Updated 1/28/2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

WECC/TEPPC Response to DOE Funding Opportunity Status Update June 29, 2009 Bradley Nickell Renewable Integration and Planning Director.
2007 Goals. Introduction Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) will be primarily defined throughout the 2007 year by Electric Reliability.
Order 2000 and PJM: A Natural Match Craig Glazer Manager of Regulatory Affairs PJM Interconnection, LLC.
Structuring and Implementing a Truly International ERO Kevin Kelly Director, Policy Analysis and Rulemaking Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates Federal.
© New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. New Challenges Facing System Operators Stephen G. Whitley President & Chief.
March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
Standards Development: Update to IMO Regulatory Standing Committee May 14, 2003.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
Regional Transmission Organizations: The Future of Transmission? Dave Edwards 4/17/2004.
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
1 ISO/RTO Council Wholesale Demand Response Projects & OpenADR David Forfia.
Electric Utility Basics An overview of the electric industry in New England and the operation of consumer-owned utilities 1.
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION NATIONAL MEETING Salt Lake City June 15, 2009 Panel: “WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET TRANSMISSION BUILT?” Remarks of James.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
The Transmission Imperative November 3, 2011 Jay Caspary.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
PacifiCorp Participation in the California ISO. 2 Full participation provides significant benefits beyond those of the Energy Imbalance Market EIM BenefitsFull.
City of Leesburg Electric Department Internal Compliance Program (ICP)
SPP.org 1. SPP: Demand Response and Advanced Metering in Arkansas.
The Value of Electric Transmission NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 25, 2012.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
PJM© PJM Confidential PJM Generation Interconnection Overview Virginia Offshore Wind Conference Virginia Beach June 22, 2011 Paul McGlynn General.
Warren Lasher Director, System Planning October 4, 2014 Our Energy Future.
Need for Transmission Investment 2010 Mid-American Regulatory Conference AEP.
1 Arizona Corporation Commission BTA Workshop Presenter: Steven Cobb May 23, 2008.
Nuclear Power Plant/Electric Grid Regulatory Coordination and Cooperation - ERO Perspective David R. Nevius and Michael J. Assante 2009 NRC Regulatory.
Electric Reliability and the Clean Power Plan Branden Sudduth Director, Reliability Planning W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
10/03/ Report on Existing and Potential Electric System Constraints and Needs Within the ERCOT Region October 3, 2002.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
ENERGY REGULATORY AND MARKET DEVELOPMENT FORUM November 4, 2010 The Honorable Philip D. Moeller Commissioner Federal Energy Regulatory Commission “ENERGY.
Overview of WECC and Regulatory Structure
Sec. 5 RE-REGULATION- EPAct 1992 FERC Orders 888 and 889 (1996) EPAct 2005 In short these three laws move the power industry towards an increase in competition.
Status Report for Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group
Mandatory Electric Reliability Standards and Transmission Expansion Suedeen G. Kelly Commissioner Federal Energy Regulatory Commission The Canadian Institute.
1 The Costs of Participating in Restructured Wholesale Markets American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 William M. Bateman Robert C. Smith.
FCC Field Hearing on Energy and the Environment Monday November 30, 2009 MIT Stratton Student Center, Twenty Chimneys Peter Brandien, Vice President System.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Smart Grid Interoperability Panel & ISO / RTO Council Smart Grid Projects David Forfia SGIP Governing Board Member – Stakeholder Category 21 ISO/RTO Sponsor.
Iowa State University Ames, IA July 5, 2011 Wind on the Wires – Wind and Transmission Issues Beth Soholt Wind on the Wires
Updated 1/28/2011. Cost Allocations and Affordability of Tariffs March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
APS Overview Richard Nicosia. APS Snapshot Largest and longest serving electric utility Operations dating back to th largest employer headquartered.
PJM©2012www.pjm.com PJM’s Experience with Capacity Markets Terry Boston President & CEO PJM Interconnection Power Across Texas September 21, 2012.
Why Should Retail Customers Care About the MISO Market? WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 WIEG Board Meeting November 8, 2007 Submitted by: Kavita Maini,
FERC Perspective on Demand Response David Kathan FERC Midwest Demand Response Initiative Chicago, IL February 9, 2007 The author’s views do not necessarily.
PJM©2015 ATTACHMENT TO TESTIMONY OF ANDREW OTT OHIO ENERGY MANDATES STUDY COMMITTEE MARCH 18,
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
SPP.org 1 SPP Mission Helping our members work together to keep the lights on – today and in the future. Updated
G&T Update – Western Farmers Electric Cooperative OAEC MR/PR Fall Meeting (2015)
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
1 NAUSCA Summer Meeting Boston June 30, 3009 David W. Hadley Vice President State Regulatory Relations Midwest ISO.
FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.
Bob Cupit Manager, Energy Facility Permitting Minnesota Public Utilities Commission.
Updated 1/28/2011. Renewables Integration Plans and Challenges March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary ·
1.
Lessons Learned from Existing RTOs John Moore January WCEA Meeting January 7 th, 2016.
PJM©2014www.pjm.com A System Operator’s Resilience Wish List Tom Bowe Executive Director Reliability and Compliance PJM Interconnection
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
5 th ERRA Annual Meeting Country News – The Russian Federation Krasnodar Territory Sergei Milovanov Regional Energy Commission – Prices and Tariffs Department.
The Midwest ISO – Platform to Meet Tomorrow’s Challenges Wisconsin Industrial Energy Group August 7, 2008.
EI-WECC Seams Study Needed
Wind Management at MISO
North American Markets Status
Updated October 17, 2017.
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
California ISO’s CIM Based Model Management
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
The Future Grid and Energy Storage
Presentation transcript:

