THE APPEALS PROCESS Purpose To provide a mechanism for employees appealing against the outcome of the application of the Scottish Joint Council Job Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Advertisements

Common Roles – an overview Autumn Term Introduction What is a Common Role? Why we need Common Roles? How will they be used in the job evaluation.
Child Safeguarding Standards
Webinar: How to handle PRP appeals Presented by Heather Mitchell, employment lawyer at Browne Jacobson.
1 Robert’s Rules of Order: A Guide To Parliamentary Procedure Schools and families working together to ensure student success.
NGSU Regional Councils – Oct/Nov 2014 Fair Treatment at Work Nationwide Group Staff Union.
Mitigation and Extenuating Circumstances
UCL Introducing NEW Job Evaluation Database and Grading Procedures for Support Staff Julie Wake HR User Group 23 March 2011.
© British Telecommunications plc 1 BTSML Voluntary Leaver scheme and Selection Process and Guidelines Tony Carroll HR Manager BT MSL.
NGSU Regional Councils: Jan-Mar 2015 Performance Rating Appeals Nationwide Group Staff Union.
Wales Accord on the Sharing of Personal Information (WASPI)
HERA briefing n Vicky Ward – Job Evaluation Project Manager 1.
HERA briefing n Vicky Ward – Job Evaluation Project Manager 1.
Executive Report to Council
UKPHR Public Health Register The Role of the Moderator – Assuring Quality Dr Cerilan Rogers UKPHR Moderator.
Code of Ethics – Discussion Question
PROMOTIONS EXERCISE 2015 HR Partners Trade Union Representatives / Role Analysts.
Cheating, Plagiarism and Unfair Practice Franchise Delivery Quality Assurance Services.
HR Initiatives in the NHS
STEREOTYPING and DISCRIMINATION STEREOTYPING can lead to PREJUDICE can lead to DISCRIMINATION.
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
How to … use the new Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures Heidi Gibaut, Law At Work 5 March 2014.
The NHS KSF Learning Programme Days One & Two [Sessions 1- 6] The NHS Knowledge and Skills Framework.
Future Aspirations Dr Maire Shelly Associate Postgraduate Dean North Western Deanery.
Session 4 The NHS KSF and Development Review. Outcomes of session 4 Understand the links between development review and appraisal Explain how the NHS.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
2 ND EDITION ROD JONES Copyright © Pearson Australia (a division of Pearson Australia Group Pty Ltd) 2010 PowerPoint presentation to accompany.
Transparency and Accountability: Management Operating Principles Addressing issues around accountability and transparency is very important (and should.
MMU Faculty of Education Subject Mentor Training
1 Welcomes You To It’s Those Wonderful Rights! Welcome To read the script that goes with each slide, click on the Notes tab (to the left of this screen).
Topics  What is grading ?  The applicable procedure  Appeals  Exceptions & Tricky cases.
Legal Studies 3C.  People must be treated fairly  Right to be heard by an unbiased decision-maker  Know allegations made against you  Given a chance.
GRADING REVIEW BRIEFING. Why are we having a grading review? To harmonise a pay and grading system for former manual workers and APT & C staff.
Agenda for Change General Awareness Session Job Evaluation.
UCL Grading Procedure for Support Staff Julie Wake HR User Group 29 th Oct 2009.
The Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council National Association of Welfare Rights Advisers 5 March 2010 Bob Chapman.
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO.
Cheating, Plagiarism Unfair Practiceaterials Quality Assurance Services Collaborations and Partnerships Group.
Membership, Representation and Diversity Committee: Changes needed to the RCN Governance Arrangements to implement the RCN Equality Schemes Jane Clarke.
City of Kamloops COACHING GUIDE PWABC Conference – September 2015 Jennifer Howatt, BBA, CHRP Human Resources Advisor.
SUPPORTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION’S OBNOVA AND PHARE PROGRAMMES Public Involvement EIA TRAINING RESOURCE MANUAL FOR SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Derbyshire County Council PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY PROCEDURE TRAINING FOR MANAGERS PUBLIC.
Local Pension Boards for the Firefighters’ Pension Schemes: A discussion document April 2014.
The Pay Agreement – An overview. The agreement is set out in the Framework document. The Framework also refers to national guidance which also makes up.
TAFE NSW Teacher Advisory and Assessment Scheme Policy Training Advisor Assessor – ( Institute Representative and Discipline Expert) Organising Manager.
Module 7- Evaluation: Quality and Standards. 17/02/20162 Overview of the Module How the evaluation will be done Questions and criteria Methods and techniques.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
An Overview of Strategic Human Resource Management.
LEEDS BECKETT UNIVERSITY CONTINUOUS AUDIT BRIEFING 2015/16 ACTIVITIES Quality Assurance Services.
Acas and Effective workplaces. LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THIS LESSON Understand the role of Acas including the part it plays in individual grievances Appreciate.
Chairing Challenging Meetings Effectively Karen Heaton Director of Human Resources March 2015.
Performance Management – Part 3 BCUHB Capability Procedure (WP3A) 69.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
We make life safer Equal Pay in HFRS Geoff Howsego HR Director Hampshire Fire & Rescue Service.
Single Status Job Evaluation for Schools Autumn Term 2008.
HR Partners Trade Union Representatives
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Induction for New Leaders and Managers
Disciplinary Training
HR Business Partner Team
Data Protection What’s new about The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) May 2018? Call Kerry on Or .
Doncaster Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report
Support Staff Promotion – what you need to know
Resolving Industrial Conflict… Trade Unions
HERA Grading Process Flowchart for Managers
LECTURE No 6 - THE EUROPEAN UNION’s JUDICIAL SYSTEM I (courts)
RESPONDING TO STUDENT VOICE: PRINCIPLES OF PRACTICE
HERA Grading Process for Individual Grading Review Requests
Presentation transcript:

THE APPEALS PROCESS Purpose To provide a mechanism for employees appealing against the outcome of the application of the Scottish Joint Council Job Evaluation Scheme.

THE APPEALS PROCESS Principles Fairness, equity, transparency, simplicity – key principles This process is the only one which can be used No recourse to any other Council procedures Outcome of appeal will be applied to all relevant jobs Partnership approach – Trade Unions, Management, H.R.

THE APPEALS PROCESS Grounds of Appeal Appeals only admissible where employee considers they are: Matched to the wrong job family and/or Matched to the wrong level within a family

THE APPEALS PROCESS Appeals Panel Representatives from - Trade Union Management Human Resources - 1 Panel Adviser - formally trained in Job Evaluation Scheme Chair rotates - Management & Trade Union Panel decisions will be by majority No involvement with appeals involving own Service

ROLE OF APPEALS PANEL Act in a fair and impartial manner Act in an independent objective way Act in an open minded manner Ensure fair play Not representing Management or TU’s Ensure all facts for the grounds of appeal have been taken into consideration in the re-evaluation Highlights the Council/TU partnership e.g. sitting as equal partners at the table Trained in appreciation of the scheme

THE APPEALS PROCESS Initiating the Appeal Appeals Application Form only Discussions with manager prior to submission Trade Union assistance in completing Form May provide supporting documentation

THE APPEALS PROCESS Informal Stage Sort out straight-forward Appeals Appellant and Job Analyst meet Trade Union Representative/Workplace Colleague, if required Clarifying positions Different Job Analyst from original evaluation if possible

THE APPEALS PROCESS Re-evaluation Job Analyst re-evaluates job Different Job Analyst from informal stage Trade Union Representative/Workplace Colleague if required Large groups up to 3 people Discuss outcome at Panel

THE APPEALS PROCESS Appeals Panel Hearing Trade Union/Workplace Colleague, if required Appellants Line Manager, if required Job Analyst explains outcome of re-evaluation Presentations and Questions Panel decision, in private, on the day

THE APPEALS PROCESS Outcomes Job placed into different level (applied to individual evaluation) Grade remains same or goes up Notified in writing Effects on others parts of the Organisation