Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.
Advertisements

Statement of Commercial Interest: RDJ: None DRH: honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics Multiple studies have shown ex.
Corneal biomechanical properties and their association with intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) Dimitrios P. Bessinis 1, Pandelis.
A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,
Comparison between Dynamic contour tonometry, Goldmann applanation tonometry and Ehlers-corrected Goldmann applanation tonometry in eyes after Laser In.
Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.
E-Poster ALC Canedo, MD 2010 Rio de Janeiro CornealTomograhyandBiomechanics Study Group Study Group Comparative Study of Corneal Biomechanical Properties.
Phacoemulsification with Goniosynechialysis in the Management of Refractory Acute Angle-closure Glaucoma Ghasem Fakhraie*, MD, Mahmoud Jabbarvand, MD,
SEI IOP and its correlations in a population based study in Central India. The Central India Eye and Medical Study. Krishna Bhojwani, Vinay Nangia, Jost.
David Zadok MD, Isaac Avni MD
CR The Glaucoma Tonometer. What sets it apart? Reichert’s 7CR Auto Tonometer + Corneal Response Technology takes corneal biomechanical properties into.
Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes
Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.
Management of Methicillin- Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Keratitis in Post-surgical Patients: Two Case Reports Sujata P. Prabhu, MD and Timothy Y. Chou,
Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. David Zadok, MD, Yakov Goldich, MD, Yaniv Barkana,
A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.
Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.
Ahmad Kheirkhah MD, Rodrigo Muller MD, Deborah Pavan-Langston MD, Andrea Cruzat MD, Pedram Hamrah MD Ocular Surface Imaging Center, Massachusetts Eye and.
Effects of IOP Lowering Agents on Myopic Regression after Refractive Surgery Lim, Taehyung M.D., Hong, So Jin M.D., Cho, Beom Jin M.D., Ph.D. Chung Kyu-Hyung.
Copyright restrictions may apply JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Trabeculectomy for Open-Angle Glaucoma Takihara Y, Inatani M, Ogata-Iwao M, et.
TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.
Correlation Between Corneal Biomechanics and Wavefront Aberrations Alejandro Rivera, MD Private Practice Mexico City The author has no financial interest.
Ten-year Clinicopathological Review Of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia In An Ophthalmological Center In Mexico City Lucero Pedro-Aguilar, M. D. Alvarez-Melloni.
Glaucoma Screening With a New Non-Contact Air Impulse Tonometer Pandelis A. Papadopoulos,1,2, Dimitrios P. Bessinis 3, Alexandros A. Papadopoulos 1, Konstantinos.
Relationship between Pachymetry and Ocular Response Analyzer Measurements Alejandro Rivera MD.
Photorefractive Keratectomy in Posterior Polymorphous Dystrophy [CONTROL ID: ] Edward W. Trudo 1, Kraig S. Bower 2, Charles D. Coe 2, Denise A. Sediq.
Effect of Corneal Thickness on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty to Decrease Intraocular Pressure as Primary or Secondary Treatment of Glaucoma ASCRS 2010.
Khairidzan Mohd Kamal MD
ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.
Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients With an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens: A Montreal Experience Georges M. Durr, MD 1,2 Johanna Choremis, MD, FRCSC.
CXL for Infectious Keratitis David Zadok, Yaakov Goldich, Isaac Avni Department of Ophthalmology Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Israel The authors have no.
Pattern of Pain and Analgesic use after Collagen Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus Ramon Coral Ghanem, MD, PhD. Renan Ferreira Oliveira, MD. Vinicius.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus TonoPen- Applination Theodore H. Curtis, M.D.1, Douglas L Mackenzie, M.D.1, Robert J. Noecker.
Naomi R. Goldberg, MD PhD Kenneth J. Wolf, MD Eric J. Wolf, MD FACS The authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster. Comparison.
A Prospective Trial Comparing Pneumotonometry of Cornea and Sclera Usiwoma Abugo BS 1, Sara Duke MD 2, Shuchi Patel, MD 2 1 Loyola University Chicago,
E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group The study of the correlations of the optic disc size with Cornal Geometry and Biomechanical.
The effect of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements after phacoemulsification surgery Ilker Eser M.D. 1 Arzu Taskiran-Comez M.D. 1 Baris Komur.
Ahmed El-Massry, M.D. Professor of Ophthalmology - Faculty of Medicine University of Alexandria Egypt long-Term Results of Corneal Biomechanical Changes.
Visual and IOP Outcomes after PRK in Pigment Dispersion Syndrome [Poster Number: P190] Kraig S. Bower, Denise A. Sediq, Charles D. Coe, Keith Wroblewski,
Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Corneal Hysteresis Role of Corneal Biomechanics in Refractive Surgery Luis Rodriguez, MD Anny Villegas, MD Clínica de Córnea Centro Médico Docente La Trinidad.
COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF OCULAR BIOMETRY USING A NEW NON-CONTACT OPTICAL LOW COHERENCE REFLECTOMETER David Goldblum 1,3, Kaspar Rohrer 1, Rudolf Waelti.
Mathematical Description of the Ocular Response Analyzer Applanation Signal in Post-LASIK Ectasia Mujtaba A. Qazi, M.D. 1,2 David A. Luce, Ph.D. 3 Jay.
BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE CORNEA IN PSEUDO-EXFOLIATION SYNDROME Aylin Kılıç Ertan, MD Özgür Bilen, MD Kudret Eye Hospital, Ankara, Turkey There is.
Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth.
D.r Nishant Nawani, MS Dr. Surinder Singh Pandav, MD Dr. Amit Gupta, MD Dr. Sushmita Kaushik, MD Advanced Eye Centre PGIMER, Chandigarh The authors have.
Instituto para Preservación de la Visión
CRF variations ( initial CRF – final CRF )
Suppressive effect of combined treatment of orthokeratology and 0
Characteristics of Primary Angle-Closure Glaucoma Patients with Normal Intraocular Pressure at the First Visit Won Hyuk Oh1, Bum Gi Kim1, Joo Hwa Lee2.
Safety of medication reduction for Primary Angle Closure (PAC) –
Influence of UVA-Riboflavin corneal collagen cross-linking on biomechanical properties of keratoconic eyes David Zadok MD, Yakov Goldich MD, Yaniv Barkana.
Date of download: 10/26/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on Ocular Response Analyzer waveform-derived variables in keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia Spatial treatment.
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
Corneal Effects of 1.5% Levofloxacin Ophthalmic Solution (IQUIX®) in Humans Mark B. Abelson, MD1,2 Gail Torkildsen, MD2; Aron Shapiro2; Ingrid Lapsa2.
Keratometric Changes in Noninflammatory Corneal Ectasic Diseases After Intraocular Pressure Reduction Authors has no financial interest. Renata T Kashiwabuchi,
Associate Professor of Ophthalmology
Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
Bruno Valbon, Ana Caiado, Ricardo Louzada, Renato Ambrosio Jr *.
Yakov Goldich MD,Yaniv Barkana MD, Isaac Avni MD, David Zadok MD,
Corneal Biomechanics after Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Samer Hamada MRCOphth FRCS(Ed)1,3 Louai.
Hyuck Jin Choi, Joo Youn Oh, Won Ryang Wee, Mee Kum Kim,
Jun Her MD. PhD, Sung-wook Kim MD, Jae-hwan Ahn MD
The Effect of Corneal Thickness on Ocular Drug Penetration
Refractive Surgery Outcomes: Corneas Thinner than 500 microns Vs
Presentation transcript:

Variations in corneal biomechanical parameters and central corneal thickness during the menstrual cycle. Yakov Goldich, MD, David Zadok MD, Yaniv Barkana, MD, Isaac Avni, MD Department of Ophthalmology Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Israel The authors have no conflicts of interest and no financial interest in the article’s subject matter or methods mentioned.

Background The cornea of women may be influenced by hormonal changes that occur during the monthly menstrual cycle. Cyclic variations in corneal topography and corneal thickness have been previously described. 1 Corneal changes are probably driven by direct interaction of sex hormones with sex hormone receptors located in the human cornea. 2 1.Kiely, P. M., L. G. Carney, et al. (1983). "Menstrual cycle variations of corneal topography and thickness." Am J Optom Physiol Opt 60(10): Gupta, P. D., K. Johar, Sr., et al. (2005). "Sex hormone receptors in the human eye." Surv Ophthalmol 50(3):

Background The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Inc, Buffalo, NY, USA) can be used to assess in- vivo corneal biomechanical properties, presented by two parameters, corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF). These biomechanical parameters were proposed to be used in addition to corneal thickness and topography for screening for corneal ectasia before performing laser refractive procedures Randleman, J. B. (2006). "Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions." Curr Opin Ophthalmol 17(4):

Purpose The aim of our study was to evaluate whether there is a clinically meaningful variation in corneal biomechanical properties as measured by ORA during the menstrual cycle.

Methods Twenty two young healthy women aged 19.5 ± 1.5 (mean ± SD) years were prospectively recruited from among the service staff of the Assaf Harofeh Medical center. Every participant was assessed at the beginning of the menstrual cycle, then during ovulation, and at the end of the cycle. The following parameters were assessed: Corneal biomechanical parameters: corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor. Non-contact IOP with ORA: Goldmann correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg) and corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc). Central corneal thickness (CCT) with US pachymetry

Menstrual cycle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Results Table. Study parameters and their mean change and statistical significance during menstrual cycle. Parameter Onset of cycle Ovulation End of cycle P value Mean ± SD Onset vs Ovulatio n Ovulatio n vs End Onset vs End CCT (µm) 535 ± ± ± 42< <0.001 CH (mmHg) 11.1 ± ± ± 1.8< CRF (mmHg) 10.6 ± ± ± IOPcc (mmHg) 14.3 ± ± ± IOPg (mmHg) 14.6 ± ± ± CCT=central corneal thickness, CH=corneal hysteresis, CRF=corneal resistance factor, IOPcc=corneal-compensated intraocular pressure; IOPg=Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure

Results: CH FIGURE 1. Box and whisker plots (smallest, median and largest values with interquartile range) showing corneal hysteresis at three different time points during menstrual cycle.

Results: CRF FIGURE 2. Box and whisker plots (smallest, median and largest values with interquartile range) showing corneal resistance factor at three different time points during menstrual cycle.

Results: CCT FIGURE 3. Box and whisker plots (smallest, median and largest values with interquartile range) showing central corneal thickness at three different time points during menstrual cycle.

Conclusions Corneal thickness and biomechanical parameters significantly vary during menstrual cycle. The central cornea is thinnest at the beginning and significantly thicker at ovulation and at the end of the cycle. CH and CRF are statistically significantly decreased at ovulation as difference between values at the beginning and the end compared with the other two time points, with no statistically significant of the cycle. Cyclical corneal alterations may need to be considered when planning corneal refractive surgery. Correspondence: Yakov Goldich MD,