Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Advertisements

2013 Statewide BIP Load Impact Evaluation Candice Churchwell DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
1 Generation Adequacy Task Force Report to TAC April 7, 2005.
ERS Update Presented to: Demand Side Working Group December 5, 2014.
February 25, 2011 Demand Side Working Group EILS Update Mark Patterson ERCOT, Manager Demand Integration.
Loads in SCED Version 2 Proxy G Proposal. This is a proposal from Carl Raish as an individual … it has not been vetted internally at ERCOT and should.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
Presented By: Mark Patterson ERCOT Manager, Demand Integration November 29, Minute ERS Pilot update to TAC 1.
Price Responsive Load / Retail DR Update to RMS Karen Farley June 3, 2014.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
ERCOT Emergency Interruptible Load Service EILS Technical Workshop Commissioners Hearing Room, PUC July 17, 2009.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
1 Presented to ERCOT Retail Market Subcommittee January 9, 2002 Profiling Working Group Darryl Nelson, Chair Load Profiling Operating Guides (LPOG)
NPRR514, Seasonal Generation Resource Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2013 Amanda Frazier.
Demand Integration Update to DSWG ERCOT Emergency Responsive Service (ERS) Report to the Public Utility Commission of Texas for the 2013 ERS Program Year.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ERS Update Plus Revisions to Proposed Changes for ERS Time Periods Presented to: Demand Side Working Group November 5, 2014.
Hour Ahead Dispatchable Loads Applicable Updates to Procedures Presentation to the Market Operations Standing Committee April 23, 2003
ERCOT Staff Demand Integration Update to DSWG 3/08/2013 DSWG Meeting.
MIG TF Voting Items Market Participant Notification Period (Transmission outage) – =1 Year Interconnection Date for Protocol Considerations – First Interconnection.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
DSWG – March 9, 2015 Four-CP Response in ERCOT Competitive Area Carl L Raish.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
1 Tab X ERCOT Confidential Credit Impact of Increased Caps The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal.
The credit exposure impact of higher system-wide offer caps was estimated using an internal ERCOT model under four scenarios: 1.(Base Case) “Normal” summer.
QMWG Update to WMS S. Looney October 9, WMS Assignments NPRR564, Thirty-Minute Emergency Response Service – Discuss concerns expressed at last WMS.
1 EILS Technical Workshop 2.0 February 16, Agenda  Introduction  June – September 2010 Procurement Schedule  EILS Submission Form  Review.
Direct Load Control Update Betty Day Manager of Load Profiling and Data Aggregation February 25, 2003 Retail Market Subcommittee.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
14 Minute Ramp Period Testing Workshop June 30, 2009.
ERS Overview of Upcoming Changes.  Procedure Changes – ERS Generator Resources  Reporting Requirements – ERS Load Resources with Back-Up Generators.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Direct Energy ERCOT PWG Chair Ed Echols Of Oncor ERCOT PWG Vice Chair for COPS Meeting.
DSWG - June 25, Four-CP Response for Transmission- and Distribution- Connected ESIIDs in ERCOT Competitive Area Carl L Raish.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Preliminary Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 12th, 2013.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Day-Ahead Market Discussion/Clarification TPTF April 24, 2006.
2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May, 2016 Prepared.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
Load Resource Participation in EILS EILS Subgroup October 27, 2011.
Analysis of Load Reductions Associated with 4-CP Transmission Charges in ERCOT Carl L Raish Principal Load Profiling and Modeling Demand Side Working Group.
Principal Load Profiling and Modeling
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
ERS Procurement Methodology
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Emergency Response Service Baselines
ERS Document Changes Associated with New SAS Implementation
NPRR829 Incorporate Real-Time Telemetered Net Generation for Non-Modeled Generation into the Real-Time Liability Estimate ERCOT PRS Meeting May 11, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013

Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Description 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 2 Pilot purpose:  Evaluate the ability of weather-sensitive Loads to provide dispatchable demand response during summer system conditions;  Evaluate the accuracy of Qualified Scheduling Entity (QSE) projections of demand response capabilities and Load growth;  Evaluate deployment impacts on end-use customers (survey);  Identify any unforeseen challenges in procuring, deploying and evaluating the performance of weather-sensitive Loads. ERCOT will procure a maximum of 30 MW for BH2, BH3 & WEH Pilot duration June – September 2013

