Carcagno 11/06/13 1. Cooldown Coil Temperature (calculated average in each of 8 coil segments) SC Transition (voltages across.
PIMS IN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES Brazing Andrzej Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
CM1 Thermal Cycle CM1 Warmup –1/4/12 (Wed.) to 1/6/12 (Fri.) (~50 hours) –Verified turbo interlock system works CM1 Cooldown –Began 1/9/12 (Monday) –At.
Experience with LEP (and LHC) cryo-modules Workshop on cryogenic and vacuum sectorisations of the SPL O.Brunner – November ’09.
Road map of the workshop Machine availability: – “work-horse” in the injection chain – 100% availability not viable,.What is achievable? And at which cost?
Test plan for SPL short cryomodule O. Brunner, W. Weingarten WW 1SPL cryo-module meeting 19 October 2010.
Workshop Chamonix XV27-January-2006 DivonneMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 State of LHCb for the Sector Test  Overview  Agreement  Status of –VELO –exit.
OLAV III Experience with the LHC Insulation Vacuum System S. Blanchard, P. Cruikshank, B. Jenninger, N. Kos, W. Maan, L. Mourier, N. Provot, J. Wallner.
L. Serio COPING WITH TRANSIENTS L. SERIO CERN, Geneva (Switzerland)
Process Definition of the Operation Modes for Super-FRS Magnet Testing CSCY - CrYogenic department in Common System, GSI, Darmstadt Y. Xiang, F. Wamers.
Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 120 May 7, 2009.
Plan for test station Marta Bajko For the Technical Review of FReSCa2 June 2015 Saclay Paris.
Heat loads and cryogenics L.Tavian, D. Delikaris CERN, Cryogenics Group, Technology Department Accelerators & Technology Sector Friday, October 15, 20101HE-LHC'10.
CHAMONIX XV QRL installation and first experiences of operation G. Riddone on behalf of the QRL team AT/ACR-cd Acknowledgements to AT/ACR-op and AT/ACR-in.
The integration of 420 m detectors into the LHC
Mike Struik / LHC-CRI INSTRUMENTATION FEEDTHROUGH SYSTEM FOR LHC MACHINE ARC QUADRUPOLE MAGNETS. 123rd LHC Vacuum Design Meeting 19 April 1999.
MAGNET#1MAGNET#2MAGNET#3 SATELLITE VB#1 SATELLITE VB#2 SATELLITE VB#3 PRECOOLER#1PRECOOLER#2 DISTRIBUTION VALVE BOX DVB CP#1CP#3CP#2 BUFFER DEWAR LHe 5m.
Can we change a magnet without warming-up a full arc ? Serge Claudet, With help from P. Cruikshank & J-P. Tock (Chamonix Jan’10)
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Cryogenic Cooling Schemes for the SPL U. Wagner TE-CRG.
Cryogenic scheme, pipes and valves dimensions U.Wagner CERN TE-CRG.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
LHC Machine Advisory Committee Meeting no.19 QRL status 16 June 2006 G. Riddone, AT-ACR On behalf of the QRL team.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Ralf Eichhorn CLASSE, Cornell University. I will not talk about: Cavities (Nick and Sam did this) HOM absorbers (did that yesterday) Power couplers (see.
A. Kraemer, OLAVIII, July 11th, Gas Loads into SIS100 Cryogenic Vacuum Sections A. Kraemer, Calculations and Transparencies courtesy of St. Wilfert.
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
Overview of elliptical cryomodules vacuum system Vacuum Equipment Standardization meeting February 2014 P. Bosland – C. Darve – N. Elias.
Workshop on cryogenic & vacuum sectorisation of the SPL Vacuum Sectorisation Paul Cruikshank, CERN Technology Department (TE) Vacuum Surfaces & Coatings.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
Max-Planck-Institut für Plasmaphysik 1 ICEC 26- ICMC 2016 March 7-11, 2016, New Delhi, India Michael Nagel Cryogenic commissioning, cool down and first.
First Outcome of the Task Force on Safety of Personnel in LHC underground areas following the sector 34 accident of 19-Sep-2008 R. Trant on behalf of the.
Design of the thermosiphon Test Facilities 2nd Thermosiphon Workshop
Sub-system integration for the VBOX
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Leak Detection Tutorial Work
The LHC - Status Is COLD Is almost fully commissioned
Consequences of warming-up a sector above 80 K
CRYOGENICS OPERATIONS 2008 Organized by CERN
ILC Experimental Hall Cryogenics An Overview
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Magnetic Field Sensors and Measurements in Cryomodules
Presentation transcript:

05 Novembre 2003Chamonix XIV Workshop, January How to deal with leaks in the QRL and magnet insulation vacuum Paul Cruikshank for AT/VAC Germana Riddone for AT/ACR Chamonix XIV Workshop, January 2005

2 Contents Insulation vacuum overview Heat loads Helium leaks Air Leaks Detection & Localisation RHIC data Repairs & downtime Summary

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Insulation vacuum Leaks – why? Origin: In-situ welds ~ ! Imported leaks Thermal cycles Faulty o-rings Damaged sealing surfaces Etc…

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Insulation vacuum - Sectorisation

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Insulation vacuum – which gases?

