Exploring the Next Frontier in QCD: The Electron-Ion Collider

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update from NSAC NuPECC Long Range Planning Meeting Susan J. Seestrom NSAC Chair U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.
Advertisements

Introduction Glasgow’s NPE research Group uses high precision electromagnetic probes to study the subatomic structure of matter. Alongside this we are.
Rolf Ent, ECT-Trento, October 28, 2008 Spin/Flavor Physics with a Future Electron-Ion Collider Electron-Ion Collider: Options and Status (in US) Gluons.
Probing Nucleon Structure at an Electron Ion Collider Long Range Plan Joint Town Meeting on QCD Temple University, Philadelphia September 14, /14/141LRP.
The Science of an EIC Nuclear Science Goals: How do we understand the visible matter in our universe in terms of the fundamental quarks and gluons of QCD?
The Frontiers of Nuclear Science: from 12 GeV to EIC Rolf Ent INT10-03 Program, Institute for Nuclear Theory, Seattle, WA Workshop on “The Science Case.
Rolf Ent, INT, September 18, 2009 GPD/TMD Studies with a Future Electron-Ion Collider Electron-Ion Collider: Status & Current Ideas Inclusive DIS Measurement.
Imaging in Exclusive Processes Tanja Horn INT10-03 “Imaging QCD Matter”, Institute for Nuclear Theory, UW, Seattle 12 November 2010 Tanja Horn, CUA Colloquium.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
New States of Matter and RHIC Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature and/or density?
Joint Halls A/C Summer Meeting Jefferson Lab – June 5-6, 2014 Semi-Inclusive Physics at the Electron-Ion Collider Rolf Ent (JLab) EIC white paper.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Stony Brook, Dec Physics Topics Working.
THE DEEP INELASTIC SCATTERING ON THE POLARIZED NUCLEONS AT EIC E.S.Timoshin, S.I.Timoshin.
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Deeply Virtual Exclusive Reactions with CLAS Valery Kubarovsky Jefferson Lab ICHEP July 22, 2010, Paris, France.
 Nucleon spin structure and Imaging in the Valence quark region ➥ Inclusive measurements at large x; quark models tests and Lattice QCD tests ➥ Exclusive.
Legend: 1 low-energy IP (s ~ 300) 2 medium-energy IPs (s < 3000) ELIC =high-energy (s = 20000?) (E p ~ 250 limited by JLab site) Use.
Spin Azimuthal Asymmetries in Semi-Inclusive DIS at JLAB  Nucleon spin & transverse momentum of partons  Transverse-momentum dependent distributions.
UK Hadron Physics D. G. Ireland 10 October 2014 NuPECC Meeting, Edinburgh.
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
Parton Model & Parton Dynamics Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics.
POETIC 2012 Indiana University R. D. McKeown 12 GeV CEBAF.
EIC Science: (Polarized) eN Collisions Rolf Ent – Jefferson Lab EIC Generic Detector R&D Advisory Committee Meeting Brookhaven National Lab, May 9 th 2011.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility R. D. McKeown Slide 1 R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary The 12 GeV Science Program.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
An Electron-Ion Collider at RHIC Steve Vigdor, DIS09, April 30, 2009.
1 EIC Update R. D. McKeown Presentation to EICAC April 10, 2011 (Thanks to R. Ent, A. Hutton, H. Montgomery, M. Farkhondeh, others)
What pHe3 can teach us  Polarized He-3 is an effective neutron target  d-quark target  Polarized protons are an effective u-quark target 1 Therefore.
MEIC: A Medium Energy Electron Ion Collider at Jefferson Lab Hadron Workshop, Huangshan July 2, 2013 R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and.
General Discussion some general remarks some questions.
UMass Amherst Christine Aidala Jacksonville, FL Measuring the Gluon Helicity Distribution at a Polarized Electron-Proton Collider APS April Meeting 2007.
Single-Spin Asymmetries at CLAS  Transverse momentum of quarks and spin-azimuthal asymmetries  Target single-spin asymmetries  Beam single-spin asymmetries.
Electron Ion Collider A. Accardi, R. Ent, V. Guzey, Tanja Horn, C. Hyde, A. Prokudin, P. Nadel-Turonski, C. Weiss, … + CASA/accelerator team LRP 2007 JLab.
Jump to first page Quark-Hadron Duality Science Driving the 12 GeV Upgrade Cynthia Keppel for Jefferson Lab PAC 23.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Rolf Ent.
The Quark Structure of the Nucleon Inti Lehmann & Ralf Kaiser University of Glasgow Cosener’s House Meeting 23/05/2007 Nucleon Structure Generalised Parton.
MEIC Overview: Physics, Project & Timeline Rolf Ent MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
Measurements with Polarized Hadrons T.-A. Shibata Tokyo Institute of Technology Aug 15, 2003 Lepton-Photon 2003.
EIC — Bring the Glue to Light. Gluons dominate QCD QCD is the fundamental theory that describes structure and interactions in nuclear matter. Without.
E Entering the Electronic Age at RHIC: RHIC APS Division of Nuclear Physics Fall Meeting October 24, 2012 Christine A. Aidala University of Michigan.
Nuclear Physics at Jefferson Lab Part III R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary Taiwan Summer School June 30, 2011.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
R.G. Milner2nd EIC Workshop Summary and Outlook science case machine design EIC realization.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility PAC-25, January 17, 2004, 1 Baldin Sum Rule Hall C: E Q 2 -evolution of GDH integral Hall A: E94-010,
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
Measurement of Flavor Separated Quark Polarizations at HERMES Polina Kravchenko (DESY) for the collaboration  Motivation of this work  HERMES experiment.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Anthony.
Imaging Studies at Future Facilities Rolf Ent – Jefferson Lab Hall C Summer Workshop, August 20 th ? (Thanks to Nicole d’Hose for.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
Physics Potential of an ep Collider at the VLHC  Why ep? When?  Physics Results from the first ep Collider – HERA  Future ep Physics Priorities  Perturbative.
3/8/20161 Nucleon Tomography --Parton Imaging in 3D Feng Yuan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Melynda Brooks, “Understanding the Origin of the Nucleon Spin” Understanding the Origin of the Nucleon Spin Andi Klein, P-23, Melynda Brooks P-25, Pat.
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei - How do the gluons contribute to the structure of the nucleus? - What are the properties of.
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
The goal of the COMPASS" workshop at CERN on 4 March 2010 at CERN on 4 March 2010 is to better define the key measurements and their outcomes with.
Towards an Electron Ion Collider R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab INT Workshop November 19, 2010.
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Future lepton scattering facilities
Physics of the EIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN.
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Physics with Nuclei at an Electron-Ion Collider
PheniX, STAr AND AN EIC E.C. Aschenauer
Electroweak and SM Physics at EIC
Selected Physics Topics at the Electron-Ion-Collider
PHENIX Transverse-Spin Physics
Introduction and Workshop Charge
SOLID Collaboration Meeting
Feedback from the Temple Town Meeting MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Exploring the Next Frontier in QCD: The Electron-Ion Collider Future Exploring the Next Frontier in QCD: The Electron-Ion Collider Rolf Ent GaryFest aka Transverse Spin Phenomena and Their Impact on QCD Workshop, Jefferson Lab, 10/29/2010 The Electron-Ion Collider - The EIC project - The EIC science EIC Roadmap Conclusions

