Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention This ppt is an adaptation of a specific PISD Training on RTI, The Educational Testing and.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
SLD Body of Evidence and Eligibility Denver Public Schools, 2011.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Determining Eligibility Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework TASP 2013 Fall ConferenceTASP 2013 Fall Conference Theresa Nicholls, Ed.S., NCSPTheresa Nicholls,
Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses Methodology
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
WRITING A COMPREHENSIVE REPORT IN SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Multidisciplinary Team Testing Considerations, and Parental Participation in the Assessment Process Chapter Seven.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
So, You Want to Try Out the Latest Model SLD? LOOKING UNDER THE HOOD OF THAT NEW MODEL.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
1/12/09Module 6 - Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D.1 Module 6: 2 Hours Developing Objectives Aligned to State Standards.
Developing the Foundation for the PLAAFP
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY (SLD). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY Documented evidence which indicates that general education interventions.
1. Suspicion of Disability = Obligation to seek informed parental consent to evaluate 2. Consideration of performance domains assures a “full and individual.
University of Rhode Island EDC 452. A process of:  Providing high-quality instruction and intervention matched to student needs and  Using learning.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Conducting Re-evaluations Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework Director of Special Education Eligibility, Theresa Nicholls | Fall 2015.
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Developing the Plan. Tier III Developing the Intervention Plan Developing the Intervention Plan.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Legal Requirements and Changes: Child Find, Evaluation, Eligibility Administrative Training Carie Hurford Emily McCambridge.
Feedback Results from Teacher PSW Worksheet(s) SUBJECT AREA:  Basic Reading  Math Calculation  Oral Expression  Reading Fluency  Math Problem Solving.
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Students with Learning Disabilities Assessment. Purposes of Assessment Screening Determining eligibility Planning a program Monitoring student progress.
Compile information (SAT Worksheet, PSW Worksheet, and REED) and send to School Psychologist School Psychologist: 1.Schedules / conducts observation 2.Reviews.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Dr. Sarah McPherson New York Institute of Technology Adapted from Lora Parks-Recore CEWW Special Education Training and Resource Center SETRC 1 Response.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Assessment My favorite topic (after grammar, of course)
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Eligibility and Determining Local Thresholds: Facilitated Discussion
Developmental Reading Assessment
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Developmental Reading Assessment
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
As a result of participating in this module, participants will be able to:
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines Specific Learning Disability (SLD) Evaluation Procedures September, 2012

Purpose District implementation of new SLD guidelines to be in compliance with Michigan rules & federal regulations

Goals for Today Understand the process and content of the SLD guideline Review district data Experience the process used to determine if SLD criteria is met Identify challenges to overcome Develop plan for successful implementation

Educational Intervention General education intervention is … Special education intervention is … What is done when a student does not meet academic and/or behavioral expectations? 4

Process for General Education Intervention District process for intervention Written? Documentation of interventions  Understood by all staff? Understood by parents? Supported by all stakeholders? Consider as part of training

Getting to know your district: Up close & personal What does the ISD composite indicate? What does the district composite indicate? How can this data inform and strengthen the instructional practices of the district? Where/when does this information get discussed?

Word Cloud of Guideline

Michigan Rule Turn to page 2 Use a highlighter Identify terms/conditions/aspects of the rule that may challenge decision making for eligibility determination-5 minutes When the bell rings, review the results with your table Report out unduplicated list

Eight Areas of SLD Read Pages 5-8 (10 minutes) Basic Reading Reading Fluency Reading Comprehension Mathematical Calculation Mathematical Problem-Solving Written Expression Oral Expression Listening Comprehension

Elbow Partners Discuss: Which areas of SLD are difficult to describe? Which areas of SLD are easily analyzed using classroom data? Report out your findings

Pattern of Strengths & Weaknesses Model used for eligibility determination Data is analyzed to develop a profile of student performance within 8 areas of SLD Strength = 3 data points within one area Weakness = 4 data points within one area One of the 4 points must be an individually administered norm-referenced assessment

Example: Pattern of Strengths & Weaknesses Basic Reading had three data points falling within the range of strength. Data indicated a personal strength in this area of SLD Math Problem Solving had 4 data points falling within the range of weakness including the score of an individually administered standardized assessment of math problem-solving.Data indicated a weakness in this area of SLD. More analysis to follow. Data is analyzed to develop a profile of student performance within 8 areas of SLD Strength = 3 data points within one area Weakness = 4 data points within one area One of the 4 points must be a norm- referenced assessment

Evaluation Components Data reflects: Inadequate achievement (p. 15)  Other factors do not explain under achievement (p. 16)  Appropriate instruction (p. 16-18)  Observation in area of difficulty (p. 19)  Parent, teacher, student, medical and other input (p. 20) 

Evaluation Components Activity Compare the five evaluation components with the Michigan rule on page 2 of the guideline. How much of the required data is available from the general education interventions and the CA-60 file? 16

Data Analysis: Performance Differentiation of areas of strengths and weaknesses page 24 Prediction with confidence: academic success and failure Cut scores are not speed limit signs: professional judgment

Data Analysis: Profile from Data Pattern or lack of pattern emerges Multiple data points from a variety of sources confirm the presence or absence of strengths and weaknesses Worksheet to Chart Pattern of Strengths and Weaknesses p. 25  SLD Summary of Data chart p. 27  18

IQ Score: Optional How has an IQ score helped inform instruction? Why is an IQ score needed? When is an IQ score helpful? Adverse Impact p. 28  Termination of eligibility p. 29 

PSW Simulation: 3 outcomes Robert, 2nd grade and making progress with general education interventions John, 5th grade and referred for an initial evaluation Tommy, 2nd grade and referred for an initial evaluation

Check for Understanding Identify the components of SLD eligibility What will be the greatest challenge for implementation in your building? Identify strategy to overcome challenge 21

Plan for Implementation of SLD Guideline Inform staff Inform parents Tools for training Process for implementation Identify start date Complete worksheet & commit to change!

Questions

Contact Information Diane Heinzelman heinzed@charemisd.org 231-547-9947 Frances Paris parisf@charemisd.org 248-807-1546