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Heat load limitations Magnet cryostat Degraded vacuum will increase heat loads to the K, K, 4.5 K and 1.9 K LHe and 1.9 K GHe cooling circuits. For the 1.9 K LHe level, the maximium available power per sector is 2400 W, and the local limitation per 214 m vacuum sub-sector is 180 W. Under operation with nominal beam, these limitations are reached with a degraded vacuum 1 E-2 Pa (1 E-4 mbar). Heat inleak at 1.9 K versus residual pressure on the CTM

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Heat load limitations QRL Degraded vacuum will increase heat loads to the K, K and 4 K VLP cooling circuits. Under operation with nominal beam, limitations are reached with a degraded vacuum 0.1 Pa (1 E-3 mbar).

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Helium leaks - LHC String Test Observations 24 hours delay before any observation of the He leak or heat load, Without the cryopumping effect, the vacuum would have degraded in 30 minutes, System is allowed to degrade to 1 E-4 mbar, The internal gauge gives only a qualitative measurement, Auxiliary pumping returns the system to nominal conditions.

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Helium Leaks – 200 days LHC operation Scaling to the cryomagnet & QRL vacuum system: With no auxiliary pumping, 214 m cryomagnet vacuum sub-sectors, 200 days continuous operation/year and 1 E-4 mbar as threshold, ~ 500 mbar.l of helium can be pumped, Integral helium leak rate < 3 E-5 mbar.l/s (for 214 m) or ~ 1 E-7 mbar.l/s/meter of machine For the QRL, the adsorbtion capacity of the 4 K surface/meter of cryostat is ~ 20 % of magnet cryostat Integral helium leak rate < 1 E-5 mbar.l/s (for 428 m)

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Special measures in case of helium leaks - thermal cycles In the magnet cryostat, the 1.9 K surfaces will adsorb the majority of the helium From experimental data, if the system is at 1 E-5 mbar: A thermal cycle from 1.9 K to 4.2 K will release 60 % of adsorbed He A thermal cycle to 1.9 K to ~ 25 K will release 99 % of adsorbed He The released helium will be pumped by fixed pumping station, and at cool-down the helium pressure is given by the reduced surface coverage. A thermal cycle for 2 cells from 1.9 K to 4.2 K to 1.9 K will take ~ 20 hrs. Such thermal cycling could be useful if the time to rise to 1 E-4 mbar due to a leak is several weeks. He adsorption isotherms on stainless steel

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Special measures in case of helium leaks - auxiliary pumping 1 For degraded vacuum, the pressure of the insulation vacuum can be reduced by turbomolecular pumping groups. The turbo MTTF is 7 years. The baseline is 0.5 l/s per meter of cryostat ~ 50 CHF/m = 2 MCHF total Changing the by-pass valve configuration gives 1 l/s/m. Standalones have 1 to 5 l/s/m Additional pumps could be added to arc sub-sectors, without breaking vacuum, to give 3 l/s per meter. Turbo group at a vacuum barrier.

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Special measures in case of helium leaks - auxiliary pumping 2 String Test – 400 l/s pumping on a 1 E-3 mbar.l/s leak reduced the heat load to nominal conditions. Tests were not made at higher leak rates, but the theoretical maximum would be ~ 4 E-2 mbar.l/s) For a local turbo pump to be effective, the axial conductance of the cryostat needs to be bigger than the speed of the pump > 200 l/s. Since helium leaks will be inside the MLI envelope, the integral transverse conductance must also be of the same order. To achieve 400 l/s A 214 m magnet cryostat (axial conductance ~ 350l/s) with baseline auxiliary pumping speed would allow a theoretical maximum helium leak rate ~ 1 E-2 mbar.l/s. A 428 m QRL cryostat has an axial conductance of ~ 33 l/s due to the fixed points every 53.5 m. The transverse conductance need to be determined.

