Parent Survey Results: Overcrowding at West Sylvan 2014-15 West Sylvan PTA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strategic Facilities Utilization Public Forum April 6, 2006.
Advertisements

 AGENDA 6:00 p.m. – Introductions 6:05 p.m. – Randy Everett, Founder 6:20 p.m. – Where we’ve been 6:45 p.m. – Where we’re going 7:00 p.m. – Tableside.
Alameda Articulation Area Facilities Proposal Creating Schools to Meet the Growing Needs of our Communities.
Neighborhood Schools A Brief History Of Managing School Use, Student Enrollment, and Transportation In the Greece Central School System.
Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? 1,000,000 5th Grade Topic 4th Grade Topic 3rd Grade Topic 2nd Grade Topic 1st Grade Topic 400, , ,000.
Pre-K Through 8 Initiative SAISD Board Update April 14, 2003.
Enrollment Data Analysis and Plans to Address Overcrowding Update to School Board February 17, 2015.
1 PROPOSED ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES FOR HERITAGE AND NEEDHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING APRIL 6, 2010.
Summary of the Evaluation of the Addiction and Pain Primer Question: The Program was credible and non-biased.
DRAFT ELP STANDARDS SURVEY RESULTS August Geographic Distribution of Respondents n = 49.
I would use linking cubes with my grade 7/8 students A. Strongly Disagree B. Disagree C. Neutral D. Agree E. Strongly Agree.
Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? 1,000,000 5th Grade Topic 1 5th Grade Topic 2 4th Grade Topic 3 4th Grade Topic 4 3rd Grade Topic 5 3rd Grade Topic.
International Charter School Options in the event of closure.
WCA Facilities Planning February WCA Request 2 Educational Program: The Charter School’s educational program has unique facilities needs. Key.
Campus Needs Assessment Progreso East Elementary.
Key Findings from a Survey of Likely Voters in Milwaukee – January, Advocates for Student Achievement Poll A Survey of 400 Likely Voters in the.
March 2007 Conducted for the California Foundation for Commerce and Education Selected Survey Results: Business Executives’ Attitudes on California Education.
Development Committee School Usage and Building Recommendations Big Walnut School District Board of Education Meeting June 9, 2008.
Special Day Class (SDC) Expansion at Bagby Presentation to Cambrian School Board Michael J. Slone February 24, 2009.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
Saugerties Central School District Redistricting Proposal October 2005.
Are You Smarter Than a 5 th Grader? 1,000,000 5th Grade TOPIC 1 5th Grade TOPIC2 4th Grade TOPIC3 4th Grade TOPIC4 3rd Grade TOPIC5 3rd Grade TOPIC6.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
April 2004 EAST SIDE UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Options for Relieving Anticipated Overcrowding At Evergreen Valley High School Presentation prepared for.
Question Everything.  Questionnaire should be: ◦ Valid – Questions should measure what was meant to be measured ◦ Reliable – Should give you the same.
Agriculture and Industrial Technology Complex Capital Planning and Development Project Highlight.
Multimedia Thematic Project – Part III Lesson II F-18E/F Maintenance Research Joe King University of Phoenix Designing and Producing Educational Technology.
88 8. Program Updates & Gotchas. 89 Forms Form 470 –Specify only the eligible services on which you are seeking discounts –Can combine all services that.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Facilities Study Committee September 20, Meeting 1 Agenda Introductions Committee Makeup Parents Staff Community Members Goal Process Middle School.
Cody Sherburn. Survey The survey was constructed to see if the generation difference between survey takers would determine their beliefs of cell phones.
Survey Basics This survey involved 300 completed telephone interviews with registered voters in the Prescott School District. All interviews were completed.
PERRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent’s Advisory Attendance Area Advisory Committee Report December 10, 2015.
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
Choice & Balance Fran Bryden (English, ). The Survey – 67 respondents.
Social Justice Post Survey Results May Social Justice & Technology Post-SurveyPlease answer all of the questions in the survey.: Please rate your.
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
FY 18 Budget Process: Options for Responding to Projected Shortfall
Smartphone questionnaire
Are you SMARTER than GRADER ?th.
ALGEBRA SWAG – Mr. Relles
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Previewing the school year
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Progression of Text Levels Expected in Grades 1 - 5
Middle School Enrollment
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
WHS Bell Schedule 1st Period  7:30 – 8:30 2nd Period  8:35 – 9:30
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader?
Neighborhood Schools A Brief History Of Managing School Use, Student Enrollment, and Transportation In the Greece Central School System.
Houston K-8 School Enrollment Information Report
Houston K-8 School Enrollment Information Report
Presentation transcript:

Parent Survey Results: Overcrowding at West Sylvan West Sylvan PTA

Do parents want all 6 th graders at East if the facilities supported that? 51.9% agreed or strongly agreed they would like to have the 6 th graders ALL at East if the facilities supported that. 24.2% disagreed or strongly disagreed they would like all 6 th graders at East if facilities supported them. 23.9% were neutral on the option. It is ok to have 6 th graders split between East and West (current situation). 19.5% strongly agreed or disagreed that it was ok to have 6 th graders split between 2 campuses. 65.9% disagreed or strongly disagreed that it was ok to have 6 th graders split between 2 campuses. 14.6% were neutral If all kids are at West, 6th Graders NEED TO BE completely separate from the other grades (e.g. in a separate part of the building, different bell schedule). 39% strongly agreed or agreed that all 6 th – 8 th graders at West, the 6 th graders should be separate from 7 th /8 th graders. 32.3% disagreed or strongly disagreed that all 6 th – 8 th graders at West, the 6 th graders should be separate from 7 th /8 th graders. 28.7% were neutral If all kids are at West, 6 th graders DO NOT NEED to be separated from 7 th and 8 th graders. 39.8% strongly agreed or agreed that if all 6 th – 8 th graders were at West, 6 th grade did NOT need to be separate. 38.9% strongly disagreed or disagreed that if all 6 th – 8 th graders were at West, 6 th grade did NOT need to be separate were neutral 72.1% ranked Option 1 as their first or second choice 53.6% ranked Option 2 as their first or second choice 14.6% ranked Option 3 as their first or second choice 37.2% ranked Option 4 as their first or second choice 15.4% ranked Option 5 as their first or second choice 5.1% ranked Option 6 as their first or second choice 46.4% said doing nothing is NOT an option

Option 1: John Ferraro’s option to utilize the underused space at West to allow all kids to be at West. 72.1% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 47.2% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 24.9% selection option 1 as their second choice 10.9% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 5.9% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 4.7% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice <1% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 5.9% not acceptable

Option 2: Sell east, seek approval from PPS to use the funds to build additional classroom and cafeteria space at West. This was a 2 year solution, not a short term fix. 53.7% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 19.6% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 34.1% selection option 1 as their second choice 16.8% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 12% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 5.6% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice 3.1% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 8.9% not acceptable

Option 3: Minimal fixes to East for the school year, relying on district wide boundary changes to resolve long term overcrowding. 14.6% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 5.9% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 8.7% selection option 1 as their second choice 18.7% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 21.5% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 14% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice 2% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 29.3% not acceptable

Option 4: Fix East campus for long term use as a 6 th grade campus (this was a 2 year solution, not a short term fix). 37.1% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 22.6% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 14.5% selection option 1 as their second choice 20.9% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 19.8% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 8.4% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice 2% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 11.7% not acceptable

Option 5: All kids at West with Creative Schedule. 15.4% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 2.8% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 12.6% selection option 1 as their second choice 21.2% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 14.2% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 17.6% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice 7% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 24.6% not acceptable

Option 6: Do nothing, wait for district wide boundary changes to address overcrowding. 5.1% of respondents selected this as their 1 st or 2 nd choice 1.7% Selected Option 1 as their first choice 3.4% selection option 1 as their second choice 5.9% Selected Option 1 as their third choice 8.1% Selected Option 1 as their 4 th choice 9.8% Selected Option 1 as their 5 th choice 24.9% selected option 1 as their 6 th choice 46.4% not acceptable