WS1 Introduction to Problem Based Learning: The AAU Way. Assessment/Examination of projects, why and how The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

Innovation in Assessment? Why? Poor student feedback regarding feedback timeliness and usefulness Staff workloads Student lack of awareness as to what.
FEEDBACK! WHATS FEEDBACK? Did you know that..... Feedback you receive is not just confined to coursework and formal assessments. It will not always come.
1 Problem based Learning in Engineering and Science – Development of Supervisor A PhD Course given by: Anette Kolmos Department of development and planning.
Two e-Learning elective seminars in Novi Sad Putnik Z., Komlenov Ž., Budimac Z. DMI, Faculty of Science University of Novi Sad.
Preceptor Orientation For the Nurse Practitioner Program
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
Blended Courses: How to have the best of both worlds in higher education By Susan C. Slowey.
James Wolff Monita Baba-Djara March 26,  Course goal: ◦ To prepare students to work in maternal and child health in a developing country setting.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
Postgraduate Orientation Seminar Dr. Christopher Staff Chair, Faculty Postgraduate Subcommittee Faculty of ICT.
ON ORAL EXAMS Susana Tosca (7/12/12). Today´s menu Introduction round Presentation “On Oral Exams” Questions & Answers Video: an examination Discussion.
Hiring Top Performing Project Managers Brian Richardson, PMP.
Intro Module11 Project-related course (PE): Problem Based and Project Based Learning Xiangyun Du Department of Development and Planning Aalborg University.
Applying the Principles of Prior Learning Assessment Debra A. Dagavarian Diane Holtzman Dennis Fotia.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
An Evaluation of SLIS Student Satisfaction and its Global Impacts Christina Hoffman, MLS Dr. Samantha Hastings, Interim Dean The University of North Texas.
Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Henry Shu-hung CHUNG Department of Electronic Engineering City University of Hong Kong.
Assessment of Learning Outcomes in Engineering - an International Perspective Mona Dahms UCPBL, Aalborg University.
The new educational model Assesment of project groups Lars Peter Jensen.
1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way To day given by: Søren Hansen Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
1 Berlin School of Economics and Law Hochschule für Wirtschaft und Recht Berlin Malta, th April 2014.
The new educational model Lars Peter Jensen. The New Aalborg Model 2 50% courses 50% project Course 5 ECTS Project 15 ECTS In groups up to 8 persons Individual.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
1 Ideas of Problem-based Learning As a learner-centred process, problem- based learning meets the learners' interests and as such gives room for developing.
Introduction The following slides reflect the views of both staff and students in regards to changes in teaching and assessment practices at Bedford Road.
Professional Development is aligned to your district’s initiatives and tailored to your districts current needs. Our modules are designed to  Deepen.
Faculty Development Tutor training and assessment Anne Baroffio, PhD M. Nendaz, MD, MHPE University of Geneva – Faculty of Medicine.
1 Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Work Shop given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK Aalborg East.
Tuesday December 15 th 2015: Results from experiments with facilitation situations + Examination Until the last day of the course the participants are.
1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Course given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK
1 Problem based Learning – The AAU Way A Work Shop given by: Mona Dahms Department of development and planning Fibigerstraede 11, DK Aalborg East.
11/06/04Supervision and Assessment1 Friday the 11 th of June: Supervision and Assessment 09.00:Cases on supervision (LK + LPJ) 11.00:Supervision - strategies.
The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New Project Examination Hans Hüttel Anette Kolmos Kathrin Otrel-Cass Egon Moesby Jette Holgaard Picture:
3 rd, 4 th and 5 th Grade. Agenda Preparation looks like… General Information for Exams Overview of ELA Exam Overview of Math Exam Ways to Help At Home.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Asssessment of projects Lars Peter Jensen. 2 Alingment.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
1 Introduction to Problem based Learning – The AAU Way Program for to day, Supervision : Exercise: Role play of a supervising situation Lunch Planning.
© E. Moesby & T. Rosenørn, Aalborg University Denmark, 2003 Towards a new educational model, Siam University Thailand October Towards a new Educational.
LEADERSHIP & TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
Subject specialist teaching
Project Organized Learning - a course from the Master Programs Introduction Semester for foreign student in Electronics and Information Technology Lars.
PE-course Project Organised Learning (POL) Mm 4: Project Management
Collaborative Learning
The New Project Examination
What lessons to be learnt from reflective learning journals written by students to improve learning and intercultural awareness? Lars Peter Jensen Associated.
Recommendations Regarding the Organisation of the educations at INS
In-Service Teacher Training
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
Asssessment of projects
Department of Teacher Education, University of Helsinki, Finland
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
Mapping Life-long Learning: A Deep Dive into a Graduate Attribute
The New Project Examination
The new educational model Assesment of project groups
Tasks & Grades for MET2.
Tasks & Grades for MET3.
Tasks & Grades for MET5.
Tasks & Grades for MET4.
Master Student Building Capacity Workshop
PBL at Aalborg University
Seven Principles of Good Teaching
Teacher Training for Professional Competence
Assessment - the hidden curriculum
The New Project Examination
Preparing students for assessments Janet Strain Ann Jakeman
Presentation transcript:

WS1 Introduction to Problem Based Learning: The AAU Way. Assessment/Examination of projects, why and how The Faculty of Engineering and Science The New Project Examination Hans Hüttel Anette Kolmos Kathrin Otrel-Cass Egon Moesby Jette Holgaard Reviewed by Lars Peter Jensen Picture:

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Agenda How - Information about the new exam format: Project exams will be group-based. This was the case at Aalborg University until Remember: while project exams are group- based, the assessment is individual (this has always been the case!) Have you seen the film? Dk.film?Dk. Why – learning from the past

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Implementing the new exam format Group project examination to start in the winter semester of 2012 (exams held in January 2013) for all first-year bachelor programs and selected first-year master programs As from summer semester 2013 all project examinations will be group-based Exemptions will be granted for final projects at Bachelor and Master level.

The Faculty of Engineering and Science A comparison Individual project examsGroup-based project exams The group presentation (app. 1 hour) at the start is not part of the examination. Individual assessment of the presentation is not possible. The group presentation (app. 1 hour) at the start is part of the examination. Individual assessment is possible. About 30 minutes of individual questions based on selected aspects of the project. A joint discussion involving the entire group. All aspects of the project are examined. More detailed knowledge in selected aspects are assessed by rounds of individual questions for each student. App. 30 minutes pr. Student. Feedback from the supervisors and examiners after the project has been assessed and grades are given. Feedback becomes part of the examination itself. Further feedback can be given after the grades are given.

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Presentation of project (students) 6-10 minutes pr. student Comments to the presentation (examiners) The examiners agree on the grades Announcement and justification of grades (Some students might prefer this individually) A general, question-based discussion with more methodological questions Specific questions for each student break An example of the structure of the new project exam. break Total planned exam time: 45 minutes pr. student. Max. 5 hours

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Supervisors and examiners Group of students to be assessed Blackboard An example of the physical setup of the new project exam

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Assessment in the new project exam format The assessment is individual; grades may (and often will) vary. The individual student is assessed on the basis of an overall evaluation of the fulfillment of the project module’s learning objectives as reflected in: the written project report and the overall presentation the student's contribution to the presentation the student's contribution during the joint discussion the student's contribution during the individual question round(s) Partial grades are not given, not even "unofficial" ones, for the individual elements, but all aspects must be satisfactory in order for the student to pass the exam.

The Faculty of Engineering and Science The new project exam for final project (Bachelor or Master thesis) exam. Same procedure and assessment format as for every other project exam but timing is 1 hour pr. Student for the whole examination procedure. Extraordinary possibility, only this year: Individual exam. You have to apply to the study board.

The Faculty of Engineering and Science 11 The Faculty of Engineering and Science Learning from the past Picture: markjuleen.com

The Faculty of Engineering and Science The preferences Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008

The Faculty of Engineering and Science The reactions at the time of the ban in 2007 There was a strong preference towards the group based exam from: 94% of the internal staff examiners (facilitators) (n=162) 87% of the external examiners (n=131) 69% of the students (n=516) Picture: Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Strong points for group assessment Easier to examine all parts of the project thoroughly. Less temptation to ask “textbook questions” that ignore the actual project. Identification and recognition of the diversity of students’ knowledge. Opportunity to demonstrate applied knowledge and competence. Students can build on and benefit from each other’s contribution. The feedback during the exam makes it easier for students to understand their grades. Picture: loridennis.com

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Skills tested - TekNat The ability to:GRP 2006IND 2008 Answer questions quickly Remember concepts and definitions Argue for methodological choices Relate different concepts to each other Show theoretical overview Show analytical skills Discuss the pros and cons of a solution Transfer knowledge to other situations Make an oral presentation Enter into dialogue and collaboration Comment and elaborate on arguments Work in teams More than 7 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent More than 9 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent More than 5 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent Fewer than 5 out of 10 felt that this ability was tested to a large or to some extent

The Faculty of Engineering and Science What students said about group-based exams The students that were in favour of group-based exams also emphasized: that the team setting create a pleasant atmosphere that they have learned a lot during the exam because of the thorough discussions. More than 80% either disagreed or partly disagreed that ‘it is easy to hide in a group-based exam’ (82%), and that ‘you do not have to cover the whole curriculum in a group-based exam’ (80%). Kolmos and Holgaard, 2008

The Faculty of Engineering and Science Conducting a good exam (for all involved) Prepare the joint discussion really well. Plan the individual round of questions well and make sure you have discussed this with students in advance. Keep track of contributions using a detailed scorecard and extensive notes. Prepare to give feedback on the performance of each student

The Faculty of Engineering and Science How can you prepare for the new format? All exams, no matter what the format, are a challenge. Make sure that you and your colleagues agree on your interpretation of the exam format. Share information about the exam format and strategies on how to ‘get through’ and be prepared early on in the teaching and supervision process. Meet the students some days before the exam to explain/discuss the format again. Agree on what constitutes good behaviour during the exam. Talk to experienced colleagues.

The Faculty of Engineering and Science All information on:

The Faculty of Engineering and Science 19 Questions? The Faculty of Engineering and Science Starting over – learning from experience Picture: infinitevitality1.wordpress.com