Elk Grove Water District – Finance Meeting Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager January 30, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discussion Topics Overview of Water Rates in California Legal Framework of Water Rates Water Consumption Patterns Empirical Data – City of Fresno The.
Advertisements

2013 Water Rate Study and Proposed Multi-Year Water Rate Adjustments 1.
Current Legal Developments on Ratemaking - A Primer on Budget-based Water Rate Structures 1 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern.
Proposed Water & Sewer Rates FY2014 Department of Utilities & General Services April 1,
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Revised FY 2007 & Proposed FY 2008 Operating & Capital Budgets Retail Rates Committee January 4, 2007.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
1 BILLING ADJUSTMENTS Utilities Department Orange County Board of County Commissioners March 20, 2012.
Municipal & Financial Services Group Village of Downers Grove Water Rate Study Rate Study Overview and Recommendations September 21, 2010 Presented by:
Cost of Service Water Rate Study Habib Isaac – Principal Greg Tobler – Task Manager May 14, 2012.
California Water Revenue Decoupling Pilot Programs Lisa M. Bilir, Senior Policy Analyst, Division of Ratepayer Advocates NASUCA 2010 Mid-Year Meeting.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions “The Longest Yard” Water Budget Rate Structures & The City of Boulder, Colorado January 25, 2007 © 2006 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc.
TVA Generates Power and sends it down Transmission Lines to Newport Utilities Distribution Substations TVA Newport Utilities Substations Distributes the.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
Staying Afloat with Water Revenues Balancing the ebb and flow of revenue stability with conservation Mayors Water Council December 3, 2009 Sandra Ralston.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Recommendation for Board approval of updated nodal fee filing Steve Byone Overview –Historical summary –Highlights from approved interim Nodal Surcharge.
Page: Water and Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast Council Presentation City of Cottonwood July 2009.
Elk Grove Water District Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal April 10, 2013.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
Finance Committee Meeting Water Rate Study Update Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager August 13, 2012.
Click to edit Master title style Bonds Payable.
Elk Grove Water District – CAC Meeting Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal Carlos Villarreal – Technical Advisor January 22,
Formation of DWID – Buyout PWCo & SWCo Revenue, Financing and Operational Cost Projections All cost projections are based on PWCo & SWCo Annual Reports.
Water Rates (Utility versus SDCs) Information to Utility Advisory Board September 21, 2009.
THE FOSTER GROUP TFGTFG City of Detroit Water and Sewerage Department Wholesale Customer Rates Meeting Water Supply System Meeting #3 – Allocated FY
Elk Grove WD Board Meeting Water Rates Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager September 10, 2012.
Water Connection Fee Analysis Elk Grove Water District Finance Committee January 30, 2013.
NARUC SUMMER COMMITTEE MEETINGS Committee on Water Agenda California Regulatory Initiatives Case History – California American Water B. Kent Turner – President.
Making Conservation Work for You Chris Brown Chris Brown Consulting for Office of Rural Community Affairs December 2, 2003.
DNPC08 Review of Standard LDZ System Charges 6 September 2010.
Smart Irrigation Technology Study Utilities Department June 30,
Investment in West Linn’s Water System Conservation Pricing Options May 17, 2010.
1 Water Utility Regulation Straw Proposal October 13, 2015.
2016 Water and Wastewater Rates Committee of the Whole November 16, 2015 Presenter: Mike Mayes – Director, Financial Services/Treasurer.
Water Conservation Update Seaneen M Wilson Division of Water & Audits September 17, 2008.
Commission Meeting November 18, 2015 WSSC Customer Use and Pricing.
Western Hills Water DistrictWater Rate Update Board Meeting HF&H Consultants, LLC 0November 4, 2015 HF&H Consultants, LLC Western Hills Water District.
Water Rates Options, Explanations & Impacts Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Presentation for a W ATER R ATE S TUDY Chris Fisher Jeff McGarvey Tony Thrasher CITY OF SOLEDAD, CALIFORNIA Presented by.
1 Service Center FY2007 Billing Rate Proposal Preparation Training Proposed Policy Revisions & Guidelines for Preparing FY2007 Billing Rate Proposals.
RATE ANALYSIS FY FY 2019 March 6, 2014 CARSON VALLEY WATER UTILITY FUND 326 – DEPARTMENT 864.
Town of Lochbuie Water 2015 Water Rate Options Presented to the Town of Lochbuie Board of Trustees Raftelis Financial Consultants, Inc. December 16, 2014.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Water and Wastewater Rates Public Hearing July 15, 2015 The Reed Group, Inc. 1.
1 City of Cocoa Michael Burton - President Andrew Burnham - Sr. Vice President Eric Grau - Project Consultant Presented by: Water, Sewer & Reclaimed Water.
FY 2016 Budget Discussion Prior to Proposed Budget Submittal July 23 rd,2015.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
Overview and Discussion Proposed Budget Fiscal Year-End June 30, 2016.
1 PG&E’s Response to the Summer 2006 Heat Storm LIOB Meeting September 14, 2006 Sacramento, CA.
May 31, 2016 WATER & SEWER RATE STUDY PRESENTATION 5/9/2016 City of Greenfield, California.
Pathways to Lasting Solutions June 9, 2009 City Council Work Session – No. 2 © 2008 Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. All Rights Reserved Water and Wastewater Rate.
Interim Fuel Factor Adjustment and Surcharge for Under-Recoveries
Current Water Rates $26.66 per month readiness to serve fee (billed on a quarterly basis at $80.00) 5.14 per 1,000 gallons of water used The City of Flushing.
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Water and Wastewater Rates
Final Rate Study Findings
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
Springfield Utility Board Proposed 5.0%
Update on Implementation of Proposed Rates for CII Customers; Outreach
Cost of Service Analysis & Rate Design
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Comprehensive Rate Study & Cost Allocation Analysis
Water Cost-of-Service
LDZ System Charges – Structure Methodology 26 July 2010
Presentation transcript:

Elk Grove Water District – Finance Meeting Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal Gregg Tobler – Task Manager January 30, 2013

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 2 Topics of Discussion Adjustments to Rate Analysis –Consumption adjustments –Revenue check –Residential non-metered accounts –FY consumption projection –Revised proposed rates for each scenario (fix/variable split) –Customer impact based on usage levels Connection Fees –Background –Methodology

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 3 Consumption Adjustments Received additional usage records –2011 through 2012 –Usage slightly higher in 2012 versus 2011 – Incorporated average of 2 years into analysis –Result: slightly more units of water to spread cost Rate per unit of water reduces

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 4 Applied current rates and proposed rates to FY consumption figures –Revenue test confirmed model is generating appropriate amount of revenue –Difference less than 1% Revenue Check

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 5 Reduced average usage to equal metered customers –Flat rate reduced Projected conversion rate of non-metered accounts –All non-metered accounts converted by April 2014 –Consumption for metered accounts increases in first 2 years –New baseline consumption calculated for FY Residential Non-Metered Accounts

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 6 Between July 2012 – December 2012 –Used 2 year average derived from 2011 and 2012 –Already accounts for non-metered conversions Between January 2013 – June 2013 –Used 2 year average derived from 2011 and 2012 for existing metered accounts –Projected usage of non-metered account conversions Conversion rate equals 125 meters per month Expected usage derived on a per month basis using 2011 and 2012 data c FY Consumption Projection

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 7 Step Up Rates: Scenario 1 – ~(60% / 40%) Residential Accounts Tier 1 = $1.60 Tier 2 = $1.92 Tier 3 = $3.11 Non-Residential Accounts $1.87 Irrigation Accounts $2.00 Existing Structure Tier 1 = $1.46 Tier 2 = $1.80

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 8 Step Up Rates: Scenario 1 - ~(60% / 40%)

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 9 Customer Impact – Scenario 1: Step Up ~(60%/40%) (1.10)

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 10 Step Up Rates: Scenario 2 - ~(65% / 35%) Residential Accounts Tier 1 = $1.41 Tier 2 = $2.81 Non-Residential Accounts $1.60 Irrigation Accounts $1.72 Existing Structure Tier 1 = $1.46 Tier 2 = $1.80

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 11 Step Up Rates: Scenario 2 - ~(65% / 35%)

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 12 Customer Impact – Scenario 2: Step Up (35%/65%)

Elk Grove Water District - Utility Rate Project | 13 Scenario Comparison Scenario %/40% Similar revenue split as current structure Allows 3-tiered structure Greater emphasis on water conservation May assist in achieving 20% by 2020, but may not be necessary Allotments 15 hcf in Tiers 1&2 Heavy users pay significantly more Scenario 2 – 65%/35% Greater Revenue Stability 2-tiered structure Similar to existing Rate structure promotes efficient use of water between tiers by adjusting price differential in rates Allocates 30hcf in Tier 1 Customer Impact more balance Heavy users still pay more