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 3 Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Participation ERIDS and Offers must be submitted by a QSE qualified to participate in ERS Fully executed Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Supplement to Market Participant Agreement is required Minimum offer is 100 kW … subject to proration as limited by Tied Offer MW Offers must include projection of the maximum number of sites during Contract Period Interval metering is required 9 months of historical interval data (when ERID form is submitted) is required for all sites in Loads using default baseline No historical data required for control group, but all sites must have interval metering prior to start of Contract Period QSE may offer the same capacity into WS ERS, 10M ERS or 30M ERS WS ERS will be awarded first Capacity may be offered / awarded into 10M ERS or 30M ERS in other time periods. If Load participates in WS ERS and another ERS program, no site changes are allowed during the Contract Period

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 4 Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Participation Loads only (no ERS Generators) and Loads must be residential-only or non- residential only Load must demonstrate weather sensitivity by meeting minimum accuracy standards posted at the following link: Accuracy is evaluated for specified time periods using Regression Baseline R 2 > 90% and MAPE < 7.5%, or R 2 > 95% and MAPE < 10.0% Residential Loads on Control Group Baseline are exempt from this requirement … but must have interval metering at start of Contract Period

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 5 Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Participation

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 6 Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Participation Residential WS ERS Loads have two baseline options Regression baseline … same as current methodology Control Group baseline at least 600 sites assigned randomly by ERCOT to control groups 2 – 20 groups available

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 7 Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Participation Non-residential WS ERS Loads have same baseline options as current ERS Regression baseline will always be available (since it’s part of qualification) ERCOT will also evaluate M810 and MDP and if sufficiently accurate, will be available for QSE selection Control group option not available for non-residential Loads

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 8 Modification of Load Population QSE may update list of sites once per month Submit updated offer form prior to 1 st of month … can add/remove sites Sites added must meet same historical interval data requirement as original sites Updated Load must meet minimum accuracy standards and baseline qualifications set by the original Load Sites added to Control Group Baseline Load may result in recalculation of number of control groups and control group assignments If number of sites falls below 600, Load will revert to default baseline Offers should take into consideration that 1 control group will be withheld from EEA event deployments Number of sites may increase from original, but not more than the greater of 100% of the original number (2 MW * max sites specified on offer) / MW capacity of offer (Effectively number of sites that would be expected to provide 2 MW)

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 9 Group Assignments for Default Baseline Loads ERCOT may, with QSE approval, split default baseline loads into two deployment groups Only one of the two groups will be deployed during a test, tests would alternate between groups ERCOT will evaluate if testing one group would provide an accurate estimate of the performance of the entire group Initial analysis indicates residential aggregations of 300 kW are likely to qualify If sufficiently accurate, ERCOT will randomly assign sites to one of the two groups and notify QSE Otherwise, all sites will be assigned to the same group If QSE modifies sites in the Load Group assignments would be subject to change Use of two groups could be disallowed if insufficiently accurate Test performance factor will be based on prorated capacity when two groups are in use

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 10 Events and Tests ERCOT will administer at least one and not more than two tests per month Tests will be fleet-wide deployments for the pilot Number of tests may be reduced by actual deployment events 30-minute ramp Tests will typically be long enough to include one full interval two of the tests may last for at least one hour test duration will not be announced prior to test ERCOT may deploy Loads up to 8 times for actual EEA deployments Subject to deployment in EEA 1 or higher Deployment instruction will specifically mention WS ERS ERCOT will pre-notify QSE on Control Groups to be with-held from deployment 30-minute ramp Three-hour time limit on a deployment for an event

