02. November 2007 Florian Probst Data and Knowledge Modelling for the Geosciences - Chris Date Seminar - e-Science Institute, Edinburgh Semantic Reference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISWC Doctoral Symposium Monday, 7 November 2005
Advertisements

KR-2002 Panel/Debate Are Upper-Level Ontologies worth the effort? Chris Welty, IBM Research.
Summer 2011 Tuesday, 8/ No supposition seems to me more natural than that there is no process in the brain correlated with associating or with.
OMG Architecture Ecosystem SIG Federal CIO Council Data Architecture Subcommittee May 2011 Cory Casanave.
Financial Industry Semantics and Ontologies The Universal Strategy: Knowledge Driven Finance Financial Times, London 30 October 2014.
Grounding Software Domain Ontologies in the Unified Foundational Ontology (UFO): The case of the ODE Software Process Ontology Giancarlo Guizzardi Renata.
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-03: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 3 Organisations.
PR-OWL: A Framework for Probabilistic Ontologies by Paulo C. G. COSTA, Kathryn B. LASKEY George Mason University presented by Thomas Packer 1PR-OWL.
Deriving Semantic Description Using Conceptual Schemas Embedded into a Geographic Context Centre for Computing Research, IPN Geoprocessing Laboratory Miguel.
Where are the Semantics in the Semantic Web? Michael Ushold The Boeing Company.
About metaphorical expressions The essence of a metaphor is understanding and experiencing one kind of things in terms of another Metaphor is pervasive.
COMP 6703 eScience Project Semantic Web for Museums Student : Lei Junran Client/Technical Supervisor : Tom Worthington Academic Supervisor : Peter Strazdins.
Geo-ontology Integration: Identifying Issues, Dimensions and Developing Guidelines M. Kavouras & M. Kokla School of Rural and Surveying Engineering National.
Modeling Units of Assessment for Sharing Assessment Process Information: towards an Assessment Process Specification Yongwu Miao, Peter Sloep, and Rob.
School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Huddersfield PDDL and other languages.. Lee McCluskey Department of Computing and Mathematical Sciences,
Immanent Realism, Orderings and Quantities Ingvar Johansson, Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science, Saarbrücken
Foundations This chapter lays down the fundamental ideas and choices on which our approach is based. First, it identifies the needs of architects in the.
International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Study Group 17, Moscow, 30 March – 8 April 2005 New Recommendations on ODP Arve Meisingset Rapporteur Q15.
Carlos Lamsfus. ISWDS 2005 Galway, November 7th 2005 CENTRO DE TECNOLOGÍAS DE INTERACCIÓN VISUAL Y COMUNICACIONES VISUAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNICATIONS.
GEM/IRDR Social Vulnerability and Resilience Information System and Metadata Portal IRDR Scientific Board Meeting Chengdu 03/11/2012.
Compositional IS Development Framework Application Domain Application Domain Pre-existing components, legacy systems Extended for CD (ontologies) OAD Methods.
Ontology Development in the Sciences Some Fundamental Considerations Ontolytics LLC Topics:  Possible uses of ontologies  Ontologies vs. terminologies.
Unit 2: Properties of Matter. The Goals… Define Matter Define Matter Calculate and understand density Calculate and understand density Describe viscosity.
Applying Belief Change to Ontology Evolution PhD Student Computer Science Department University of Crete Giorgos Flouris Research Assistant.
Ontology-Driven Information Retrieval Nicola Guarino Laboratory for Applied Ontology Institute for Cognitive Sciences and Technology (ISTC-CNR) Trento-Roma,
Ontologies for the Integration of Geospatial Data Michael Lutz Workshop: Semantics and Ontologies for GI Services, 2006 Paper: Lutz et al., Overcoming.