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Air Leaks Unlike helium leaks, which may be initiated or amplified under cryogenic conditions, air leaks can be identified & repaired before cool-down. However, with 5 ppm helium in ambient air, their magnitude needs to be limited. The specified integral air leak rate per 214 m vacuum sub-sector is 1 E-5mbar.l/s The gas load from thermal outgassing is ~ 1 E-3 mbar.l/s for the same sub-sector. Air leaks which develop during operation will be observed as a large change in vacuum pressure but minor cryogenic heat load. A 214 m sub-sector could operation for 200 days with a leak of 1 mbar.l/s

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Detection & Localisation of leaks Detection Sensor:Vacuum pressure measurement Vacuum pumping groups Cryogenic flow control valves Cryogenic temperature sensors Mass spec. leak detectors (mobile) Localisation Feature: Localisation steps (helium leak):Remote localisation from the control room Localisation in-tunnel with mobile equipment Warm-up Localisation in-tunnel with mobile equipment Break vacuum & open interconnect(s) Confirm leak position During String 2 experiments, simulated helium leaks could be longitudinally located to within one interconnect with the vacuum system closed, but only when the thermal shield and MLI were not installed. Magnet Cryostat QRL Vacuum sub-sector214 m428 m Helium circuitsC’,E,L,XB,C,D,F Vacuum gauge spacing160.5 m214 m 1.9 K cooling loop length107 m----- Temperature sensor spacing~ 15 m214 m Conductance orifices m Manual valve spacing107 m Vacuum port spacing53.5 m

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Data from RHIC Heat load limit for degraded vacuum in mid E-4 mbar range. Baseline auxiliary pumping is 0.5 l/s/m. In year 2000, several leaks > 1 E-3 mbar.l/s were present in the vacuum system, requiring additional turbos to be installed. Degradation has been observed following thermal cycles (2 arcs have been cycled 5 times, and 30% of machine 8 times). Leak repairs (faulty welds) have all been made during annual shutdowns. The machine is now running with the baseline auxiliary pumping. 4 out of 12 valve boxes, located outside the machine tunnel, have suffered from brazing flux corrosion problems, leading to repairs and or replacement – leaks > E-2 mbar.l/s

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Repairs & downtime If a helium leak cannot be contained with a combination of thermal cycles and auxiliary pumping, repairs will be necessary. The cryogenic and vacuum sectorisation allows local warm-up of a sector eg QRL only, standalone only, cryomagnet sub-sector only. Intervention times for the QRL have not been studied yet. Warmup from 1.9 to 4.5 K*5.8 Warmup from 4.5 to 300 K*87.8 Venting1 Opening of vacuum vessel5.5 Mechanical intervention15-30 Leak test2 Closing of vacuum vessel11 Evacuation4 Leak test8 Pressure test4 Cooldown from 300 to 4.5 K*95 Cooldown from 4.5 to 1.9 K*14.4 Total (hours) Total (days) Fast (hours) Normal (hours) Warmup from 1.9 to 4.5 K* Warmup from 4.5 to 300 K* Venting11 Opening of vacuum vessel5.5 Mechanical intervention200 Leak test66 Closing of vacuum vessel11 Evacuation24 Leak test16 Alignment44 Pressure test44 Cooldown from 300 to 4.5 K* Cooldown from 4.5 to 1.9 K*2438 Total (hours) Total (days) ‘Short Intervention’ (fast warmup 100 g/s) eg for leak repair at an interconnect ‘Long Intervention’ Extract from LHC-PM-ES with warmup & cooldown values from Chamonix XII.

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Summary The cryogenic heat load limit for the 1.9 K LHe circuit occurs with a degraded vacuum of 1 E-4 mbar in the magnet cryostat. The cryogenic heat load limit for the 4.5–20 K or 4 K VLP circuit occurs with a degraded vacuum of 1 E-3 mbar in the QRL cryostat. For a 214 m magnet sub-sector: Helium leaks up to 3 E-5 mbar.l/s can be adsorbed by the 1.9 K surfaces without exceeding 1 E-4 mbar for 200 days continuous operation. Thermal cycles up to 4.2 K will partially regenerate the surfaces. For a 428 m QRL sub-sector: Helium leaks up to 1 E-5 mbar.l/s can be adsorbed by the 4 K surfaces without exceeding 1 E-3 mbar for 200 days continuous operation. Thermal cycles will regenerate the surfaces. The installed auxiliary pumping can pump helium leaks up to 1 E-2 mbar.l/s. Additional pumps can be installed without breaking vacuum. Air leaks up to 1 mbar.l/s can be tolerated. The minimum time to repair a helium leak which requires opening of a 214 m vacuum sub- sector is 10.5 days. Replacement of an arc cryomagnet would take 25.4 days. Repair times for the QRL need to be determined. RHIC exploits auxiliary pumping and executed repairs during annual shutdowns. The objective to leak test individual components and subassemblies before their installation, and to fully leak test & repair the systems in the tunnel before cool-down, remains essential.

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Cold/warm correlation for leaks

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Leak testing techniques Recall of methods with MSLD

Chamonix XIV Workshop, January Clamshell tools