A High-Luminosity Electron Ion Collider NSAC 2007 Long-Range Plan: “An Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) with polarized beams has been embraced by the U.S. nuclear science community as embodying the vision for reaching the next QCD frontier. EIC would provide unique capabilities for the study of QCD well beyond those available at existing facilities worldwide and complementary to those planned for the next generation of accelerators in Europe and Asia.” Base EIC Requirements: range in energies from s = few 100 to s = few 1000 & variable fully-polarized (>70%), longitudinal and transverse ion species up to A = 200 or so high luminosity: about 1034 e-nucleons cm-2 s-1 upgradable to higher energies

Why an Electron-Ion Collider? fdilution, fixed_target Longitudinal and Transverse Spin Physics! 70+% polarization of beam and target without dilution transverse polarization also 70%! Detection of fragments far easier in collider environment! fixed-target experiments boosted to forward hemisphere no fixed-target material to stop target fragments access to neutron structure w. deuteron beams (@ pm = 0!) Easier road to do physics at high CM energies! Ecm2 = s = 4E1E2 for colliders, vs. s = 2ME for fixed-target  4 GeV electrons on 12 GeV protons ~ 100 GeV fixed-target Easier to produce many J/Y’s, high-pT pairs, etc. Easier to establish good beam quality in collider mode Longitudinal polarization FOM Target fdilution, fixed_target Pfixed_target f2P2fixed_target f2P2EIC p 0.2 0.8 0.03 0.5 d 0.4 0.04