Evaluation of software engineering. Software engineering research : Research in SE aims to achieve two main goals: 1) To increase the knowledge about.
Introduction to Chemistry
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
MPEG-7 Interoperability Use Case. Motivation MPEG-7: set of standardized tools for describing multimedia content at different abstraction levels Implemented.
Quick Flip Questioning for Critical Thinking Kobets S.A. Lyceum №87.
Constructivism and Innovation in English Language Teaching Prof Bob Adamson Hong Kong Institute of Education
DESIGN R CHAWUTHAI 1. COMMUNITY KNOWLEDGE 1.information preservation, refers to the ability to understand the rendered object at any time, i.e., to be.
Dimitrios Skoutas Alkis Simitsis
Taken from Schulze-Kremer Steffen Ontologies - What, why and how? Cartic Ramakrishnan LSDIS lab University of Georgia.
Variables and their Operational Definitions
Jan 9, 2004 Symposium on Best Practice LSA, Boston, MA 1 Comparability of language data and analysis Using an ontology for linguistics Scott Farrar, U.
COGNITIVE SEMANTICS: INTRODUCTION DANA RETOVÁ CSCTR2010 – Session 1.
A Context Model based on Ontological Languages: a Proposal for Information Visualization School of Informatics Castilla-La Mancha University Ramón Hervás.
Christoph F. Eick University of Houston Organization 1. What are Ontologies? 2. What are they good for? 3. Ontologies and.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
SOCoP 2013 Workshop: Vision and Strategy Gary Berg-Cross SOCoP Executive Secretary Nov NSF Stafford II facility Wilson Blvd, Ballston VA.
Integration of Domain & Application Knowledge in MPEG-7/21 in the DS-MIRF Framework Laboratory of Distributed Multimedia Information Systems & Applications.
Ontology Mapping in Pervasive Computing Environment C.Y. Kong, C.L. Wang, F.C.M. Lau The University of Hong Kong.
HOW DO YOU DESCRIBE MATTER? ANSWER: WE CLASSIFY IT!! GOAL: DESCRIBES AND CITES EXAMPLES OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF MATTER.
Florian A. Twaroch Institute for Geoinformation and Cartography, TU Vienna Naive Semantic Interoperability Florian A. Twaroch.
MDA & RM-ODP. Why? Warehouses, factories, and supply chains are examples of distributed systems that can be thought of in terms of objects They are all.
1 Class exercise II: Use Case Implementation Deborah McGuinness and Peter Fox CSCI Week 8, October 20, 2008.
University of Paderborn - GermanyPresenter: Johannes Magenheim Developing the AGORA Road Map – 9 th WCCE July 27 th – 31 st, 2009 Bento Gonçalves, Brazil.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Computational Models of Discourse Analysis Carolyn Penstein Rosé Language Technologies Institute/ Human-Computer Interaction Institute.
UNEP Terminology Workshop - Geneva, April 15, Environmental Terminology & Thesaurus Workshop UN Environment Programme Regional Office of Europe.
Lecture №4 METHODS OF RESEARCH. Method (Greek. methodos) - way of knowledge, the study of natural phenomena and social life. It is also a set of methods.
Ontologies, Conceptualizations, and Possible Worlds Revisiting “Formal Ontologies and Information Systems” 10 years later Nicola Guarino CNR Institute.
Background-assumptions in knowledge representation systems Center for Cultural Informatics, Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology.
Architecture Ecosystem SIG March 2010 Update Jacksonville FL.
CHAPTER 5 Transfer of Training.
The Semantic Web By: Maulik Parikh.
Ontology Evolution: A Methodological Overview
Ontology Reuse In MBSE Henson Graves Abstract January 2011
CSc4730/6730 Scientific Visualization
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Ontology-Based Approaches to Data Integration
Schema translation and data quality Sven Schade
Block Matching for Ontologies
Towards Semantically Grounded Decision Rules Using ORM+
COMPASS: A Geospatial Knowledge Infrastructure Managed with Ontologies
Matter.
Chapter 2 Section 1 Describing matter.
Presentation transcript:

02. November 2007 Florian Probst Data and Knowledge Modelling for the Geosciences - Chris Date Seminar - e-Science Institute, Edinburgh Semantic Reference Spaces for Observations and Measurements

Florian Probst 2... short version Theory on how to categorize Qualities („properties of things“) and how to name their magnitudes („property values“) --> Ontologies --> Semantics

Florian Probst 3 Vision, Motivation, Problem (Where to go? Why? What‘s the problem?) Background (Semantics, Ontologies ) Research Questions Assumptions (basis of the approach) Qualities and Quality Spaces (ontological part) Semantic Reference Spaces (semantic part) Unit of Measure Region Extension Quality Roles Summary and Future Work

Florian Probst 4 Vision, Motivation and Problem Vision: Answer questions (solve problems) based on information from distributed and heterogeneous information sources. --> knowledge infrastructure, e-science Motivation: Sharing knowledge requires the ability to compare conceptualizations and the ability to communicate about the meaning of words. Problem: Lack of methods to assess semantic interoperability of information sources. ? Gewässer max. Tiefe in Meter #A30 #B52 lakedepth in inch #10.11 #20.23

Florian Probst 5 Ontology  An ontology is a symbol system (= human made artifact)  An IS ontology is a formal theory. Information System Ontologies ”An ontology is a formal and explicit partial account of a conceptualization.” (Guarino, 1998) Conceptualization “world view” Referent

Florian Probst 6 Focus What are the basic building blocks of geospatial information?  results of observations and measurements. Focus on: unary qualities of physical entities Examples: the height of a mountain the mass of an apple the volume of a lake

Florian Probst 7 Goal and Research Questions If we want to communicate the meaning of words denoting observations results we need to answer: What is the ontological nature of an observation? How to explicate the conceptualization underlying an observation result? How to name an observation result? --> Develop methods to identify commensurability of information sources.

Florian Probst 8 Assumptions "Stand alone ontologies" are not enough for comparing conceptualizations. commensurable  A foundational ontology is required My work is based on DOLCE (

Florian Probst 9 measuring = approximating perceiving = approximating Endurants, Qualities and Magnitudes Volume Quality Space volume quality (understood as individual entity) physical endurant volume quality hasQuality physical endurant hasQuality Magnitudes of qualities are structured in quality spaces. 10 cm 3 Reference Space hasQualityLocation

Florian Probst 10 Taxonomy of Quality Spaces

Florian Probst 11 Quality Spaces and Reference Spaces How to associate a sign with a magnitude?

Florian Probst 12 Elements of a Semantic Datum I

Florian Probst 13 Roles Roles are individual entities An entity can play roles. An entity does not loose its identity when it stops playing a certain role. --> any-rigid or non-essential A role allows to functionally characterize an entity Ontology engineering problem: At a certain stage anything seems to be a role.

Florian Probst 14 Position of the Grounding Region

Florian Probst 15 Elements of a Semantic Datum II Grounding Magnitude A grounding magnitude is defined by agreement of a community. An atomic quality region plays the role of a grounding magnitude. Grounding Reference Region Since a unit of measure maps to an atomic quality region, practically useful measurement is not yet possible. The grounding reference region extends the number of magnitudes that can be validly named from a single magnitude to a magnitude range. It is this extension that makes measurement possible. Region Extension Quality This kind of quality specifies the extent of the each non-atomic reference region in the reference space. Unit of Measure The previously agreed grounding magnitude grounds an atomic reference region. Sign for the Unit of Measure Any symbol can be used to denote the unit of measure, e.g. /1mm/. Note that the grounding magnitude gives meaning to this symbol. Position of the Unit of Measure within the Grounding Region Without an explicitly defined position of the unit of measure within the grounding region, the grounding region can map on different magnitude ranges

Florian Probst 16 Results The presented theory provides answers on how to classify observable entities how to structure the magnitudes of qualities in a scientific as well as cognitive plausible way how to partition the structured magnitudes and how to name the partitions. + Ontology for qualities, endurants and perdurants + Ontology for quality spaces + Semantic Reference Spaces Theory of semantic reference systems for observations and measurements

Florian Probst 17 Future Work Formal Ontology Extend theory: Investigate relational qualities (relational moments) and roles. Usability Methods for supporting users in “learning” a formal ontology. Research idea: semantic annotation infrastructure Semantic Translation Research idea: Combine methods for semantic similarity measurement with semantic reference systems.

Florian Probst 18 Thanks for your attention!