Updated 1/28/2011

Legislative Drivers, Regulatory Practices and Market Solutions March 8, 2011 Jay Caspary jcaspary@spp.org · 501.614.3220

SPP Milestones 2009 Integrated Nebraska utilities 1968 Became NERC Regional Council 1980 Implemented telecommunications network 1991 Implemented operating reserve sharing 1994 Incorporated as non-profit 1997 Implemented reliability coordination 1998 Implemented tariff administration 2001 Implemented regional scheduling 2004 Became FERC-approved Regional Transmission Organization 2006 Implemented contract services 2007 Launched EIS market, became NERC Regional Entity 2009 Integrated Nebraska utilities 2010 FERC approved Highway/Byway cost allocation methodology and Integrated Transmission Planning Process 1968: NERC was formed in response to a blackout in the northeast. SPP was a founding member. 1980: SPP’s members implemented a telecommunications network to facilitate information sharing. 1991: Reserve sharing allows all member systems to rely further on each other, reducing the reserves they each have to hold and making more power available for sale. 1997 - 2001: SPP added more services to provide regional benefit: reliability coordination, tariff administration, and scheduling. 2006: SPP began offering services on a contract basis. SPP did not even exist as a legal entity until 1994, and from 1941-1998 the SPP membership agreement was one paragraph. Many of our member companies have been working together for decades; these relationships are SPP’s foundation and why being relationship-based is a key corporate strategy.

The SPP Difference Relationship - Based Member - Driven Independence Through Diversity Evolutionary vs. Revolutionary Reliability and Economics Inseparable Our relationships with our members are very important to us. Our members drive SPP’s major decisions and plans for the future. We have a diverse membership and an independent Board of Directors that make decisions in an evolutionary rather than revolutionary way. Our members’ needs have changed over the years, and a deliberate evolutionary process has guided our growth. We believe that we can’t discuss electric reliability without also discussing economic issues that impact us all. As a single organization addressing both reliability and economic issues, we provide cost- effective choices and bring efficiency to our members and our region.

Operating Region 2010 370,000 square miles service territory 859 generating plants 6,101 substations 48,930 miles transmission: 69 kV – 12,722 miles 115 kV – 10,143 miles 138 kV – 10,009 miles 161 kV – 5,097 miles 230 kV – 3,787 miles 345 kV – 7,079 miles 500 kV – 93 miles These statistics are for the RTO footprint; the map depicts transmission for both the RTO and ICT (Entergy) footprints.

Operating Region 2010 53,012 MW peak demand 223,080 GWh energy consumption 1,500 MW wholesale demand response 419 MW retail demand response 66,175 megawatts generating capacity: The non-coincident peak load was set on 8/11/2010 for the Reliability Coordinator footprint. Non-coincident peak is the sum of each footprint's members' peak energy use for a particular day. The energy consumption number represents the summed hourly average of the amount of energy used by retail customers in the market footprint. SPP's demand peaks in the summer. Generating capacity (depicted for the RTO footprint) represents what our region's generating units are capable of producing during peak season. The generating units do not always run at this capacity. This is similar to saying your car is capable of producing 200 horsepower, even though you may not use all that horsepower all the time. The wholesale demand response number is for the market footprint and represents resources co-located with load and behind-the-meter. The retail demand response number is for the RTO footprint and represents retail load-reducing resources. Read more about SPP’s footprints on SPP.org>Fast Facts>Footprints