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 11 Event / Test Performance Load-level Interval performance factors calculated same as regular ERS (baseline – actual) / (int_frac * obligation) … but not capped at one Obligation is directly from offer (or 0.5 * offer if 2 deployment groups used) Demand reduction value (baseline – actual) normalized for normal peak weather is used for weighting interval performance factors Timeliness of deployment at Load level is assessed for tests/events with two or more full intervals If EIPF for first full interval is less than 75% of average EIPF for remaining intervals, a financial penalty is imposed (baseline lowered to reduce event performance factor by 25%) QSE-level Interval performance factors Normalized DR Value and obligations summed across deployed Loads Weighted average interval fraction (by DR Value) across deployed Loads (DR Value) / (int_frac * obligation)

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 12 Event / Test Performance Event performance factors (QSE and Load) Weighted average of interval performance factors for the event Weighted by normalized DR Value and interval fraction QSE Contract Period Event performance Factor Weighted average of interval performance factors for all tests and events during Contract Period Weighted by QSE-level normalized DR Value and interval fraction

4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 13 Performance Penalties Financial Performance Penalties will be imposed (no suspensions) for the following: If maximum number of sites for a Load during Contract Period is less than 90% of number projected on the offer If average normalized DR Value per site for a Load is less than 90% of (Offer MW / projected maximum sites) If one of the above conditions is true the baseline is reduced to result in the Load’s event performance factor to be equal to the square of the original event performance factor If both of the above conditions are true the baseline is reduced to result in the Load’s event performance factor to be equal to the cube of the original event performance factor However, the penalties are waived if: The DR Value provided by the Load is greater than or equal to 90% of the offered MW, or The ERS Load’s obligation is exhausted during the Contract Period

ERS Submission Form Changes 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 14 This portion of the ID page must be filled out. Submittal Type Options: Preliminary Review Procurement ERID 10M Procurement Offer 30M Procurement Offer WS Procurement Offer 10M Reinstatement ERID 10M Reinstatement Offer 30M Reinstatement Offer 10M Substitution 30M Substitution WS Site Update

ERS Submission Form Changes 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 15 Hours for 10 Minute ERS & 30 Minute ERS Pilot Business Hours 1 (BH1) are the Hours Ending 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday, except ERCOT holidays. Business Hours 2 (BH2) are the Hours Ending 1400 through 1600, Monday thru Friday, except ERCOT holidays. Business Hours 3 (BH3) are the Hours Ending 1700 through 2000, Monday thru Friday, except ERCOT holidays. Non-Business Hours (NBH) are all other hours. Hours for Weather Sensitive ERS Pilot Business Hours 2 (BH2) are the Hours Ending 1400 through 1600, Monday thru Friday, except ERCOT holidays. Business Hours 3 (BH3) are the Hours Ending 1700 through 2000, Monday thru Friday, except ERCOT holidays. WeekEnd Holidays (WEH) are the Hours Ending , Saturday, Sundays & Holidays New tab added, Contract Hours

ERS Submission Form Changes 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 16 Several changes to this section of the ERS Submission Form: 1.Cell B2 – added Weather Sensitive Load as an option 2.Cell C2 – Projected # of Sites for Weather Sensitive ERS 3.Baseline – WS Control Group added as an option 4.ERS Time Period – WeekEnd Holidays added for Weather Sensitive

Major Program Differences 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 17 Program Characteristics 10 Minute ERS30 Minute ERSWeather Sensitive ERS StatusProductionPilot Ramp Rate10 Minutes30 Minutes How PaidPaid As BidClearing Price DeployedEEA Level 2 or higherEEA Level 1 or higher Deployments Durations 8 hours max per CP, remain deployed until recall Max 8 cum hours, up to 4 events Max 3 hours per event, up to 8 events ERS GeneratorsYesNo Opt-In RenewalYesNo Self ProvisionYes No Number of Tests Must have passed a test in the last 365 days At least 1, max of 4 per Contract Period At least 1, max of 2 per month (event offset) Testing / Event Event – XML & All QSE Hotline Test - XML & call on OPX XML & All QSE Hotline Call No XML during WEH SuspensionsAvailability & Load Test FailuresNo Suspensions * Suspended Resources can offer in WS ERS / ERS 30 without serving suspension but must successfully complete the reinstatement process.

Questions 4/5/2013 Weather Sensitive ERS Training 18