EIC@JLab High-Level Science Overview Hadrons in QCD are relativistic many-body systems, with a fluctuating number of elementary quark/gluon constituents and a very rich structure of the wave function. With 12 GeV we study mostly the valence quark component, which can be described with methods of nuclear physics (fixed number of particles). With an (M)EIC we enter the region where the many-body nature of hadrons, coupling to vacuum excitations, etc., become manifest and the theoretical methods are those of quantum field theory. An EIC aims to study the sea quarks, gluons, and scale (Q2) dependence. 12 GeV

Nuclear Physics – 12 GeV to EIC Study the Force Carriers of QCD The role of Gluons and Sea Quarks

Current Ideas for a Collider Design Goals for Colliders Under Consideration World-wide Energies s Design Luminosity (M)EIC@JLab Up to 11 x 60+ 240-3000+ Close to 1034 Future ELIC@JLab Up to 11 x 250 (20? x 250) 11000 (20000?) Close to 1035 Staged MeRHIC@BNL Up to 5 x 250 600-5000 eRHIC@BNL Up to 20 x 325 (30 x 325) 26000 (39000) ENC@GSI Up to 3 x 15 180 Few x 1032 LHeC@CERN 60 x 7000 (140x7000) 1680000 (3920000) Close to 1033 Present focus of interest (in the US) are the (M)EIC and Staged MeRHIC versions, with s up to ~4000 and 5000, resp.

or 130 GeV/u Au with DX magnets removed 5 GeV e x 250 GeV p – 100 GeV/u Au MeRHIC - Concept s = 600 - 5000 Vertically separated recirculating passes. # of passes will be chosen to optimize eRHIC cost eRHIC detector injector 2 Superconducting RF linacs 1  5 GeV per pass 4 (or 6) passes Coherent e-cooler eRHIC-I  eRHIC: energy of electron beam is increased from 5 GeV to 30 GeV by building up the linacs PHENIX  ePHENIX STAR  eSTAR ePHENIX RHIC: 325 GeV p or 130 GeV/u Au with DX magnets removed MeRHIC Medium Energy eRHIC @ IP12 of RHIC 5 GeV e- x 50-250 GeV p L ~ 1033-1034 cm-2 sec -1 eSTAR

A High-Luminosity EIC at JLab - Concept Ecm2 = s = 4EeEp Ee = 3 – 11 GeV (upgradeable to 20+ GeV) Ep = 20 – 60+ GeV (12 GeV injection energy) (upgradeable to 250 GeV) Legend: (M)EIC@JLab 1 low-energy IP (s ~ 300) 2 medium-energy IPs (s < 4000) ELIC = high-energy EIC@JLab (s = 20000?) (Ep ~ 250 limited by JLab site) Use CEBAF “as-is” after 12-GeV Upgrade

The Science of an (M)EIC Nuclear Science Goal: How do we understand the visible matter in our universe in terms of the fundamental quarks and gluons of QCD? Overarching EIC Goal: Explore and Understand QCD Three Major Science Questions for an EIC (from NSAC LRP07): What is the internal landscape of the nucleons? What is the role of gluons and gluon self-interactions in nucleons and nuclei? What governs the transition of quarks and gluons into pions and nucleons? Or, Elevator-Talk EIC science goals: Map the spin and spatial structure of quarks and guons in nucleons (show the nucleon structure picture of the day…) Discover the collective effects of gluons in atomic nuclei (without gluons there are no protons, no neutrons, no atomic nuclei) Understand the emergence of hadronic matter from quarks and gluons (how does E = Mc2 work to create pions and nucleons?) + Hunting for the unseen forces of the universe?