Generating Resources

Regulatory Environment Incorporated in Arkansas as 501(c)(6) non-profit corporation FERC - Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Regulated public utility Regional Transmission Organization NERC - North American Electric Reliability Corporation Founding member Regional Entity SPP is regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). SPP was approved as a FERC Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) in 2004. We operate subject to a tariff that is filed with and governed by FERC. This tariff contains over 2,100 pages of rates, terms and conditions for providing transmission service to our eligible customers to move wholesale electric power within and across our footprint. SPP is a founding member of the North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC). We became a NERC Regional Entity in 2007, which gives us the responsibility of enforcing reliability standards for users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system in the SPP footprint. 8

3 Electric Interconnections / 8 NERC Regions This NERC map shows the other NERC Regional Entities and the three electric interconnections. (Nebraska is not included as part of the SPP region on this map, because SPP’s Nebraska members are part of the MRO Regional Entity, not the SPP Regional Entity. Nebraska is part of the SPP Regional Transmission Organization.)

Independent System Operator (ISO) / Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) Map This map depicts the 10 other FERC-approved Independent System Operators and Regional Transmission Organizations in the United States and Canada.

Interregional Coordination ISO-RTO Council Interregional planning efforts, including Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative North American Energy Standards Board National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners SPP is a member of the ISO/RTO Council (IRC), an organization of 10 ISOs/RTOs. The IRC collaborates on issues of joint concern. We are also involved with NAESB and NARUC. SPP participates in several interregional planning efforts, and is working with our neighbors on seams agreements, which determine how neighboring transmission providers interact at their borders. The United States bulk power system is the most complicated and extensive machine in existence. The skilled people who operate it must find a way to make fair and efficient interregional cost allocations and seams agreements a reality to ensure the reliable supply of electricity to meet the ever-growing needs of electricity consumers.

Our Major Services Facilitation Reliability Coordination Tariff Administration Market Operation Standards Setting Compliance Enforcement Transmission Planning Regional Independent Cost-effective Focus on reliability We offer a number of services for our members, including: Facilitating meetings and decision-making processes Monitoring the grid to maintain electric reliability Processing requests for use of the transmission grid under a tariff with consistent rates and terms for all participants Operating a wholesale energy market Ensuring that users, owners, and operators of the bulk transmission system are in compliance with federal reliability standards Creating regional reliability standards Planning for future transmission needs With all of our services, we focus on being regional, independent, and cost-effective. Our overarching goal is maintaining electric reliability.

SPP Strategically SPP’s strategic plan may be downloaded from the About Us section of SPP.org. To continue to promote reliability excellence and meet our members' needs, the Strategic Planning Committee reassessed its 2008 Strategic Plan, positioning SPP to fulfill its mission statement over the next decade and beyond. The committee first established a baseline for where SPP is today, then reviewed alternative visions of how the industry may change over the next decade. Three foundational strategies and associated initiatives were developed to leverage SPP's capabilities and operational processes: 1. Build a Robust Transmission System: Implement Priority Projects Develop/Implement Integrated Transmission Planning Process Regional Cost Recovery Inter-Regional Optimization Operational Optimization 2. Develop Efficient Market Processes: Implement Day Ahead Market with Transmission Congestion Rights Implement Reliability Unit Commitment Process Incorporate Operating Reserves into Real Time Balancing and Day Ahead Markets Implement Consolidated Balancing Authority Demand Response Integration Manage Implementation 3. Create Member Value: Reliability Excellence Benchmarking and Measurement Enhance Market Monitoring Tools Continuous Process Improvement Strategic Membership Expansion Communication and Education

Transmission is Enabler Transmission capacity defines and creates markets. Its absence limits choices and has very long term consequences EHV/UHV transmission capability is often undervalued in grid planning and operations Bulk power transmission facilities have tremendous economies of scope and scale, which can lower reliability margins and drastically improve dynamic performance and system operations

Legislative Drivers, Regulatory Practices Mandated Standards and Climate Legislation/ Protocols should drive bulk power planning decisions Be aware of unintended consequences of well intentioned edicts and mandates which may not be feasible or very costly in terms of compliance Governance regarding responsibility and authority for cost allocations is critical success factor with Regional State Committee in SPP

Market Solutions Collaboration and coordination are key Evolutionary approaches work not only for broader planning, but also market developments Joint Coordinated System Plan in ‘08, Eastern Wind Integration and Transmission Study in ‘09 and Eastern Interconnection Planning Collaborative in process Transmission Service in ‘97, Energy Imbalance Service Market in ‘07, Integrated Marketplace in ‘14 Transmission infrastructure needs to be robust to support efficient markets