Why a New-Generation EIC? Obtain detailed differential transverse quark and gluon images (derived directly from the t dependence with good t resolution!) Gluon size from J/Y and f electroproduction Singlet quark size from deeply virtual compton scattering (DVCS) Strange and non-strange (sea) quark size from p and K production Determine the spin-flavor decomposition of the light-quark sea Constrain the orbital motions of quarks & anti-quarks of different flavor - The difference between p+, p–, and K+ asymmetries reveals the orbits Map both the gluon momentum distributions of nuclei (F2 & FL measurements) and the transverse spatial distributions of gluons on nuclei (coherent DVCS & J/Y production). At high gluon density, the recombination of gluons should compete with gluon splitting, rendering gluon saturation. Can we reach such state of saturation? Explore the interaction of color charges with matter and understand the conversion of quarks and gluons to hadrons through fragmentation and breakup. longitudinal momentum transverse distribution orbital motion quark to hadron conversion Dynamical structure! Gluon saturation?

The Science of an (M)EIC Or, Elevator-Talk EIC science goals: Map the spin and spatial structure of quarks and guons in nucleons (show the nucleon structure picture of the day…) Discover the collective effects of gluons in atomic nuclei (without gluons there are no protons, no neutrons, no atomic nuclei) Understand the emergence of hadronic matter from quarks and gluons (how does E = Mc2 work to create pions and nucleons?) + Hunting for the unseen forces of the universe?

World Data on g1p World Data on g2p&n soon soon 30% of proton spin carried by quark spin

Projected g1p Landscape of the EIC Access to Dg/g is possible from the g1p measurements through the QCD evolution, or from open charm (D0) production (see below), or from di-jet measurements. RHIC-Spin Similar for g2p (and g2n)!

Sea Quark Polarization Spin-Flavor Decomposition of the Light Quark Sea } 100 days, L =1033, s = 1000 Access requires s ~ 1000 (and good luminosity) u u u > Many models predict Du > 0, Dd < 0 u d | p = + + + … u u u u d d d d

Beyond form factors and quark distributions – Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs) X. Ji, D. Mueller, A. Radyushkin (1994-1997) Proton form factors, transverse charge & current densities Structure functions, quark longitudinal momentum & helicity distributions Correlated quark momentum and helicity distributions in transverse space - GPDs Extend longitudinal quark momentum & helicity distributions to transverse momentum distributions - TMDs 2000’s

Transverse quark/gluon imaging of nucleon Deep exclusive measurements in ep/eA with an EIC: diffractive: transverse gluon imaging J/y, f, ro, g (DVCS) non-diffractive: quark spin/flavor structure p, K, r+, … Describe correlation of longitudinal momentum and transverse position of quarks/gluons  Transverse quark/gluon imaging of nucleon (“tomography”) Are gluons uniformly distributed in nuclear matter or are there small clumps of glue? Are gluons & various quark flavors similarly distributed? (some hints to the contrary)

Detailed differential images from nucleon’s partonic structure EIC: Gluon size from J/Y and f electroproduction (Q2 > 10 GeV2) t [Transverse distribution derived directly from t dependence] Hints from HERA: Area (q + q) > Area (g) Dynamical models predict difference: pion cloud, constituent quark picture - EIC: singlet quark size from deeply virtual compton scattering t Q2 > 10 GeV2 for factorization Statistics hungry at high Q2! EIC: strange and non-strange (sea) quark size from p and K production

GPDs and Transverse Gluon Imaging Goal: Transverse gluon imaging of nucleon over wide range of x: 0.001 < x < 0.1 Requires: - Q2 ~ 10-20 GeV2 to facilitate interpretation - Wide Q2, W2 (x) range - luminosity of 1033 (or more) to do differential measurements in Q2, W2, t EIC enables gluon imaging! Q2 = 10 GeV2 projected data Simultaneous data at other Q2-values (Andrzej Sandacz)

The road to orbital motion Swing to the left, swing to the right: A surprise of transverse-spin experiments The difference between the p+, p–, and K+ asymmetries reveals that quarks and anti-quarks of different flavor are orbiting in different ways within the proton. An EIC with high transverse polarization is the optimal tool to to study this! Illustration of the possible correlation between the internal motion of an up quark and the direction in which a positively-charged pion (ud) flies off. -

Single-Spin Asymmetry Projections with Proton (Also π-) 11 + 60 GeV 36 days L = 3x1034 /cm2/s 2x10-3 , Q2<10 GeV2 4x10-3 , Q2>10 GeV2 3 + 20 GeV L = 1x1034/cm2/s 3x10-3 , Q2<10 GeV2 7x10-3 , Q2>10 GeV2 Polarization 80% Overall efficiency 70% z: 12 bins 0.2 - 0.8 PT: 5 bins 0-1 GeV φh angular coverage incuded Average of Collins/Sivers/Pretzelosity projections Still with θh <40 cut, needs to be updated

The Science of an (M)EIC Or, Elevator-Talk EIC science goals: Map the spin and spatial structure of quarks and guons in nucleons (show the nucleon structure picture of the day…) Discover the collective effects of gluons in atomic nuclei (without gluons there are no protons, no neutrons, no atomic nuclei) Understand the emergence of hadronic matter from quarks and gluons (how does E = Mc2 work to create pions and nucleons?) + Hunting for the unseen forces of the universe?

Gluons in Nuclei What do we know about gluons in a nucleus? NOTHING!!! Ratio of gluons in lead to deuterium What do we know about gluons in a nucleus? NOTHING!!! Large uncertainty in gluon distributions need range of Q2 in shadowing region,  x ~ 10-2-10-3  sEIC = 1000+ + Transverse distribution of gluons on nuclei from coherent Deep-Virtual Compton Scattering and coherent J/Y production [Measurements at DESY of diffractive channels (J/y, f, r, g) confirmed the applicability of QCD factorization: t-slopes universal at high Q2 & flavor relations f:r hold] Gluon radius of a nucleus?

The Science of an (M)EIC Or, Elevator-Talk EIC science goals: Map the spin and spatial structure of quarks and guons in nucleons (show the nucleon structure picture of the day…) Discover the collective of gluons in atomic nuclei (without gluons there are no protons, no neutrons, no atomic nuclei) Understand the emergence of hadronic matter from quarks and gluons (how does E = Mc2 work to create pions and nucleons?) + Hunting for the unseen forces of the universe?

EIC: Explore the interaction of color charges with matter Hadronization EIC: Understand the conversion of quarks and gluons to hadrons through fragmentation and breakup un-integrated parton distributions current fragmentation +h ~ 2 EIC Fragmentation from QCD vacuum target fragmentation -h ~ -4 EIC: Explore the interaction of color charges with matter

Electron-Ion Collider – Roadmap EIC (eRHIC/ELIC) webpage: http://web.mit.edu/eicc/ Weekly meetings at both BNL and JLab Wiki pages at http://eic.jlab.org/ & https://wiki.bnl.gov/eic EIC Collaboration has biannual meetings since 2006 Last EIC meeting: July 29-31, 2010 @ Catholic University, DC INT10-03 program @ Institute for Nuclear Theory ongoing spin, QCD matter, imaging, electroweak Sept. 10 – Nov. 19, 2010 Periodic EIC Advisory Committee meetings (convened by BNL & JLab) After INT10-03 program (2011 – next LRP) need to produce single, community-wide White Paper laying out full EIC science program in broad, compelling strokes and need to adjust EIC designs to be conform accepted energy- luminosity profile of highest nuclear science impact followed by an apples-to-apples bottom-up cost estimate comparison for competing designs, folding in risk factors and folding in input from ongoing Accelerator R&D, EICAC and community

EIC Realization From Hugh Montgomery’s presentation at the INT10-03 Program in Seattle Assumes endorsement for an EIC at the next ~2012/13 NSAC Long Range Plan

GaryFest “… in honor of Gary Goldstein's 70th Birthday to celebrate him and his many contributions to the fields of spin polarization phenomena, transversity, and heavy quark physics in QCD and hadronic physics.” The EIC is the perfect laboratory to match Gary’s interest and multiple contributions. Gary’s most recent work is on deeply virtual exclusive processes with charm at an EIC… … ending with announcement of further work on multiple spin correlation observables in hyperon production  Happy 70th birthday!

Appendix

EIC@JLab assumptions x = Q2/ys (x,Q2) phase space directly correlated with s (=4EeEp) : @ Q2 = 1 lowest x scales like s-1 @ Q2 = 10 lowest x scales as 10s-1 x = Q2/ys General science assumptions: (“Medium-Energy”) EIC@JLab option driven by: access to sea quarks (x > 0.01 (0.001?) or so) deep exclusive scattering at Q2 > 10 (?) any QCD machine needs range in Q2  s = few 100 - 1000 seems right ballpark  s = few 1000 allows access to gluons, shadowing Requirements for deep exclusive and high-Q2 semi-inclusive reactions also drives request for (lower &) more symmetric beam energies. Requirements for very-forward angle detection folded in Interaction Region design from the start

QCD and the Origin of Mass 99% of the proton’s mass/energy is due to the self-generating gluon field Higgs mechanism has almost no role here. The similarity of mass between the proton and neutron arises from the fact that the gluon dynamics are the same Quarks contribute almost nothing.

Gluons and QCD QCD is the fundamental theory that describes structure and interactions in nuclear matter. Without gluons there are no protons, no neutrons, and no atomic nuclei Gluons dominate the structure of the QCD vacuum Facts: The essential features of QCD (e.g. asymptotic freedom, chiral symmetry breaking, and color confinement) are all driven by the gluons! Unique aspect of QCD is the self interaction of the gluons 99% of mass of the visible universe arises from glue Half of the nucleon momentum is carried by gluons

Wu(x,k,r) TMDu(x,kT) f1,g1,f1T ,g1T GPDu(x,x,t) Hu, Eu, Hu, Eu f1(x) Towards a “3D” spin-flavor landscape Wu(x,k,r) (Wigner Function) p m x TMD d3r TMDu(x,kT) f1,g1,f1T ,g1T h1, h1T , h1L , h1 GPDu(x,x,t) Hu, Eu, Hu, Eu ~ p m B GPD d2kT Transverse-Momentum Dependent Parton Distributions Link to Orbital Momentum Link to Orbital Momentum Generalized Parton Distributions Want PT > L but not too large! x = 0, t = 0 dx d2kT f1(x) g1, h1 u(x) Du, du F1u(t) F2u,GAu,GPu Parton Distributions Form Factors

What’s the use of GPDs? 1. Allows for a unified description of form factors and parton distributions 2. Describe correlations of quarks/gluons 3. Allows for Transverse Imaging gives transverse spatial distribution of quark (parton) with momentum fraction x Fourier transform in momentum transfer x < 0.1 x ~ 0.3 x ~ 0.8 4. Allows access to quark angular momentum (in model-dependent way)

Where does the spin of the proton originate? (let alone other hadrons…) The Standard Model tells us that spin arises from the spins and orbital angular momentum of the quarks and gluons: ½ = ½ DS + DG + L Experiment: DS ≈ 0.3 Gluons contribute to much of the mass and ≈ half of the momentum of the proton, but… … recent results (RHIC-Spin, COMPASS@CERN) indicate that their contribution to the proton spin is small: DG < 0.1? (but only in small range of x…) Lu, Ld, Lg?

Superb sensitivity to Dg at small x! The Gluon Contribution to the Proton Spin at small x Superb sensitivity to Dg at small x!

EIC Project - Roadmap Year CEBAF Upgrade Electron-Ion Colldier 1994 1st CEBAF at Higher Energies Workshop 1996 (LRP) CEBAF Upgrade an Initiative ~2000 Energy choice settled, “Golden Experiments” 1st workshops on US Electron-Ion Collider 2002 (LRP) JLab 12-GeV Upgrade 4th recommendation Electron-Ion Collider an Initiative 2007 (LRP) JLab 12-GeV Upgrade highest recommendation Electron-Ion Collider “half-recommendation” 2010 EIC “Golden Experiments”??? 2013? (LRP) JLab 12-GeV & FRIB construction highest recommendation? EIC a formal (numbered) recommendation? 2015 JLab 12-GeV Upgrade construction complete EIC Mission Need, formal R&D ongoing? 2025? EIC construction complete?

MEIC & ELIC: Luminosity Vs. CM Energy e + p facilities e + A facilities https://eic.jlab.org/wiki/index.php/Machine_designs 37

Quarks & Anti-Quarks in Nuclei F2 structure functions, or quark distributions, are altered in nuclei ~1000 papers on the topic; the best models explain the curve by change of nucleon structure - BUT we are still learning (e.g. local density effect) Drell-Yan: Is the EMC effect a valence quark phenomenon or are sea quarks involved? E772 F2A/F2D x

EIC: Explore the interaction of color charges with matter Hadronization EIC: Explore the interaction of color charges with matter (1 month only) EIC: Understand the conversion of quarks and gluons to hadrons through fragmentation and breakup